Growing smothering species

Introduce one or more smothering species into the rotation: these crops are characterized by a high potential for spatial coverage, as well as rapid growth and good establishment capacity. The objective is to establish strong competition for light to the detriment of weeds. These crops can be annual, perennial, or integrated into intermediate covers.
Authors:
| Rodriguez | Alain | ACTA | Baziège (31) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guichard | Laurence | INRA | Grignon (78) |
| Munier-Jolain | Nicolas | INRA | Dijon (21) |
| Cherifi | Alexandra | EPLEFPA 89 | Auxerre (89) |
| Halska | Julien | INRA | Dijon (21) |
| Bernicot | Marie-Hélène | INRA | Dijon (21) |
Presentation
Characterization of the technique
Description of the technique:
This involves integrating certain crops into the rotation, targeting certain weeds to be disadvantaged by their competition: for example alfalfa against thistle (well documented) or bindweed (less documented). They can be grown pure or in mixtures. High-density sowing with reduced spacing increases the smothering power (see complementary techniques). The chosen crop(s) must develop rapidly and cover the soil well before it becomes infested. Smothering crops: alfalfa, mixed cereal-legume association (for example pea-wheat each at 75% of their pure crop density), hemp, buckwheat, mustard, vetch, triticale, winter oat, rye, winter barley, etc. Annual legumes are generally poor competitors.
Example of implementation: Example taken from the ENDURE network document. Farm located in Burgundy (limestone plateau, shallow soils, degraded oceanic climate), initial rotation: winter oilseed rape - winter soft wheat - winter barley. Weed management is one of the priorities in designing a new cropping system. The proposed new rotation is: winter oilseed rape - winter soft wheat - spring barley - alfalfa - alfalfa - winter soft wheat - mustard as cover crop - sunflower - triticale. The smothering crops introduced are thus alfalfa, mustard as cover crop, and triticale.
Details on the technique:
The effect on weeds depends on the covers and rotations. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to think that ubiquitous species (found in wide and varied territories), composites, willows and grasses are less disadvantaged by this technique than other species. These are pioneer species with intense and rapid development in early stages, as well as those that germinate year-round or those that are not demanding in terms of pedoclimatic conditions.
Application of the technique to...
Implementation period On established crop
Spatial scale of implementation Plot
All crops: Easily generalizable
All soil types: Easily generalizable
All climatic contexts: Easily generalizable
Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system
Expected reduction in the use of herbicides (and possibly other phytosanitary products) and low level of inputs required by smothering crops. The transfer of phytosanitary products depends on the physico-chemical characteristics of the molecules. Possible reduction in the number of sprayer passes, but variable balance depending on the technical itineraries of the introduced crops. Possible reduction in nitrogen fertilizer inputs if pure or associated legumes are introduced. Furthermore, if smothering crops diversify rotations, a reduction in the use of fungicides and insecticides can also be expected due to interruption of cycles of other pests than weeds.
"Environmental" criteria
Effect on air quality: Variable
Phytosanitary emissions: DECREASE
GHG emissions: VARIABLE
Effect on water quality: Increasing
Eutrophication: DECREASE
Pesticides: DECREASE
Effect on fossil resource consumption: Variable
Fossil energy consumption: VARIABLE
GHG emissions: variable, at the CO2 level, possible reduction in the number of herbicide passes, but variable balance depending on the technical itineraries of the introduced crops. No knowledge for N2O.
"Agronomic" criteria
Productivity: Variable, the previous effect of the introduced crop can improve or deteriorate the yield of the following crop. However, the physico-chemical fertility of the soil is maintained or even improved, as well as the control of pest development.
Soil fertility: Increasing, varied crops explore different soil compartments and different resources.
Water stress: No effect (neutral)
Functional Biodiversity: Increasing, increase in cultivated biodiversity, and likely associated wild biodiversity (more varied habitats and resources).
Other agronomic criteria: Decreasing, pest pressure: Decrease, if smothering crops diversify rotations, a reduction in pressure from insects and diseases can be expected due to interruption of cycles of other pests than weeds.
"Economic" criteria
Finding buyers may be difficult for some crops depending on the local context and volumes produced. However, economic risks can also be considered reduced thanks to the existence of varied outlets.
Operating costs: Decreasing, evolution depending on the introduced crops (increased costs for cover crops, but possible compensation if they provide nitrogen to the system). Possible reduction in phytosanitary costs due to reduced pressure from certain pests in the cover (effect of diversification of rotations).
Mechanization costs: Variable, variable evolution depending on the chosen species and associated technical itineraries.
Margin: Variable, the evolution of margins on the rotation will depend on the introduced crop (potential margin of the crop and previous effect). However, if current rotations are economically optimized, there is a risk that diversification tends to affect margins negatively. But there are counter-examples. Phytosanitary costs are reduced.
"Social" criteria
Working time: Variable depending on the introduced crop(s).
Peak period: Decreasing, diversification does not imply a systematic increase in overall workload. It can limit workload peaks by spreading out operations (sowing, harvesting). Farmers often feel an increase in workload which actually comes from a different distribution. The system is however more complex, some activities take more time (tool adjustment for example).
Observation time: Increasing, each crop requires specific observations. Introducing smothering crops partly means diversifying crops, which implies more observation time.
Need for farmer training: increasing, managing a greater number of crops requires more know-how, necessitates learning, etc.
Favored or disadvantaged organisms
Disfavored Bioagressors
Further reading
- Herbicide-free agriculture principles and methods - Joseph Pousset, France Agricole Editions, p216, Book, 2003.
- Beyond Herbicides: New Approaches to Managing Weeds - Robert E. Blackshaw (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada); John T. O’Donovan (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada); K. Neil Harker (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) and Xiangju Li (Institute of Cereal and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural Sciences), ICESA 2002, Peer-reviewed article, 2002/
- Genotype of wheat and barley affects light penetration and wild oat growth - Lanning S.P.; L.E. Talbert; J.M. Martin; T.K. Blake; P.L. Bruckner, Agronomy journal 89, pp 100-103, Peer-reviewed article, 1997/
- Weed smothering - Pierre Mischler (Agro-Transfert ressources et Territoires) Agro-Transfert ressources et Territoires, Technical brochure, 2011.
- Competitive crops and cultivars - Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, page visited on 24/06/2011, Website, 2011.
- Redesigning cropping systems in three French regions - Gabriele Fortino (INRA); Laurence Guichard (INRA); Elise Pelzer (INRA); Raymond Reau (INRA); Muriel Valantin-Morison (INRA); Xavier Pinochet (CETIOM) ENDURE Network - From Science to Field - Winter Crops Based Cropping Systems (WCCS) Case Study - Guide Number 2, Peer-reviewed article, 2010.
- Crop protection strategies saving phytosanitary products - Gran Aymerich L. Ministry of Agriculture and Fishing, Professional report, 2006
Appendices
Est complémentaire des leviers
Défavorise les bioagresseurs suivants
- Abutilon theophrasti
- Yarrow
- Agrostis capillaris
- Creeping bentgrass
- Field lady's mantle
- White amaranth
- Prostrate amaranth
- Prostrate pigweed
- Hybrid amaranth
- Reflecting amaranth
- Ragweed leaf ambrosia
- Tall ammi
- Mayweed chamomile
- Field chamomile
- Tall chamomile
- Common chervil
- Thalius rockcress
- Common mugwort
- Spreading orach
- Clustered oatgrass
- Ludovic sterile oat
- Intermediate barbarée
- Three-lobed bident
- Cornflower
- Sterile brome
- Irregular calepine
- Shepherd's purse
- Hairy bittercress
- Carex
- Wild carrot
- Clustered cerastium
- Field cerastium
- Milk thistle
- White goosefoot
- Wall goosefoot
- Hybrid goosefoot
- Polyspermous goosefoot
- Couch grass (chicken foot)
- Creeping couch grass
- Corn marigold
- Nîmes hawkweed
- Dodder
- Jimsonweed
- Red digitgrass
- False rocket
- Four-angled willowherb
- Hemlock-leaved stork's-bill
- Poison hemlock
- Small spurge
- Spurges (morning-glory)
- Common fennel
- Lesser celandine
- Wild oats
- Small-flowered fumitory
- Common fumitory
- Cleavers
- Cottonweed
- Round-leaved geranium
- Slender-stemmed geranium
- Dove's-foot crane's-bill
- Cut-leaved geranium
- Soft geranium
- Tuberous pea
- Field gromwell
- False vipers bugloss
- Soft brome
- Rigid ryegrass
- Frog rush
- Field sow-thistle
- Rough sow-thistle
- Curly endive
- Clasping-leaved dead-nettle
- Purple dead-nettle
- Large-fruited hemp-nettle
- Common nipplewort
- Bastard toadflax
- Elatine toadflax
- Lesser toadflax
- Field bindweed
- Hedge bindweed
- Dioecious campion
- Chamomile matricaria
- Scentless chamomile
- Common mallow
- Round-leaved mint
- Annual mercury
- Black nightshade
- Field chickweed
- Field mustard
- Black mustard
- Field forget-me-not
- Corncockle
- Branched broomrape
- Dichotomous panicgrass
- Hair panicgrass
- False millet panicgrass
- Cock's-foot panicgrass
- Two-spiked paspalum
- Field speedwell
- Drave speedwell
- Annual meadow grass
- Common meadow grass
- Argemone poppy
- Common poppy
- Venus comb
- Field pansy
- Corn parsley
- Paradoxical phalaris
- Ten-stamened pokeweed
- False hawkweed picris
- Dandelion
- Ribwort plantain
- Greater plantain
- Creeping potentilla
- Purslane
- Giant horsetail
- Horsetails
- Rough charlock
- Charlock
- Perennial ryegrass
- Italian ryegrass
- Field buttercup
- Marsh buttercup
- Creeping buttercup
- Patience-leaved knotweed
- Amphibious knotweed terrestrial form
- Bird's knotweed
- Bindweed knotweed
- Persicaria knotweed
- Mignonette
- Blunt-leaved dock
- Curly dock
- Small sorrel
- Common ragwort
- Glaucous setaria
- Green setaria
- Whorled setaria
- Field sherardia
- Hedge mustard
- Aleppo sorghum
- Edible chufa
- Venus mirror specular
- Field spurrey
- Intermediate stitchwort
- Field thistle
- Tall tordylium
- Field torilis
- Knotted torilis
- Wild sunflower
- Clovers
- Coltsfoot
- Sumatra fleabane
- Ivy-leaved speedwell
- Persian speedwell
- Field speedwell
- Shining speedwell
- Common vervain
- Rat's-tail fescue
- Field foxtail