Hedge trimmer for weeding in grain legumes
Feedback from Robert Melix, as part of the Aglae project, on the use of the topper to reduce the seed production of weeds.
Motivations
Following the transition of the farm to organic farming in 2016, I had to modify my strategy for managing flora in my cropping systems.
I started by integrating mechanical weeding and adapting technical itineraries. Having introduced seed legumes into my rotation, I faced some difficulties. No approved product exists in organic farming to effectively manage weeds on this type of legumes. For some delicate crops, such as lentil for example, it is also not possible to mechanically intervene to eliminate weeds during the cycle because the crop is too fragile and cannot withstand machinery passage.
I therefore had to find catch-up weeding solutions to avoid not only seed set, and consequently the contamination of plots, but also the pollution of harvested batches.
The use of the topper then appeared as the most effective technique to meet these objectives. This technique now allows me to limit the renewal of weed seed stocks in my plots, particularly in crops of chickpea and soybean (regrowth of sunflower, thistles, amaranths, goosefoot) and lentil/camelina (wild oat, thistles, ryegrass, mayweed).
Practical implementation

Focus: The topper my way

- Allows cutting weeds that exceed the crop height
- No air displacement with this machine so weeds do not lie down in front of the tool during its passage: increased efficiency
- Speed 10 ha/h
- Width 12m*
- 20 decks
Front lifting system

- Cutting height from 20cm to 1.2m
- 2 hydraulic distributors at the front
Traction

- 110 horsepower tractor
- Narrow tires, 25cm wide: to crush the main crop as little as possible
- Reinforced front wheels to support the load of the topper
Cost
- Topper costs: between €20,000 and €25,000 (between €30,000 and €35,000 fully equipped + tractor adaptations)

Combined with the use of the topper, I sow my lentil/camelina at a high density (400 and 200 gr/m² respectively), which helps to smother small weeds at the beginning of their development. The topper then complements this to eliminate other weeds such as wild oat, ryegrass and thistles that have managed to develop through the biomass of the lentil/camelina. Meanwhile, the stems of these weeds have served as support for the crop throughout its development.
Benefits and points of caution
Benefits
- Prevents the spread of weed seeds, especially those resistant to herbicides
- Very effective on thistle and wild-oat
- Interesting complementary weeding in cereals seed production
- Facilitates harvest
- Adaptable to any crop
Points of caution
- Effective only on weeds taller than the crop
- Financial investment
- Less effective on too woody weeds
My tips for success
- Work on leveled soil
- Work on well-drained soil
- Do not operate in strong wind
- Choose the date of passage based on weather retrospectively (a few dry days after mowing to avoid regrowth)
- Avoid too early mowing to prevent the weed from setting seed at a lower height.
- Avoid too late mowing on wild oat because when lignified they coil around the tool and become very difficult to destroy
- Combine this technique with other levers for more effectiveness
My perspectives

- Improve on the intervention stages of weeds in certain crops upstream
- Implement more intercropping
- Increase sowing densities
- Install deflectors on the topper to be more effective on too woody weeds (such as wild oat)
Leviers évoqués dans ce système
- Extend the rotation
- Sowing density
- Mechanical weeding
- Species mixture
- Long rotation
- Sow / transplant at high density
My results
Agri-environmental
Decrease in weed pressure
Stability of pest pressure
Stability of disease pressure
Social
Increase in mechanization time
Stability regarding periods of work overload
Stability of observation time
Economic
Increase in mechanization costs
Stability of net margin
Increase in implementation cost
Expert committee opinion
Evaluation according to the ESR analysis grid.
Substitution
Implementation of alternative control methods replacing chemical means.

Farmer member of the DEPHY Farm network, led by the Chambre d’Agriculture de l’Aude.


Author of the sheet: Loïc Doussat.
Date of edition: 2019.
Appendices and links
- Aglae sheet published by the Chamber of Agriculture Occitanie https://occitanie.chambre-agriculture.fr/agroenvironnement/agroecologie/aglae/tous-les-temoignages/lecimeuse-pour-reduire-la-production-de-graines-dadventices/
Matériel évoqué dans ce retour d'expérience
Bioagresseurs évoqués dans ce retour d'expérience