Lutte contre les dicotylédones de printemps :Intercropping Byzantine Oats with Spring Fava Beans

From Triple Performance
Association of Byzantine oat with spring fava bean
Cet article est issu du site EcophytoPic[CC BY-NC-SA 3.0]. Cliquez ici pour accéder à la page d’origine : Logo EcophytoPIC


Mikaël and Rémy Hily implemented this practice as part of an agronomic strategy for maximum spatial and temporal coverage of plots to limit weed pressure and with a goal of total autonomy for cattle feeding.

Context

Origin of the practice and farmer's approach

The practice fully fits into an agronomic strategy of maximum spatial and temporal coverage of plots and a goal of total autonomy for cattle feeding (no purchase of nitrogen concentrates or production concentrates). The trigger was the implementation of ensiled mixed crops on the farm and the observation of the benefit of associating a legume with a grass for strong soil cover early in the cycle to limit weed pressure. For grain harvest, the farmers then associated winter or spring fava bean with oat.

The technique

Objective

  • Strongly limit weed infestation at the scale of the crop and rotation.
  • Reduce herbicide IFT and weed control costs at the crop scale.
  • Ensure grain production with oat, in case of failure or low yield of the fava bean crop.

Description

Start date of implementation: 2015.

2 sowing techniques


In both cases:

  • Pre-emergence weed control at half the approved dose (Challenge + Prowl 400).
  • Fungicide: one treatment at half the approved dose at early flowering + possibly one treatment 3 weeks later based on observation.
  • Insecticide: one treatment based on observations if the aphid risk threshold is exceeded.


For winter oat sowing in August: destruction of oat in spring with a foliar anti-grass herbicide at 1/3 or 1/2 approved dose.


Fava bean yield: 28 to 50 q/ha.

Byzantine oat yield: 8 to 12 q/ha.

Farmer's expectations

Since his installation, Rémy sought to progressively increase the farm's feed autonomy. This pursuit was continued with his son Mikaël and resulted in a diversification of crops on the farm and a set of complementary solutions to achieve this autonomy.

At the same time, Rémy and Mikaël, both passionate about agronomy and attached to their decision autonomy for crops, developed practices leading to cost reduction notably by dose modulation. This was made possible by crop monitoring and observation, optimization of treatment practices (treatment conditions, low volume…) and lengthening of the rotation.


Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages

  • Secure fava bean weed control with reduced dose.
  • Ensure a yield supplement on the plot with oat in years when climatic conditions are unfavorable to fava bean.

Disadvantages

  • Additional work time and seed cost for sowing Byzantine oat
  • Implementation of an additional tool during fava bean sowing for sowing in black oat: tooth cultivator at the front of the tractor and combined rotary harrow single-seed drill.
  • Risk of difficult weed control at reduced dose in case of poor oat seed distribution during broadcast sowing.

Implementation and success conditions

The choice of oat associated with fava bean is important. Black oat is interesting to keep the plot clean between an autumn harvest and fava bean sowing after winter. However, it can be competitive with the protein crop and at worst cause lodging. This requires an additional intervention for its chemical destruction with a foliar anti-grass herbicide whose dose will be modulated. Hence the interest of replacing black oat with Byzantine oat, which is shorter, less water-demanding, less prone to lodging and has good tolerance to rust. However, this requires positioning the crop after a late harvest such as fodder beet if one wants to avoid establishing an intercrop after cereals.

Farmer's testimony

"Growing fava bean in association also reduces or eliminates attacks by sitones early in the cycle, avoiding a specific treatment if the damage threshold is exceeded. However, it has no positive or negative effect on the development of diseases of fava bean."

"Since we use the grain directly for supplementing silage maize in dairy cow feeding, harvesting two species together does not require extra sorting work. And joint harvesting of the two species poses no problem for threshing at harvest, both for the mix of Byzantine oat and fava bean, and for fava bean alone."

Improvements and other envisaged uses

"To speed up the start of spring fava bean, we plan to apply localized phosphorus at sowing (super triple). For sowing the associated cereal at the end of summer, rye which is more covering and faster to develop early in the cycle could replace oat. However, this would require using a disc drill for maize establishment."

Farmer's advice

  • It is necessary to test the technique under the pedoclimatic conditions of one's plots.
  • It is important to sow as early as possible, possibly from mid-January, to limit spring weed pressure… and to limit yield losses in case of dry spring.

For further information

Results from the PROGRAILIVE 2015-2019 project (June 2020): Producing protein crops in association for grain harvest



Starting from an already low initial value, a steady decrease in herbicide IFT at GAEC Hily with fluctuations linked to climatic conditions and crop rotations.



A total IFT stabilizing around 0.8, a 36% reduction compared to the initial total IFT.


With a diversity of crops including grassland and a long rotation, the cropping system shows strong resilience allowing it to limit IFT variations without being strongly impacted by the year's conditions.


Result indicators

Satisfaction level

/ performance

Farmer's comments
Weed control Positif Reduction of dicot pressure in the rotation
Pest control Positif Better control of sitones
Disease control Neutre Neutral effect
IFT of the concerned crop(s) Positif Secures weed control at reduced dose
IFT of the cropping system Positif Reduction of herbicide IFT
Yield Positif Equivalent for fava bean with Byzantine oat
Work time in the plot Neutre Work for sowing Byzantine oat
Observation time Positif Little impacted by the association
Mechanization costs Neutre Slight increase with Byzantine oat
Semi-net margin of the system Neutre Compensation of herbicide costs – mechanical costs
Risk-taking Positif Reduced competition with Byzantine oat


Farmer satisfaction level:

Positif Satisfied

Neutre Moderately satisfied

Négatif Not satisfied

Farmer's takeaway

"The reduction of pesticides is not spectacular with this technique and this is not the primary goal: what is more important is medium and long-term control at the rotation scale of weeds and especially spring weeds.

From this point of view, it is crucial to sow as soon as soil conditions allow from mid-January. In plots with limited useful water reserve, this also ensures good grain filling, even with limited rainfall at the end of the cycle. And in drying conditions, oat provides a yield supplement always appreciated."

DEPHY engineer's opinion

Fava bean cultivation is one of the solutions developed by GAEC Hily to achieve feed autonomy in energy and protein. Meeting needs relies on combining optimized grazing, grass ensiling, cultivation of cereals, maize, beet, alfalfa, ensiled mixed crops and protein crops.

This diversified strategy reduces risks and ensures forage system security. Thus, fava bean is grown both as winter and spring crop, allowing compensation in case of poor success of one of the crops. Finally, chemical weed control options are few for fava bean, especially for catch-up: success of pre-emergence treatment is essential, while dose reductions with these products are limited by the risk of significant loss of persistence and efficacy.


Leviers évoqués dans ce système

Matériel évoqué dans ce retour d'expérience

Template:Cultures concernées

Bioagresseurs évoqués dans ce retour d'expérience

Sources