Growing Species with Low Phosphorus Requirements

From Triple Performance
(header image; author: Wolfgang Moroder; license: (CC BY-SA 3.0))


Presentation

Characterization of the technique

Description of the technique :

 

François Dumoulin CA 60 francois.dumoulin(at)agri60.fr Fresnoy le Luat (60)
Rémy Ballot INRA remy.ballot(at)grignon.inra.fr Grignon (78)

Spam control: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @


Maximize the share in the rotation of crops with low phosphorus requirement (wheat in rotation, sunflower, flax, maize grain…) to medium (barley, straw wheat, legumes…) compared to crops with high requirement (beet, rapeseed, potato, alfalfa…). The phospho-potassic fertilization reasoning method established by COMIFER defines as low requirement the crops whose yield losses in case of phosphorus deficiency do not exceed 5%. This method recommends skipping phosphate fertilization for low requirement crops at lower soil phosphate content than for medium requirement crops. For high requirement crops (whose yield losses exceed 30% in case of deficiency), skipping is never recommended.


Implementation period On established crop


Spatial scale of implementation Farm

Application of the technique to...

Positif All crops : Easily generalizable


Positif All soil types : Easily generalizable


Positif All climatic contexts : Easily generalizable

Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality : Increasing


GHG emissions : DECREASE


Positif Effect on water quality : Increasing


N.P. : DECREASE


Positif Effect on fossil resource consumption : Decreasing


fossil energy consumption : DECREASE


Neutre Other : No effect (neutral)


Air : Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied, thus reducing greenhouse gas emissions related to their manufacture, transport…


Water : Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied, thus potentially reducing phosphorus transfers to water.


Fossil energy : Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied, thus reducing energy consumption related to their extraction, transport…


Accumulation of pollutants in soils : Decrease


Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied, and thus the input flows of trace metal elements (TMEs) into the fields.

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Soil fertility : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Water stress : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Functional Biodiversity : No effect (neutral)

"Economic" criteria

Positif Operating costs : Decreasing


Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the amount of phosphate fertilizer applied, thus reducing fertilization costs.


Neutre Mechanization costs : Variable


Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the frequency of phosphate fertilizer applications, thus reducing mechanization costs related to spreading. But in many cases, phosphorus is applied with other elements. Changing or diversification of the crop rotation can also lead to increased mechanization costs.


Positif Margin : Increasing


The reduction in fertilization costs without yield penalty should lead to increased profitability of the cropping system.


Positif Other economic criteria : Decreasing


Fuel consumption : Decrease


Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the frequency of phosphate fertilizer applications, thus reducing fuel consumption related to spreading, unless phosphorus is usually applied with other elements.

"Social" criteria

Positif Working time : Decreasing


Maximizing the share of low phosphorus requirement crops in the rotation reduces the frequency of phosphate fertilizer applications, thus reducing the workload related to spreading, unless phosphorus is usually applied with other elements.


Négatif Observation time : Increasing


Implementing a reasoned phosphate fertilization taking into account (1) crop requirements, (2) past practices of fertilization, (3) residue management practices and especially (4) soil phosphorus content requires regular soil analyses (every 4-6 years minimum).

To learn more

  • Basics of reasoning : 4 criteria to decide
    -Le Souder C. (Arvalis)


Perspectives agricoles n°292, p32-34, Press article, 2003

  • PK fertilization reasoning : Pushing practice to the limits
    -Le Souder C., Castillon P. (Arvalis)


Perspectives agricoles n°354, p44-46, Press article, 2009


paid article

  • P, K and Mg contents of harvested plant organs
    -COMIFER


Technical brochure, 2009


link to brochure

Annexes