Choosing a cover crop

A cover crop refers to a group of plants covering the soil either permanently or temporarily.
Choice of cover
Definition and prioritization of its purpose
It is important to prioritize the objectives of the cover crop:
- generate biomass
- restructure the soil
- provide nitrogen
- reduce fertilizer inputs
- attract beneficial insects
- produce forage
- create biodiversity
- combat weeds
- control pests
Taking constraints into account
To make the right choice of a cover crop, certain criteria must be considered :
- the rotation of crops on the plot
- soil type
- crop type
- duration of the intercrop period
- the sowing date (early or late): depending on climatic conditions, species must be chosen accordingly
- whether or not it will be used as forage
- method of destruction
- cost
- available equipment: single hopper cereal drill (prefer seeds of uniform size to avoid sedimentation in the drill), precision drill, double hopper drill...
- nitrogen supply
- positive impact on pollinators
- regulations
- the CAP
Avoiding increased disease risk
Generally, it is advisable to avoid choosing a cover crop from the same family as the following crop to prevent increased risks of diseases or pests.
- For example, in a short intercrop, it is not recommended to sow oats before wheat or, in a long intercrop, nyjer before sunflower.
- The crops present in the rotation must also be considered to avoid increasing medium-term risk : before corn, in a rotation including pea, it is better not to choose a cover sensitive to Aphanomyces (pea cover, lentil, alfalfa and vetch for example). Before corn in a rotation with frequent oilseed rape return, crucifers (mustard, radish covers…) should be avoided as they may increase clubroot risk on the upcoming oilseed rape.
- If legumes are present in the rotation. Some legumes can increase fungal Aphanomyces risk (lentils, vetch, forage pea), others less so (field beans, fenugreek, Alexandrian clover).
Avoiding increased pest pressure
Given the frequency of dwarf yellowing of barley in some regions, limit the proportion of grasses in cover crops and/or destroy the cover in winter, during a period unfavorable to aphid flight. Similarly, take-all is becoming more frequent. This is one reason to favor sowing a cover crop rather than leaving regrowth of cereal straw that maintains the fungus.
Choice of sowing characteristics
Sowing date
Depending on climatic conditions, species more or less tolerant to heat and drought will be chosen.

Sowing density
Densities for each species are calculated based on pure dose percentages. The principle is to divide the sowing rate of each species in the mixture by the number of species present. However, vigorous species at establishment such as crucifers sometimes need to be under-dosed to avoid suppressing others. Conversely, it may be wise to increase the density of slower species (field bean, crimson clover). In agriculture, the economic aspect must always be kept in mind. Locally present species or seeds produced on site should be favored to optimize costs.

Sowing method
| Techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages | Tools | Cost €/ha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Broadcast sowing | Low establishment cost
Fast Avoids all constraints related to plant debris (if previous soil work was well done) |
|
Centrifugal spreader, DP12, sowing under cutting bar | 15 to 35 |
| Conventional row drill | Ensures optimal sowing depth, uniform distribution and rapid emergence
Compatible with all species No investment |
|
Mechanical and pneumatic drill | 30 to 65 |
| No-till sowing |
|
|
Specific drill required (Unidrill, Semeato, Gaspardo Directa) | 25 to 60 |

Impact of sowing density on biomass produced
The denser a cover crop is sown, the more productive it will be in terms of biomass (optimum: 300 seeds per m²).
How many species in a cover?
Above 5 species, the amount of biomass produced no longer increases; the more species, the lower the sowing rate per species. Thus, with 10 species, emergence is ensured, but the species that emerge will be too weakly sown.
Making your choice with DSS
DSS (decision support tools) can help make the right choice.
- Cover crop choice offered by Arvalis.
- ACACIA (Aid for Choice and Adaptation of Intercrop Cover Crops in Crop Rotations) offered by GIEE MAGELLAN.
For a summer cover
Short intercrop covers, for example between 2 wheat crops, play a key role in improving the overall "fertility" of your plot. Ideally, the cover should be composed of a mixture of several species to enhance biomass production and maximize benefits.
The summer cover is to be established before harvest or quickly after harvest depending on equipment and constraints (shared equipment…). It can also be complementary, to follow with a relay cover (long intercrop cover, winter cover).
Yield increase
Trials conducted by Arvalis have shown that, regardless of species in the cover, the average yield of the 2nd wheat is improved compared to the control without cover.
- Grasses in cover bring on average +1% yield;
- Crucifers +3%;
- Legumes and cover mixtures with legumes +6%;
For wheat yielding 7 t/ha, a 3% yield increase represents 210 kg/ha more. At €200/t, the gain is €42/ha (the cost of the cover and seeding pass are partly reimbursed just by this yield gain, not counting other agroecosystem benefits).
To achieve more than 3%, species choice is important. It is recommended to choose species that develop quickly, are less sensitive to heat, and have different root systems, as well as legumes to fix nitrogen.
Choosing small seeds increases the chances of success (they have lower water needs for germination). Rates should be adapted according to local conditions and possibilities, to be discussed with the local agronomist:
- Phacelia
- Radish/rape
- Nyjer
- Alexandrian or squarrosum clover
- Flax
- Sorghum
- Hairy vetch
- Mustard (variety "Verte", later maturing)
Nitrogen capture
The summer cover is also a very good trap for residual nitrogen and a good way to capture nitrogen from the air:
- A legume-only cover: up to 200 U/ha stored and 4-5 t DM/ha;
- A multi-species cover with legumes: up to 250 U/ha and 8-9 t DM/ha;
- A multi-species cover without legumes: up to 100 U/ha and 8 t DM/ha.
Adding legumes in the cover also maintains a medium/low C/N ratio ranging from 10 to 20, which allows rapid release (2-3 months) for most organic elements during destruction stages (start of first flowers), without causing nitrogen hunger.
Advantages and disadvantages of different species
| Grasses (Poaceae) | Crucifers (Brassicaceae) | Legumes (Fabaceae) | Sunflower (Asteraceae) | Nyjer (Asteraceae) | Phacelia (Hydrophyllaceae) | Flax (Linaceae) | Buckwheat (Polygonaceae) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advantages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Disadvantages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Examples | Winter grasses:
Summer grasses:
|
|
Annual legumes:
Perennial legumes:
|
Mono-species covers have economic, logistical, and technical advantages. A pure cover can address a specific issue on a plot. For example, mustard can be interesting to combat nematodes on an infested plot.
Species mixtures
Cover crops can be sown as mono-species, simple mixtures (2-3 species), or complex mixtures (>3 species, called "biomax").
Species mixtures introduce a form of homogeneity in agroecosystems:
- In unfavorable pedoclimatic conditions, a mono-species cover will perform less well than a mixture.
- A mixture of different species adapts better to heterogeneous conditions within a plot and avoids "putting all eggs in one basket".
- If nitrogen supply in the soil (residual and post-harvest mineralization) is sufficient, crucifers and grasses tend to express better and produce more biomass than legumes.
- If nitrogen supply is limiting, legumes will dominate thanks to their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen.
Species mixtures introduce a form of resilience in agroecosystems:
- Each family and species has a different root and aerial system: Mixing plants increases light capture and root exploration capacity to remobilize mineral elements for the following crop.
- Diversity of root exudates and complementarity of mycorrhizal communities make mixtures better than pure species.
- Mixtures allow progressive release of nutrients to ensure balanced nutrition for crops. Once the cover is destroyed, nutrient release rates differ by species according to their characteristics. Field bean with its upright habit has less soil contact (40% of its biomass will mineralize quickly, stems remain in place). Whereas vetch or fenugreek with their sprawling habit have 100% of their aerial biomass in contact with soil, thus releasing nitrogen faster.
Non-exhaustive list of main species usable in cover cropping
| Families | Species | Destruction
by frost |
Root
system |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legumes | Fenugreek | -7 °C | mixed |
| Spring Faba bean | -5 °C | taproot | |
| Winter Faba bean | -10 °C | taproot | |
| Vetch | -10 °C | fibrous | |
| Forage Lentil | -7 °C | mixed | |
| Bird's-foot trefoil | -10 °C | mixed | |
| Lupin | DND | mixed | |
| Alfalfa | DND | taproot | |
| Sweet clover | DND | fibrous | |
| Minette | DND | fibrous | |
| Spring Pea (protein pea) | DND | taproot | |
| Winter Pea (protein pea) | DND | taproot | |
| Spring forage Pea | -2 °C | taproot | |
| Winter forage Pea | -10 °C | taproot | |
| Sainfoin | -10 °C | taproot | |
| Soybean | DND | mixed | |
| White clover | DND | mixed | |
| Alexandrian clover | -5 °C | mixed | |
| Crimson clover | -10 °C | taproot | |
| Red clover | DND | fibrous | |
| Persian clover | -10 °C | mixed | |
| Spring Vetch | 0 °C | fibrous | |
| Winter Vetch | -7 °C | fibrous | |
| Legume regrowths | DND | mixed | |
| Grasses | Spring Oat | 0 °C | fibrous |
| Winter Oat | -13 °C | fibrous | |
| Brazilian diploid Oat | -4 °C | fibrous | |
| Foxtail millet | -1 °C | fibrous | |
| Millet | DND | fibrous | |
| Italian ryegrass | DND | fibrous | |
| Rye | ND | fibrous | |
| Sorghum | -1 °C | mixed | |
| cereal regrowths | DND | mixed | |
| Crucifers | Camelina | -10 °C | taproot |
| Winter forage Rapeseed | DND | taproot | |
| Winter Rapeseed | DND | mixed | |
| Rapeseed regrowths | DND | taproot | |
| Brown mustard | DND | taproot | |
| Classic white/yellow Mustard | DND | mixed | |
| White/yellow Mustard "nematodes" | DND | mixed | |
| Winter forage Turnip | -13 °C | taproot | |
| Forage Radish | -13 °C | taproot | |
| Composites | Nyjer | -1 °C | taproot |
| Sunflower | -3 °C | taproot | |
| Hydrophyllaceae | Phacelia | -6 °C | mixed |
| Polygonaceae | Buckwheat | -2 °C | mixed |
| Linaceae | Spring Flax | -10 °C | mixed |
| Winter Flax | -13 °C | mixed |
| Family | Species | % of DM depending on cover age | % nitrogen in DM depending on biomass | Root correction
coefficient for nitrogen |
% P in DM | % K in DM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 60 days | < 90 days | > 90 days | < 1 t | < 2 t | < 3 t | > 3 t | |||||
| Composites | Nyjer | 13 | 17 | 21 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.0 |
| Sunflower | 12 | 13 | 16 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 3.0 | |
| Crucifers | Crucifers (average) | 16 | 17 | 18 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 3.4 |
| Forage cabbages | 22 | 22 | 22 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Winter rapeseed | 14 | 15 | 18 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| White mustard | 13 | 16 | 18 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 3.0 | |
| Turnip rape | 10 | 13 | 21 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 4.0 | |
| Radish | 11 | 13 | 15 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 4.0 | |
| Chinese radish | 12 | 12 | 12 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 4.0 | |
| Winter rapeseed regrowths | 20 | 23 | 25 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Grasses | Grasses (average) | 18 | 20 | 21 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.2 |
| Spring oat | 16 | 19 | 21 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.5 | |
| Winter oat | 16 | 19 | 21 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.5 | |
| Strigose oat | 18 | 18 | 20 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | |
| Winter soft wheat | 23 | 23 | 23 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | |
| Spring barley | 12 | 14 | 17 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | |
| Winter barley | 17 | 19 | 24 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | |
| Italian ryegrass | 16 | 16 | 19 | 2.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| Hybrid ryegrass | 16 | 16 | 19 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | |
| Winter soft wheat regrowths | 18 | 18 | 23 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | |
| Classic rye | 16 | 16 | 17 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.5 | |
| Hybrid rye (J.D.) | 23 | 23 | 24 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3.3 | |
| Forage sorghum | 14 | 14 | 14 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.5 | |
| Hydrophyllaceae | Phacelia | 8 | 9 | 11 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 5.0 |
| Legumes | Legumes (average) | 16 | 16 | 14 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.2 |
| Fenugreek | 16 | 16 | 16 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Faba bean (winter & spring) | 14 | 14 | 14 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Vetch | 16 | 16 | 14 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Lentil | 18 | 18 | 15 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Alfalfa | 32 | 32 | 32 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Sweet clover | 30 | 30 | 30 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.5 | |
| Minette | 19 | 19 | 19 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 2.5 | |
| Forage pea | 12 | 12 | 12 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 1.3 | |||
| Protein pea | 19 | 19 | 19 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | |
| White clover | 24 | 24 | 24 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | |
| Alexandrian clover | 10 | 11 | 13 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | |
| Crimson clover (and hybrid clover) | 21 | 21 | 22 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | |
| Subterranean clover | 24 | 24 | 24 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | |||
| Red clover (and Persian clover) | 17 | 17 | 17 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.3 | |
| Vetch (winter & spring) | 21 | 21 | 20 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 3.5 | |
| Linaceae | Flax | 22 | 22 | 22 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 2.6 |
| Polygonaceae | Buckwheat | 22 | 23 | 25 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 2.3 |
| Others | Mercurialis | 15 | 15 | 15 | 3.5 | 1.2 | |||||
To delve a little deeper into the subject, you can consult :
To go further
- Cover crops
- Sowing a cover crop
- Succeeding with a cover crop
- Destroying a cover crop
- Rolling cover crops during the intercrop period
- Permanent cover crops
Other interesting documents
- Cover crops during intercrop - Chamber of Agriculture Ile-de-France region
- Intermediate crops in long intercrop - Chambers of Agriculture Pays de la Loire
- Cover crops - GRAB HN
- Cover crops, superficial techniques, Organic Farming and Agroforestry - GABB 32
- Choosing and succeeding with your cover crop during the intercrop period in organic farming - ITAB
- Innovative cover crops - Sem-Partners
- Intercrop cover crops - TCS Magazine
- Establishing cover crops Keys to success - Simplified Cultural Techniques
- Cover crops to improve soil fertility - GRAB
- Cover crops : A forage opportunity? Livestock Institute
- Intermediate crops - IBIS
- Impacts of inserting intercrop cover crops in cropping systems - Chambers of Agriculture Languedoc-Roussillon Midi-Pyrénées
- Cover crops. Which species for which sowing periods? - Green Science City
- The intercrop cover crop guide - Chamber of Agriculture Isère
- New cover crops - Sem-Partners
- Cover me!! - Agrivulg
- Guide on mechanical destruction of cover crops - CUMA 640
- Forage crops, cover crops - UNEAL
- Intercrop in Alsace. How to VALUE it? Chamber of Agriculture Alsace
- “Living Soil” cropping systems : What concrete solutions? - Agro d'oc
- Conservation agriculture. Cover crops - EUSKAL HERRIKO LABORANTZA GANBARA
- Cover crops Keys to success! - Chamber of Agriculture Meurthe-et-Moselle
- Cover crop, a crop in its own right - Chamber of Agriculture Brittany
- Cover crop trials after potato 2018-2019 - Bretagne Plants – Syndicat de l’Elorn et de l’Horn – Triskalia/capinov
- Better managing the intercrop for agronomic and environmental benefits - Chamber of Agriculture Poitou Charentes
- Legumes, how to use them as intermediate crops? - Chamber of Agriculture Poitou Charentes
- Multi-annual technical summaries - Green Science City
- Cover crops - Simplified Cultural Techniques
- The cover crop essential for soil fertility - Terra
- Species to sow in summer cover crops and benefits, AgroLeague
Appendices
Sources
- Cover crop datasheets - Arvalis-infos
- Decision support tool Arvalis : Choix-des-couverts.arvalis-infos.fr
- Wikipedia page on cover crops
- Making the right cover crop choices
- Arvalis: Some key elements to succeed with your cover crop
- Choosing and succeeding with your cover crop during the intercrop period in organic farming - ITAB
- Which mixtures for cover crops?, AgroLeague
- ↑ Key elements for successful cover crops https://www.arvalis-infos.fr/quelques-elements-cles-pour-reussir-son-couvert-@/view-27884-arvarticle.html
- ↑ CRA PC, 2012 https://agriculture-de-conservation.com/sites/agriculture-de-conservation.com/IMG/pdf/itab-engrais-verts.pdf
- ↑ AgroLeague - Which mixtures for cover crops? https://www.agro-league.com/blog/les-couverts-vegetaux-quels-melanges
- ↑ Choosing and succeeding with your cover crop during the intercrop period in organic farming - Joséphine Ghesquière (ITAB/ ISA Lille), Adeline Cadillon (ITAB/ISARA-Lyon), Laetitia Fourrié and Laurence Fontaine (ITAB) https://agriculture-de-conservation.com/sites/agriculture-de-conservation.com/IMG/pdf/itab-engrais-verts.pdf
- ↑ Regional reference values for DM, N, P and K contents of different cover crop species (Matthieu Archambeaud, Sébastien Minette) https://agriculture-de-conservation.com/sites/agriculture-de-conservation.com/IMG/pdf/merci-TCS-59.pdf