Rotate or alternate chemical families to prevent resistance development

From Triple Performance


Presentation

Technique characterization

Technique description :

 

Julien Halska INRA julien.halska(at)grignon.inra.fr Epoisses (21)
Rémy Ballot INRA remy.ballot(at)grignon.inra.fr Grignon (78)

Spam prevention: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @


Avoid repeatedly using the same active ingredient (or active ingredients belonging to the same chemical family) on the same plot to prevent selecting resistant populations of bioagressors, and causing efficacy drifts that can affect fungicides, insecticides, and herbicides.


Combining several commercial products with different modes of action also helps prevent this selection.


Implementation period On established crops


Alternating chemical families can be implemented within the same crop, but also in crop rotation (for example, do not use the same fungicides on wheat and barley), diversify herbicide modes of action across different crops.


Spatial scale of implementation Plot

Application of the technique to...

Positif All crops : Easily generalizable


Positif All soil types : Easily generalizable


Positif All climatic contexts : Easily generalizable

Effects on cropping system sustainability

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality : Increasing


phytosanitary emissions : DECREASE


GHG emissions : NEUTRAL


Positif Effect on water quality : Increasing


pesticides : DECREASE


Neutre Other : No effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, phyto ...) : Decrease


Alternating or combining chemical families helps prevent efficacy drifts leading to increased doses of herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides applied per hectare. The risk of transfer is reduced by reduced usage.


Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, phyto ...) : Decrease


Alternating or combining chemical families helps prevent efficacy drifts leading to increased doses of herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides applied per hectare. The risk of transfer is reduced by reduced usage.


Fossil energy consumption : no effect (neutral)


GHG emissions : no effect (neutral)

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity : No effect (neutral)


Alternating or combining chemical families helps preserve the efficacy of available herbicides, fungicides, and insecticides.


Positif Soil fertility : Increasing


Neutre Water stress : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Functional Biodiversity : No effect (neutral)


Positif Other agronomic criteria : Decreasing


Risk of resistance development : Decreasing

"Economic" criteria

Neutre Operating costs : Variable


Depending on the costs of the different products used, phytosanitary costs may increase or decrease compared to systematic use of the same product. Systematic use of the same product promotes the emergence of resistances which can lead to increased phytosanitary expenses (more expensive products and in larger quantities).


Neutre Mechanization costs : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Margin : Variable


But rather increasing by limiting the risk of resistance development.

"Social" criteria

Neutre Working time : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Observation time : No effect (neutral)

Favored or disadvantaged organisms

Disadvantaged bioagressors

Organism Technique impact Type Details
weeds weeds All bioagressors targeted by treatments. The effectiveness of this technique depends on the products used and application conditions.
pathogen (bioagressor) pathogen (bioagressor) All bioagressors targeted by treatments. The effectiveness of this technique depends on the products used and application conditions.
pest, predator or parasite pest, predator or parasite All bioagressors targeted by treatments. The effectiveness of this technique depends on the products used and application conditions.


For further information

  • Herbicides : modes of action and fate
    -Gasquez J.


Les mots de l'Agronomie, Website, 2015


link to the page

  • Diseases of cereal straw - Institutes and public authorities recommend diversifying control methods
    -Maumené C. (Arvalis)


Agricultural Perspectives no. 386, p55-57, Press article, 2012

  • Phytosanitary products : Managing resistances
    -Geist P., Rohrbacher P., Fritsch L., Lemercier G., Michaël R. (CA 67)


Technical brochure, 2005


link to the brochure

  • Resistance to herbicides
    -Gasquez J.


Les mots de l'Agronomie, Website, 2015


link to the page

Keywords

Bioagressor control method : Chemical control


Mode of action : Catch-up


Type of pesticide use strategy : Efficiency

Appendices

Défavorise les bioagresseurs suivants