Limit treatment to infestation sites

From Triple Performance


1. Presentation

Characterization of the technique

Description of the technique:

 

Julien Halska INRA julien.halska(at)grignon.inra.fr Dijon (21)

Spam control: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @


 

Some bioagressors spread from hotspots. They can therefore be managed by treatments limited to these areas or by physical control. Note that localized weed control on the row is the subject of a specific sheet (it is not a hotspot). Very few references were found in large crops, this technique seems more developed in arboriculture, viticulture and horticulture on aphids, mites and other insects.


Implementation period On established crop


Spatial scale of implementation Plot

Application of the technique to...

Négatif All crops: Not generalizable


Only crops on which bioagressors develop from hotspots are concerned.


Milk thistle: all crops.


Dodder: beet.


Pod weevil and cabbage aphid (of crucifers): winter and spring rapeseed


Positif All soil types: Easily generalizable


Positif All climatic contexts: Easily generalizable

Regulation



2. Services provided by the technique



3. Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality: Increasing


phytosanitary emissions: DECREASE


GHG emissions: DECREASE


Positif Effect on water quality: Increasing


pesticides: DECREASE


Positif Effect on fossil resource consumption: Decreasing


fossil energy consumption: DECREASE


Neutre Other: No effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, phyto ...): Decrease


Reduction of treated area, thus quantities of products used and risk of pollution.


Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, phyto ...): Decrease


Reduction of treated area, thus quantities of products used and risk of pollution.


Fossil energy consumption: Decrease


Less distance traveled.


GHG emissions: Decrease


Less distance traveled and therefore less CO2 emissions. No effect on N2O.


Biodiversity: Increase


Reduction of pressure exerted on living organisms by pesticides in untreated areas.

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Soil fertility: No effect (neutral)


Less pressure on beneficial soil organisms?


Neutre Water stress: No effect (neutral)


Positif Functional biodiversity: Increasing


Reduction of pressure exerted on living organisms by pesticides in untreated areas, notably on organisms beneficial to agriculture.

"Economic" criteria

Positif Operational costs: Decreasing


Reduction of quantities of products needed.


Neutre Mechanization costs: No effect (neutral)


No effect as equipment remains necessary. Less distance traveled.


Positif Margin: Increasing


Via reduction of quantities of products used.

"Social" criteria

Neutre Working time: No knowledge on impact


Less time spent treating, except possibly manually.


Négatif Observation time: Increasing


Fine observation necessary to detect hotspots.




4. Favored or disadvantaged organisms

Favored bioagressors

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged bioagressors

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details
Pod weevil STRONG pest, predator or parasite Treatment can be targeted on edges.
Milk thistle MEDIUM weeds
Dodder STRONG weeds Treatment of hotspots with total herbicide.
Cabbage aphids STRONG pest, predator or parasite Treatment can be localized on edges.

Favored Auxiliaries

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged Auxiliaries

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Favored climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details

Disadvantaged climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details




5. For more information


Avert n°18, 26 April 2011, p1, Technical brochure, 2011


Damier Vert n°296 of April 22, 2011, Technical brochure, 2011


Techn'ITAB Arboriculture, ITAB, CIVAM Bio Corsica, October 2005, Technical brochure, 2005


link to the brochure




6. Keywords

Bioagressor control method: Chemical control


Mode of action: Rescue


Type of strategy regarding pesticide use: Efficiency

Annexes

Défavorise les bioagresseurs suivants