Avoiding irrigation

From Triple Performance
Author: Alupus; license CC BY-SA 3.0



The development of certain pests can be favored by an excess of irrigation of the crop in place. Better irrigation management (see "Irrigate by maximizing water use efficiency") will therefore help limit damage.


The decision not to irrigate a crop can be tactical or strategic (no equipment on the farm, no access to water…).

Points of attention

  • The yield of crops whose water needs coincide with periods of low rainfall (summer crops) can be strongly penalized "dry". This phenomenon can be accentuated on soils with low available water capacity.
  • The impact of dry management of a crop on yield is directly correlated to the annual climatic context (rainfall).

Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality :

  • Phytosanitary emissions : Neutral.
  • GHG emissions : Decrease.


Neutre Effect on water quality :

  • N.P. : Variable.
  • Pesticides : Decrease.


Positif Effect on fossil resource consumption :

  • Fossil energy consumption : Decrease.

Not irrigating avoids fuel consumption related to irrigation implementation (pumping, moving reels…).


Neutre Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, phyto ...): Variable.

Not irrigating can help avoid nitrate leaching or phosphorus and pesticide residue runoff transfers caused by excess irrigation. However, if water deficit does not allow achieving the targeted yield, the residual mineral nitrogen present in the soil at the start of winter may imply increased leaching risks during the drainage period.


Neutre Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, phyto ...) : No effect (neutral).


Positif GHG emissions : Decrease. Not irrigating avoids fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to irrigation implementation (pumping, moving reels…). Moreover, dry management of crops avoids nitrous oxide emissions linked to surface anoxia caused by excess irrigation.

"Agronomic" criteria

Négatif Productivity : Decreasing. The effect of not irrigating on crop yield depends on:

Generally, the effect is neutral in situations where irrigation would not have been justified.


Neutre Soil fertility : No effect (neutral).


Négatif Water stress : Increasing.


Neutre Functional Biodiversity : No effect (neutral).

"Economic" criteria

Positif Operating costs : Decreasing.

Not irrigating a crop, when decided in advance, should lead to reviewing all elements of the technical itinerary: seeding density, nitrogen dose… in line with the targeted yield objective.


Positif Mechanization costs : Decreasing.

Not irrigating avoids mechanization costs related to irrigation: fuel costs related to pumping, moving reels… or even depreciation of irrigation equipment if the decision not to irrigate leads to not investing (or reinvesting) in equipment.


Neutre Margin : Variable. The effect of not irrigating on profitability depends on the effect on yield, cost reductions allowed, or even subsidies that may be obtained.

"Social" criteria

Positif Working time : Decreasing.

Not irrigating avoids the workload related to irrigation.

Learn more

Keywords

  • Pest control method : Cultural control.
  • Mode of action : Mitigation.
  • Type of strategy regarding pesticide use : Redesign.

Contacts

Estelle Meslin - INRA - estelle.meslin@rennes.inra.fr - Rennes (35). Rémy Ballot - INRA - remy.ballot@grignon.fr - Grignon (78).

Appendices