Sowing / transplanting at high density

From Triple Performance
Photo credits: CC0 1.0


1. Presentation

Characterization of the technique

Description of the technique:

This involves increasing the sowing density of crops by 10 to 15% to ensure the development of a dense stand in order to limit the space available for the development of weeds. Combining with complementary techniques is strongly recommended (row spacing, competitive ability of the variety or varieties, etc.).


Implementation period On established crop


Spatial scale of implementation Plot

Application of the technique to...

Positif All crops: Easily generalizable


Positif All soil types: Easily generalizable


Neutre All climatic contexts: Generalization sometimes delicate


In mild climates, the risk of diseases is higher with dense sowing. It is then preferable to choose varieties tolerant / resistant to diseases, and possibly sow a mixture of several varieties (especially soft wheat).

Regulation



2. Services provided by the technique



3. Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality: Increasing


phytosanitary emissions: DECREASE


Positif Effect on water quality: Increasing


pesticides: DECREASE


Positif Effect on fossil resource consumption: Decreasing


fossil energy consumption: DECREASE


Neutre Other: No effect (neutral)


This technique contributes to reducing the use of herbicides. However, be careful not to favor diseases too much and thus not increase the use of fungicides. The use of seed treatments can degrade this criterion, due to the use of a larger quantity of seeds.

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity: Variable


An increase in sowing density, as a component of yield, can lead to an increase in yield. However, increasing density does not systematically improve yield, as it depends on the crops sown and can for example lead to lodging or the appearance of foliar diseases.


Therefore, sowing density is reasoned according to sowing date, soil type, and sowing conditions.


Négatif Water stress: Increasing


Neutre Other agronomic criteria: Variable


Disease risk: link=|alt=red face size 10


The risk of diseases is higher for dense sowing, especially in regions with mild winters (Picardy, regions of the West).


Risk related to certain pests: link=|alt=green face size 10


Damage caused by pests causing plant losses can be limited (grey fly, seed fly, wireworms, etc.).


Sensitivity to lodging: link=|alt=red face size 10


Especially in case of sensitive variety and high availability of nitrogen. Variety mixtures can limit this risk.

"Economic" criteria

Négatif Operating costs: Increasing


Increase in seed costs and possibly fungicides, but reduction in herbicide use.


Neutre Margin: Variable


It depends on the balance between the increase in seed costs (possibly fungicides) and savings in herbicides.

"Social" criteria

Neutre Working time: No effect (neutral)




4. Organisms favored or disadvantaged

Favored Biotic stressors

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details
brown rust pathogen (biotic stressor) Disease development can be earlier at high density.
yellow rust pathogen (biotic stressor) Disease development can be earlier at high density.
septoria leaf blotch pathogen (biotic stressor) Greater vegetative mass and humidity within the canopy.

Disadvantaged biotic stressors

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details
Annual weeds MEDIUM weeds Moderately effective technique if used alone (also concerns some occasional perennial weeds)
perennials LOW weeds Weakly effective technique if used alone

Favored Auxiliaries

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged auxiliaries

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Favored climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details

Disadvantaged climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details




5. For more information


Perspectives Agricoles no. 337, September 2007, pp 48-51, Press article, 2007


Link to article

  • Agronomic solutions limiting herbicide use
    -Gran Aymerich L.


Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Professional report, 2006


Link to report. Sheet no. 9 largely inspired this technical sheet.

  • Smothering weeds
    -Pierre Mischler (Agro-Transfert)


Agro-Transfert resources and Territories, Press article, 2011


Link to article




6. Keywords

Method of biotic stressor control: Cultural control


Mode of action: Mitigation


Type of strategy regarding pesticide use: Redesign

Annexes

Est complémentaire des leviers

S'applique aux cultures suivantes

Favorise les bioagresseurs suivants

Défavorise les bioagresseurs suivants