Sowing / transplanting at high density

1. Presentation
Characterization of the technique
Description of the technique:
This involves increasing the sowing density of crops by 10 to 15% to ensure the development of a dense stand in order to limit the space available for the development of weeds. Combining with complementary techniques is strongly recommended (row spacing, competitive ability of the variety or varieties, etc.).
Implementation period On established crop
Spatial scale of implementation Plot
Application of the technique to...
All crops: Easily generalizable
All soil types: Easily generalizable
All climatic contexts: Generalization sometimes delicate
In mild climates, the risk of diseases is higher with dense sowing. It is then preferable to choose varieties tolerant / resistant to diseases, and possibly sow a mixture of several varieties (especially soft wheat).
Regulation
2. Services provided by the technique
3. Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system
"Environmental" criteria
Effect on air quality: Increasing
phytosanitary emissions: DECREASE
Effect on water quality: Increasing
pesticides: DECREASE
Effect on fossil resource consumption: Decreasing
fossil energy consumption: DECREASE
Other: No effect (neutral)
This technique contributes to reducing the use of herbicides. However, be careful not to favor diseases too much and thus not increase the use of fungicides. The use of seed treatments can degrade this criterion, due to the use of a larger quantity of seeds.
"Agronomic" criteria
Productivity: Variable
An increase in sowing density, as a component of yield, can lead to an increase in yield. However, increasing density does not systematically improve yield, as it depends on the crops sown and can for example lead to lodging or the appearance of foliar diseases.
Therefore, sowing density is reasoned according to sowing date, soil type, and sowing conditions.
Water stress: Increasing
Other agronomic criteria: Variable
Disease risk: link=|alt=red face size 10
The risk of diseases is higher for dense sowing, especially in regions with mild winters (Picardy, regions of the West).
Risk related to certain pests: link=|alt=green face size 10
Damage caused by pests causing plant losses can be limited (grey fly, seed fly, wireworms, etc.).
Sensitivity to lodging: link=|alt=red face size 10
Especially in case of sensitive variety and high availability of nitrogen. Variety mixtures can limit this risk.
"Economic" criteria
Operating costs: Increasing
Increase in seed costs and possibly fungicides, but reduction in herbicide use.
Margin: Variable
It depends on the balance between the increase in seed costs (possibly fungicides) and savings in herbicides.
"Social" criteria
Working time: No effect (neutral)
4. Organisms favored or disadvantaged
Favored Biotic stressors
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| brown rust | pathogen (biotic stressor) | Disease development can be earlier at high density. | |
| yellow rust | pathogen (biotic stressor) | Disease development can be earlier at high density. | |
| septoria leaf blotch | pathogen (biotic stressor) | Greater vegetative mass and humidity within the canopy. |
Disadvantaged biotic stressors
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual weeds | MEDIUM | weeds | Moderately effective technique if used alone (also concerns some occasional perennial weeds) |
| perennials | LOW | weeds | Weakly effective technique if used alone |
Favored Auxiliaries
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|
Disadvantaged auxiliaries
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|
Favored climatic and physiological accidents
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Details |
|---|
Disadvantaged climatic and physiological accidents
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Details |
|---|
5. For more information
- Sowing of soft wheat: Review dates and densities to avoid drought
- -Gate P.; Gouache D.; Garcia C. (Arvalis)
Perspectives Agricoles no. 337, September 2007, pp 48-51, Press article, 2007
- Agronomic solutions limiting herbicide use
- -Gran Aymerich L.
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Professional report, 2006
Link to report. Sheet no. 9 largely inspired this technical sheet.
- Smothering weeds
- -Pierre Mischler (Agro-Transfert)
Agro-Transfert resources and Territories, Press article, 2011
6. Keywords
Method of biotic stressor control: Cultural control
Mode of action: Mitigation
Type of strategy regarding pesticide use: Redesign
Annexes
Est complémentaire des leviers
S'applique aux cultures suivantes
Favorise les bioagresseurs suivants
Défavorise les bioagresseurs suivants