Prefer seed treatments over foliar treatments

From Triple Performance


Presentation

Technique characterization

Technique description :

 

Julien Halska INRA julien.halska(at)grignon.inra.fr Epoisses (21)
Rémy Ballot INRA remy.ballot(at)grignon.inra.fr Grignon (78)

Spam prevention: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @


Whenever possible, prioritize crop protection by seed treatment rather than foliar treatments.


Implementation period On established crop


Spatial scale of implementation Plot

Application of the technique to...

Neutre All crops : Sometimes difficult to generalize


This technique can only be applied for the combinations of crops X pests for which a seed treatment can substitute a foliar treatment.


Positif All soil types : Easily generalizable


Positif All climatic contexts : Easily generalizable

Regulations

For the use of seeds protected by certain seed treatments, regulations require pneumatic seed drills to be equipped with deflectors to limit dust dispersion into the atmosphere.


Decree of April 13, 2010 modifying the decree of January 13, 2009 relating to the conditions of coating and use of seeds treated with products mentioned in article L. 253-1 of the rural code

Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality : Increasing


Phytosanitary emissions : DECREASE


GHG emissions : NEUTRAL


Neutre Other : No effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, phytosanitary ...) : no knowledge on impact


The impact of substituting seed treatments for foliar treatments on the risk of transfer to water is difficult to assess. It can be assumed that the risk of transfer by leaching is increased, but the transfer of phytosanitary products to water mainly occurs by runoff: active substances buried with the seed would therefore be less subject to this risk.


Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, phytosanitary ...) : Decrease


Substituting seed treatments for foliar treatments avoids the transfer of active substances to the air by drift or volatilization. However, seed treatment dust can be dispersed into the atmosphere at sowing. The use of deflectors on the seed drill limits this risk.


Fossil energy consumption : no effect (neutral)


Substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment avoids a sprayer pass, but the fuel consumption related to this pass can be considered negligible.


GHG emissions : no effect (neutral)

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity : Variable


Substituting seed treatments for foliar treatments, when possible, has the same effectiveness on the targeted pest. It can serve as "insurance" in situations where foliar intervention might be difficult to carry out (intervention conditions, competition with other operations...).


Neutre Soil fertility : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Water stress : No effect (neutral)


Neutre Functional Biodiversity : No knowledge on impact


It can be assumed that the use of seed treatments impacts the functional biodiversity of the soil. But this impact is difficult to assess: it must include the reduction in the amount of active substance applied that substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment allows in certain situations.

"Economic" criteria

Négatif Operating costs : Increasing


Substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment generally involves an additional cost. This cost is all the more significant if it is accompanied by a transition from farm-saved seed to certified seed.


Neutre Mechanization costs : No effect (neutral)


Substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment avoids a sprayer pass, but mechanization costs related to this pass can be considered negligible.


Neutre Margin : Variable


The impact of substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment depends on the additional cost related to the seed treatment, or even seed purchase, and the potential yield gain in situations where a foliar treatment cannot be performed.

"Social" criteria

Positif Working time : Decreasing


Substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment avoids a sprayer pass.


Positif Observation time : Decreasing


Substituting a seed treatment for a foliar treatment removes the need to monitor crops for treatment triggering.

For more information

  • Phytosanitary products in the air
    -Technical brochure, 2007


link to references

Keywords

Pest control method : Chemical control


Mode of action : Rescue


Strategy type regarding pesticide use : Efficiency

Appendices