Optimizing Traction Effort

From Triple Performance
(header image; author: cjp24; license: (CC BY-SA 3.0))


1. Presentation

Characterization of the technique

Description of the technique:

 

Rémy Ballot INRA remy.ballot(at)grignon.inra.fr Grignon (78)

Spam prevention: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @


Limit slippage in the field by


(1) reducing tire inflation pressure (< 1 bar for work requiring high traction),


(2) replacing drive wheel tires as soon as they are worn,


(3) ballasting the tractor (40-50 kg/hp for traction work),


(4) adjusting the hitch settings according to use (long convergence for draft control work: ploughing... and short convergence for floating position work).


A slippage rate of 10% should be targeted. On the road, on the contrary, rolling resistance is limited by high inflation pressure and minimal tractor ballast.


Implementation period On established crop


Spatial scale of implementation Farm

Application of the technique to...

Positif All crops: Easily generalizable


Positif All soil types: Easily generalizable


Positif All climatic contexts: Easily generalizable

Regulation



2. Services provided by the technique



3. Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality: Increasing


acidification: DECREASE


GHG emissions: DECREASE


Positif Effect on fossil resource consumption: Decreasing


fossil energy consumption: DECREASE


Neutre Other: No effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, pesticides ...): no effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, pesticides ...): Decrease


Optimizing traction effort helps limit fuel consumption and related sulfur dioxide emissions.


Fossil energy consumption: Decrease


Optimizing traction effort helps limit fuel consumption.


GHG emissions: Decrease


Optimizing traction effort helps limit fuel consumption and related carbon dioxide emissions.

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Soil fertility: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Water stress: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Biodiversity functional: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Other agronomic criteria: Variable


Compaction risks: Decrease


Reducing inflation pressure for heavy work also reduces compaction risks by increasing the tire contact area with the soil.

"Economic" criteria

Neutre Operating costs: No effect (neutral)


Positif Mechanization costs: Decreasing


Optimizing traction effort helps limit fuel consumption and related costs. In the longer term, this also helps preserve equipment longevity.


Positif Margin: Increasing


Optimizing traction effort improves profitability through better control of fuel/lubricant expenses.

"Social" criteria

Négatif Working time: Increasing


Adjusting inflation pressure, mounting and dismounting weights involve additional workload and can be difficult to implement.


Neutre Observation time: No effect (neutral)




4. Organisms favored or disadvantaged

Favored Pests

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged Pests

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Favored Beneficials

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged Beneficials

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Favored climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details

Disadvantaged climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details




5. For more information

  • Save on fuel!
    -Savary C. (CA 50)


Technical brochure

  • Control your energy consumption - Your range of fuel solutions
    -CRA Picardie


Technical brochure




6. Keywords

Bioaggressor control method:


Mode of action:


Type of strategy regarding pesticide use:

Annexes