Favoring Tractors / Tools with Low Fuel Consumption

From Triple Performance


1. Presentation

Characterization of the technique

Description of the technique:

 

Rémy Ballot INRA remy.ballot(at)grignon.inra.fr Grignon (78)

Spam prevention: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @


When purchasing, favor tractors that have the lowest fuel consumption at equivalent performance, and avoid options / equipment that imply additional fuel consumption (air conditioning, xenon headlights...). Also favor the purchase of tools requiring the least power.


Implementation period


Spatial scale of implementation Farm

Application of the technique to...

Positif All crops: Easily generalizable


Positif All soil types: Easily generalizable


Positif All climatic contexts: Easily generalizable

Regulation



2. Services provided by the technique



3. Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system

"Environmental" criteria

Positif Effect on air quality: Increasing


acidification: DECREASE


GHG emissions: DECREASE


Positif Effect on fossil resource consumption: Decreasing


fossil energy consumption: DECREASE


Neutre Other: No effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, phytosanitary ...): no effect (neutral)


Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, phytosanitary ...): Decrease


Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces consumption and related sulfur dioxide emissions.


Fossil energy consumption: Decrease


Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces consumption.


GHG emissions: Decrease


Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces consumption and related carbon dioxide emissions.

"Agronomic" criteria

Neutre Productivity: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Soil fertility: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Water stress: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Functional Biodiversity: No effect (neutral)

"Economic" criteria

Neutre Operating costs: No effect (neutral)


Positif Mechanization costs: Decreasing


Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces fuel / lubricant costs.


Positif Margin: Increasing


Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption improves profitability by reducing fuel / lubricant costs.

"Social" criteria

Neutre Working time: No effect (neutral)


Neutre Observation time: No effect (neutral)




4. Favored or disadvantaged organisms

Favored Pests

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged pests

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Favored Auxiliaries

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Disadvantaged Auxiliaries

Organism Impact of the technique Type Details

Favored climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details

Disadvantaged climatic and physiological accidents

Organism Impact of the technique Details




5. To learn more

  • Save on fuel oil!
    -Savary C. (CA 50)


Technical brochure

  • Control your energy consumption - Your range of fuel solutions
    -CRA Picardie


Technical brochure




6. Keywords

Bioaggressor control method:


Mode of action:


Type of strategy regarding pesticide use:

Appendices