Favoring Tractors / Tools with Low Fuel Consumption
1. Presentation
Characterization of the technique
Description of the technique:
| Rémy Ballot | INRA | remy.ballot(at)grignon.inra.fr | Grignon (78) |
Spam prevention: To use these addresses, replace (at) with @
When purchasing, favor tractors that have the lowest fuel consumption at equivalent performance, and avoid options / equipment that imply additional fuel consumption (air conditioning, xenon headlights...). Also favor the purchase of tools requiring the least power.
Implementation period
Spatial scale of implementation Farm
Application of the technique to...
All crops: Easily generalizable
All soil types: Easily generalizable
All climatic contexts: Easily generalizable
Regulation
2. Services provided by the technique
3. Effects on the sustainability of the cropping system
"Environmental" criteria
Effect on air quality: Increasing
acidification: DECREASE
GHG emissions: DECREASE
Effect on fossil resource consumption: Decreasing
fossil energy consumption: DECREASE
Other: No effect (neutral)
Pollutant transfer to water (N, P, phytosanitary ...): no effect (neutral)
Pollutant transfer to air (N, P, phytosanitary ...): Decrease
Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces consumption and related sulfur dioxide emissions.
Fossil energy consumption: Decrease
Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces consumption.
GHG emissions: Decrease
Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces consumption and related carbon dioxide emissions.
"Agronomic" criteria
Productivity: No effect (neutral)
Soil fertility: No effect (neutral)
Water stress: No effect (neutral)
Functional Biodiversity: No effect (neutral)
"Economic" criteria
Operating costs: No effect (neutral)
Mechanization costs: Decreasing
Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption reduces fuel / lubricant costs.
Margin: Increasing
Choosing tractors / tools with low fuel consumption improves profitability by reducing fuel / lubricant costs.
"Social" criteria
Working time: No effect (neutral)
Observation time: No effect (neutral)
4. Favored or disadvantaged organisms
Favored Pests
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|
Disadvantaged pests
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|
Favored Auxiliaries
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|
Disadvantaged Auxiliaries
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Type | Details |
|---|
Favored climatic and physiological accidents
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Details |
|---|
Disadvantaged climatic and physiological accidents
| Organism | Impact of the technique | Details |
|---|
5. To learn more
- Save on fuel oil!
- -Savary C. (CA 50)
Technical brochure
- Control your energy consumption - Your range of fuel solutions
- -CRA Picardie
Technical brochure
6. Keywords
Bioaggressor control method:
Mode of action:
Type of strategy regarding pesticide use: