Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen et al., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, & Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, & Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, & Zalom, 2011).
Biology and Identification
Drosophila suzukii belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, & Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh et al., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen et al., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, & Haviland, 2011).
Host Range and Crop Damage
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee et al., 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, & Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, & Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh et al., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen et al., 2015).
Ecology and Distribution
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen et al., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, & Anfora, 2012; Fraimout et al., 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez & Colinet, 2017).
Impact on Global Agriculture
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen et al., 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, & Zalom, 2010; De Ros et al., 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi & Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez et al., 2016).
Detection and Monitoring
Early detection is crucial for managing D. suzukii populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:
- Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps
- Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions
- Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.
Management Strategies
Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020; Knoll, Herz, & Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.
Trichopria drosophiliae (Hymenoptera Diapridae)
Trichopria drosophilae is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren et al., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.
Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis (Hymenoptera, Figitidae)
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of Drosophila suzukii in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane et al., 2016; Girod et al., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where Drosophila subpulchrella emerged in the absence of D. suzukii, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).
Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae)
Leptopilina japonica is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod et al., 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.
Trichopria drosophiliae as a Biological Control
- In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, T. drosophilae has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.
- Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.
Advantages
- It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.
How to Obtain It:
- T. drosophilae can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).
- For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using D. suzukii pupae as hosts.
- When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.
Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica as Biological Control
- L. japonica has been naturally associated with D. suzukii in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.
- Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.
Advantages
- Researchers consider L. japonica a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by D. suzukii.
How to Obtain It:
- Currently, L. japonica is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.
- Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.
- Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).
Introduction of Parasitoid into a Farm
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy T. drosophilae as:
- parasitized pupae
- or emerging adults
Best time for release
- Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build
- Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)
Temperature requirement
- Optimal activity: 18–25°C
- Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.
Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards)
Step 1: Distribute release containers
Place parasitoid release points:
- Near fruiting zones
- At field edges (SWD hotspots)
- Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)
- In areas with fallen or damaged fruit
Recommended density:
- 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release
- Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks
Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups
- Attach to branches at waist height
- Avoid direct sunlight
- Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)
Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference
- STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides
- If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)
Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.
Method:
- Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters
- Place containers in shaded corners
- Maintain humidity around 60–80%
Release rate:
- 500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²
- Repeat every 1–2 weeks
Enhance Their Establishment
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.
Provide:
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.
Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)
Combine T. drosophilae releases with:
✔ Good sanitation: remove fallen/overripe fruit
✔ Mass trapping (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)
✔ Exclusion netting on fruiting crops
✔ Cold storage immediately after harvest
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.
Monitor Parasitism Success to confirm establishment
How to check:
- Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit
- Rear them in containers
- Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence
A good establishment rate:
- 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat
Testimonials
- In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in D. suzukii infestation levels after repeated releases of T. drosophilae.
What they did:
- Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of T. drosophilae during the fruiting period.
- Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.
- Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.
- Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.
Why it worked:
- T. drosophilae parasitizes the pupal stage of D. suzukii in soil and fallen fruit.
- Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.
- Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.
2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control Drosophila suzukii
2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased. What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control Drosophila suzukii
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid against Drosophila suzukii. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials. Repeated Releases of Trichopria drosophilae
Repeated Releases of Trichopria drosophilae
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.
What they did:
- Released T. drosophilae in multiple weekly rounds.
- Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.
- Releases were done during periods of high D. suzukii pupal availability.
- Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.
Purpose:
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally. Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment
Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment:
- Because T. drosophilae parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.
- They did this by:
- Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).
- Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).
- Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.
- This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.
- Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence
- To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:
- How many parasitoids emerged
- How many SWD emerged
- Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended
- They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:
- ✔ establishment ✔ reproduction ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)
- This demonstrated classical biological control potential.
- Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations
- Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:
- control plots (no parasitoids)
- treated plots (with releases)
- Results:
- SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.
- Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.
- In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.
- In field sites, T. drosophilae successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.
- This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.
Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices
Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices:
- While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:
- ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.
- ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.
- ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.
Research and Innovation
Farm level control of Drosophila suzukii now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.
1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract D. suzukii adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.
2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more D. suzukii. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.
3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage D. suzukii oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.
4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to D. suzukii. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.
5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.
6. Integrate crop environment management
Dense canopies and high humidity favor D. suzukii survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.
7. Future tools may include genetic control
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.
Conclusion
Drosophila suzukii has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.
D. suzukii reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.
Références
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., & Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of Drosophila suzukii: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.
Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.
Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., & Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid Trichopria drosophilae in controlling Drosophila suzukii. Biological Control, 165, 104795.
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.
Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., & Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by Leptopilina japonica of Drosophila suzukii in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.
Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., & Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.
Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., & Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.
Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., & Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.
Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., & Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.
Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., & Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.
Enriquez, T., & Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.
Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., & Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.
Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.
Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., & Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.
De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., & Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.
Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., & Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.
Mazzi, D., & Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., & Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.
Knoll, V., Herz, A., & Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.
Wang, X., Nance, A. H., & Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.
Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., & Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., & Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., & Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.
Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., & Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., & Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.
