<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Astrid+Robette+%281886608933%29</id>
	<title>Triple Performance - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Astrid+Robette+%281886608933%29"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/wiki/Special:Contributions/Astrid_Robette_(1886608933)"/>
	<updated>2026-05-07T03:43:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11113</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11113"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T13:58:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drosophile Cycle.jpg|center|Cycle de vie de Drosophila suzukii]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Host Range and Crop Damage ==&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ecology and Distribution ==&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Impact on Global Agriculture ==&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Detection and Monitoring ==&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Best time for release ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Temperature requirement ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monitor Parasitism Success ===&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Testimonials ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11053</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11053"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T13:18:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drosophile Cycle.jpg|center|Cycle de vie de Drosophila suzukii]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host Range and Crop Damage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ecology and Distribution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Impact on Global Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Detection and Monitoring ===&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Best time for release:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature requirement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 6. Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 7. Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11018</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11018"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T11:15:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile Cycle.jpg|Cycle de vie de Drosophila suzukii|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host Range and Crop Damage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ecology and Distribution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Impact on Global Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Detection and Monitoring ===&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Best time for release:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature requirement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 6. Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 7. Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11017</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11017"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T11:13:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): /* Biology and Identification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Cycle.jpg|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host Range and Crop Damage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ecology and Distribution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Impact on Global Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Detection and Monitoring ===&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Best time for release:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature requirement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 6. Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 7. Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11016</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11016"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T11:12:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Cycle.jpg|Drosophila suzukii&#039;s life circle|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host Range and Crop Damage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ecology and Distribution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Impact on Global Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Detection and Monitoring ===&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centré]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Best time for release:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature requirement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 6. Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 7. Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11015</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11015"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T11:11:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): /* Biology and Identification */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Cycle.jpg|Drosophila suzukii&#039;s life circle|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host Range and Crop Damage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ecology and Distribution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Impact on Global Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Detection and Monitoring ===&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centred]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Best time for release:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature requirement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 6. Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 7. Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11014</id>
		<title>Drosophila suzukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_suzukii&amp;diff=11014"/>
		<updated>2025-12-18T11:10:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Insect&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Fruit fly (Drosophila suzukii)&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = Insect (pest)&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila suzukii&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Spotted-wing_Drosophila_(Drosophila_suzukii)_male_(15359228246).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Cycle.jpg|Drosophila suzukii&#039;s life circle|centred]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host Range and Crop Damage ===&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ecology and Distribution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Impact on Global Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Detection and Monitoring ===&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Fichier:Drosophile_Trichopria.jpg|centred]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control: ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Advantages ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== How to Obtain It: ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Best time for release:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature requirement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research and Innovation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm ====&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices ====&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties ====&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes ====&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases ====&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 6. Integrate crop environment management ====&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 7. Future tools may include genetic control ====&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
* Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
* Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
* Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
* Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
* Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
* Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
* Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
* Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
* Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
* Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annexes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{S&#039;attaque aux cultures | Apricot&lt;br /&gt;
 | Cherry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Raspberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Blueberry&lt;br /&gt;
 | Peach&lt;br /&gt;
 | Vine}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Techniques favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cultures favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autres bioagresseurs favorisant la présence de ce bioagresseur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#set: GECO import on = 01/02/2021}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Insecte (bioagresseur)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_Isaria_fumosorosea_to_control_insects,_particularly_whiteflies&amp;diff=10612</id>
		<title>Use Isaria fumosorosea to control insects, particularly whiteflies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_Isaria_fumosorosea_to_control_insects,_particularly_whiteflies&amp;diff=10612"/>
		<updated>2025-12-16T10:52:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Arable crops@ Mixed farming&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Biodiversity@ Protection against insects and pests&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a pest control solution that is not only effective, but harnesses the power of nature itself. &#039;&#039;[[Isaria fumosorosea]]&#039;&#039;, a remarkable fungus found in soils and plants worldwide, is helping farmers protect their crops from destructive insect pests in an environmentally friendly way. In this article, you will discover how this biological ally works, why it is beneficial for sustainable agriculture, and how growers can integrate it into modern pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039;? A natural ally for pest control ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Isaria fumosorosea]]&#039;&#039; is a fungus which lives mostly in the soil worldwide, but it is also found on plants and in water. This organism is an insect killer, or [https://ucanr.edu/blog/e-journal-entomology-and-biologicals/article/entomopathogenic-microorganisms-modes-action-and#:~:text=Entomopathogens%20are%20microorganisms%20that%20are,important%20role%20in%20their%20management. entomopathogen]. The fungal colonies start out white and can change to a pink or purple color as they grow. The fungus has a basic, asexual life cycle. The infectious parts are called conidia and blastospores &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Brunner-Mendoza, C., Navarro-Barranco, H., León-Mancilla, B., Pérez-Torres, A., &amp;amp; Toriello, C. (2017). Biosafety of an entomopathogenic fungus Isaria fumosorosea in an acute dermal test in rabbits. &#039;&#039;Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;36&#039;&#039;(1), 12–18. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2016.1156122&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the fungus to kill a pest, its spores must first stick firmly to the insect&#039;s outer skin (cuticle). It then produces special enzymes that help it break through the insect&#039;s protective layer &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Castellanos-Moguel, J., Mier, T., Reyes-Montes, M. del R., Navarro Barranco, H., Zepeda Rodríguez, A., Pérez-Torres, A., &amp;amp; Toriello, C. (2013). Fungal growth development index and ultrastructural study of whiteflies infected by three &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; isolates of different pathogenicity. &#039;&#039;Revista Mexicana de Micología&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;38&#039;&#039;, 55–61&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The time required for an &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; spore to penetrate the insect cuticle varies with the specific fungal strain and the host, but the critical breach is generally rapid. The spore first adheres, germinates, and uses enzymes (like those that suggest serious cuticular damage) to penetrate the insect&#039;s protective layer. For a highly virulent isolate (EH-506/3) tested against whitefly nymphs, significant cuticular damage was observed as early as 6 hours after inoculation &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Evidence of successful internal colonization, characterized by hyphal growth emerging from the host’s body, was documented starting at 12 hours for this fast-acting strain. Therefore, for susceptible hosts and effective isolates, the penetration phase is often completed within the first 12 to 24 hours, well before visible symptoms become widespread (which typically occurs within 24 to 48 hours)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Belgium. (2013). &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosoroseusa strain Apopka 97 Volume 1 – Report and Proposed Decision May 2013&#039;&#039; (Draft Assessment Report).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high level of natural variation found in different strains means that &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is considered a species complex. For example, one virulent strain showed 92.6% mortality against Colorado potato beetle larvae, while the reference strain Apopka 97 showed 54.5%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hussein, H. M., Skoková, O., Půža, V., &amp;amp; Zemek, R. (2016). Laboratory Evaluation of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; CCM 8367 and &#039;&#039;Steinernema feltiae&#039;&#039; Ustinov against Immature Stages of the Colorado Potato Beetle. &#039;&#039;PLoS ONE&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;(3), e0152399.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 1 - Isaria structures.png|center|thumb|971x971px|A) Conidia of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumorosea&#039;&#039; germinating on a nymph after 24 h of innoculation.B) appressoria forming on the intersegmental area 36 h hours after innoculation.C) Blastopore formation 48 h after inoculation. co: conidia, gt: germ tube, ap: appresorium&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;GÖKÇE, A., &amp;amp; ER, M. (2005). Pathogenicity of Paecilomyces spp. To the Glasshouse Whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, with Some Observations on the Fungal Infection Process. &#039;&#039;Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;29&#039;&#039;(5), 331–340. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/-&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host range and crops ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is highly valued in farming because it has a very broad host range, capable of infecting over 40 species of arthropods, including pests from at least 10 different insect orders. This makes it useful against many different agricultural pests. The pests it controls include whiteflies, aphids, mealybugs, thrips, psyllids (like the Asian citrus psyllid), and different types of beetles and caterpillars &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthurs, S. P., Aristizábal, L. F., &amp;amp; Avery, P. B. (2013). Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi against chilli thrips, &#039;&#039;Scirtothrips dorsalis&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Journal of Insect Science&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;13&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In France, the commercial product PREFERAL WG (containing strain Apopka 97, 109 UFC/g) is authorized as an insecticide, primarily for the control of whiteflies (Aleurodes), specifically under closed shelters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Specific authorized crop uses in France/Europe for the control of Aleurodes include&#039;&#039;&#039;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetables and fruits:&#039;&#039;&#039; Tomatoes and aubergines, cucurbits (with edible and non-edible skin), beans and peas (shelled and unshelled fresh), pepper, strawberry, blackcurrant, and raspberry.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ornamentals / other:&#039;&#039;&#039; Trees and shrubs, flowering and foliage plants, rose, aromatic herbs, and seed-bearing crops.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 2 - Isaria invasion.png|center|thumb|622x622px|&#039;&#039;Isaria fumorosea&#039;&#039; infection on &#039;&#039;Aleurodicus rugioperculatus&#039;&#039; on eggs (A), thrid and fourth instar nymphs (B, C) and adults (D). ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I. fumosorosea and whiteflies: A focused ally ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is one of the most important natural enemies of whiteflies. Whiteflies, especially species like the sweet potato whitefly (&#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039;) and the greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum), are global concerns because they damage crops directly through feeding and indirectly by transmitting devastating viruses (like begomoviruses).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sani, I. (2020)&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; A review of the biology and control of whitefly, &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), with special reference to biological control using entomopathogenic fungi. &#039;&#039;Insects&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;(9), 619&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Zou C., Li L., Dong T., Zhang B., &amp;amp; Hu Q. (2014). Joint action of the entomopathogenic fungus &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and four chemical insecticides against the whitefly &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Biocontrol Science and Technology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;24&#039;&#039;(3), 315–324. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.860427&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fungus works by infecting the insect body. Its spores (blastospores or conidia) must stick to the insect&#039;s outer skin (cuticle). Once attached, the fungus produces structures that penetrate the cuticle, causing serious damage often attributed to enzymatic action. Once inside, the fungus multiplies and causes death. For farmers, this means seeing infected whiteflies, which often stop moving or appear moldy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Targeting whitefly life stages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; can infect eggs, nymphs (immature stages), and adults of whiteflies. However, the immature stages (nymphs) are typically the most susceptible targets. When tested, different fungal isolates show variable speed of kill (virulence). For instance, some commercial strains have demonstrated a median lethal time (LT50) as low as 3.72 days against second instar B. tabaci nymphs, while other isolates took longer, up to 6.36 days. The fungus provides good control activity against whitefly nymphs on the leaf surface, but multiple applications are generally needed for successful control &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ruiz-Sánchez E., Munguía-Rosales R., &amp;amp; Torres-Acosta R. I. (2013). Virulence and genetic variability of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; isolates from the Yucatan Peninsula against &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). &#039;&#039;International Journal of Agricultural Science&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;(2), 113-118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 3 - Isaria infection on Diaphorina.png|center|thumb|796x796px|A) &#039;&#039;Diaphorina citri&#039;&#039; adult dead infected by &#039;&#039;Isaria fumorosea.&#039;&#039;B) Conidia production of &#039;&#039;I. fumorosea.&#039;&#039;C) Chains of conidia. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why use isaria? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Farmers look for tools that are effective, safe, and sustainable. &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; excels in these areas, especially when compared to traditional chemical control:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Safety and low risk:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is considered a low-risk environmental alternative to chemical insecticides. It is safe for workers; for example, acute dermal toxicity tests showed no inflammatory reactions or clinical signs of disease, supporting its safety when applied to the skin. It poses a negligible risk to birds and mammals, particularly since its representative uses focus on glasshouse application.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brunner-Mendoza, C., Navarro-Barranco, H., León-Mancilla, B., Pérez-Torres, A., &amp;amp; Toriello, C. (2016). Biosafety of an entomopathogenic fungus &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; in an acute dermal test in rabbits. &#039;&#039;Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2016.1156122&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No resistance development:&#039;&#039;&#039; Unlike synthetic chemicals, which face widespread pest resistance (making them less effective over time), studies on &#039;&#039;B. tabaci&#039;&#039; exposed to &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; over multiple generations showed no significant differences in susceptibility. This means the product can be relied upon long-term without resistance issues.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gao, T., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., Keyhani, N. O., &amp;amp; Huang, Z. (2017). Lack of resistance development in &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; after multiple generations of selection. &#039;&#039;Scientific Reports&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;7&#039;&#039;, 42727&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Compatibility with biocontrol:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fungus is vital for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. It is compatible with many beneficial natural enemies used in greenhouses, such as the parasitoid Encarsia formosa, predatory mites, and bugs like Macrolophus caliginosus. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Synergy with combined treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; While Isaria acts slower than chemical sprays (often taking 7–10 days to cause death), its speed and efficacy can be significantly boosted when combined with certain chemical insecticides. Strong synergistic actions have been observed in mixtures of &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; with insecticides like Spirotetramat, Imidacloprid, and Thiamethoxam during the first 2–4 days after treatment. This joint action helps to shorten the time it takes for the pest to die. It is also highly compatible with insect growth regulators (IGRs) like Buprofezin, which can act as an effective adjuvant for whitefly control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use isaria (strategy and timing) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Applications should target the first whitefly larvae. Repeated treatments (often 2 to 3 treatments) spaced by a minimum interval (e.g., 15 days) are typically needed, especially against whitefly nymphs.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;UConn. (2023). Entomopathogenic Fungi for Greenhouse Pest Management. &#039;&#039;UConn Extension IPM Program&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Application timing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Apply Isaria products, often formulated as Water Dispersible Granules (WG), in the late afternoon or evening, or on cloudy/rainy days. This timing protects the spores from UV rays and ensures a period of naturally higher humidity, maximizing the chances of spore germination. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sandeep, A., Selvaraj, K., Kalleshwaraswamy, C. M., Hanumanthaswamy, B. C., &amp;amp; Mallikarjuna, H. B. (2022). Field efficacy of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; alone and in combination with insecticides against &#039;&#039;Aleurodicus rugioperculatus&#039;&#039; on coconut. &#039;&#039;Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;32&#039;&#039;, 106. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/1186/s41938-022-00600-z&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to use isaria and when: crucial field considerations ==&lt;br /&gt;
For &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; to work effectively, careful application timing and environmental management are critical. To maximize the effect and overcome environmental limitations, follow these best practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Application method: ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spray to glisten, not to runoff. The product is often applied as a &amp;quot;spot treatment&amp;quot; to areas with high pest density, especially in greenhouse settings. In the case of Preferal WG must be prepared through a preliminary mixing step in clean water with gentle agitation before being added to the spray tank. The mixture should be prepared immediately before application to ensure the viability of the fungal spores and to avoid sedimentation. During spraying, continuous agitation is essential to maintain a homogeneous suspension.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to PFR-97, which requires prolonged mixing and uses only the supernatant after sedimentation, Preferal WG should neither be left to settle nor filtered prior to use. However, because its suspensions have limited stability, operator experience and careful handling—particularly maintaining consistent agitation—are key factors to optimize product performance.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kumar, V., Francis, A., Avery, P., McKenzie, C., &amp;amp; Osborne, L. (2018). Assessing compatibility of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and buprofezin for mitigation of &#039;&#039;Aleurodicus rugioperculatus&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)—An invasive pest in the Florida landscape. &#039;&#039;Journal of Economic Entomology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;111&#039;&#039;(3), 1069–1079.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No complex pre-processing steps are required beyond proper mixing and tank management. It is also important to avoid combinations with incompatible products that could affect fungal viability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tank mixing and compatibility:&#039;&#039;&#039; If tank mixing with chemical products, ensure compatibility. Some fungicides, especially those containing copper or the product Bellis (at high concentrations like 100 mg/L), can inhibit fungal growth and should be avoided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Environmental considerations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The fungus is a living organism, and its survival and ability to infect depend heavily on the conditions immediately after application:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Humidity is key:&#039;&#039;&#039; The most crucial factor for initiating infection is high relative humidity (RH). The fungus requires RH above 95% for a short period so the spores can properly germinate and penetrate the insect’s protective cuticle. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature range:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fungal growth is successful within a temperature range, with optimal colony growth occurring between 23°C and 25°C. Growth slows above 25°C and stops completely above 32°C. In field trials, even when average temperatures (e.g., 22 °C–26 °C) seem conducive, the mortality rate can be lower than in the lab due to other limiting factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;UV radiation (sunlight):&#039;&#039;&#039; The spores are highly sensitive to sunlight. UV-B radiation is the most detrimental factor and can rapidly reduce spore viability. This is a major reason why field mortality is often lower than lab results.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Loong, C., Ahmad, S. S., Hafidzi, M. N., Dzolkifli, O., &amp;amp; Faizah, A. (2013). Effect of UV-B and solar radiation on the efficacy of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Metarhizium anisopliae&#039;&#039; (Deuteromycetes: Hyphomycetes) for controlling bagworm, &#039;&#039;Pterona pendula&#039;&#039; (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). &#039;&#039;Journal of Entomology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;10&#039;&#039;, 53–65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wind and coverage:&#039;&#039;&#039; While not as direct a killer as UV, efficacy can be reduced if the application does not reach the pests, particularly because whiteflies often reside on the lower leaf surface, requiring thorough spray coverage (avoiding lack of translaminar coverage).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ·&#039;&#039;&#039;Other reductions in efficacy:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fungal efficacy can be reduced by factors like rainfall washing blastospores off the plants or the biodegradation of spores over time.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Loong, C., Ahmad, S. S., Hafidzi, M. N., Dzolkifli, O., &amp;amp; Faizah, A. (2013). Effect of UV-B and solar radiation on the efficacy of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Metarhizium anisopliae&#039;&#039; (Deuteromycetes: Hyphomycetes) for controlling bagworm, &#039;&#039;Pterona pendula&#039;&#039; (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). &#039;&#039;Journal of Entomology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;10&#039;&#039;, 53–65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Storage and preparation: ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spores are living. They are harmed by high temperatures and should be stored in the fridge (2–6°C) to achieve maximum shelf life (e.g., 6 months). Do not keep the spores submerged in water for more than 24 hours prior to spraying.[3] [4]   Continuous agitation in the spray tank may be necessary to keep the product properly suspended. Always wear appropriate protective equipment, such as a mask and gloves, during mixing and application.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 4 - Isaria infection on Firefly.png|center|thumb|396x396px|Larva of a firefly contaminated by the fungus &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039;. The fungus fructifies on the surface of the insect, producing elongated, cylindrical ascocarps ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compatibility with chemical products and biocontrol strategies ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is an important component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. It is generally considered compatible with many beneficial biological control agents used in greenhouses, such as the parasitoid &#039;&#039;Encarsia formosa&#039;&#039; and various predatory mites and insects like &#039;&#039;Delphastus&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Dicyphus&#039;&#039;. Using &#039;&#039;Isaria&#039;&#039; helps preserve these natural enemies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mixing Isaria with certain chemical insecticides can be highly effective. This combined approach often shows a synergistic effect, meaning the combined result is better than using either product alone. For example, mixing the fungus with Thiamethoxam or Imidacloprid can boost the immediate control rate against whiteflies. Similarly, testing showed that mixing Isaria with the insect growth regulator Buprofezin produced excellent results against invasive whiteflies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, care is needed when mixing with fungicides. While some fungicides (like Carbendazim and Ridomil Gold) are compatible with Isaria at normal rates, others, such as certain copper-based products or high concentrations of products like Bellis, can inhibit the growth of the fungus and should be avoided in tank mixes. Always check the compatibility information before tank mixing. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Khan, F. Z., Khan, A., Saravanakumar, D., &amp;amp; Thomas, A. (2024). &#039;&#039;In vitro&#039;&#039; compatibility of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; from &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; with four commonly used fungicides in vegetable production. &#039;&#039;Journal of Advanced Studies in Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;(1), 1–11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avery, P. B., Pick, D. A., Aristizábal, L. F., Kerrigan, J., Powell, C. A., Rogers, M. E., &amp;amp; Arthurs, S. P. (2013). Compatibility of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) Blastospores with Agricultural Chemicals Used for Management of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, &#039;&#039;Diaphorina citri&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Liviidae). &#039;&#039;Insects&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;(4), 694–711. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/insects4040694&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. [73, 76–84, 87]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some considerations ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Effects on Beneficial Arthropods and Pollinators ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is generally compatible with many natural enemies, including parasitoids and predators, making it suitable for IPM programs. However, there is a moderate caution for bees due to potential contact exposure. Because available data are limited, growers should apply basic mitigation measures&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). (2014). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; strain Apopka 97. &#039;&#039;EFSA Journal&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;12&#039;&#039;(5), 3679. [63–67, 122–125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid spraying during flowering. &lt;br /&gt;
* Apply in the evening or at night in pollinator-dependent crops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These practices help minimize risk when regulatory information for pollinators is incomplete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Safety for Vertebrates and Mammals ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regulatory evaluations indicate a low risk for mammals and birds. No unusual toxic or pathogenic characteristics have been observed. In greenhouse uses, additional toxicity data are often waived due to minimal exposure. Overall, &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is considered safe for wildlife.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aquatic Environment and Persistence ===&lt;br /&gt;
The fungus can persist in soil and water, similar to other entomopathogenic fungi, but it is not considered a hazard to aquatic organisms. One key characteristic is its heat sensitivity: temperatures above 25 °C sharply reduce viability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has two implications: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It lowers the risk of residues in harvested food (since processing temperatures inactivate it).&lt;br /&gt;
* ·Growers must maintain cool, stable storage conditions to preserve product effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Human Health and Worker Exposure ===&lt;br /&gt;
The main human-health concern is not toxicity, but the risk of sensitization or allergy from repeated exposure to spores. Therefore, applicators must use full PPE, including protective clothing, gloves, eye protection, and—critically—a NIOSH-approved respirator for particulates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although biologicals reduce chemical exposure, proper respiratory protection remains essential to avoid inhalation of spores during handling and application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Secondary Metabolites (Mycotoxins) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Like other fungi, &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; produces secondary metabolites, some potentially toxic. Current evidence suggests a very low likelihood of these compounds entering the food chain. Its heat sensitivity further reduces residue risk. Still, this is an area where ongoing research is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Effects on Soil Microorganisms and Biocontrol Agents ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spores can enter the soil through drift or infected cadavers, but no negative environmental or human-health impacts from soil entomopathogenic fungi have been reported.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interactions with other biocontrol agents, especially entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), can be significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Simultaneous application of &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and EPNs can improve pest control.&lt;br /&gt;
* Applying nematodes more than 24 hours later may reduce nematode performance due to inhibitory bacterial metabolites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, timing is critical when combining both tools in integrated control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key Operational Limitations for Growers ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Slow speed of action:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fungus takes 2–5 days to kill pests. Under high pest pressure, it may appear less effective than chemicals. This means growers should use it preventively rather than as a crisis treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Storage and stability:&#039;&#039;&#039; Viability drops quickly above 25 °C, making proper storage essential. Poor temperature management leads directly to control failure.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tank-mix compatibility and crop interactions:&#039;&#039;&#039; While compatible with many products, it should not be mixed with botanical oils, borax, or some copper fungicides, which can inhibit fungal growth.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In some crops,&#039;&#039;&#039; natural plant chemicals may also reduce efficacy, so small preliminary tests are recommended before full adoption in new crop–pest systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is a powerful tool for pest control, particularly against whiteflies, offering a sustainable alternative that is safe for workers, preserves beneficial insects, and avoids the serious problem of insecticide resistance. While it relies heavily on favorable environmental conditions (high humidity, moderate temperature, and low UV exposure), these requirements can be managed through careful application timing (evening sprays) and compatible formulations. Combining Isaria with chemical partners, especially IGRs or certain insecticides (like Imidacloprid or Thiamethoxam), can achieve faster and more robust control results than the fungus used alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Embrace combined strategies:&#039;&#039;&#039; Do not rely solely on the fungus for rapid control. Incorporate Isaria alongside beneficial insects and consider tank-mixing with compatible chemicals (especially IGRs) to manage infestations effectively and quickly. This approach reduces the overall chemical load and environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing is everything:&#039;&#039;&#039; Recognize that this product is highly biological. Treat it like a living organism. Maximize efficacy by ensuring the microclimate immediately following application is favorable (high humidity, protection from sun).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Future - proof your farm:&#039;&#039;&#039; Because whiteflies cannot easily develop resistance to Isaria, incorporating it into your routine pest control schedule is a long-term strategy that helps protect the few effective chemical tools you still have access to.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor compatibility:&#039;&#039;&#039; If you need to use fungicides, always check the compatibility data or contact a specialist. Products like Carbendazim and Ridomil Gold appear safe to use, but others like certain high-concentration copper-based products or Bellis should be avoided or applied separately by several days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Utiliser Isaria fumosorosea pour contrôler les insectes, en particulier les aleurodes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10611</id>
		<title>Flavescence dorée</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10611"/>
		<updated>2025-12-16T08:53:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Winegrowing&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Diseases&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
This article provides an overview of Flavescence dorée (FD), a quarantine disease of grapevine: how it spreads, how to recognize it, and which collective measures help to limit its propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== An incurable phytoplasma disease ==&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée is recognized as one of the most severe and damaging diseases affecting European vineyards. Classified as a quarantine organism under European regulations (Directive 2000/29/EC, A2 list), it is caused by the phytoplasma &#039;&#039;Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis&#039;&#039; and transmitted by &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;, the Flavescence dorée leafhopper &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Winetwork. (2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Guide des bonnes pratiques de gestion de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. https://www.vignevin-occitanie.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Winetwork-projet-Guide-des-bonnes-pratiques-de-gestion-de-la-FD.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This phytoplasma is a wall-less bacterium that lives and multiplies exclusively within the phloem of grapevine. By disrupting the transport of assimilates, it blocks the plant’s metabolic exchanges and leads to progressive decline, often resulting in the complete death of the vine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First reported in the 1950s in the Armagnac region of southwestern France, Flavescence dorée is now present in at least 18 European countries, including France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EFSA Panel on Plant Health.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Risk to plant health of Flavescence dorée for the EU territory&#039;&#039;. EFSA Journal, 14(12), Article e04603. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4603&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EPPO. (2022).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma – Datasheet&#039;&#039;. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PHYP64&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repartition map.png|center|frame|Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in Europe &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;IFV – Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. (2014).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;État des lieux de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Techniloire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://techniloire.com/sites/default/files/etat_des_lieux_de_la_flavescence_doree.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Situation in France ==&lt;br /&gt;
In France, the situation of Flavescence dorée varies greatly between wine-growing regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Endemic areas:&#039;&#039;&#039; Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie and Savoie are persistently affected, with long-standing and recurrent outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Partial presence:&#039;&#039;&#039; Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur (PACA), Corsica, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes and Bourgogne-Franche-Comté show localized outbreaks that emerged in the 2000s.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Recent outbreaks:&#039;&#039;&#039; Champagne and the Loire Valley have experienced a more recent spread of the disease, while isolated cases have been reported in Alsace, where the vector &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is still absent &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date, Lorraine remains the only major French wine-growing region with no confirmed detections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From one season to the next, monitoring reveals a wave-like dynamic, with new outbreaks appearing at the edges of already contaminated zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Loire Valley, the contaminated surface increased from 56 to 78 plots between 2022 and 2023, despite the uprooting of infected vines and the implementation of a coordinated action plan managed by the Plant Health Organizations (OVS – FREDON, Polleniz) and regional wine federations &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:France map e.png|center|frame|Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in France &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Dubois, A. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. GDON de Gironde, YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main vector: &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
The primary agent responsible for the epidemic transmission of Flavescence dorée from vine to vine is the Flavescence dorée leafhopper (&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;). This insect, native to North America, was accidentally introduced into Europe, most likely through the importation of American rootstocks in the early 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is a univoltine species (one generation per year) and, in Europe, is strictly associated with grapevine (&#039;&#039;Vitis vinifera&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Life cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
In France, &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; completes its full life cycle between April and the first autumn frosts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; laid at the end of summer in old wood (cane internodes). They overwinter in this stage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hatching:&#039;&#039;&#039; from mid-April to early May, depending on temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Larvae (L1 to L5):&#039;&#039;&#039; five larval stages follow one another from May to June. Larvae cannot fly but are highly active on the foliage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Adults:&#039;&#039;&#039; appear from late June to July; they are capable of flight, enabling broader dispersion within the vineyard and towards neighbouring outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;End of cycle:&#039;&#039;&#039; adults survive until the first frosts (late September–early October) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cycle de vie en.png|center|frame|Life cycle of the Flavescence dorée leafhopper on its host plant &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chuche, J., &amp;amp; Mazzetto, F. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus up-to-the-minute: Biology, ecology, and role as a vector&#039;&#039;. Entomologia Generalis, 44(3). &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2023/2597&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Acquisition and transmission of the phytoplasma ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contamination follows a strict sequence:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquisition:&#039;&#039;&#039; A healthy leafhopper becomes infected when feeding on an infected vine (stylet probing and ingestion from the phloem sap).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Latent period (10 to 45 days depending on temperature):&#039;&#039;&#039; During this phase, the phytoplasma circulates through the haemolymph and then colonizes the salivary glands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Infectious insect:&#039;&#039;&#039; Once the salivary glands are colonized, the leafhopper remains infectious for life. It transmits the phytoplasma to every healthy plant on which it feeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No transmission to eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; There is no transovarial transmission. Larvae hatching in spring are always healthy, even when originating from an infected female &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recognition: Key symptoms and possible confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
Symptoms of Flavescence dorée are generally not visible during the year of infection (N) but appear the following year (N+1), or even several years later. They are most noticeable at the &#039;&#039;&#039;end of summer&#039;&#039;&#039; (late July–August).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To suspect a phytoplasma disease, growers should look for three characteristic symptoms on the same shoot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. On leaves: ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Discoloration:&#039;&#039;&#039; Yellowing occurs on white cultivars and reddening on red cultivars. The discoloration may be complete or partial, and sometimes follows the veins.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Deformation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaves roll downward, become abnormally rigid, and feel brittle when touched.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 1.png|center|frame|Leaf reddening on red cultivars, yellowing on white cultivars, and downward leaf rolling]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. On shoots ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of lignification:&#039;&#039;&#039; Shoots show poor lignification (“non-ripening”). They remain green, soft and flexible (rubbery), instead of hardening and snapping like normally ripened canes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. On clusters ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Desiccation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Inflorescences and berries wilt and then dry out partially or completely. This can result in yield losses of up to 100%.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 2 e.png|center|frame|Poor shoot lignification (“non-ripening”) and wilting/drying of grape clusters]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because these symptoms can be confused with those caused by Bois Noir (BN), confirmation of the diagnosis relies on PCR analysis performed by an accredited laboratory, which is the only method capable of identifying &#039;&#039;‘Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis’&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Laboratoires officiels et reconnus en santé des végétaux&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
== Mandatory collective control: The three pillars ==&lt;br /&gt;
In France, control of Flavescence dorée is permanently mandatory across the entire national vineyard as soon as the disease is detected. The strategy is based on three coordinated components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ensuring the health of planting material ===&lt;br /&gt;
Using certified planting material, controlled by FranceAgriMer and the Official Certification Service (SOC), is the first barrier against Flavescence dorée. This plant material is traceable, inspected, and guaranteed free of infection before planting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Importing plant material from other EU countries is permitted, provided it carries a phytosanitary passport compliant with Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further reduce the risk of introducing the phytoplasma, nurseries apply Hot Water Treatment (HWT), which consists of immersing planting material at 50 °C for 45 minutes. Mandatory in certain regulated zones, this treatment significantly reduces the risk of transmitting the phytoplasma through planting stock &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TEC eng.jpg|center|frame|Hot Water Treatment  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Vitisphere. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Traitement à l’eau chaude des bois et plants de vigne : une organisation bien huilée chez les pépinières Viaud&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.vitisphere.com/actualite-101189-traitement-a-leau-chaude-des-bois-et-plants-de-vigne-une-organisation-bien-huilee-chez-les-pepinieres-viaud.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vector control (insecticide-based measures) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Control of &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is mandatory within regulated areas, previously called &#039;&#039;Périmètres de Lutte Obligatoire&#039;&#039;(PLO) and now generally referred to as &#039;&#039;Zones Délimitées&#039;&#039; (ZD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Conventional strategy ====&lt;br /&gt;
Regulations typically require three insecticide treatments, with application dates determined each year by the regional plant health authorities (DRAAF/SRAL) according to the sanitary risk &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée – Informations officielles.&#039;&#039; Ministère de l’Agriculture. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first treatment (T1) must be applied roughly one month after the first egg hatch, targeting the young larval stages (ideally L2–L3) before they become infectious.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cid1 eng.png|center|frame|Larvae are identified by two symmetrical black dots located dorso-laterally at the posterior end of the abdomen]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The second treatment (T2) is applied at the end of the residual activity of the first one (around 10 days after T1).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The third treatment (T3) targets adults, if required.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cic 2 e.png|center|frame|Adult &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, the active substances authorised in France belong mainly to the pyrethroid family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These insecticides act by contact and aim to eliminate young larvae before they become infectious. Their performance is highly dependent on the timing of application (more effective in the evening) and on spray quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Biological strategy ====&lt;br /&gt;
The only plant protection products authorised against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; are natural pyrethrin and paraffinic oils, which are primarily effective on the earliest larval stages (L1–L2) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Modalités de lutte contre la cicadelle de la Flavescence dorée de la vigne – Campagne 2025.&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté Alimentaire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (conventionnels).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (biologiques).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Associated prophylactic measures ====&lt;br /&gt;
Early shoot removal (&#039;&#039;épamprage&#039;&#039;) must be carried out before T1, as basal shoots provide refuge zones for larvae that are poorly covered by insecticide sprays  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Role of GDONs ====&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;Groupements de Défense contre les Organismes Nuisibles&#039;&#039; (GDONs) play a key role in organising this collective control strategy. Through larval counts and adult trapping, GDONs can authorise exemptions from T1 and/or T2 treatments, providing important economic and environmental benefits &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON des Bordeaux. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Missions du GDON des Bordeaux : organisation de la surveillance et de la lutte contre la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.gdon-bordeaux.fr/le-gdon/missions/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monitoring and eradication (vine removal) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Once infected, a vine remains diseased and contagious. There is no method to cure an infected plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Detection and destruction:&#039;&#039;&#039; Any vine confirmed as infected must be uprooted or destroyed, including the rootstock. The operation must be completed no later than 31 March following detection, before the vegetative restart and before larval emergence.&lt;br /&gt;
** If the infection rate of a plot exceeds a threshold (often set at 20% of affected vines), complete uprooting of the entire vineyard block is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rootstocks and regrowth:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rootstocks may act as symptomless carriers (infected but expressing few or no symptoms). Removal must therefore be thorough to eliminate all regrowth that could remain a reservoir for phytoplasmas.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wild vines:&#039;&#039;&#039; Abandoned or wild vines located within the regulated area must be removed, as they serve as refuges for the leafhopper and potential reservoirs of the phytoplasma &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic consequences and challenges ==&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée generates significant costs due to mandatory insecticide treatments, vine removal, and replanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Direct economic impact:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A simulation based on data from the Occitanie region shows that, in the absence of control measures, a contaminated vineyard block may require complete uprooting within three years. This leads to substantial yield losses and high replanting and maintenance costs, severely compromising the long-term viability of the vineyard &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CRAO – Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Occitanie. (2020).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Tout savoir sur la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://occitanie.chambres-agriculture.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/265_chambre_dagriculture_-_occitanie/Interface/Doc/Publications/ToutSavoirSurLaFD-CRAO2020.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion and perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée remains a major threat to grapevine, and its control still relies on an essential foundation: certified planting material, coordinated monitoring, removal of infected vines, and mandatory insecticide treatments against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;. These measures are effective, but their repeated use raises concerns regarding ecological and economic sustainability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research efforts primarily aim to reduce dependence on insecticides. Mineral products such as kaolin show a disruptive effect on young larvae, but their efficacy remains variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Favre, A., Mittaz, C., &amp;amp; Kehrli, P. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Controlling Scaphoideus titanus with kaolin: Summary of four years of field trials in Switzerland (Open Access).&#039;&#039; Agroscope. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371304680_Controlling_Scaphoideus_titanus_with_kaolin_Summary_of_four_years_of_field_trials_in_Switzerland_OPEN_ACCESS&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Behaviour-based approaches, including vibrational or chemical signalling disruption, also offer promising avenues, although they are still at an experimental stage. In the long term, these strategies could strengthen integrated protection by improving the precision of interventions &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Genetic tolerance is another exploratory avenue: some cultivars appear less sensitive, but graft–rootstock interactions and the risk of asymptomatic reservoirs currently limit practical application. Marker-assisted selection could accelerate progress, but this approach remains a long-term perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the short and medium term, the most realistic advances concern the optimisation of sanitary decision-making: earlier detection of outbreaks, better-targeted interventions, and a reasoned use of physical and biological alternatives. Behaviour-based and genetic innovations will complement—rather than replace—the current core measures of disease management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful links ==&lt;br /&gt;
To explore further, here is a selection of reliable and up-to-date resources on Flavescence dorée and its management in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;A – Understanding the disease and collective control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Full webinar on the current status of Flavescence dorée in France / GDON example in Gironde – Antoine (Min 12:48–25:05)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;amp;t=376s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;B – Diagnostic: accredited laboratories&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated list of laboratories accredited for phytoplasma detection (French Ministry of Agriculture)                                                                                                              &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;C – Insecticides and authorised products&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2025 list of authorised products (DRAAF PACA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – conventional products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Q2ljYWRlbGxlcyZtb2RlPSZmJTVCMCU1RD1saXN0X3R5cGVfdXNhZ2UlM0EyMDEwMDQwMTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMQ%3D%3D&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – organic products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Jm1vZGU9JmYlNUIwJTVEPWxpc3RfdHlwZV91c2FnZSUzQTIwMTAwNDAxMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAx&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimated pesticide prices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.coutdesfournitures.fr/sites/default/files/page_39_0.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;D – Regulations and official documents&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DRAAF PACA – Official information on Flavescence dorée&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Flavescence dorée]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10610</id>
		<title>Flavescence dorée</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10610"/>
		<updated>2025-12-16T08:10:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Winegrowing&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Diseases&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
This article provides an overview of Flavescence dorée (FD), a quarantine disease of grapevine: how it spreads, how to recognize it, and which collective measures help to limit its propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== An incurable phytoplasma disease ==&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée is recognized as one of the most severe and damaging diseases affecting European vineyards. Classified as a quarantine organism under European regulations (Directive 2000/29/EC, A2 list), it is caused by the phytoplasma &#039;&#039;Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis&#039;&#039; and transmitted by &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;, the Flavescence dorée leafhopper &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Winetwork. (2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Guide des bonnes pratiques de gestion de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. https://www.vignevin-occitanie.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Winetwork-projet-Guide-des-bonnes-pratiques-de-gestion-de-la-FD.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This phytoplasma is a wall-less bacterium that lives and multiplies exclusively within the phloem of grapevine. By disrupting the transport of assimilates, it blocks the plant’s metabolic exchanges and leads to progressive decline, often resulting in the complete death of the vine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First reported in the 1950s in the Armagnac region of southwestern France, Flavescence dorée is now present in at least 18 European countries, including France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EFSA Panel on Plant Health.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Risk to plant health of Flavescence dorée for the EU territory&#039;&#039;. EFSA Journal, 14(12), Article e04603. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4603&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EPPO. (2022).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma – Datasheet&#039;&#039;. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PHYP64&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repartition map.png|center|frameless|865x865px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in Europe &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;IFV – Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. (2014).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;État des lieux de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Techniloire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://techniloire.com/sites/default/files/etat_des_lieux_de_la_flavescence_doree.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Situation in France ==&lt;br /&gt;
In France, the situation of Flavescence dorée varies greatly between wine-growing regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Endemic areas:&#039;&#039;&#039; Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie and Savoie are persistently affected, with long-standing and recurrent outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Partial presence:&#039;&#039;&#039; Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur (PACA), Corsica, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes and Bourgogne-Franche-Comté show localized outbreaks that emerged in the 2000s.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Recent outbreaks:&#039;&#039;&#039; Champagne and the Loire Valley have experienced a more recent spread of the disease, while isolated cases have been reported in Alsace, where the vector &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is still absent &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date, Lorraine remains the only major French wine-growing region with no confirmed detections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From one season to the next, monitoring reveals a wave-like dynamic, with new outbreaks appearing at the edges of already contaminated zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Loire Valley, the contaminated surface increased from 56 to 78 plots between 2022 and 2023, despite the uprooting of infected vines and the implementation of a coordinated action plan managed by the Plant Health Organizations (OVS – FREDON, Polleniz) and regional wine federations &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:France map e.png|center|frameless|650x650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in France &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Dubois, A. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. GDON de Gironde, YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main vector: &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; ==&lt;br /&gt;
The primary agent responsible for the epidemic transmission of Flavescence dorée from vine to vine is the Flavescence dorée leafhopper (&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;). This insect, native to North America, was accidentally introduced into Europe, most likely through the importation of American rootstocks in the early 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is a univoltine species (one generation per year) and, in Europe, is strictly associated with grapevine (&#039;&#039;Vitis vinifera&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Life cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
In France, &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; completes its full life cycle between April and the first autumn frosts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; laid at the end of summer in old wood (cane internodes). They overwinter in this stage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hatching:&#039;&#039;&#039; from mid-April to early May, depending on temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Larvae (L1 to L5):&#039;&#039;&#039; five larval stages follow one another from May to June. Larvae cannot fly but are highly active on the foliage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Adults:&#039;&#039;&#039; appear from late June to July; they are capable of flight, enabling broader dispersion within the vineyard and towards neighbouring outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;End of cycle:&#039;&#039;&#039; adults survive until the first frosts (late September–early October) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cycle de vie en.png|center|frameless|550x550px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Life cycle of the Flavescence dorée leafhopper on its host plant &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chuche, J., &amp;amp; Mazzetto, F. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus up-to-the-minute: Biology, ecology, and role as a vector&#039;&#039;. Entomologia Generalis, 44(3). &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2023/2597&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Acquisition and transmission of the phytoplasma ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contamination follows a strict sequence:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquisition:&#039;&#039;&#039; A healthy leafhopper becomes infected when feeding on an infected vine (stylet probing and ingestion from the phloem sap).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Latent period (10 to 45 days depending on temperature):&#039;&#039;&#039; During this phase, the phytoplasma circulates through the haemolymph and then colonizes the salivary glands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Infectious insect:&#039;&#039;&#039; Once the salivary glands are colonized, the leafhopper remains infectious for life. It transmits the phytoplasma to every healthy plant on which it feeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No transmission to eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; There is no transovarial transmission. Larvae hatching in spring are always healthy, even when originating from an infected female &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recognition: Key symptoms and possible confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
Symptoms of Flavescence dorée are generally not visible during the year of infection (N) but appear the following year (N+1), or even several years later. They are most noticeable at the &#039;&#039;&#039;end of summer&#039;&#039;&#039; (late July–August).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To suspect a phytoplasma disease, growers should look for three characteristic symptoms on the same shoot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. On leaves: ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Discoloration:&#039;&#039;&#039; Yellowing occurs on white cultivars and reddening on red cultivars. The discoloration may be complete or partial, and sometimes follows the veins.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Deformation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaves roll downward, become abnormally rigid, and feel brittle when touched.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 1.png|center|frameless|950x950px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 4:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaf reddening on red cultivars, yellowing on white cultivars, and downward leaf rolling&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. On shoots ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of lignification:&#039;&#039;&#039; Shoots show poor lignification (“non-ripening”). They remain green, soft and flexible (rubbery), instead of hardening and snapping like normally ripened canes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. On clusters ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Desiccation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Inflorescences and berries wilt and then dry out partially or completely. This can result in yield losses of up to 100%.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 2 e.png|center|frameless|970x970px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poor shoot lignification (“non-ripening”) and wilting/drying of grape clusters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because these symptoms can be confused with those caused by Bois Noir (BN), confirmation of the diagnosis relies on PCR analysis performed by an accredited laboratory, which is the only method capable of identifying &#039;&#039;‘Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis’&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Laboratoires officiels et reconnus en santé des végétaux&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mandatory collective control: The three pillars ==&lt;br /&gt;
In France, control of Flavescence dorée is permanently mandatory across the entire national vineyard as soon as the disease is detected. The strategy is based on three coordinated components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ensuring the health of planting material ===&lt;br /&gt;
Using certified planting material, controlled by FranceAgriMer and the Official Certification Service (SOC), is the first barrier against Flavescence dorée. This plant material is traceable, inspected, and guaranteed free of infection before planting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Importing plant material from other EU countries is permitted, provided it carries a phytosanitary passport compliant with Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further reduce the risk of introducing the phytoplasma, nurseries apply Hot Water Treatment (HWT), which consists of immersing planting material at 50 °C for 45 minutes. Mandatory in certain regulated zones, this treatment significantly reduces the risk of transmitting the phytoplasma through planting stock &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TEC eng.jpg|center|frameless|450x450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Hot Water Treatment  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Vitisphere. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Traitement à l’eau chaude des bois et plants de vigne : une organisation bien huilée chez les pépinières Viaud&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.vitisphere.com/actualite-101189-traitement-a-leau-chaude-des-bois-et-plants-de-vigne-une-organisation-bien-huilee-chez-les-pepinieres-viaud.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vector control (insecticide-based measures) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Control of &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is mandatory within regulated areas, previously called &#039;&#039;Périmètres de Lutte Obligatoire&#039;&#039;(PLO) and now generally referred to as &#039;&#039;Zones Délimitées&#039;&#039; (ZD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Conventional strategy ====&lt;br /&gt;
Regulations typically require three insecticide treatments, with application dates determined each year by the regional plant health authorities (DRAAF/SRAL) according to the sanitary risk &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée – Informations officielles.&#039;&#039; Ministère de l’Agriculture. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first treatment (T1) must be applied roughly one month after the first egg hatch, targeting the young larval stages (ideally L2–L3) before they become infectious.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cid1 eng.png|center|frameless|693x693px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 7:&#039;&#039;&#039; Larvae are identified by two symmetrical black dots located dorso-laterally at the posterior end of the abdomen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The second treatment (T2) is applied at the end of the residual activity of the first one (around 10 days after T1).&lt;br /&gt;
* The third treatment (T3) targets adults, if required.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cic 2 e.png|center|frameless|753x753px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Adult &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, the active substances authorised in France belong mainly to the pyrethroid family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These insecticides act by contact and aim to eliminate young larvae before they become infectious. Their performance is highly dependent on the timing of application (more effective in the evening) and on spray quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Biological strategy ====&lt;br /&gt;
The only plant protection products authorised against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; are natural pyrethrin and paraffinic oils, which are primarily effective on the earliest larval stages (L1–L2) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Modalités de lutte contre la cicadelle de la Flavescence dorée de la vigne – Campagne 2025.&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté Alimentaire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (conventionnels).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (biologiques).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Associated prophylactic measures ====&lt;br /&gt;
Early shoot removal (&#039;&#039;épamprage&#039;&#039;) must be carried out before T1, as basal shoots provide refuge zones for larvae that are poorly covered by insecticide sprays  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Role of GDONs ====&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;Groupements de Défense contre les Organismes Nuisibles&#039;&#039; (GDONs) play a key role in organising this collective control strategy. Through larval counts and adult trapping, GDONs can authorise exemptions from T1 and/or T2 treatments, providing important economic and environmental benefits &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON des Bordeaux. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Missions du GDON des Bordeaux : organisation de la surveillance et de la lutte contre la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.gdon-bordeaux.fr/le-gdon/missions/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Monitoring and eradication (vine removal) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Once infected, a vine remains diseased and contagious. There is no method to cure an infected plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Detection and destruction:&#039;&#039;&#039; Any vine confirmed as infected must be uprooted or destroyed, including the rootstock. The operation must be completed no later than 31 March following detection, before the vegetative restart and before larval emergence.&lt;br /&gt;
** If the infection rate of a plot exceeds a threshold (often set at 20% of affected vines), complete uprooting of the entire vineyard block is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rootstocks and regrowth:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rootstocks may act as symptomless carriers (infected but expressing few or no symptoms). Removal must therefore be thorough to eliminate all regrowth that could remain a reservoir for phytoplasmas.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wild vines:&#039;&#039;&#039; Abandoned or wild vines located within the regulated area must be removed, as they serve as refuges for the leafhopper and potential reservoirs of the phytoplasma &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic consequences and challenges ==&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée generates significant costs due to mandatory insecticide treatments, vine removal, and replanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Direct economic impact:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A simulation based on data from the Occitanie region shows that, in the absence of control measures, a contaminated vineyard block may require complete uprooting within three years. This leads to substantial yield losses and high replanting and maintenance costs, severely compromising the long-term viability of the vineyard &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CRAO – Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Occitanie. (2020).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Tout savoir sur la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://occitanie.chambres-agriculture.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/265_chambre_dagriculture_-_occitanie/Interface/Doc/Publications/ToutSavoirSurLaFD-CRAO2020.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion and perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée remains a major threat to grapevine, and its control still relies on an essential foundation: certified planting material, coordinated monitoring, removal of infected vines, and mandatory insecticide treatments against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;. These measures are effective, but their repeated use raises concerns regarding ecological and economic sustainability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research efforts primarily aim to reduce dependence on insecticides. Mineral products such as kaolin show a disruptive effect on young larvae, but their efficacy remains variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Favre, A., Mittaz, C., &amp;amp; Kehrli, P. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Controlling Scaphoideus titanus with kaolin: Summary of four years of field trials in Switzerland (Open Access).&#039;&#039; Agroscope. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371304680_Controlling_Scaphoideus_titanus_with_kaolin_Summary_of_four_years_of_field_trials_in_Switzerland_OPEN_ACCESS&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Behaviour-based approaches, including vibrational or chemical signalling disruption, also offer promising avenues, although they are still at an experimental stage. In the long term, these strategies could strengthen integrated protection by improving the precision of interventions &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Genetic tolerance is another exploratory avenue: some cultivars appear less sensitive, but graft–rootstock interactions and the risk of asymptomatic reservoirs currently limit practical application. Marker-assisted selection could accelerate progress, but this approach remains a long-term perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the short and medium term, the most realistic advances concern the optimisation of sanitary decision-making: earlier detection of outbreaks, better-targeted interventions, and a reasoned use of physical and biological alternatives. Behaviour-based and genetic innovations will complement—rather than replace—the current core measures of disease management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful links ==&lt;br /&gt;
To explore further, here is a selection of reliable and up-to-date resources on Flavescence dorée and its management in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;A – Understanding the disease and collective control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Full webinar on the current status of Flavescence dorée in France / GDON example in Gironde – Antoine (Min 12:48–25:05)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;amp;t=376s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;B – Diagnostic: accredited laboratories&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated list of laboratories accredited for phytoplasma detection (French Ministry of Agriculture)                                                                                                              &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;C – Insecticides and authorised products&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2025 list of authorised products (DRAAF PACA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – conventional products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Q2ljYWRlbGxlcyZtb2RlPSZmJTVCMCU1RD1saXN0X3R5cGVfdXNhZ2UlM0EyMDEwMDQwMTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMQ%3D%3D&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – organic products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Jm1vZGU9JmYlNUIwJTVEPWxpc3RfdHlwZV91c2FnZSUzQTIwMTAwNDAxMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAx&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimated pesticide prices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.coutdesfournitures.fr/sites/default/files/page_39_0.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;D – Regulations and official documents&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DRAAF PACA – Official information on Flavescence dorée&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Flavescence dorée]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Neemastra&amp;diff=10609</id>
		<title>Neemastra</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Neemastra&amp;diff=10609"/>
		<updated>2025-12-16T07:58:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Neemastra preparation.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra is a &#039;&#039;&#039;traditional fermented botanical biopesticide&#039;&#039;&#039; originally developed in India under the &#039;&#039;&#039;Zero Budget Natural Farming&#039;&#039;&#039; (ZBNF) approach. It is made using neem leaves (Azadirachta indica), cow dung, cow urine, and water - all natural farm derived materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra works as an eco-friendly &#039;&#039;&#039;insecticide&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;repellent&#039;&#039;&#039;, and &#039;&#039;&#039;growth inhibitor&#039;&#039;&#039;, mainly against &#039;&#039;&#039;sucking pests&#039;&#039;&#039; (aphids, mealybugs, whiteflies), &#039;&#039;&#039;leaf-eating caterpillars&#039;&#039;&#039;, and certain &#039;&#039;&#039;fungal pathogens&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It offers farmers a low-cost, low-impact, and locally adaptable alternative to synthetic pesticides, fitting well within integrated pest management (IPM) or organic farming strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Composition and active principles&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Rameez, S.P., &amp;amp; Ray, S. (2023). Neemastra: Green Solution Controlling Pest. &#039;&#039;Just Agriculture&#039;&#039; , &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; (2), 228-231&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Subha B, RS Marabi, SB Das, Kailash Chaukikar and Vikas Gupta. Bio-efficacy of biodynamics and botanicals against major insect pests of summer green gram and their impact on natural enemies. Int. J.Adv. Biochem. Res. 2025;9(9):263-266. DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9d.5584&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Surpura, R.M., Rathore, A.P., Patel, S.K., Jangir, S., Goswami, D., Rawal, R., &amp;amp; Pandya, H.A. (2025). Harnessing microbial properties of natural farming components for soil and crop health improvement: A review. &#039;&#039;Agricultural Reviews&#039;&#039; , 1-15&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hashim, M., Kumar, N., Deo, MM, &amp;amp; Singh, D. Pulse production system under natural farming-issues and management practices&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Typical ingredients (traditional Indian recipe) for 1 ha:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* 5 kg neem leaves (rich in azadirachtin and other limonoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* 2 kg fresh cow dung (microbial inoculant and nutrient source)&lt;br /&gt;
* 5 litres cow urine (contains nitrogen and enzymes aiding fermentation)&lt;br /&gt;
* Water (to make up 100 litres total)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active molecules are primarily limonoids (especially azadirachtin, salannin, and nimbin), which:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* disrupt insect growth and molting,&lt;br /&gt;
* inhibit feeding and egg-laying,&lt;br /&gt;
* and repel the insects&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cow dung and urine act as fermentation catalysts, producing microbial metabolites that enhance bioactivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &#039;&#039;&#039;Preparation and Formulation&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Megha Chandraker, Gajendra Chandrakar, Bheesham Kumar and Rupendra Patel. Bio-efficacy of plant-based materials against major insect pest under organic rice cultivation system. Int. J.Adv. Biochem. Res. 2025;9(9):488-494. DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9g.5679&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Traditional Method (India):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
#  Crush neem leaves or small branches.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Mix with cow dung and cow urine in a clean barrel.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Add water (to 100 L total volume) and cover it.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Stir once daily for 24-48 hours (fermentation).&lt;br /&gt;
#  Filter before spraying.&lt;br /&gt;
# Froath is found on the fermented solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fermented liquid is usually diluted 1:10 (10%) before application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This is for warm, humid, subtropical field conditions where fermentation occurs rapidly.(mostly Indian climate)&lt;br /&gt;
* In temperate climate, fermentation may take longer (2–4 days at 20 °C) and should ideally be kept in a warm shed or greenhouse during preparation.(France climate)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crops and Pests Targeted&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pobożniak, M., &amp;amp; Olczyk, M. (2025). Biocontrol in Integrated Pest Management in Fruit and Vegetable Field Production. &#039;&#039;Horticulturae&#039;&#039; , &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039; (5), 522.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Danga, SPY, Nukenine, EN, Fotso, GT, &amp;amp; Adler, C. (2015). Use of NeemPro®, a neem product to control maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on three maize varieties in Cameroon. &#039;&#039;Agriculture &amp;amp; Food Security&#039;&#039; , &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039; (1), 18.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Prakash, S. (2011). Use of Neem products for biological control of pest population. &#039;&#039;INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, IT, ENGINEERING AND SOCIAL SCIENCES ISSN: 2349-7793 Impact Factor: 6.876&#039;&#039; , &#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039; (1), 37-45.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra can be used against most of the lepidopteran larvaes and sucking pests like aphids, jassids, mealy bugs, thrips, whiteflies and it can be applied on a wide range of fruits and vegetables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modes of Action&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Research Council (US) Panel on Neem. Neem: A Tree For Solving Global Problems. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1992. 5, Effects on Insects&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Feeding deterrent&#039;&#039;&#039; - insects avoid feeding on treated leaves.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Growth regulator&#039;&#039;&#039; - interferes with molting and development.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Reproduction blocker&#039;&#039;&#039; - inhibits egg laying and fertility.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Repellent&#039;&#039;&#039;- drives pests away from treated zones.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Mild antifungal / antibacterial&#039;&#039;&#039; - reduces fungal spore germination (not its primary use).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unlike synthetic pesticides, Neemastra works gradually, aiming to reduce pest pressure rather than kill instantly. This favors ecological balance and preserves beneficial insects. &#039;&#039;&#039;It acts like a prevention step&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recommended Use and Application&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caboni P, Sarais G, Angioni A, Garcia AJ, Lai F, Dedola F, Cabras P. Residues and persistence of neem formulations on strawberry after field treatment. J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Dec 27;54(26):10026-32. doi:10.1021/jf062461v. PMID: 17177537&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
# Application method: foliar spray (hand sprayer or mist blower).&lt;br /&gt;
# Dilution: typically 1:10 (10 L Neemastra in 100 L water).&lt;br /&gt;
# Timing: early morning or late afternoon, avoiding direct sun and rain.&lt;br /&gt;
# Frequency: every 7-10 days during pest outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Storage: up to 15 days in a cool, shaded place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With lower average temperatures and humidity, Neemastra residues persist slightly longer on foliage - meaning lower frequency of spraying may be sufficient compared to tropical climates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Timing Matters ==&lt;br /&gt;
As the solution is low persistent, because of photodegradation and microbial breakdown, residual activity may be short. It means timing of spray is important (morning/late afternoon, little direct sun) and frequency may need adjustment for climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For instance, in a study azadirachtin on strawberries showed rapid degradation under sunlight. So, timing really matters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Safety and Environmental Aspects&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Raizada RB, Srivastava MK, Kaushal RA, Singh RP. Azadirachtin, a neem biopesticide: subchronic toxicity assessment in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001 May;39(5):477-83. doi: 10.1016/s0278-6915(00)00153-8. PMID: 11313114&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Biodegradable and non-toxic to mammals and birds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Low toxicity to pollinators and beneficial insects when used properly.&lt;br /&gt;
* Use basic protection (gloves, mask) during spraying.&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid mixing with strong alkaline or synthetic pesticides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra’s ecological profile makes it ideal for transitioning farms seeking to reduce chemical load and preserve soil and biodiversity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cost and Accessibility ==&lt;br /&gt;
In India, Neemastra costs almost nothing - farmers make it themselves. In France, neem leaves could be imported or substituted with locally available botanicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If scaled up, local cooperatives could ferment batches for regional use, maintaining low costs and traceability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Kilani-Morakchi, S., Morakchi-Goudjil, H., &amp;amp; Sifi, K. (2021). Azadirachtin-based insecticide: Overview, risk assessments, and future directions. &#039;&#039;Frontiers in agronomy&#039;&#039; , &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039; , 676208.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
* 100% natural, biodegradable and low risk for mammals and birds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Compatible with organic farming and agro-ecology.&lt;br /&gt;
* Low cost if materials are locally available or if production can be done on-farm or cooperatively.&lt;br /&gt;
* Offers a preventive strategy rather than reactive high-dose synthetic pesticide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations &amp;amp; Considerations&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Slower acting compared to synthetic insecticides; effect may not be immediate.&lt;br /&gt;
* Shorter residual life (due to sunlight degradation) will likely require more frequent application under high pest pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
* Studies show low mortality of natural enemies at lower doses, but harmful effects at higher/double doses include reduced fertility and developmental abnormalities in some experiments. To combat the situation it is important to apply when pollinators are not foraging. Also avoid direct spraying on flowering parts when bees are active.&lt;br /&gt;
* Requires correct preparation and application technique (fermentation, filtration, dilution) to work well.&lt;br /&gt;
* Materials (neem leaves, cow dung/urine) may be less commonly available in European settings; adaptation (imported neem, or local equivalents) may be required.&lt;br /&gt;
* In environments with vulnerable individuals (e.g. pregnant persons working in fields), additional precaution is warranted - limiting direct exposure, using protective gear, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pati, S., Banerjee, S., Ghosh, M., Debnath, P., &amp;amp; Dolui, S. (2023). Effect of organic manure and neemastra on growth and yield of Indian mustard varieties in Lower Gangetic Plains of West Bengal.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Régulation in Europe ==&lt;br /&gt;
Azadirachtin is an approved active substance in Europe under EU Plant Protection Products Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009), so azadirachtin-based formulations can be authorised for usage.But a new neem-leaf product like neemastra must either follow the full authorisation route or fit into EU specific simplified category to be legal for the usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Success stories from different locations in India ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Success Story 1 - Organic rice (field): control of rice-butterfly / leaf-roller larvae&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Location &amp;amp; conditions: Field rice under warm, humid Kharif season (reported trial conditions ≈ 25-34 °C, high relative humidity).&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop &amp;amp; pest: Rice; lepidopteran larvae (rice butterfly / leaf-rollers) causing “dead-heart” and “white ear” symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
* Product &amp;amp; application: Neemastra (fermented neem formulation) applied as foliar spray during active larval period; standard field application schedule used in the trial.&lt;br /&gt;
* Outcome: Neemastra gave the best reduction in larval counts among several plant-based treatments in the study. Damage (dead-heart / white ear) and larval incidence were significantly reduced.&lt;br /&gt;
* Practical takeaways: Use Neemastra as an early preventive foliar spray when egg hatch / early larvae are observed; works best under warm, humid rice seasons when re-application may be needed according to pest pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
Success Story 2 - Mustard (rapeseed) - improved growth and reduced pest incidence&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Success Story 2 - Mustard (rapeseed) - improved growth and reduced pest incidence&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Location &amp;amp; conditions: Rabi season trials in lower Gangetic plains (cooler-warm conditions typical of winter-spring cycle).&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop &amp;amp; pest: Indian mustard (&#039;&#039;Brassica spp&#039;&#039;.); trials measured growth, yield and pest incidence under organic management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Product &amp;amp; application: Foliar application of Neemastra (sprayed three times during crop cycle) integrated with organic manures.&lt;br /&gt;
* Outcome: Plots receiving Neemastra sprays recorded higher seed yield compared to untreated control and some conventional nutrient regimes (trial reported measurable yield increases attributed to better pest suppression and crop health).&lt;br /&gt;
* Practical takeaways: Neemastra foliar sprays can be integrated with organic nutrient management to reduce pest damage and support yield-useful on oilseed crops with moderate pest pressure in cooler-to-moderate temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
Success Story 3 -Castor crop (field): reduced pest counts and safety to natural enemies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kumar, G.S. and Sarada, O., 2020. Evaluation of cow based fermented organic products for non-insecticidal pest management in castor. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(10), pp.292-300.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Success Story 3 -Castor crop (field): reduced pest counts and safety to natural enemies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kumar, G.S. and Sarada, O., 2020. Evaluation of cow based fermented organic products for non-insecticidal pest management in castor. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(10), pp.292-300.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Location &amp;amp; conditions: Field trials in Andhra Pradesh (hot Kharif conditions; typical daytime temps often 25–35 °C during trials).&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop &amp;amp; pest: Castor; commonly attacked by caterpillars and sucking pests (aphids, jassids, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
* Product &amp;amp; application: Neemastra (20% in trial) compared with Brahmastra, Agniastra and Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE 5%); foliar sprays applied per trial schedule. (Brahmastra, Agniastra are other organic solutions similar to neemastra but the components are different).&lt;br /&gt;
* Outcome: Neemastra and NSKE significantly reduced pest populations on castor; importantly, Neemastra showed lower negative impact on natural enemies (predators/parasitoids) compared with broad-spectrum chemicals -enabling faster recovery of beneficials.&lt;br /&gt;
* Practical takeaways: For castor and similar field crops, Neemastra provides effective pest suppression while conserving natural enemies .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;“Neem is a farmer’s silent doctor”&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Neemastra]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mating_disruption_for_codling_moth_control_using_pheromones&amp;diff=10600</id>
		<title>Mating disruption for codling moth control using pheromones</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mating_disruption_for_codling_moth_control_using_pheromones&amp;diff=10600"/>
		<updated>2025-12-09T10:55:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = CMLarvae.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Codling moth (Cydia pomonella), a key pest of apple, pear, and walnut orchards&lt;br /&gt;
| Type de production = Arboriculture@ Grandes cultures&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Réduction des IFT@ Productivité&lt;br /&gt;
| Glyph = eb66, ea06&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = pheromone, biocontrol, lepidoptera, codling moth, apple, mating disruption&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Codling moth (&#039;&#039;Cydia pomonella&#039;&#039;) is a major pest in apple, pear, and walnut orchards, capable of destroying up to 70-90% of fruit if uncontrolled&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Miller JR, Gut LJ. General principles of attraction and competitive attraction in mating disruption. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 28. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2806766/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benelli G, Lucchi A, Thomson D, Ioriatti C. Sex Pheromone Aerosol Devices for Mating Disruption: Challenges for a Brighter Future. Insects. 2019;10(10):308.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Managing this pest traditionally involves 6-10 insecticide applications per season, which leads to high costs, pesticide resistance, and environmental harm&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Effect of Mating Disruption Pheromone Dispensers on the Control of the Codling Moth in Lake District Apple Orchards. 2023 Oct. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.51532/meyve.1367991&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Atakan E, Canhilal R. Application of the Mating Disruption Technique Against Codling Moth in Kahramanmaraş Province. ANAJAS. 2022. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.7161/omuanajas.1066972&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Pheromone-based mating disruption offers a sustainable alternative that reduces chemical use while effectively controlling pests.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CODM5.jpg|center|thumbnail|493x493px|Figure 2: Codling moth (&#039;&#039;Cydia pomonella)&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What are pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones are chemical substances &#039;&#039;&#039;released by insects that trigger specific behavioural responses&#039;&#039;&#039; in other members of the same species, particularly for mating&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rizvi SAH, George J, Reddy GVP, Zeng X, Guerrero A. Latest Developments in Insect Sex Pheromone Research and Its Application in Agricultural Pest Management. Insects. 2021;12(6):484. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060484&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. For codling moth, the key pheromone is &#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikt:codlemone|codlemone]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, a synthetic version of the natural female sex pheromone that attracts males&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;UC IPM. Codling Moth Management Guidelines. University of California. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/walnut/codling-moth/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How does mating disruption work? ==&lt;br /&gt;
The orchard is saturated with synthetic pheromones released from dispensers placed throughout the trees. This &#039;&#039;&#039;confuses male moths&#039;&#039;&#039;, making it i&#039;&#039;&#039;mpossible for them to locate real females&#039;&#039;&#039; for mating&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Suterra. Mating Disruption - Premium Pheromone Pest Control. 2021. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.suterra.com/mating-disruption&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two action modes: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Males follow false pheromone trails created by dispensers rather than real females.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pheromone saturation masks natural female signals, blocking male detection&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steyn DMV, et al. Experimental quantification of mating disruption for false codling moth. Crop Protection. 2024;180:106650. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424001650&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pheromone-and-Mating-Disruption-101---False-trail-following.png.jpg|center|thumbnail|500x500px|Figure 3 : Mating disruption simplified &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://blog.semios.com/pheromones-and-mating-disruption-101&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dispenser types ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hand-applied dispensers (twist-ties, ropes): &#039;&#039;&#039;300-400 per acre&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;750-1,000 per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Capture d’écran 2025-11-28 à 17.48.21.png|center|thumbnail|534x534px|Figure 4: Examples of the different pheromones dispensers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.novagrica.com/shop/pheromones/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aerosol puffers: 2-5 per hectare, programmable for timed releases&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Knight AL. Addition of Pear Ester With Sex Pheromone Enhances Disruption of Mating by Female Codling Moth. Environ Entomol. 2017. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/ee/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ee/nvw168&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Capture d’écran 2025-11-28 à 17.49.30.png|center|thumbnail|Figure 5  : Aerosol pheromones dispensers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implementation guide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== When to apply ===&lt;br /&gt;
Install dispensers in early spring &#039;&#039;&#039;(March-April) before the first adult moth flight&#039;&#039;&#039;. Late application compromises effectiveness&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray M, Alston D. Codling Moth Mating Disruption. Utah State University Extension. 2024 Jul. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://extension.usu.edu/planthealth/research/codling-moth-mating-disruption&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Where It works ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Minimum effective area: approximately 4 hectares&lt;br /&gt;
* Best in square-shaped orchards rather than narrow strips.&lt;br /&gt;
* Most &#039;&#039;&#039;effective when neighboring orchards&#039;&#039;&#039; also &#039;&#039;&#039;use mating disruption&#039;&#039;&#039; (area-wide programs)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Less effective in small&#039;&#039;&#039;, isolated blocks with moth immigration from untreated areas &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Effect of mating disruption in walnut orchards under organic farming. J Biopestic. 2021 May. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.jbiopestic.com/archivesbrief.php?id=125&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Application details ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hand-applied dispensers (twist-ties, ropes): approximately 500-1000 dispensers per hectare approximately , based on extension service recommendations and field trials&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kovanci O.B. &#039;&#039;Comparison of the costs of mating disruption with traditional insecticide applications for control of codling moth in apple orchards in Turkey.&#039;&#039; Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture. 2017;61:455–459. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://horticulturejournal.usamv.ro/pdf/2017/Art67.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Aerosol puffers: 5-10 per hectare; programmable for timed pheromone release&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most dispensers release effective pheromone levels for approximately &#039;&#039;&#039;140 days,&#039;&#039;&#039; covering the entire growing season&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. After this period, pheromone is depleted, necessitating replacement or refill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While many traditional hand-applied dispensers are single-use, newer systems &#039;&#039;&#039;often feature refillable dispensers&#039;&#039;&#039;. Growers can replace pheromone cartridges within the dispenser unit rather than discarding the entire device. Aerosol puffers similarly use refillable cartridges. This reduces waste and may lower long-term costs. Biodegradable dispensers are also available, which break down naturally in orchards, minimizing waste concerns &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A. &#039;&#039;Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management.&#039;&#039;Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2010;36(1):80–100. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29352393/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Waste Management and Recycling ==&lt;br /&gt;
Responsible disposal of used dispensers and cartridges is essential. Many manufacturers and cooperative programs offer recycling initiatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In France, the &#039;&#039;&#039;AgriPlastic Recycling i&#039;&#039;&#039;nitiative organises the collection and recycling of agricultural plastics, including pheromone dispensers, through cooperatives and designated centers. This program helps farmers reduce plastic waste and promotes sustainable disposal practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Growers should consult local extension services or suppliers for guidance on disposal or recycling options in their region&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ADIVALOR. &#039;&#039;Agriculteurs, Distributeurs, Industriels pour la VALORisation des déchets agricoles.&#039;&#039; ADIVALOR – éco-organisme pour la collecte et le recyclage des déchets agricoles. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.adivalor.fr&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Integration with other controls ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Combine mating disruption&#039;&#039;&#039; with 2-3 applications of &#039;&#039;Bacillus thuringiensis&#039;&#039; (Bt) targeting larvae for optimal results. In high-pressure orchards, supplemental border sprays may be necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lacey LA, Unruh TR. &#039;&#039;Biological control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella, Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its role in integrated pest management, with emphasis on entomopathogens.&#039;&#039; Vedalia. 2005;12(1):33–60. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/20920000/publicationlists/lacey_extra/lacey-unruh-bc-cm.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Or with traps, trap &amp;amp; Kill strategy&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agronomy-13-00047-g001.png|center|thumbnail|732x732px|Figure 1. Three kinds of conventional traps, installation positions of pheromone lure and their insect collection devices. (a) Trap YL-HEMT; (b) Trap YL-NMT; (c) Trap YL-VT; (d–f) Pheromone lure installation device and location&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For farmers ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduces insecticide applications by 40-56%&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Gut LJ, Stelinski LL, Thomson DR, Miller JR. Quantifying the Benefits of Areawide Pheromone Mating Disruption Programs. Am Entomol. 2011;57(2):94-100. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/ae/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ae/57.2.94&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brinza L, Boulay T, Waters SM, Boisvert M. Economic Benefits of Using Sterile Insect Technique and Mating Disruption to Control Codling Moth. J Agric Sci. 2015;7(6):72-80. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/49352&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Compatible with organic certification&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Improves fruit quality: 87-90% achieve premium grade&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduces pesticide resistance risk&lt;br /&gt;
* Net benefit of €253/hectare vs. €232/hectare for sterile insect technique&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the environment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Species-specific with minimal non-target effects&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserves beneficial insects and pollinators&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduces soil and water contamination&lt;br /&gt;
* Supports biodiversity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;A Comprehensive Review of Advances in Semiochemical Exploitation for Insect Pest Management.&#039;&#039; OpenAccess Journals4Promo. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://openaccess.journals4promo.com/id/eprint/1554/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Higher labor required for annual installation&lt;br /&gt;
* Small orchards (&amp;lt;4hectares) show poor results&lt;br /&gt;
* Requires consistent monitoring to detect outbreaks&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Initial material costs €90-€180 more per hectare than conventional insecticides (costs equalize after 2-3 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Products and suppliers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Available products: NoMate®, Isomate®, CIDETRAK® &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemplers. NoMate® Codling Moth Mating Disruption, 400 count. 2025. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://gemplers.com/products/nomate-codling-moth-mating-disruption-400-count&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andermatt Garden. Codling moth trap refill. 2023-2024. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://andermattgarden.co.uk/products/codling-moth-trap-refill&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to purchase:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Agricultural supply companies (Gemplers, local distributors)&lt;br /&gt;
* Grower cooperatives&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Real-World results ==&lt;br /&gt;
Turkey (Kahramanmaraş Province, 2018-2019): Orchards using mating disruption + 2-3 Bt applications showed 8.4-9.1% fruit damage vs. 43.7% in conventional orchards with 6 insecticide applications. Trap catches dropped from 1,136 moths (conventional) to 18-37 moths (mating disruption)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulgaria (Pazardzhik Region, 2018-2019): Organic walnut orchards with mating disruption (no insecticides) had lower fruit damage than conventional orchards receiving 9-10 insecticide treatment&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromone-based mating disruption offers a sustainable, pesticide-free solution for managing codling moth in apple, pear, and walnut orchards. By confusing males and preventing mating, it significantly lowers pest pressure and reduces insecticide use by up to 50%. This technique is most effective in large, coordinated orchard areas and fits perfectly within Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. With refillable or biodegradable dispensers and proven field success, it represents a key step toward eco-friendly, high-quality fruit production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Lutter contre le carpocapse des pommes avec la confusion sexuelle par phéromones]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_susukii&amp;diff=10597</id>
		<title>Drosophila susukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_susukii&amp;diff=10597"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T15:14:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Drosophila_pseudoobscura-Male.png&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = &lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés=Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, Fruits pests, Biological control of fruits pests, Fruits production&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Pests}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biology and Identification ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Host Range and Crop Damage ==&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ecology and Distribution ==&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Impact on Global Agriculture ==&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Detection and Monitoring ==&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Management Strategies ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps ===&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Trichopria drosophiliae (Hymenoptera Diapridae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Trichopria drosophiliae as a Biological Control ===&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica as Biological Control ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm ==&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Best time for release ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Temperature requirement ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Step 1: Distribute release containers ====&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups ====&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference ====&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Enhance Their Establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monitor Parasitism Success to confirm establishment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Testimonials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;What they did:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Why it worked:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased. What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;What they did:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Research and Innovation ==&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;6. Integrate crop environment management&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;7. Future tools may include genetic control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Références ==&lt;br /&gt;
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_Nitrogen_Fertilizers_Enriched_with_Selenium_(Se-enriched_N)&amp;diff=10596</id>
		<title>Use of Nitrogen Fertilizers Enriched with Selenium (Se-enriched N)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_Nitrogen_Fertilizers_Enriched_with_Selenium_(Se-enriched_N)&amp;diff=10596"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T15:04:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Arable crops&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Reduction in IFT&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium-enriched nitrogen fertilizers are standard nitrogen products—such as urea, UAN, ammonium sulfate, or NPK blends—that have been coated or impregnated with small, controlled amounts of selenium, usually in the form of sodium selenate (Na₂SeO₄) or sodium selenite (Na₂SeO₃). When applied in the field, these fertilizers improve crop performance by enhancing stress tolerance, supporting healthier root growth, and strengthening plant defence systems. Selenium helps plants moderate oxidative stress, maintain better chlorophyll function, and cope with drought, salinity, and certain disease pressures. Because the selenium is delivered together with nitrogen, crops absorb it more efficiently, which often results in stronger early growth, improved vigour, and more uniform stands. This makes Se-enriched N fertilizers a practical, field-ready option for farmers looking to improve crop resilience and productivity without changing their existing fertilizer programs.&lt;br /&gt;
==Principle==&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium (Se) is not required in large quantities by plants, but small additions of Se through fertilizers can significantly improve crop performance under field conditions. The agronomic principle behind using Se-enriched nitrogen fertilizers is that selenium, when applied in very low, controlled doses, enhances plant physiological functions such as antioxidant capacity, stress tolerance, root development, and nitrogen-use efficiency. These improvements help crops maintain better growth under drought, salinity, high temperature, and other environmental stresses—leading to more stable yields.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fertilizers, selenium is supplied mainly in two inorganic forms: selenate (SeVI) and selenite (SeIV).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Selenate (SeVI)&#039;&#039;&#039; is highly soluble and moves easily through soil and plant tissues. It is taken up efficiently by roots and transported to leaves, where it supports photosynthesis and stress defense.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Selenite (SeIV)&#039;&#039;&#039; is more strongly bound to soil particles and tends to stay near the root zone. It is absorbed more slowly but promotes root activity and oxidative stress reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once inside the plant, selenium participates in the sulfur metabolic pathway, where it boosts the plant’s natural antioxidant system (e.g., glutathione, peroxidases). This reduces cellular damage, delays leaf senescence, and helps plants maintain greener leaf area during critical growth stages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nitrogen fertilizers act as practical carriers for selenium because they provide uniform field distribution and improve Se uptake. Nitrogen application stimulates amino acid and protein synthesis in crops, which enhances the incorporation of selenium into plant metabolism and improves the plant’s physiological resilience. This Se–N synergy results in improvements such as better chlorophyll maintenance, stronger root systems, improved nutrient uptake, and greater tolerance to environmental stress (Ramkissoon et al., 2019).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Description of Formulations ==&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Selenate-enriched urea granules&#039;&#039;&#039; (solid blends)  These consist of urea granules impregnated or coated with sodium selenate. Upon dissolution, both N and Se are simultaneously available to the root zone. &#039;&#039;Premarathna et al.&#039;&#039; (2012) demonstrated that applying selenate-enriched urea in flooded paddy rice at the heading stage significantly increased rice grain Se concentration, with over 90% of total grain Se occurring as SeMet, indicating highly efficient biofortification.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Se-coated macronutrient granules&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., Se + ammonium sulfate, Se + NPK)  These are manufactured through coating or blending processes. However, their performance depends on granule dissolution, soil pH, and redox conditions. In alkaline or reducing soils, selenate may be quickly converted to less available SeIV, reducing Se bioavailability. &#039;&#039;Ramkissoon et al.&#039;&#039; (2019) found that while granular Se-enriched macronutrients worked in some soils, pure soluble selenate applications were generally more effective for consistent Se uptake.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Foliar Se applications with N carriers&#039;&#039;&#039; (liquid urea or UAN)  Foliar application of selenate or selenite solutions combined with 2% (w/v) urea enhances cuticular penetration and Se translocation to grains. Studies show that foliar Se + N mixtures can double grain Se accumulation compared with Se-only sprays, while reducing soil Se buildup and environmental risks (Ramkissoon et al., 2019).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Se-enriched compound fertilizers and slow-release/nano-Se formulations&#039;&#039;&#039;  Recent innovations include nano-selenium and Se bound to organic or microbial carriers, designed to stabilize Se in soil, prevent leaching, and prolong availability (Kang et al., 2024). These formulations also improve soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity, enhancing nutrient cycling and Se bioavailability in the rhizosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to Use Se-enriched N Fertilizers ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil broadcast or base application:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Apply Se-enriched granules as part of standard nitrogen dressing (either basal or side-dress). In rice, broadcasting Se-enriched urea into floodwater at heading dramatically improved Se accumulation in grain (Premarathna et al., 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Foliar application:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Use low Se concentration solutions (typically &amp;lt;50 mg Se·L⁻¹) mixed with 2% urea or UAN. Apply at growth stages corresponding to grain/tuber filling to maximize Se transfer to edible tissues. Foliar routes offer high efficiency, using minimal Se mass while maintaining safe residue levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Seed priming or dressing:&#039;&#039;&#039;  For small-seeded crops, short-duration soaking in dilute Se solutions can enhance early seedling vigor and Se uptake. However, concentrations must be extremely low to avoid phytotoxicity (Danso et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Se biofortification promotes crop yields and quality parameters. Se-biofortification ap proaches include (1) genetic tools, (2) through foliar application, (3) soil amendment, (4) agronomic biofortification, (5) broadcasting into soils, (6) green manure with Se, enriched growth and development of plants, (7) nano-sized biofortification to leaves or soil, and (8) intercropping with Se- hyper-accumulator plants (Hossain et al., 2021).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to Use It ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cereals&#039;&#039;&#039;: Foliar sprays at heading or early grain filling maximize SeMet formation in grain. Soil-applied Se at heading in flooded rice is also effective (Premarathna et al., 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Root/tuber crops&#039;&#039;&#039;: Applying Se + N during bulking stages enhances Se translocation into tubers and may increase yield (Li et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Leafy vegetables&#039;&#039;&#039;: Foliar Se sprays at late vegetative stages boost Se levels but require careful control to prevent taste or tissue damage (Schiavon et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Salinity resistance&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium efficacy in preventing such stress has been documented in a number of publications. Onions grown on silt loam soil with a salinity of 8 dS/m were less affected by salt stress after receiving an application of Se in the form of sodium selenite(0.5-1 kg/ha) (Bybordi et al., 2018). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Human nutrition and bioavailability:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Se-enriched fertilizers effectively raise dietary Se intake, with most of the accumulated Se in crops present as selenomethionine, a highly bioavailable form. Se acts as a strong antioxidant and protects the body from heart disease, Cardiovascular Problems, some cancers and beneficial for thyroid health (Hossain et al., 2021).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agronomic and physiological benefits:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Proper Se application enhances antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., glutathione peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase), improves photosynthetic efficiency, and increases resistance to oxidative stress (Li et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limits and Risks ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Toxicity risk:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Selenium is an essential micronutrient for humans, and the recommended intake is 55–70 g per day (Schiavon et al., 2022). Excessive Se in food can lead to selenosis in animals and humans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil chemical constraints:&#039;&#039;&#039;  pH, organic matter, redox, and clay content determine Se mobility. Selenate may reduce to SeIV or elemental Se under waterlogged or reducing conditions, limiting plant uptake (Sarwar et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Environmental concerns:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Leaching of soluble selenate into groundwater or runoff into aquatic systems can cause ecological harm. Buffer zones and precision dosing are essential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Regulatory and logistical challenges:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Se fertilizer use is regulated in several countries, with limited commercial availability. Safe handling and strict adherence to national limits are required (Danso et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Field Testimonials ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rice:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Two Se species, selenate (SeO4 2−) and selenite (SeO3 2−), were applied at a rate equivalent to 30 g ha−1. Four application methods were employed as follows: (i) Se applied at soil preparation, (ii) Se-enriched urea granules applied to floodwater at heading; (iii) foliar Se applied at heading; and (iv) fluid fertilizer Se applied to soil or flood water at heading. &#039;&#039;Premarathna et al.&#039;&#039; (2012) reported 5–6× higher grain Se concentrations after broadcasting selenate-enriched urea in paddy floodwater, with &amp;gt;90% Se as SeMet.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wheat:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Ramkissoon et al.&#039;&#039; (2019) demonstrated that foliar Se + 2% urea doubled grain Se content compared to Se-only foliar application. A pot trial was set up to investigate whether the application of 3.33 µg kg−1 of Se (equivalent to 10 g ha−1) to wheat can be made more efficient by its co-application with macronutrient carriers, either to the soil or to the leaves.  In the soil, Se was applied either on its own (selenate only) or as a granular, Se-enriched macronutrient fertilizer supplying nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium or sulfur.  Co-application of foliar Se with an N carrier doubled the Se concentration in wheat grains compared to the application of foliar Se on its own,&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Potato:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Li et al.&#039;&#039; (2023) found Se + N improved root function, photosynthesis, and tuber Se accumulation, increasing yield efficiency. Field experiments were conducted in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021. Three N levels, i.e., 0 kg N ha-1 (N0), 150 kg Nha -1 (N1) and 200kg Nha-1 (N2),and three Se levels, i.e., 0 g Se ha -1 (Se0), 500 g Se ha -1 (Se1) and 1000 g Se ha-1 (Se2), were set up. &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Leafy greens:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Schiavon et al.&#039;&#039; (2022) observed dose-dependent Se enrichment in rocket leaves, altering phytochemical composition and nutritional value. Se was applied foliarly as selenate at 2.5, 5, or 10 mg per plant to two rocket species, Diplotaxistenuifolia and Eruca sativa, grown in soil and the effects in terms of Se enrichment and content of primary and secondary metabolites were comparatively analyzed. Foliar application of Seat the minimum dosage (2.5mg Se per plant) increased the fresh leaf and root biomass &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium-enriched nitrogen fertilizers are a proven agronomic tool that improve crop vigor, stress tolerance, and nutrient-use efficiency. Small, well-regulated doses of Se—especially when applied with nitrogen during reproductive stages—strengthen antioxidant activity, support root growth, and help maintain yield stability under drought, heat, or salinity. Because Se has a narrow safe range, applications must be tailored to soil conditions and crop needs. When properly managed, Se-enriched N fertilizers provide a cost-effective way to enhance plant resilience and overall fertilizer performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
Danso, O. P., Asante-Badu, B., Zhang, Z., Song, J., Wang, Z., Yin, X., &amp;amp; Zhu, R. (2023). Selenium biofortification: Strategies, progress and challenges. Agriculture, 13(2), 416.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hossain, A., Skalicky, M., Brestic, M., Maitra, S., Sarkar, S., Ahmad, Z., ... &amp;amp; Laing, A. M. (2021). Selenium biofortification: Roles, mechanisms, responses and prospects. Molecules, 26(4), 881.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kang, Y., Ming, J., Fu, W., Long, L., Wen, X., Zhang, Q., ... &amp;amp; Yin, H. (2024). Selenium fertilizer improves microbial community structure and diversity of rhizospheric soil and selenium accumulation in tomato plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 55(10), 1430–1444.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Li, S., Chen, H., Jiang, S., Hu, F., Xing, D., &amp;amp; Du, B. (2023). Selenium and nitrogen fertilizer management improves potato root function, photosynthesis, yield and selenium enrichment. Sustainability, 15(7), 6060.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Premarathna, L., McLaughlin, M. J., Kirby, J. K., Hettiarachchi, G. M., Stacey, S., &amp;amp; Chittleborough, D. J. (2012). Selenate-enriched urea granules are a highly effective fertilizer for selenium biofortification of paddy rice grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(23), 6037–6044.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramkissoon, C., Degryse, F., da Silva, R. C., Baird, R., Young, S. D., Bailey, E. H., &amp;amp; McLaughlin, M. J. (2019). Improving the efficacy of selenium fertilizers for wheat biofortification. Scientific Reports, 9, 19520.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarwar, N., Akhtar, M., Kamran, M. A., Imran, M., Riaz, M. A., Kamran, K., &amp;amp; Hussain, S. (2020). Selenium biofortification in food crops: Key mechanisms and future perspectives. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 93, 103615.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schiavon, M., Nardi, S., Pilon-Smits, E. A., &amp;amp; Dall’Acqua, S. (2022). Foliar selenium fertilization alters the content of dietary phytochemicals in two rocket species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 987935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White, P. J., &amp;amp; Broadley, M. R. (2009). Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets. New Phytologist, 182(1), 49–84.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bybordi, A., Saadat, S., &amp;amp; Zargaripour, P. (2018). The effect of zeolite, selenium and silicon on qualitative and quantitative traits of onion grown under salinity conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64(4), 520-530.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_Nitrogen_Fertilizers_Enriched_with_Selenium_(Se-enriched_N)&amp;diff=10595</id>
		<title>Use of Nitrogen Fertilizers Enriched with Selenium (Se-enriched N)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_Nitrogen_Fertilizers_Enriched_with_Selenium_(Se-enriched_N)&amp;diff=10595"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T13:08:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Arable crops&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Reduction in IFT&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium-enriched nitrogen fertilizers are standard nitrogen products—such as urea, UAN, ammonium sulfate, or NPK blends—that have been coated or impregnated with small, controlled amounts of selenium, usually in the form of sodium selenate (Na₂SeO₄) or sodium selenite (Na₂SeO₃). When applied in the field, these fertilizers improve crop performance by enhancing stress tolerance, supporting healthier root growth, and strengthening plant defence systems. Selenium helps plants moderate oxidative stress, maintain better chlorophyll function, and cope with drought, salinity, and certain disease pressures. Because the selenium is delivered together with nitrogen, crops absorb it more efficiently, which often results in stronger early growth, improved vigour, and more uniform stands. This makes Se-enriched N fertilizers a practical, field-ready option for farmers looking to improve crop resilience and productivity without changing their existing fertilizer programs.&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
== 1. Principle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium (Se) is not required in large quantities by plants, but small additions of Se through fertilizers can significantly improve crop performance under field conditions. The agronomic principle behind using Se-enriched nitrogen fertilizers is that selenium, when applied in very low, controlled doses, enhances plant physiological functions such as antioxidant capacity, stress tolerance, root development, and nitrogen-use efficiency. These improvements help crops maintain better growth under drought, salinity, high temperature, and other environmental stresses—leading to more stable yields.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fertilizers, selenium is supplied mainly in two inorganic forms: selenate (SeVI) and selenite (SeIV).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Selenate (SeVI)&#039;&#039;&#039; is highly soluble and moves easily through soil and plant tissues. It is taken up efficiently by roots and transported to leaves, where it supports photosynthesis and stress defense.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Selenite (SeIV)&#039;&#039;&#039; is more strongly bound to soil particles and tends to stay near the root zone. It is absorbed more slowly but promotes root activity and oxidative stress reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once inside the plant, selenium participates in the sulfur metabolic pathway, where it boosts the plant’s natural antioxidant system (e.g., glutathione, peroxidases). This reduces cellular damage, delays leaf senescence, and helps plants maintain greener leaf area during critical growth stages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nitrogen fertilizers act as practical carriers for selenium because they provide uniform field distribution and improve Se uptake. Nitrogen application stimulates amino acid and protein synthesis in crops, which enhances the incorporation of selenium into plant metabolism and improves the plant’s physiological resilience. This Se–N synergy results in improvements such as better chlorophyll maintenance, stronger root systems, improved nutrient uptake, and greater tolerance to environmental stress (Ramkissoon et al., 2019).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;2. Description of Formulations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Selenate-enriched urea granules&#039;&#039;&#039; (solid blends)  These consist of urea granules impregnated or coated with sodium selenate. Upon dissolution, both N and Se are simultaneously available to the root zone. &#039;&#039;Premarathna et al.&#039;&#039; (2012) demonstrated that applying selenate-enriched urea in flooded paddy rice at the heading stage significantly increased rice grain Se concentration, with over 90% of total grain Se occurring as SeMet, indicating highly efficient biofortification.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Se-coated macronutrient granules&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., Se + ammonium sulfate, Se + NPK)  These are manufactured through coating or blending processes. However, their performance depends on granule dissolution, soil pH, and redox conditions. In alkaline or reducing soils, selenate may be quickly converted to less available SeIV, reducing Se bioavailability. &#039;&#039;Ramkissoon et al.&#039;&#039; (2019) found that while granular Se-enriched macronutrients worked in some soils, pure soluble selenate applications were generally more effective for consistent Se uptake.&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Foliar Se applications with N carriers&#039;&#039;&#039; (liquid urea or UAN)  Foliar application of selenate or selenite solutions combined with 2% (w/v) urea enhances cuticular penetration and Se translocation to grains. Studies show that foliar Se + N mixtures can double grain Se accumulation compared with Se-only sprays, while reducing soil Se buildup and environmental risks (Ramkissoon et al., 2019).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Se-enriched compound fertilizers and slow-release/nano-Se formulations&#039;&#039;&#039;  Recent innovations include nano-selenium and Se bound to organic or microbial carriers, designed to stabilize Se in soil, prevent leaching, and prolong availability (Kang et al., 2024). These formulations also improve soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity, enhancing nutrient cycling and Se bioavailability in the rhizosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;3. How to Use Se-enriched N Fertilizers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil broadcast or base application:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Apply Se-enriched granules as part of standard nitrogen dressing (either basal or side-dress). In rice, broadcasting Se-enriched urea into floodwater at heading dramatically improved Se accumulation in grain (Premarathna et al., 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Foliar application:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Use low Se concentration solutions (typically &amp;lt;50 mg Se·L⁻¹) mixed with 2% urea or UAN. Apply at growth stages corresponding to grain/tuber filling to maximize Se transfer to edible tissues. Foliar routes offer high efficiency, using minimal Se mass while maintaining safe residue levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Seed priming or dressing:&#039;&#039;&#039;  For small-seeded crops, short-duration soaking in dilute Se solutions can enhance early seedling vigor and Se uptake. However, concentrations must be extremely low to avoid phytotoxicity (Danso et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Se biofortification promotes crop yields and quality parameters. Se-biofortification ap proaches include (1) genetic tools, (2) through foliar application, (3) soil amendment, (4) agronomic biofortification, (5) broadcasting into soils, (6) green manure with Se, enriched growth and development of plants, (7) nano-sized biofortification to leaves or soil, and (8) intercropping with Se- hyper-accumulator plants (Hossain et al., 2021).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;5. When to Use It&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cereals&#039;&#039;&#039;: Foliar sprays at heading or early grain filling maximize SeMet formation in grain. Soil-applied Se at heading in flooded rice is also effective (Premarathna et al., 2012).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Root/tuber crops&#039;&#039;&#039;: Applying Se + N during bulking stages enhances Se translocation into tubers and may increase yield (Li et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Leafy vegetables&#039;&#039;&#039;: Foliar Se sprays at late vegetative stages boost Se levels but require careful control to prevent taste or tissue damage (Schiavon et al., 2022).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;6. Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Salinity resistance&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium efficacy in preventing such stress has been documented in a number of publications. Onions grown on silt loam soil with a salinity of 8 dS/m were less affected by salt stress after receiving an application of Se in the form of sodium selenite(0.5-1 kg/ha) (Bybordi et al., 2018). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Human nutrition and bioavailability:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Se-enriched fertilizers effectively raise dietary Se intake, with most of the accumulated Se in crops present as selenomethionine, a highly bioavailable form. Se acts as a strong antioxidant and protects the body from heart disease, Cardiovascular Problems, some cancers and beneficial for thyroid health (Hossain et al., 2021).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Agronomic and physiological benefits:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Proper Se application enhances antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., glutathione peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase), improves photosynthetic efficiency, and increases resistance to oxidative stress (Li et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;7. Limits and Risks&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Toxicity risk:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Selenium is an essential micronutrient for humans, and the recommended intake is 55–70 g per day (Schiavon et al., 2022). Excessive Se in food can lead to selenosis in animals and humans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil chemical constraints:&#039;&#039;&#039;  pH, organic matter, redox, and clay content determine Se mobility. Selenate may reduce to SeIV or elemental Se under waterlogged or reducing conditions, limiting plant uptake (Sarwar et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Environmental concerns:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Leaching of soluble selenate into groundwater or runoff into aquatic systems can cause ecological harm. Buffer zones and precision dosing are essential.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Regulatory and logistical challenges:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Se fertilizer use is regulated in several countries, with limited commercial availability. Safe handling and strict adherence to national limits are required (Danso et al., 2023).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;8. Field Testimonials&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rice:&#039;&#039;&#039;  Two Se species, selenate (SeO4 2−) and selenite (SeO3 2−), were applied at a rate equivalent to 30 g ha−1. Four application methods were employed as follows: (i) Se applied at soil preparation, (ii) Se-enriched urea granules applied to floodwater at heading; (iii) foliar Se applied at heading; and (iv) fluid fertilizer Se applied to soil or flood water at heading. &#039;&#039;Premarathna et al.&#039;&#039; (2012) reported 5–6× higher grain Se concentrations after broadcasting selenate-enriched urea in paddy floodwater, with &amp;gt;90% Se as SeMet.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wheat:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Ramkissoon et al.&#039;&#039; (2019) demonstrated that foliar Se + 2% urea doubled grain Se content compared to Se-only foliar application. A pot trial was set up to investigate whether the application of 3.33 µg kg−1 of Se (equivalent to 10 g ha−1) to wheat can be made more efficient by its co-application with macronutrient carriers, either to the soil or to the leaves.  In the soil, Se was applied either on its own (selenate only) or as a granular, Se-enriched macronutrient fertilizer supplying nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium or sulfur.  Co-application of foliar Se with an N carrier doubled the Se concentration in wheat grains compared to the application of foliar Se on its own,&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Potato:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Li et al.&#039;&#039; (2023) found Se + N improved root function, photosynthesis, and tuber Se accumulation, increasing yield efficiency. Field experiments were conducted in 2019–2020 and 2020–2021. Three N levels, i.e., 0 kg N ha-1 (N0), 150 kg Nha -1 (N1) and 200kg Nha-1 (N2),and three Se levels, i.e., 0 g Se ha -1 (Se0), 500 g Se ha -1 (Se1) and 1000 g Se ha-1 (Se2), were set up. &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Leafy greens:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Schiavon et al.&#039;&#039; (2022) observed dose-dependent Se enrichment in rocket leaves, altering phytochemical composition and nutritional value. Se was applied foliarly as selenate at 2.5, 5, or 10 mg per plant to two rocket species, Diplotaxistenuifolia and Eruca sativa, grown in soil and the effects in terms of Se enrichment and content of primary and secondary metabolites were comparatively analyzed. Foliar application of Seat the minimum dosage (2.5mg Se per plant) increased the fresh leaf and root biomass &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;9. Conclusions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selenium-enriched nitrogen fertilizers are a proven agronomic tool that improve crop vigor, stress tolerance, and nutrient-use efficiency. Small, well-regulated doses of Se—especially when applied with nitrogen during reproductive stages—strengthen antioxidant activity, support root growth, and help maintain yield stability under drought, heat, or salinity. Because Se has a narrow safe range, applications must be tailored to soil conditions and crop needs. When properly managed, Se-enriched N fertilizers provide a cost-effective way to enhance plant resilience and overall fertilizer performance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;10. References&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Danso, O. P., Asante-Badu, B., Zhang, Z., Song, J., Wang, Z., Yin, X., &amp;amp; Zhu, R. (2023). Selenium biofortification: Strategies, progress and challenges. Agriculture, 13(2), 416.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hossain, A., Skalicky, M., Brestic, M., Maitra, S., Sarkar, S., Ahmad, Z., ... &amp;amp; Laing, A. M. (2021). Selenium biofortification: Roles, mechanisms, responses and prospects. Molecules, 26(4), 881.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kang, Y., Ming, J., Fu, W., Long, L., Wen, X., Zhang, Q., ... &amp;amp; Yin, H. (2024). Selenium fertilizer improves microbial community structure and diversity of rhizospheric soil and selenium accumulation in tomato plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 55(10), 1430–1444.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Li, S., Chen, H., Jiang, S., Hu, F., Xing, D., &amp;amp; Du, B. (2023). Selenium and nitrogen fertilizer management improves potato root function, photosynthesis, yield and selenium enrichment. Sustainability, 15(7), 6060.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Premarathna, L., McLaughlin, M. J., Kirby, J. K., Hettiarachchi, G. M., Stacey, S., &amp;amp; Chittleborough, D. J. (2012). Selenate-enriched urea granules are a highly effective fertilizer for selenium biofortification of paddy rice grain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(23), 6037–6044.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramkissoon, C., Degryse, F., da Silva, R. C., Baird, R., Young, S. D., Bailey, E. H., &amp;amp; McLaughlin, M. J. (2019). Improving the efficacy of selenium fertilizers for wheat biofortification. Scientific Reports, 9, 19520.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sarwar, N., Akhtar, M., Kamran, M. A., Imran, M., Riaz, M. A., Kamran, K., &amp;amp; Hussain, S. (2020). Selenium biofortification in food crops: Key mechanisms and future perspectives. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 93, 103615.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schiavon, M., Nardi, S., Pilon-Smits, E. A., &amp;amp; Dall’Acqua, S. (2022). Foliar selenium fertilization alters the content of dietary phytochemicals in two rocket species. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 987935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White, P. J., &amp;amp; Broadley, M. R. (2009). Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets. New Phytologist, 182(1), 49–84.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bybordi, A., Saadat, S., &amp;amp; Zargaripour, P. (2018). The effect of zeolite, selenium and silicon on qualitative and quantitative traits of onion grown under salinity conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64(4), 520-530.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_Isaria_fumosorosea_to_control_insects,_particularly_whiteflies&amp;diff=10594</id>
		<title>Use Isaria fumosorosea to control insects, particularly whiteflies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_Isaria_fumosorosea_to_control_insects,_particularly_whiteflies&amp;diff=10594"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T13:07:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Arable crops@ Mixed farming&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Biodiversity@ Protection against insects and pests&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Imagine a pest control solution that is not only effective, but harnesses the power of nature itself. &#039;&#039;[[Isaria fumosorosea]]&#039;&#039;, a remarkable fungus found in soils and plants worldwide, is helping farmers protect their crops from destructive insect pests in an environmentally friendly way. In this article, you will discover how this biological ally works, why it is beneficial for sustainable agriculture, and how growers can integrate it into modern pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039;? A natural ally for pest control ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Biology ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[Isaria fumosorosea]]&#039;&#039; is a fungus which lives mostly in the soil worldwide, but it is also found on plants and in water. This organism is an insect killer, or [https://ucanr.edu/blog/e-journal-entomology-and-biologicals/article/entomopathogenic-microorganisms-modes-action-and#:~:text=Entomopathogens%20are%20microorganisms%20that%20are,important%20role%20in%20their%20management. entomopathogen]. The fungal colonies start out white and can change to a pink or purple color as they grow. The fungus has a basic, asexual life cycle. The infectious parts are called conidia and blastospores &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Brunner-Mendoza, C., Navarro-Barranco, H., León-Mancilla, B., Pérez-Torres, A., &amp;amp; Toriello, C. (2017). Biosafety of an entomopathogenic fungus Isaria fumosorosea in an acute dermal test in rabbits. &#039;&#039;Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;36&#039;&#039;(1), 12–18. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2016.1156122&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the fungus to kill a pest, its spores must first stick firmly to the insect&#039;s outer skin (cuticle). It then produces special enzymes that help it break through the insect&#039;s protective layer &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Castellanos-Moguel, J., Mier, T., Reyes-Montes, M. del R., Navarro Barranco, H., Zepeda Rodríguez, A., Pérez-Torres, A., &amp;amp; Toriello, C. (2013). Fungal growth development index and ultrastructural study of whiteflies infected by three &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; isolates of different pathogenicity. &#039;&#039;Revista Mexicana de Micología&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;38&#039;&#039;, 55–61&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The time required for an &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; spore to penetrate the insect cuticle varies with the specific fungal strain and the host, but the critical breach is generally rapid. The spore first adheres, germinates, and uses enzymes (like those that suggest serious cuticular damage) to penetrate the insect&#039;s protective layer. For a highly virulent isolate (EH-506/3) tested against whitefly nymphs, significant cuticular damage was observed as early as 6 hours after inoculation &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Evidence of successful internal colonization, characterized by hyphal growth emerging from the host’s body, was documented starting at 12 hours for this fast-acting strain. Therefore, for susceptible hosts and effective isolates, the penetration phase is often completed within the first 12 to 24 hours, well before visible symptoms become widespread (which typically occurs within 24 to 48 hours)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Belgium. (2013). &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosoroseusa strain Apopka 97 Volume 1 – Report and Proposed Decision May 2013&#039;&#039; (Draft Assessment Report).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high level of natural variation found in different strains means that &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is considered a species complex. For example, one virulent strain showed 92.6% mortality against Colorado potato beetle larvae, while the reference strain Apopka 97 showed 54.5%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hussein, H. M., Skoková, O., Půža, V., &amp;amp; Zemek, R. (2016). Laboratory Evaluation of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; CCM 8367 and &#039;&#039;Steinernema feltiae&#039;&#039; Ustinov against Immature Stages of the Colorado Potato Beetle. &#039;&#039;PLoS ONE&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;(3), e0152399.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 1 - Isaria structures.png|center|thumb|971x971px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1.&#039;&#039;&#039; A) Conidia of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumorosea&#039;&#039; germinating on a nymph after 24 h of innoculation, B) appressoria forming on the intersegmental area 36 h hours after innoculation and C) Blastopore formation 48 h after inoculation. co: conidia, gt: germ tube, ap: appresorium&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;GÖKÇE, A., &amp;amp; ER, M. (2005). Pathogenicity of Paecilomyces spp. To the Glasshouse Whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, with Some Observations on the Fungal Infection Process. &#039;&#039;Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;29&#039;&#039;(5), 331–340. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/-&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Host range and crops ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is highly valued in farming because it has a very broad host range, capable of infecting over 40 species of arthropods, including pests from at least 10 different insect orders. This makes it useful against many different agricultural pests. The pests it controls include whiteflies, aphids, mealybugs, thrips, psyllids (like the Asian citrus psyllid), and different types of beetles and caterpillars &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arthurs, S. P., Aristizábal, L. F., &amp;amp; Avery, P. B. (2013). Evaluation of entomopathogenic fungi against chilli thrips, &#039;&#039;Scirtothrips dorsalis&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Journal of Insect Science&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;13&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. In France, the commercial product PREFERAL WG (containing strain Apopka 97, 109 UFC/g) is authorized as an insecticide, primarily for the control of whiteflies (Aleurodes), specifically under closed shelters &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. Specific authorized crop uses in France/Europe for the control of Aleurodes include&#039;&#039;&#039;:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetables and fruits:&#039;&#039;&#039; Tomatoes and aubergines, cucurbits (with edible and non-edible skin), beans and peas (shelled and unshelled fresh), pepper, strawberry, blackcurrant, and raspberry.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Ornamentals / other:&#039;&#039;&#039; Trees and shrubs, flowering and foliage plants, rose, aromatic herbs, and seed-bearing crops.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 2 - Isaria invasion.png|center|thumb|622x622px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figura 2.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Isaria fumorosea&#039;&#039; infection on &#039;&#039;Aleurodicus rugioperculatus&#039;&#039; on eggs (A), thrid and fourth instar nymphs (B, C) and adults (D). ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== I. fumosorosea and whiteflies: A focused ally ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is one of the most important natural enemies of whiteflies. Whiteflies, especially species like the sweet potato whitefly (&#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039;) and the greenhouse whitefly (Trialeurodes vaporariorum), are global concerns because they damage crops directly through feeding and indirectly by transmitting devastating viruses (like begomoviruses).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Sani, I. (2020)&#039;&#039;&#039;.&#039;&#039;&#039; A review of the biology and control of whitefly, &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), with special reference to biological control using entomopathogenic fungi. &#039;&#039;Insects&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;(9), 619&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Zou C., Li L., Dong T., Zhang B., &amp;amp; Hu Q. (2014). Joint action of the entomopathogenic fungus &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and four chemical insecticides against the whitefly &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;Biocontrol Science and Technology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;24&#039;&#039;(3), 315–324. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.860427&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fungus works by infecting the insect body. Its spores (blastospores or conidia) must stick to the insect&#039;s outer skin (cuticle). Once attached, the fungus produces structures that penetrate the cuticle, causing serious damage often attributed to enzymatic action. Once inside, the fungus multiplies and causes death. For farmers, this means seeing infected whiteflies, which often stop moving or appear moldy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Targeting whitefly life stages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; can infect eggs, nymphs (immature stages), and adults of whiteflies. However, the immature stages (nymphs) are typically the most susceptible targets. When tested, different fungal isolates show variable speed of kill (virulence). For instance, some commercial strains have demonstrated a median lethal time (LT50) as low as 3.72 days against second instar B. tabaci nymphs, while other isolates took longer, up to 6.36 days. The fungus provides good control activity against whitefly nymphs on the leaf surface, but multiple applications are generally needed for successful control &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ruiz-Sánchez E., Munguía-Rosales R., &amp;amp; Torres-Acosta R. I. (2013). Virulence and genetic variability of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; isolates from the Yucatan Peninsula against &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). &#039;&#039;International Journal of Agricultural Science&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;(2), 113-118.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 3 - Isaria infection on Diaphorina.png|center|thumb|796x796px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 3&#039;&#039;&#039;. A) &#039;&#039;Diaphorina citri&#039;&#039; adult dead infected by &#039;&#039;Isaria fumorosea&#039;&#039;, B) Conidia production of &#039;&#039;I. fumorosea&#039;&#039; and C) Chains of conidia. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why use isaria? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Farmers look for tools that are effective, safe, and sustainable. &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; excels in these areas, especially when compared to traditional chemical control:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Safety and low risk:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is considered a low-risk environmental alternative to chemical insecticides. It is safe for workers; for example, acute dermal toxicity tests showed no inflammatory reactions or clinical signs of disease, supporting its safety when applied to the skin. It poses a negligible risk to birds and mammals, particularly since its representative uses focus on glasshouse application.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brunner-Mendoza, C., Navarro-Barranco, H., León-Mancilla, B., Pérez-Torres, A., &amp;amp; Toriello, C. (2016). Biosafety of an entomopathogenic fungus &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; in an acute dermal test in rabbits. &#039;&#039;Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2016.1156122&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No resistance development:&#039;&#039;&#039; Unlike synthetic chemicals, which face widespread pest resistance (making them less effective over time), studies on &#039;&#039;B. tabaci&#039;&#039; exposed to &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; over multiple generations showed no significant differences in susceptibility. This means the product can be relied upon long-term without resistance issues.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gao, T., Wang, Z., Huang, Y., Keyhani, N. O., &amp;amp; Huang, Z. (2017). Lack of resistance development in &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; after multiple generations of selection. &#039;&#039;Scientific Reports&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;7&#039;&#039;, 42727&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Compatibility with biocontrol:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fungus is vital for Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. It is compatible with many beneficial natural enemies used in greenhouses, such as the parasitoid Encarsia formosa, predatory mites, and bugs like Macrolophus caliginosus. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Synergy with combined treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; While Isaria acts slower than chemical sprays (often taking 7–10 days to cause death), its speed and efficacy can be significantly boosted when combined with certain chemical insecticides. Strong synergistic actions have been observed in mixtures of &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; with insecticides like Spirotetramat, Imidacloprid, and Thiamethoxam during the first 2–4 days after treatment. This joint action helps to shorten the time it takes for the pest to die. It is also highly compatible with insect growth regulators (IGRs) like Buprofezin, which can act as an effective adjuvant for whitefly control.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use isaria (strategy and timing) ==&lt;br /&gt;
Applications should target the first whitefly larvae. Repeated treatments (often 2 to 3 treatments) spaced by a minimum interval (e.g., 15 days) are typically needed, especially against whitefly nymphs.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;UConn. (2023). Entomopathogenic Fungi for Greenhouse Pest Management. &#039;&#039;UConn Extension IPM Program&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Application timing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Apply Isaria products, often formulated as Water Dispersible Granules (WG), in the late afternoon or evening, or on cloudy/rainy days. This timing protects the spores from UV rays and ensures a period of naturally higher humidity, maximizing the chances of spore germination. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sandeep, A., Selvaraj, K., Kalleshwaraswamy, C. M., Hanumanthaswamy, B. C., &amp;amp; Mallikarjuna, H. B. (2022). Field efficacy of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; alone and in combination with insecticides against &#039;&#039;Aleurodicus rugioperculatus&#039;&#039; on coconut. &#039;&#039;Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;32&#039;&#039;, 106. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/1186/s41938-022-00600-z&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to use isaria and when: crucial field considerations ==&lt;br /&gt;
For &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; to work effectively, careful application timing and environmental management are critical. To maximize the effect and overcome environmental limitations, follow these best practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Application method: ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spray to glisten, not to runoff. The product is often applied as a &amp;quot;spot treatment&amp;quot; to areas with high pest density, especially in greenhouse settings. In the case of Preferal WG must be prepared through a preliminary mixing step in clean water with gentle agitation before being added to the spray tank. The mixture should be prepared immediately before application to ensure the viability of the fungal spores and to avoid sedimentation. During spraying, continuous agitation is essential to maintain a homogeneous suspension.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to PFR-97, which requires prolonged mixing and uses only the supernatant after sedimentation, Preferal WG should neither be left to settle nor filtered prior to use. However, because its suspensions have limited stability, operator experience and careful handling—particularly maintaining consistent agitation—are key factors to optimize product performance.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kumar, V., Francis, A., Avery, P., McKenzie, C., &amp;amp; Osborne, L. (2018). Assessing compatibility of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and buprofezin for mitigation of &#039;&#039;Aleurodicus rugioperculatus&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)—An invasive pest in the Florida landscape. &#039;&#039;Journal of Economic Entomology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;111&#039;&#039;(3), 1069–1079.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No complex pre-processing steps are required beyond proper mixing and tank management. It is also important to avoid combinations with incompatible products that could affect fungal viability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tank mixing and compatibility:&#039;&#039;&#039; If tank mixing with chemical products, ensure compatibility. Some fungicides, especially those containing copper or the product Bellis (at high concentrations like 100 mg/L), can inhibit fungal growth and should be avoided. However, fungicides like Carbendazim and Ridomil Gold were found compatible at all tested concentrations and temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Environmental considerations ===&lt;br /&gt;
The fungus is a living organism, and its survival and ability to infect depend heavily on the conditions immediately after application:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Humidity is key:&#039;&#039;&#039; The most crucial factor for initiating infection is high relative humidity (RH). The fungus requires RH above 95% for a short period so the spores can properly germinate and penetrate the insect’s protective cuticle. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Temperature range:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fungal growth is successful within a temperature range, with optimal colony growth occurring between 23°C and 25°C. Growth slows above 25°C and stops completely above 32°C. In field trials, even when average temperatures (e.g., 22 °C–26 °C) seem conducive, the mortality rate can be lower than in the lab due to other limiting factors.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;UV radiation (sunlight):&#039;&#039;&#039; The spores are highly sensitive to sunlight. UV-B radiation is the most detrimental factor and can rapidly reduce spore viability. This is a major reason why field mortality is often lower than lab results.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Loong, C., Ahmad, S. S., Hafidzi, M. N., Dzolkifli, O., &amp;amp; Faizah, A. (2013). Effect of UV-B and solar radiation on the efficacy of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Metarhizium anisopliae&#039;&#039; (Deuteromycetes: Hyphomycetes) for controlling bagworm, &#039;&#039;Pterona pendula&#039;&#039; (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). &#039;&#039;Journal of Entomology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;10&#039;&#039;, 53–65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wind and coverage:&#039;&#039;&#039; While not as direct a killer as UV, efficacy can be reduced if the application does not reach the pests, particularly because whiteflies often reside on the lower leaf surface, requiring thorough spray coverage (avoiding lack of translaminar coverage).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ·&#039;&#039;&#039;Other reductions in efficacy:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fungal efficacy can be reduced by factors like rainfall washing blastospores off the plants or the biodegradation of spores over time.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Loong, C., Ahmad, S. S., Hafidzi, M. N., Dzolkifli, O., &amp;amp; Faizah, A. (2013). Effect of UV-B and solar radiation on the efficacy of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Metarhizium anisopliae&#039;&#039; (Deuteromycetes: Hyphomycetes) for controlling bagworm, &#039;&#039;Pterona pendula&#039;&#039; (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). &#039;&#039;Journal of Entomology&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;10&#039;&#039;, 53–65&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Storage and preparation: ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spores are living. They are harmed by high temperatures and should be stored in the fridge (2–6°C) to achieve maximum shelf life (e.g., 6 months). Do not keep the spores submerged in water for more than 24 hours prior to spraying.[3] [4]   Continuous agitation in the spray tank may be necessary to keep the product properly suspended. Always wear appropriate protective equipment, such as a mask and gloves, during mixing and application.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fig 4 - Isaria infection on Firefly.png|border|center|thumb|396x396px|&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 4.&#039;&#039;&#039; Larva of a firefly contaminated by the fungus &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039;. The fungus fructifies on the surface of the insect, producing elongated, cylindrical ascocarps ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Compatibility with chemical products and biocontrol strategies ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is an important component of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. It is generally considered compatible with many beneficial biological control agents used in greenhouses, such as the parasitoid &#039;&#039;Encarsia formosa&#039;&#039; and various predatory mites and insects like &#039;&#039;Delphastus&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Dicyphus&#039;&#039;. Using &#039;&#039;Isaria&#039;&#039; helps preserve these natural enemies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mixing Isaria with certain chemical insecticides can be highly effective. This combined approach often shows a synergistic effect, meaning the combined result is better than using either product alone. For example, mixing the fungus with Thiamethoxam or Imidacloprid can boost the immediate control rate against whiteflies. Similarly, testing showed that mixing Isaria with the insect growth regulator Buprofezin produced excellent results against invasive whiteflies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, care is needed when mixing with fungicides. While some fungicides (like Carbendazim and Ridomil Gold) are compatible with Isaria at normal rates, others, such as certain copper-based products or high concentrations of products like Bellis, can inhibit the growth of the fungus and should be avoided in tank mixes. Always check the compatibility information before tank mixing. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Khan, F. Z., Khan, A., Saravanakumar, D., &amp;amp; Thomas, A. (2024). &#039;&#039;In vitro&#039;&#039; compatibility of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; from &#039;&#039;Bemisia tabaci&#039;&#039; with four commonly used fungicides in vegetable production. &#039;&#039;Journal of Advanced Studies in Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;(1), 1–11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Avery, P. B., Pick, D. A., Aristizábal, L. F., Kerrigan, J., Powell, C. A., Rogers, M. E., &amp;amp; Arthurs, S. P. (2013). Compatibility of &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) Blastospores with Agricultural Chemicals Used for Management of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, &#039;&#039;Diaphorina citri&#039;&#039; (Hemiptera: Liviidae). &#039;&#039;Insects&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;(4), 694–711. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/insects4040694&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. [73, 76–84, 87]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Some considerations ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Effects on Beneficial Arthropods and Pollinators ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is generally compatible with many natural enemies, including parasitoids and predators, making it suitable for IPM programs. However, there is a moderate caution for bees due to potential contact exposure. Because available data are limited, growers should apply basic mitigation measures&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). (2014). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance &#039;&#039;Isaria fumosorosea&#039;&#039; strain Apopka 97. &#039;&#039;EFSA Journal&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;12&#039;&#039;(5), 3679. [63–67, 122–125]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid spraying during flowering. &lt;br /&gt;
* Apply in the evening or at night in pollinator-dependent crops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These practices help minimize risk when regulatory information for pollinators is incomplete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Safety for Vertebrates and Mammals ===&lt;br /&gt;
Regulatory evaluations indicate a low risk for mammals and birds. No unusual toxic or pathogenic characteristics have been observed. In greenhouse uses, additional toxicity data are often waived due to minimal exposure. Overall, &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is considered safe for wildlife.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aquatic Environment and Persistence ===&lt;br /&gt;
The fungus can persist in soil and water, similar to other entomopathogenic fungi, but it is not considered a hazard to aquatic organisms. One key characteristic is its heat sensitivity: temperatures above 25 °C sharply reduce viability. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This has two implications: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It lowers the risk of residues in harvested food (since processing temperatures inactivate it).&lt;br /&gt;
* ·Growers must maintain cool, stable storage conditions to preserve product effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Human Health and Worker Exposure ===&lt;br /&gt;
The main human-health concern is not toxicity, but the risk of sensitization or allergy from repeated exposure to spores. Therefore, applicators must use full PPE, including protective clothing, gloves, eye protection, and—critically—a NIOSH-approved respirator for particulates.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although biologicals reduce chemical exposure, proper respiratory protection remains essential to avoid inhalation of spores during handling and application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Secondary Metabolites (Mycotoxins) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Like other fungi, &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; produces secondary metabolites, some potentially toxic. Current evidence suggests a very low likelihood of these compounds entering the food chain. Its heat sensitivity further reduces residue risk. Still, this is an area where ongoing research is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Effects on Soil Microorganisms and Biocontrol Agents ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spores can enter the soil through drift or infected cadavers, but no negative environmental or human-health impacts from soil entomopathogenic fungi have been reported.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interactions with other biocontrol agents, especially entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), can be significant:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Simultaneous application of &#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; and EPNs can improve pest control.&lt;br /&gt;
* Applying nematodes more than 24 hours later may reduce nematode performance due to inhibitory bacterial metabolites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, timing is critical when combining both tools in integrated control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key Operational Limitations for Growers ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Slow speed of action:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fungus takes 2–5 days to kill pests. Under high pest pressure, it may appear less effective than chemicals. This means growers should use it preventively rather than as a crisis treatment.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Storage and stability:&#039;&#039;&#039; Viability drops quickly above 25 °C, making proper storage essential. Poor temperature management leads directly to control failure.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tank-mix compatibility and crop interactions:&#039;&#039;&#039; While compatible with many products, it should not be mixed with botanical oils, borax, or some copper fungicides, which can inhibit fungal growth.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;In some crops,&#039;&#039;&#039; natural plant chemicals may also reduce efficacy, so small preliminary tests are recommended before full adoption in new crop–pest systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;I. fumosorosea&#039;&#039; is a powerful tool for pest control, particularly against whiteflies, offering a sustainable alternative that is safe for workers, preserves beneficial insects, and avoids the serious problem of insecticide resistance. While it relies heavily on favorable environmental conditions (high humidity, moderate temperature, and low UV exposure), these requirements can be managed through careful application timing (evening sprays) and compatible formulations. Combining Isaria with chemical partners, especially IGRs or certain insecticides (like Imidacloprid or Thiamethoxam), can achieve faster and more robust control results than the fungus used alone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Perspectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Embrace combined strategies:&#039;&#039;&#039; Do not rely solely on the fungus for rapid control. Incorporate Isaria alongside beneficial insects and consider tank-mixing with compatible chemicals (especially IGRs) to manage infestations effectively and quickly. This approach reduces the overall chemical load and environmental impact.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing is everything:&#039;&#039;&#039; Recognize that this product is highly biological. Treat it like a living organism. Maximize efficacy by ensuring the microclimate immediately following application is favorable (high humidity, protection from sun).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Future - proof your farm:&#039;&#039;&#039; Because whiteflies cannot easily develop resistance to Isaria, incorporating it into your routine pest control schedule is a long-term strategy that helps protect the few effective chemical tools you still have access to.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor compatibility:&#039;&#039;&#039; If you need to use fungicides, always check the compatibility data or contact a specialist. Products like Carbendazim and Ridomil Gold appear safe to use, but others like certain high-concentration copper-based products or Bellis should be avoided or applied separately by several days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Utiliser Isaria fumosorosea pour contrôler les insectes, en particulier les aleurodes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10593</id>
		<title>Flavescence dorée</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10593"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T13:05:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Winegrowing&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Diseases&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
This article provides an overview of Flavescence dorée (FD), a quarantine disease of grapevine: how it spreads, how to recognize it, and which collective measures help to limit its propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;An incurable phytoplasma disease&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée is recognized as one of the most severe and damaging diseases affecting European vineyards. Classified as a quarantine organism under European regulations (Directive 2000/29/EC, A2 list), it is caused by the phytoplasma &#039;&#039;Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis&#039;&#039; and transmitted by &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;, the Flavescence dorée leafhopper &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Winetwork. (2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Guide des bonnes pratiques de gestion de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. https://www.vignevin-occitanie.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Winetwork-projet-Guide-des-bonnes-pratiques-de-gestion-de-la-FD.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This phytoplasma is a wall-less bacterium that lives and multiplies exclusively within the phloem of grapevine. By disrupting the transport of assimilates, it blocks the plant’s metabolic exchanges and leads to progressive decline, often resulting in the complete death of the vine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First reported in the 1950s in the Armagnac region of southwestern France, Flavescence dorée is now present in at least 18 European countries, including France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EFSA Panel on Plant Health.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Risk to plant health of Flavescence dorée for the EU territory&#039;&#039;. EFSA Journal, 14(12), Article e04603. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4603&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EPPO. (2022).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma – Datasheet&#039;&#039;. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PHYP64&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repartition map.png|center|frameless|865x865px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in Europe &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;IFV – Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. (2014).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;État des lieux de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Techniloire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://techniloire.com/sites/default/files/etat_des_lieux_de_la_flavescence_doree.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Situation in France ====&lt;br /&gt;
In France, the situation of Flavescence dorée varies greatly between wine-growing regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Endemic areas:&#039;&#039;&#039; Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie and Savoie are persistently affected, with long-standing and recurrent outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Partial presence:&#039;&#039;&#039; Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur (PACA), Corsica, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes and Bourgogne-Franche-Comté show localized outbreaks that emerged in the 2000s.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Recent outbreaks:&#039;&#039;&#039; Champagne and the Loire Valley have experienced a more recent spread of the disease, while isolated cases have been reported in Alsace, where the vector &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is still absent &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date, Lorraine remains the only major French wine-growing region with no confirmed detections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From one season to the next, monitoring reveals a wave-like dynamic, with new outbreaks appearing at the edges of already contaminated zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Loire Valley, the contaminated surface increased from 56 to 78 plots between 2022 and 2023, despite the uprooting of infected vines and the implementation of a coordinated action plan managed by the Plant Health Organizations (OVS – FREDON, Polleniz) and regional wine federations &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:France map e.png|center|frameless|650x650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in France &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Dubois, A. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. GDON de Gironde, YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Main vector: &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary agent responsible for the epidemic transmission of Flavescence dorée from vine to vine is the Flavescence dorée leafhopper (&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;). This insect, native to North America, was accidentally introduced into Europe, most likely through the importation of American rootstocks in the early 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is a univoltine species (one generation per year) and, in Europe, is strictly associated with grapevine (&#039;&#039;Vitis vinifera&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Life cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
In France, &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; completes its full life cycle between April and the first autumn frosts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; laid at the end of summer in old wood (cane internodes). They overwinter in this stage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hatching:&#039;&#039;&#039; from mid-April to early May, depending on temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Larvae (L1 to L5):&#039;&#039;&#039; five larval stages follow one another from May to June. Larvae cannot fly but are highly active on the foliage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Adults:&#039;&#039;&#039; appear from late June to July; they are capable of flight, enabling broader dispersion within the vineyard and towards neighbouring outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;End of cycle:&#039;&#039;&#039; adults survive until the first frosts (late September–early October) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cycle de vie en.png|center|frameless|550x550px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Life cycle of the Flavescence dorée leafhopper on its host plant &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chuche, J., &amp;amp; Mazzetto, F. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus up-to-the-minute: Biology, ecology, and role as a vector&#039;&#039;. Entomologia Generalis, 44(3). &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2023/2597&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Acquisition and transmission of the phytoplasma ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contamination follows a strict sequence:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquisition:&#039;&#039;&#039; A healthy leafhopper becomes infected when feeding on an infected vine (stylet probing and ingestion from the phloem sap).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Latent period (10 to 45 days depending on temperature):&#039;&#039;&#039; During this phase, the phytoplasma circulates through the haemolymph and then colonizes the salivary glands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Infectious insect:&#039;&#039;&#039; Once the salivary glands are colonized, the leafhopper remains infectious for life. It transmits the phytoplasma to every healthy plant on which it feeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No transmission to eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; There is no transovarial transmission. Larvae hatching in spring are always healthy, even when originating from an infected female &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recognition: Key symptoms and possible confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
Symptoms of Flavescence dorée are generally not visible during the year of infection (N) but appear the following year (N+1), or even several years later. They are most noticeable at the &#039;&#039;&#039;end of summer&#039;&#039;&#039; (late July–August).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To suspect a phytoplasma disease, growers should look for three characteristic symptoms on the same shoot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. On leaves: ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Discoloration:&#039;&#039;&#039; Yellowing occurs on white cultivars and reddening on red cultivars. The discoloration may be complete or partial, and sometimes follows the veins.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Deformation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaves roll downward, become abnormally rigid, and feel brittle when touched.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 1.png|center|frameless|950x950px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 4:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaf reddening on red cultivars, yellowing on white cultivars, and downward leaf rolling&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. On shoots ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of lignification:&#039;&#039;&#039; Shoots show poor lignification (“non-ripening”). They remain green, soft and flexible (rubbery), instead of hardening and snapping like normally ripened canes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. On clusters ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Desiccation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Inflorescences and berries wilt and then dry out partially or completely. This can result in yield losses of up to 100%.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 2 e.png|center|frameless|970x970px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poor shoot lignification (“non-ripening”) and wilting/drying of grape clusters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because these symptoms can be confused with those caused by Bois Noir (BN), confirmation of the diagnosis relies on PCR analysis performed by an accredited laboratory, which is the only method capable of identifying &#039;&#039;‘Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis’&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Laboratoires officiels et reconnus en santé des végétaux&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mandatory collective control: The three pillars ===&lt;br /&gt;
In France, control of Flavescence dorée is permanently mandatory across the entire national vineyard as soon as the disease is detected. The strategy is based on three coordinated components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1. Ensuring the health of planting material ===&lt;br /&gt;
Using certified planting material, controlled by FranceAgriMer and the Official Certification Service (SOC), is the first barrier against Flavescence dorée. This plant material is traceable, inspected, and guaranteed free of infection before planting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Importing plant material from other EU countries is permitted, provided it carries a phytosanitary passport compliant with Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further reduce the risk of introducing the phytoplasma, nurseries apply Hot Water Treatment (HWT), which consists of immersing planting material at 50 °C for 45 minutes. Mandatory in certain regulated zones, this treatment significantly reduces the risk of transmitting the phytoplasma through planting stock &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TEC eng.jpg|center|frameless|450x450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Hot Water Treatment  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Vitisphere. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Traitement à l’eau chaude des bois et plants de vigne : une organisation bien huilée chez les pépinières Viaud&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.vitisphere.com/actualite-101189-traitement-a-leau-chaude-des-bois-et-plants-de-vigne-une-organisation-bien-huilee-chez-les-pepinieres-viaud.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. Vector control (insecticide-based measures) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Control of &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is mandatory within regulated areas, previously called &#039;&#039;Périmètres de Lutte Obligatoire&#039;&#039;(PLO) and now generally referred to as &#039;&#039;Zones Délimitées&#039;&#039; (ZD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conventional strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regulations typically require three insecticide treatments, with application dates determined each year by the regional plant health authorities (DRAAF/SRAL) according to the sanitary risk &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée – Informations officielles.&#039;&#039; Ministère de l’Agriculture. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first treatment (T1) must be applied roughly one month after the first egg hatch, targeting the young larval stages (ideally L2–L3) before they become infectious.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cid1 eng.png|center|frameless|693x693px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 7:&#039;&#039;&#039; Larvae are identified by two symmetrical black dots located dorso-laterally at the posterior end of the abdomen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The second treatment (T2) is applied at the end of the residual activity of the first one (around 10 days after T1).&lt;br /&gt;
* The third treatment (T3) targets adults, if required.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cic 2 e.png|center|frameless|753x753px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Adult &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, the active substances authorised in France belong mainly to the pyrethroid family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These insecticides act by contact and aim to eliminate young larvae before they become infectious. Their performance is highly dependent on the timing of application (more effective in the evening) and on spray quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Biological strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039; The only plant protection products authorised against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; are natural pyrethrin and paraffinic oils, which are primarily effective on the earliest larval stages (L1–L2) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Modalités de lutte contre la cicadelle de la Flavescence dorée de la vigne – Campagne 2025.&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté Alimentaire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (conventionnels).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (biologiques).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Associated prophylactic measures:&#039;&#039;&#039;Early shoot removal (&#039;&#039;épamprage&#039;&#039;) must be carried out before T1, as basal shoots provide refuge zones for larvae that are poorly covered by insecticide sprays  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Role of GDONs:&#039;&#039;&#039; The &#039;&#039;Groupements de Défense contre les Organismes Nuisibles&#039;&#039; (GDONs) play a key role in organising this collective control strategy. Through larval counts and adult trapping, GDONs can authorise exemptions from T1 and/or T2 treatments, providing important economic and environmental benefits &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON des Bordeaux. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Missions du GDON des Bordeaux : organisation de la surveillance et de la lutte contre la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.gdon-bordeaux.fr/le-gdon/missions/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. Monitoring and eradication (vine removal) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Once infected, a vine remains diseased and contagious. There is no method to cure an infected plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Detection and destruction:&#039;&#039;&#039; Any vine confirmed as infected must be uprooted or destroyed, including the rootstock. The operation must be completed no later than 31 March following detection, before the vegetative restart and before larval emergence.&lt;br /&gt;
** If the infection rate of a plot exceeds a threshold (often set at 20% of affected vines), complete uprooting of the entire vineyard block is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rootstocks and regrowth:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rootstocks may act as symptomless carriers (infected but expressing few or no symptoms). Removal must therefore be thorough to eliminate all regrowth that could remain a reservoir for phytoplasmas.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wild vines:&#039;&#039;&#039; Abandoned or wild vines located within the regulated area must be removed, as they serve as refuges for the leafhopper and potential reservoirs of the phytoplasma &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Economic consequences and challenges ===&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée generates significant costs due to mandatory insecticide treatments, vine removal, and replanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Direct economic impact:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A simulation based on data from the Occitanie region shows that, in the absence of control measures, a contaminated vineyard block may require complete uprooting within three years. This leads to substantial yield losses and high replanting and maintenance costs, severely compromising the long-term viability of the vineyard &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CRAO – Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Occitanie. (2020).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Tout savoir sur la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://occitanie.chambres-agriculture.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/265_chambre_dagriculture_-_occitanie/Interface/Doc/Publications/ToutSavoirSurLaFD-CRAO2020.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conclusion and perspectives ===&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée remains a major threat to grapevine, and its control still relies on an essential foundation: certified planting material, coordinated monitoring, removal of infected vines, and mandatory insecticide treatments against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;. These measures are effective, but their repeated use raises concerns regarding ecological and economic sustainability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research efforts primarily aim to reduce dependence on insecticides. Mineral products such as kaolin show a disruptive effect on young larvae, but their efficacy remains variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Favre, A., Mittaz, C., &amp;amp; Kehrli, P. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Controlling Scaphoideus titanus with kaolin: Summary of four years of field trials in Switzerland (Open Access).&#039;&#039; Agroscope. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371304680_Controlling_Scaphoideus_titanus_with_kaolin_Summary_of_four_years_of_field_trials_in_Switzerland_OPEN_ACCESS&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Behaviour-based approaches, including vibrational or chemical signalling disruption, also offer promising avenues, although they are still at an experimental stage. In the long term, these strategies could strengthen integrated protection by improving the precision of interventions &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Genetic tolerance is another exploratory avenue: some cultivars appear less sensitive, but graft–rootstock interactions and the risk of asymptomatic reservoirs currently limit practical application. Marker-assisted selection could accelerate progress, but this approach remains a long-term perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the short and medium term, the most realistic advances concern the optimisation of sanitary decision-making: earlier detection of outbreaks, better-targeted interventions, and a reasoned use of physical and biological alternatives. Behaviour-based and genetic innovations will complement—rather than replace—the current core measures of disease management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Useful links ===&lt;br /&gt;
To explore further, here is a selection of reliable and up-to-date resources on Flavescence dorée and its management in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;A – Understanding the disease and collective control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Full webinar on the current status of Flavescence dorée in France / GDON example in Gironde – Antoine (Min 12:48–25:05)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;amp;t=376s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;B – Diagnostic: accredited laboratories&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated list of laboratories accredited for phytoplasma detection (French Ministry of Agriculture)                                                                                                              &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;C – Insecticides and authorised products&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2025 list of authorised products (DRAAF PACA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – conventional products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Q2ljYWRlbGxlcyZtb2RlPSZmJTVCMCU1RD1saXN0X3R5cGVfdXNhZ2UlM0EyMDEwMDQwMTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMQ%3D%3D&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – organic products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Jm1vZGU9JmYlNUIwJTVEPWxpc3RfdHlwZV91c2FnZSUzQTIwMTAwNDAxMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAx&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimated pesticide prices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.coutdesfournitures.fr/sites/default/files/page_39_0.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;D – Regulations and official documents&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DRAAF PACA – Official information on Flavescence dorée&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Flavescence dorée]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Neemastra&amp;diff=10592</id>
		<title>Neemastra</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Neemastra&amp;diff=10592"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T13:04:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Neemastra preparation.png&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra is a traditional fermented botanical biopesticide originally developed in India under the Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) approach. It is made using neem leaves (Azadirachta indica), cow dung, cow urine, and water - all natural farm derived materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra works as an eco-friendly insecticide, repellent, and growth inhibitor, mainly against sucking pests (aphids, mealybugs, whiteflies), leaf-eating caterpillars, and certain fungal pathogens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It offers farmers a low-cost, low-impact, and locally adaptable alternative to synthetic pesticides, fitting well within integrated pest management (IPM) or organic farming strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEEM - &#039;&#039;Azadirachta indica&#039;&#039; ; ASTRA - Weapon&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;NEEMASTRA&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra is a traditional fermented botanical biopesticide originally developed in India under the Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) approach. It is made using neem leaves (Azadirachta indica), cow dung, cow urine, and water - all natural farm derived materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra works as an eco-friendly insecticide, repellent, and growth inhibitor, mainly against sucking pests (aphids, mealybugs, whiteflies), leaf-eating caterpillars, and certain fungal pathogens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It offers farmers a low-cost, low-impact, and locally adaptable alternative to synthetic pesticides, fitting well within integrated pest management (IPM) or organic farming strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEEM - &#039;&#039;Azadirachta indica&#039;&#039; ; ASTRA - Weapon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Composition and active principles&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical ingredients (traditional Indian recipe):For 1ha&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 5 kg neem leaves (rich in azadirachtin and other limonoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* 2 kg fresh cow dung (microbial inoculant and nutrient source)&lt;br /&gt;
* 5 litres cow urine (contains nitrogen and enzymes aiding fermentation)&lt;br /&gt;
* Water (to make up 100 litres total)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The active molecules are primarily limonoids (especially azadirachtin, salannin, and nimbin), which:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* disrupt insect growth and molting,&lt;br /&gt;
* inhibit feeding and egg-laying,&lt;br /&gt;
* and repel the insects&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cow dung and urine act as fermentation catalysts, producing microbial metabolites that enhance bioactivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Preparation and Formulation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Traditional Method (India) :&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#  Crush neem leaves or small branches.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Mix with cow dung and cow urine in a clean barrel.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Add water (to 100 L total volume) and cover it.&lt;br /&gt;
#  Stir once daily for 24-48 hours (fermentation).&lt;br /&gt;
#  Filter before spraying.&lt;br /&gt;
# Froath is found on the fermented solution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fermented liquid is usually diluted 1:10 (10%) before application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* This is for warm, humid, subtropical field conditions where fermentation occurs rapidly.(mostly Indian climate)&lt;br /&gt;
* In temperate climate, fermentation may take longer (2–4 days at 20 °C) and should ideally be kept in a warm shed or greenhouse during preparation.(France climate)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Crops and Pests Targeted&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra can be used against most of the lepidopteran larvaes and sucking pests like aphids, jassids, mealy bugs, thrips, whiteflies and it can be applied on a wide range of fruits and vegetables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Modes of Action&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Feeding deterrent - insects avoid feeding on treated leaves.&lt;br /&gt;
# Growth regulator - interferes with molting and development.&lt;br /&gt;
# Reproduction blocker -inhibits egg laying and fertility.&lt;br /&gt;
# Repellent-drives pests away from treated zones.&lt;br /&gt;
# Mild antifungal / antibacterial -reduces fungal spore germination (not its primary use).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Unlike synthetic pesticides, Neemastra works gradually, aiming to reduce pest pressure rather than kill instantly. This favors ecological balance and preserves beneficial insects. &#039;&#039;&#039;It acts like a prevention step&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended Use and Application&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Application method: foliar spray (hand sprayer or mist blower).&lt;br /&gt;
# Dilution: typically 1:10 (10 L Neemastra in 100 L water).&lt;br /&gt;
# Timing: early morning or late afternoon, avoiding direct sun and rain.&lt;br /&gt;
# Frequency: every 7-10 days during pest outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
# Storage: up to 15 days in a cool, shaded place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* With lower average temperatures and humidity, Neemastra residues persist slightly longer on foliage - meaning lower frequency of spraying may be sufficient compared to tropical climates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Timing Matters&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the solution is low persistent, because of photodegradation and microbial breakdown, residual activity may be short. It means timing of spray is important (morning/late afternoon, little direct sun) and frequency may need adjustment for climate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For instance, in a study azadirachtin on strawberries showed rapid degradation under sunlight. So, timing really matters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Safety and Environmental Aspects&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Biodegradable and non-toxic to mammals and birds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Low toxicity to pollinators and beneficial insects when used properly.&lt;br /&gt;
* Use basic protection (gloves, mask) during spraying.&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid mixing with strong alkaline or synthetic pesticides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neemastra’s ecological profile makes it ideal for transitioning farms seeking to reduce chemical load and preserve soil and biodiversity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Cost and Accessibility&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In India, Neemastra costs almost nothing - farmers make it themselves. In France, neem leaves could be imported or substituted with locally available botanicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If scaled up, local cooperatives could ferment batches for regional use, maintaining low costs and traceability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 100% natural, biodegradable and low risk for mammals and birds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Compatible with organic farming and agro-ecology.&lt;br /&gt;
* Low cost if materials are locally available or if production can be done on-farm or cooperatively.&lt;br /&gt;
* Offers a preventive strategy rather than reactive high-dose synthetic pesticide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Limitations &amp;amp; Considerations&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Slower acting compared to synthetic insecticides; effect may not be immediate.&lt;br /&gt;
* Shorter residual life (due to sunlight degradation) will likely require more frequent application under high pest pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
* Studies show low mortality of natural enemies at lower doses, but harmful effects at higher/double doses include reduced fertility and developmental abnormalities in some experiments. To combat the situation it is important to apply when pollinators are not foraging. Also avoid direct spraying on flowering parts when bees are active.&lt;br /&gt;
* Requires correct preparation and application technique (fermentation, filtration, dilution) to work well.&lt;br /&gt;
* Materials (neem leaves, cow dung/urine) may be less commonly available in European settings; adaptation (imported neem, or local equivalents) may be required.&lt;br /&gt;
* In environments with vulnerable individuals (e.g. pregnant persons working in fields), additional precaution is warranted - limiting direct exposure, using protective gear, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Régulation in Europe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Azadirachtin is an approved active substance in Europe under EU Plant Protection Products Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009), so azadirachtin-based formulations can be authorised for usage.But a new neem-leaf product like neemastra must either follow the full authorisation route or fit into EU specific simplified category to be legal for the usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Success stories from different locations in India&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Success Story 1 - Organic rice (field): control of rice-butterfly / leaf-roller larvae&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Location &amp;amp; conditions: Field rice under warm, humid Kharif season (reported trial conditions ≈ 25-34 °C, high relative humidity).&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop &amp;amp; pest: Rice; lepidopteran larvae (rice butterfly / leaf-rollers) causing “dead-heart” and “white ear” symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
* Product &amp;amp; application: Neemastra (fermented neem formulation) applied as foliar spray during active larval period; standard field application schedule used in the trial.&lt;br /&gt;
* Outcome: Neemastra gave the best reduction in larval counts among several plant-based treatments in the study. Damage (dead-heart / white ear) and larval incidence were significantly reduced.&lt;br /&gt;
* Practical takeaways: Use Neemastra as an early preventive foliar spray when egg hatch / early larvae are observed; works best under warm, humid rice seasons when re-application may be needed according to pest pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Success Story 2 - Mustard (rapeseed) - improved growth and reduced pest incidence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Location &amp;amp; conditions: Rabi season trials in lower Gangetic plains (cooler-warm conditions typical of winter-spring cycle).&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop &amp;amp; pest: Indian mustard (&#039;&#039;Brassica spp&#039;&#039;.); trials measured growth, yield and pest incidence under organic management.&lt;br /&gt;
* Product &amp;amp; application: Foliar application of Neemastra (sprayed three times during crop cycle) integrated with organic manures.&lt;br /&gt;
* Outcome: Plots receiving Neemastra sprays recorded higher seed yield compared to untreated control and some conventional nutrient regimes (trial reported measurable yield increases attributed to better pest suppression and crop health).&lt;br /&gt;
* Practical takeaways: Neemastra foliar sprays can be integrated with organic nutrient management to reduce pest damage and support yield-useful on oilseed crops with moderate pest pressure in cooler-to-moderate temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Success Story 3 -Castor crop (field): reduced pest counts and safety to natural enemies&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Location &amp;amp; conditions: Field trials in Andhra Pradesh (hot Kharif conditions; typical daytime temps often 25–35 °C during trials).&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop &amp;amp; pest: Castor; commonly attacked by caterpillars and sucking pests (aphids, jassids, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
* Product &amp;amp; application: Neemastra (20% in trial) compared with Brahmastra, Agniastra and Neem Seed Kernel Extract (NSKE 5%); foliar sprays applied per trial schedule. (Brahmastra, Agniastra are other organic solutions similar to neemastra but the components are different).&lt;br /&gt;
* Outcome: Neemastra and NSKE significantly reduced pest populations on castor; importantly, Neemastra showed lower negative impact on natural enemies (predators/parasitoids) compared with broad-spectrum chemicals -enabling faster recovery of beneficials.&lt;br /&gt;
* Practical takeaways: For castor and similar field crops, Neemastra provides effective pest suppression while conserving natural enemies .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;“Neem is a farmer’s silent doctor”&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Références&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
# Subha B, RS Marabi, SB Das, Kailash Chaukikar and Vikas Gupta. Bio-efficacy of biodynamics and botanicals against major insect pests of summer green gram and their impact on natural enemies. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 2025;9(9):263-266. DOI: [https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9d.5584 10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9d.5584].&lt;br /&gt;
# Caboni P, Sarais G, Angioni A, Garcia AJ, Lai F, Dedola F, Cabras P. Residues and persistence of neem formulations on strawberry after field treatment. J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Dec 27;54(26):10026-32. doi: 10.1021/jf062461v. PMID: 17177537.&lt;br /&gt;
# Lingampally, V., Solanki, V.R. and Raja, S.S., Reasons led to reconsideration of botanicals as stored grain insect pest control agents.&lt;br /&gt;
# Deewan, P., Rajhans Verma, D.P., Aechra, S. and Narolia, R.K., 2025. Natural Farming: A promising Approach for Agriculture. &#039;&#039;JUST AGRICULTURE PUBLICATIONS&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
# Zala, P.H., Kalsariya, B.N. and Kapuriya, T.D., IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL FARMING PRACTICES ADOPTED BY FARMERS.&lt;br /&gt;
# Megha Chandraker, Gajendra Chandrakar, Bheesham Kumar and Rupendra Patel. Bio-efficacy of plant-based materials against major insect pest under organic rice cultivation system. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 2025;9(9):488-494.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pati, S., Banerjee, S., Ghosh, M., Debnath, P. and Dolui, S., 2023. Effect of organic manure and neemastra on growth and yield of Indian mustard varieties in Lower Gangetic Plains of West Bengal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Kumar, G.S. and Sarada, O., 2020. Evaluation of cow based fermented organic products for non-insecticidal pest management in castor. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 9(10), pp.292-300.&lt;br /&gt;
# Kilani-Morakchi, S., Morakchi-Goudjil, H. and Sifi, K., 2021. Azadirachtin-based insecticide: Overview, risk assessments, and future directions. &#039;&#039;Frontiers in agronomy&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;, p.676208.&lt;br /&gt;
# Cura, M.S. and Gençer, N.S., 2019. Side effects of azadirachtin on some important beneficial insects in laboratory. &#039;&#039;Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;13&#039;&#039;(37), pp.39-47.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Applicable on wide range of crops as a preventive step&lt;br /&gt;
|Défavorise=Limits sucking pests and leaf eating caterpillars&lt;br /&gt;
|Complémentaire=It compliments organic farming&lt;br /&gt;
|Incompatible=Incompatible with synthetic pesticides&lt;br /&gt;
|Matériels=Hand sprayer and mist blower&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Neemastra]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_pheromones:_Natural_allies_for_protecting_crops&amp;diff=10591</id>
		<title>Use of pheromones: Natural allies for protecting crops</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_pheromones:_Natural_allies_for_protecting_crops&amp;diff=10591"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T12:59:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Photo illustration 2.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Harnessing the language of insects to better protect your crops, without           chemicals inputs and without impacting the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Arboriculture@ Arable crops@ Tropical crops@ Forestry@ Winegrowing&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Reduction in IFT&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones, these chemical substances naturally emitted by insects, are now valuable tools for monitoring, trapping, or disrupting the reproduction of agricultural pests. They allow for the protection of crops in an ecological, targeted, and residue-free manner, while also reducing the use of chemical insecticides.&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Biological control]] is not limited to the use of [[Beneficial organisms|natural enemies]] against [[pests]]. There are many other methods that are equally effective and environmentally safe, such as the use of pheromones to control pest populations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones, these chemical substances naturally emitted by insects, are now valuable tools for monitoring, trapping, or disrupting the reproduction of agricultural pests. They allow for the protection of crops in an ecological, targeted, and residue-free manner, while also reducing the use of chemical insecticides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is a pheromone? ==&lt;br /&gt;
A pheromone is a molecule produced by an insect to communicate with other individuals of the same species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It acts in very small doses and conveys a specific message: to attract a mate, signal danger, or indicate a food source. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have succeeded in reproducing these molecules in the laboratory, paving the way for their use in [[biological control]] &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ph%C3%A9romone&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK200991/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Operating principle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones work on the principle of chemical communication. Each insect species has its own &amp;quot;olfactory language&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. By releasing a specific pheromone, we can:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attract males to a trap to reduce populations: mass trapping&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Saturate the surrounding air with sexual scents, preventing males and females from finding each other : sexual confusion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Monitor populations using surveillance traps : monitoring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The different types of pheromones used by pests ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones can have different functions in pests:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex pheromones:&#039;&#039;&#039; attract a mate for mating (e.g. Moth : &#039;&#039;[[Tuta absoluta]], [[Helicoverpa armigera]]…&#039;&#039;) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224804/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aggregation pheromones:&#039;&#039;&#039; bring several individuals together on the same resource (e.g. Coleoptera, Bugs : weevils, stink bugs…) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10886-014-0465-6&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Trail or path pheromones:&#039;&#039;&#039; mark a route to a food source (as in [[Ant|ants]]) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020627&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Usage strategies in biological control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sexual confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Confusion sex.png|left|thumb|194x194px|Skema illustrating how the sexual confusion strategy works.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For sexual confusion, sex pheromone dispensers are installed in the plot to disrupt communication between male and female pests of the same species. This helps reduce mating, thereby decreasing egg production and [[Pests|pest]] populations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Widely used in [[Winegrowing|viticulture]], [[Arboriculture|arboriculture,]] and greenhouse crops &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X23001273&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mass-trapping.png|thumb|215x215px|Mass trapping of male moths in the bag trap]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mass trapping ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This technique involves capturing a large number of insects (males and femeles) to limit reproduction and kill them through the presence of sex or aggregation pheromones in the trap. It is effective in orchards, greenhouses, and enclosed vegetable crops &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/jee/article-abstract/99/5/1550/2218584?login=false&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358614335_Awareness_creation_on_Fall_Armyworm_and_IPM_capacity_development_efforts_in_Asia&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monitoring (population tracking) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Photo 1.png|left|thumb|Delta trap containing a pheromone capsule to attract males and a sticky trap to catch and trap them|302x302px]]Monitoring involves tracking the evolution of pest populations over time in order to determine periods of flight, mating, or infestation. The trap used here are not intended to eliminate insects at the beginning, but to detect their presence and anticipate treatments or control interventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring involves placing sticky traps equipped with sex or aggregation pheromones to attract and detect the early presence of a pest and to decide the right time to take action. In this type of trap, the pheromone is released by a special capsule placed inside the trap called Rubber septa. This capsule acts as a source of artificial pheromones that mimics the natural pheromones emitted by femele insects. It is the most common method, used in almost all [[Crops and productions|crops]] &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10886-016-0753-4&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Attract and kill.png|thumb|238x238px|Skema showing the butterfly being attracted to the pheromone capsule, which then ends up in the insecticide trap (Attract then kill)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The &amp;quot;Attract-and-Kill&amp;quot; strategy ===&lt;br /&gt;
In this strategy, pheromones are combined with a food lure or an insecticidal surface. They selectively attract pests to a specific point where they are then eliminated. This method helps reduce insecticide treatments at the plot level by targeting only the attracted individuals &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314264484_Development_of_an_Attract-and-Kill_Strategy_for_Drosophila_suzukii_Diptera_Drosophilidae_Evaluation_of_Attracticidal_Spheres_Under_Laboratory_and_Field_Conditions&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The &#039;Lure-and-Infect&#039; strategy ===&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, pheromones attract pests to a dissemination point of a pathogen (entomopathogenic fungus, virus, or [[nematode]]). The insects become infected there and then spread the pathogen within their population. This is an innovative approach that combines chemical communication and natural biopesticides &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964417300117&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aggregation and anti-aggregation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aggregation pheromones can be used to gather pests in areas where they can be more easily trapped or treated. Conversely, anti-aggregation pheromones repel individuals, preventing them from colonizing a given area. These strategies are tested, for example, for weevils, bark beetles, and stink bugs &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11805885/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The &#039;Push-Pull&#039; strategy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Push pull strat.png|left|thumb|318x318px|Skema illustrating the &amp;quot;Push-Pull&amp;quot; strategy]]The principle is based on a combination of attractive and repellent signals:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The “&#039;&#039;&#039;push&#039;&#039;&#039;” uses repellent agents like reppelent plants or avoidance pheromones to drive the pest away from the main crop.&lt;br /&gt;
* The “&#039;&#039;&#039;pull&#039;&#039;&#039;” employs attractive agents like trap plants or dispensers of attractive pheromones to concentrate them elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a comprehensive agroecological approach, already used against certain moths, [[aphids]], and maize borers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The different types of traps using pheromones ==&lt;br /&gt;
The choice of trap depends on the type of insect targeted, its behavior (flying, crawling, attracted to a particular color, etc.), the type of the crop, and the goal (monitoring, mass trapping, or mating disruption). Here are the main models used in agriculture: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:13&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://opera-connaissances.chambres-agriculture.fr/doc_num.php?explnum_id=200214&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:14&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://achatnature.com/628-pieges-pheromones&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/pheromone-traps-in-agriculture-agriculture-maps-top-2025&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Delta Trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DELTA-trap.webp|thumb|183x183px|Photo of a Delta trap hanging from a tree]]The delta trap is undoubtedly the most commonly used in monitoring programs. It is shaped like a small triangle made of cardboard or plastic, inside which there is a sticky plate and a pheromone capsule. When a male insect is attracted by the scent, it sticks to the plate, allowing easy counting of the captures. This type of trap is very effective for monitoring pest moths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lightweight, economical, and easy to install, it must nevertheless be protected from rain and dust to maintain its effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The funnel trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Funnel multi trap.png|left|thumb|136x136px|Photo of an example of a multi-funnel trap set up on a forest tree]]The funnel trap is designed to capture large quantities of insects. It consists of a plastic funnel leading to a collection container placed below. The pheromone attracts pests, who fall inside and cannot escape. This system is particularly used for large-sized coleopterans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very sturdy and weather-resistant, it is well suited for mass trapping or long-term monitoring. The only drawback: it is a bit bulky and needs to be emptied regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Bucket Trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Funnel petit1.png|left|thumb|148x148px|Photo of a bucket trap installed in a fruit tree]]The bucket trap works on the same principle as the funnel trap but in a simpler form: a plastic bucket with a lid and side openings. The pheromone capsule is suspended inside, attracting insects that fall into the bucket and cannot escape. This device is often used for the mass trapping of nocturnal moths and borers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very sturdy, it withstands open-field conditions well, particularly in large-scale crops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Bottle Trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bouteille trap1.png|thumb|162x162px|Photo of a bottle used as an insect trap.]]The bottle trap is a simple and economical solution, often made from recycled plastic bottles. With a few holes drilled and equipped with a pheromone cap, the bottle attracts insects that enter, cannot get out and then die from drowning or poisoning. This system is particularly appreciated for artisanal or local monitoring of pests such as certain [[Fly|flies moths]]&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;es, or beetles. Although inexpensive and easy to make yourself, it must be replaced regularly, as it deteriorates over time and with exposure to the weather.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aggregation trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege punaise diabolique.png|left|thumb|153x153px|Photo of an example of an aggregation trap used against stink bugs]]Aggregation traps use aggregation pheromones, which attract both males and females of the same species to the same resource. This type of trap is particularly effective against beetles (such as [[Weevil|weevils]] or [[Bark beetle|bark beetles]]) and certain bugs. It is often used for mass trapping or monitoring populations in orchards, palm groves, large crops, and sometimes in wooded areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Summary Table : Choice of Pheromone Trap According to Pest and Crop &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:16&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.plantarchives.org/article/200-%20Pheromone%20Traps%20in%20Insect%20Pest%20Management%20A%20Comprehensive%20Review%20of%20Their%20Applications,%20Efficacy%20and%20Future%20Directions%20in%20Integrated%20Pest%20Management.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Type of trap&lt;br /&gt;
!Targeted pests&lt;br /&gt;
!Crops concerned&lt;br /&gt;
!Type of pheromone&lt;br /&gt;
!Usage Objective&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Delta trap 22.png|131x131px]]Delta trap&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;- Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (tortrix moths, cutworms, clothes moths)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable crops&#039;&#039;&#039; under greenhouse or tunnel&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Orchards&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Monitoring&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Funnel noirs1.jpg|140x140px]]Multiple funneltrap&lt;br /&gt;
| -&#039;&#039;&#039;Wood-boring beetles&#039;&#039;&#039; (bark beetles, longhorn beetles...)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Forests&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Palm groves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Aggregation pheromone&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Funnel sachet1.jpg|151x151px]]Funnel trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (moths, migratory butterflies)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-scale crops&#039;&#039;&#039; (corn, cotton, soy)&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Open field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Funnel jaune vert1.png|150x150px]]Bucket trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (moths, migratory butterflies)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Large crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Tropical orchards&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Bouteille pheromone1.jpg|136x136px]]Bottle trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Diptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (fruit flies)&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Coleoptera&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;-Vegetable crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Tropical crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Monitoring&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Artisanal mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Piege punaise diabolique.png|182x182px]]Aggregation trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Beetles&#039;&#039;&#039; (weevils, bark beetles)&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;True bugs&#039;&#039;&#039; (stink bugs)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Field crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Orchards&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Ornamental crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Aggregation pheromone&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to use pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
For optimal use, traps or dispensers should be installed at the start of the season, before the first pest flights. The choice of device should be suited to the target species: funnel traps, delta traps, buckets, bottles, or other specific models.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromone capsules must be replaced regularly, generally every 4 to 6 weeks depending on environmental conditions. In greenhouses or under tunnels, heat increases evaporation and speeds up pheromone degradation, so it is recommended to change the capsules every 4 weeks. In open fields or orchards, where conditions are often cooler and more stable, their effective duration can sometimes reach 6 to 8 weeks &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:13&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:15&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Used capsules may still contain remnants of pheromones, which are considered as biopesticides, so they should not be thrown into regular trash or discarded in nature. The best practice would be to gather the used capsules in a sealed bag or container and then deposit them in the specific agricultural waste stream, through a system such as [https://www.adivalor.fr/ ADIVALOR] or collection of plant protection waste (at authorized distributors, cooperatives, chambers of agriculture, etc.).If no specific collection exists, they should be treated as non-hazardous chemical waste: at a waste disposal site, specifying that it is &amp;quot;used [[biocontrol]] material.&amp;quot; Some companies that supply the capsules (e.g., [https://www.biobest.com/fr-FR &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Biobest&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://www.sumiagro.fr/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SumiAgro&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://russellipm.com/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Russell IPM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;]…) offer take-back or recovery programs for used capsules &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:16&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where to use pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones can be used on a wide range of crops:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans vignes1.png|thumb|168x168px|Vineyards ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans tunnel1.png|left|thumb|144x144px|Protected crops (tunnels, greenhouses) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khaled-Abbes/publication/257224255_First_estimate_of_the_damage_of_Tuta_absoluta_Povolny_Lepidoptera_Gelecheiidae_and_evaluation_of_the_efficacy_of_sex_pheromone_traps_in_greenhouses_of_tomato_crops_in_the_Bekalta_Region_Tunisia/links/00b7d524e957f121ec000000/First-estimate-of-the-damage-of-Tuta-absoluta-Povolny-Lepidoptera-Gelecheiidae-and-evaluation-of-the-efficacy-of-sex-pheromone-traps-in-greenhouses-of-tomato-crops-in-the-Bekalta-Region-Tunisia.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans arbre 22.jpg|center|thumb|215x215px|Orchards &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:18&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/10/791&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:19&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/jee/article-abstract/100/6/1797/2198752?login=false&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans champs.png|left|thumb|266x266px|Large-scale crops &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:20&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.vinopole.com/docs/confusion-sexuellecochylis-cryptoblabes-eudemis/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Funnel dans foret1.png|center|thumb|204x204px|Forest &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:21&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1025767217376&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are effective in both organic and conventional production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
The installation depends on the pest&#039;s life cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general, pheromones are placed: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pestcontrold.com/home-garden/the-role-of-pheromones-in-modern-pest-control/?utm_source#A_Species_Resistance&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the first flights (spring) for lepidopterans to prevent mating  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuously, for pests present throughout the season  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And adjustments are made based on trapping observations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How can one obtain pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones and their traps are available: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At agricultural cooperatives ([https://www.coop-valsiagne.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cata-WEB_valsiagne_Lutte-biologique-2020.pdf?utm_source &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Coopérative Valsiagne Pro&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://uneal.com/phyto/1001/10014/p/U000215/insecticide-ginko-pac-400-sachets-diff?utm_source &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Unéal&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;]…)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From suppliers specializing in [[biological control]] and integrated protection ([https://www.biobest.com/fr-FR &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Biobest&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://www.koppert.fr/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Koppert&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://www.sumiagro.fr/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SumiAgro&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://russellipm.com/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Russell IPM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On certain authorized professional specialized websites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How much do pheromones cost? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Costs vary depending on several factors: the crop to be protected, its size, the targeted pest species, and the strategy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Pheromone capsule:&#039;&#039;&#039; €3 to €10 each, approximately 30 to 100 € per hectare, depending on the number of traps installed (often 10 to 20 traps/ha for monitoring) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:23&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.gammvert.fr/p/decamp-piege-a-pheromones-universel-67580daf386740fc4cf1a87c?utm_source&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Complete trap:&#039;&#039;&#039; €10 to €30 depending on the model around €100 to €300 per hectare for a standard monitoring network &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:24&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.andermatt.fr/pheromones/52-piege-funnel.html?utm_source&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mating disruption:&#039;&#039;&#039; approximately €80 to €250 per hectare &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:25&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.diproclean.com/pheromone-carpocapse-fruits-pepins-xml-274_498_521-2460.html?utm_source&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages of using pheromones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the producer: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Significant reduction in pest populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fewer chemical insecticide treatments used → cost savings and better production image.&lt;br /&gt;
* Compatible with other biological control methods.&lt;br /&gt;
* Easy to use and integrate into an overall strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the environment: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Species-specific (no impact on [[Beneficial organisms|beneficial insects]], helpful organisms, [[Pollinator|pollinators]], or humans).&lt;br /&gt;
* No chemical residues or toxic compounds left in the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
* Preservation of [[biodiversity]] and ecological balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitation on the use of pheromones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the producer: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Initial cost higher than a conventional insecticide (Higher initial cost but often offset in the long term by a reduction in the number of treatments, resulting in a lower cost per treatment and better durability of results)&lt;br /&gt;
* Effectiveness depends on pest density and the size of the treated area (better on a large scale)&lt;br /&gt;
* Requires good knowledge of the pest&#039;s life cycle to know when to apply the pheromone precisely&lt;br /&gt;
* Some species do not yet have an available pheromone&lt;br /&gt;
* Some pests can develop resistance to the pheromones used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the environment: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Little direct impact if the pest migrates from untreated areas&lt;br /&gt;
* Sensitive to weather conditions (heat, wind)&lt;br /&gt;
* Regular monitoring is necessary to prevent recurrences&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique}}&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Phéromone. In: Wikipédia [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 30]. Available from: https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ph%C3%A9romone&amp;amp;oldid=230965319&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Kaissling KE. Pheromone Reception in Insects: The Example of Silk Moths. In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editor. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication [Internet]. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor &amp;amp; Francis; 2014 [cited 2025 Nov 30]. (Frontiers in Neuroscience).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rizvi SAH, George J, Reddy GVP, Zeng X, Guerrero A. Latest Developments in Insect Sex Pheromone Research and Its Application in Agricultural Pest Management. Insects. 2021 May 23;12(6):484.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Cardé RT. Defining Attraction and Aggregation Pheromones: Teleological Versus Functional Perspectives. J Chem Ecol. 2014 June 1;40(6):519–20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Czaczkes TJ, Grüter C, Ratnieks FLW. Trail Pheromones: An Integrative View of Their Role in Social Insect Colony Organization. Annual Review of Entomology. 2015 Jan 7;60(Volume 60, 2015):581–99.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Hasan MM, Mahroof RM, Aikins MJ, Athanassiou CG, Phillips TW. Pheromone-based auto-confusion for mating disruption of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in structures with raw and processed grain products. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2023 Dec 1;104:102201.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Potential of Mass Trapping for Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species | Journal of Economic Entomology | Oxford Academic [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 30].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Chaudhary M, Choudhary B, Deshmukh S, Krupnik T, Rakshit S, Davis T. Awareness creation on Fall Armyworm, and IPM capacity development efforts in Asia. In 2021. p. 154–71.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Larsson MC. Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals for Monitoring Rare and Endangered Species. J Chem Ecol. 2016 Sept 1;42(9):853–68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rice K, Short B, Leskey T. Development of an Attract-and-Kill Strategy for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Evaluation of Attracticidal Spheres Under Laboratory and Field Conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2017 Mar 7;110.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Mfuti DK, Niassy S, Subramanian S, du Plessis H, Ekesi S, Maniania NK. Lure and infect strategy for application of entomopathogenic fungus for the control of bean flower thrips in cowpea. Biological Control. 2017 Apr 1;107:70–6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:11&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Viklund L, Bång J, Schroeder M, Hedenström E. New Insights into the Composition of Aggregation Pheromones in Polygraphus poligraphus, Polygraphus punctifrons, Polygraphus subopacus and Polygraphus proximus. J Chem Ecol. 2025;51(1):25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:12&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA. The Use of Push-Pull Strategies in Integrated Pest Management. Annual Review of Entomology. 2007 Jan 1;52(Volume 52, 2007):375–400.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:13&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; GUIDE DES BONNES PRATIQUES D’UTILISATION DES PIÈGES À PHÉROMONES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:14&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Pièges et Phéromones anti nuisibles - achatnature.com [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:15&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Pheromone Traps In Agriculture, Agriculture Maps: Top 2025 [Internet]. 2025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:16&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; PHEROMONE TRAPS IN INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THEIR APPLICATIONS, EFFICACY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. PA [Internet]. 2025 Mar 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:17&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Brahim C, Abbes K, Aoun M, Ben. Othmen S, Ouhibi M, Gamoon W, et al. First estimate of the damage of Tuta absoluta (Povolny) (Lepidoptera: Gelecheiidae) and evaluation of the efficacy of sex pheromone traps in greenhouses of tomato crops in the Bekalta Region, Tunisia. African Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology. 2009 Jan 1;3:49–52.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:18&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Carnio V, Favaro R, Preti M, Angeli S. Impact of Aggregation Pheromone Traps on Spatial Distribution of Halyomorpha halys Damage in Apple Orchards. Insects. 2024 Oct;15(10):791.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:20&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Phéromones | Wiki Biocontrôle en Viticulture [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:19&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Monitoring of European Corn Borer with Pheromone-Baited Traps: Review of Trapping System Basics and Remaining Problems | Journal of Economic Entomology | Oxford Academic [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:21&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Schlyter F, Zhang QH, Liu GT, Ji LZ. A successful Case of Pheromone Mass Trapping of the Bark Beetle Ips duplicatus in a Forest Island, Analysed by 20-year Time-Series Data. Integrated Pest Management Reviews. 2001 Sept 1;6(3):185–96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Grant R. The Role Of Pheromones In Modern Pest Control | Pest Control’d [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:23&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Forestier jean pierre. Diproclean.com. [cited 2025 Nov 30]. Phéromone Papillons des Fruits Pépins - Carpocapses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:24&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Décamp’ - Piège à phéromones Universel - Gamm vert [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:25&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Andermatt France [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 30]. Piège phéromone Funnel - piège insectes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Utilisation des phéromones : Alliés naturels pour protéger les cultures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_susukii&amp;diff=10590</id>
		<title>Drosophila susukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_susukii&amp;diff=10590"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T12:58:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Drosophila_pseudoobscura-Male.png&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = &lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés=Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, Fruits pests, Biological control of fruits pests, Fruits production&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Pests}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Biology and Identification&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Host Range and Crop Damage&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Ecology and Distribution&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Impact on Global Agriculture&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Detection and Monitoring&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Management Strategies&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                            &#039;&#039;&#039;  &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Best time for release: ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Temperature requirement ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Enhance Their Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Research and Innovation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;6. Integrate crop environment management&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;7. Future tools may include genetic control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Références&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Drosophile (Drosophila suzukii)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_pheromones:_Natural_allies_for_protecting_crops&amp;diff=10589</id>
		<title>Use of pheromones: Natural allies for protecting crops</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Use_of_pheromones:_Natural_allies_for_protecting_crops&amp;diff=10589"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T10:18:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Photo illustration 2.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Harnessing the language of insects to better protect your crops, without           chemicals inputs and without impacting the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Arboriculture@ Arable crops@ Tropical crops@ Forestry@ Winegrowing&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Reduction in IFT&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones, these chemical substances naturally emitted by insects, are now valuable tools for monitoring, trapping, or disrupting the reproduction of agricultural pests. They allow for the protection of crops in an ecological, targeted, and residue-free manner, while also reducing the use of chemical insecticides.&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Biological control]] is not limited to the use of [[Beneficial organisms|natural enemies]] against [[pests]]. There are many other methods that are equally effective and environmentally safe, such as the use of pheromones to control pest populations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones, these chemical substances naturally emitted by insects, are now valuable tools for monitoring, trapping, or disrupting the reproduction of agricultural pests. They allow for the protection of crops in an ecological, targeted, and residue-free manner, while also reducing the use of chemical insecticides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What is a pheromone? ==&lt;br /&gt;
A pheromone is a molecule produced by an insect to communicate with other individuals of the same species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It acts in very small doses and conveys a specific message: to attract a mate, signal danger, or indicate a food source. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have succeeded in reproducing these molecules in the laboratory, paving the way for their use in [[biological control]] &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ph%C3%A9romone&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK200991/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Operating principle ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones work on the principle of chemical communication. Each insect species has its own &amp;quot;olfactory language&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. By releasing a specific pheromone, we can:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attract males to a trap to reduce populations: mass trapping&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Saturate the surrounding air with sexual scents, preventing males and females from finding each other : sexual confusion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Monitor populations using surveillance traps : monitoring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The different types of pheromones used by pests ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones can have different functions in pests:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex pheromones:&#039;&#039;&#039; attract a mate for mating (e.g. Moth : &#039;&#039;[[Tuta absoluta]], [[Helicoverpa armigera]]…&#039;&#039;) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8224804/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Aggregation pheromones:&#039;&#039;&#039; bring several individuals together on the same resource (e.g. Coleoptera, Bugs : weevils, stink bugs…) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10886-014-0465-6&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Trail or path pheromones:&#039;&#039;&#039; mark a route to a food source (as in [[Ant|ants]]) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020627&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Usage strategies in biological control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sexual confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Confusion sex.png|left|thumb|194x194px|Skema illustrating how the sexual confusion strategy works.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For sexual confusion, sex pheromone dispensers are installed in the plot to disrupt communication between male and female pests of the same species. This helps reduce mating, thereby decreasing egg production and [[Pests|pest]] populations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Widely used in [[Winegrowing|viticulture]], [[Arboriculture|arboriculture,]] and greenhouse crops &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X23001273&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mass-trapping.png|thumb|215x215px|Mass trapping of male moths in the bag trap]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mass trapping ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This technique involves capturing a large number of insects (males and femeles) to limit reproduction and kill them through the presence of sex or aggregation pheromones in the trap. It is effective in orchards, greenhouses, and enclosed vegetable crops &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/jee/article-abstract/99/5/1550/2218584?login=false&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358614335_Awareness_creation_on_Fall_Armyworm_and_IPM_capacity_development_efforts_in_Asia&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Monitoring (population tracking) ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Photo 1.png|left|thumb|Delta trap containing a pheromone capsule to attract males and a sticky trap to catch and trap them|302x302px]]Monitoring involves tracking the evolution of pest populations over time in order to determine periods of flight, mating, or infestation. The trap used here are not intended to eliminate insects at the beginning, but to detect their presence and anticipate treatments or control interventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Monitoring involves placing sticky traps equipped with sex or aggregation pheromones to attract and detect the early presence of a pest and to decide the right time to take action. In this type of trap, the pheromone is released by a special capsule placed inside the trap called Rubber septa. This capsule acts as a source of artificial pheromones that mimics the natural pheromones emitted by femele insects. It is the most common method, used in almost all [[Crops and productions|crops]] &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10886-016-0753-4&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Attract and kill.png|thumb|238x238px|Skema showing the butterfly being attracted to the pheromone capsule, which then ends up in the insecticide trap (Attract then kill)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The &amp;quot;Attract-and-Kill&amp;quot; strategy ===&lt;br /&gt;
In this strategy, pheromones are combined with a food lure or an insecticidal surface. They selectively attract pests to a specific point where they are then eliminated. This method helps reduce insecticide treatments at the plot level by targeting only the attracted individuals &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314264484_Development_of_an_Attract-and-Kill_Strategy_for_Drosophila_suzukii_Diptera_Drosophilidae_Evaluation_of_Attracticidal_Spheres_Under_Laboratory_and_Field_Conditions&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The &#039;Lure-and-Infect&#039; strategy ===&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, pheromones attract pests to a dissemination point of a pathogen (entomopathogenic fungus, virus, or [[nematode]]). The insects become infected there and then spread the pathogen within their population. This is an innovative approach that combines chemical communication and natural biopesticides &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964417300117&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aggregation and anti-aggregation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aggregation pheromones can be used to gather pests in areas where they can be more easily trapped or treated. Conversely, anti-aggregation pheromones repel individuals, preventing them from colonizing a given area. These strategies are tested, for example, for weevils, bark beetles, and stink bugs &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:11&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11805885/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The &#039;Push-Pull&#039; strategy ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Push pull strat.png|left|thumb|318x318px|Skema illustrating the &amp;quot;Push-Pull&amp;quot; strategy]]The principle is based on a combination of attractive and repellent signals:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The “&#039;&#039;&#039;push&#039;&#039;&#039;” uses repellent agents like reppelent plants or avoidance pheromones to drive the pest away from the main crop.&lt;br /&gt;
* The “&#039;&#039;&#039;pull&#039;&#039;&#039;” employs attractive agents like trap plants or dispensers of attractive pheromones to concentrate them elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a comprehensive agroecological approach, already used against certain moths, [[aphids]], and maize borers &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:12&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091407&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The different types of traps using pheromones ==&lt;br /&gt;
The choice of trap depends on the type of insect targeted, its behavior (flying, crawling, attracted to a particular color, etc.), the type of the crop, and the goal (monitoring, mass trapping, or mating disruption). Here are the main models used in agriculture: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:13&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://opera-connaissances.chambres-agriculture.fr/doc_num.php?explnum_id=200214&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:14&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://achatnature.com/628-pieges-pheromones&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:15&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/pheromone-traps-in-agriculture-agriculture-maps-top-2025&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Delta Trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DELTA-trap.webp|thumb|183x183px|Photo of a Delta trap hanging from a tree]]The delta trap is undoubtedly the most commonly used in monitoring programs. It is shaped like a small triangle made of cardboard or plastic, inside which there is a sticky plate and a pheromone capsule. When a male insect is attracted by the scent, it sticks to the plate, allowing easy counting of the captures. This type of trap is very effective for monitoring pest moths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lightweight, economical, and easy to install, it must nevertheless be protected from rain and dust to maintain its effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The funnel trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Funnel multi trap.png|left|thumb|136x136px|Photo of an example of a multi-funnel trap set up on a forest tree]]The funnel trap is designed to capture large quantities of insects. It consists of a plastic funnel leading to a collection container placed below. The pheromone attracts pests, who fall inside and cannot escape. This system is particularly used for large-sized coleopterans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very sturdy and weather-resistant, it is well suited for mass trapping or long-term monitoring. The only drawback: it is a bit bulky and needs to be emptied regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Bucket Trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Funnel petit1.png|left|thumb|148x148px|Photo of a bucket trap installed in a fruit tree]]The bucket trap works on the same principle as the funnel trap but in a simpler form: a plastic bucket with a lid and side openings. The pheromone capsule is suspended inside, attracting insects that fall into the bucket and cannot escape. This device is often used for the mass trapping of nocturnal moths and borers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very sturdy, it withstands open-field conditions well, particularly in large-scale crops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Bottle Trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bouteille trap1.png|thumb|162x162px|Photo of a bottle used as an insect trap.]]The bottle trap is a simple and economical solution, often made from recycled plastic bottles. With a few holes drilled and equipped with a pheromone cap, the bottle attracts insects that enter, cannot get out and then die from drowning or poisoning. This system is particularly appreciated for artisanal or local monitoring of pests such as certain [[Fly|flies moths]]&amp;lt;nowiki/&amp;gt;es, or beetles. Although inexpensive and easy to make yourself, it must be replaced regularly, as it deteriorates over time and with exposure to the weather.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aggregation trap ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege punaise diabolique.png|left|thumb|153x153px|Photo of an example of an aggregation trap used against stink bugs]]Aggregation traps use aggregation pheromones, which attract both males and females of the same species to the same resource. This type of trap is particularly effective against beetles (such as [[Weevil|weevils]] or [[Bark beetle|bark beetles]]) and certain bugs. It is often used for mass trapping or monitoring populations in orchards, palm groves, large crops, and sometimes in wooded areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Summary Table : Choice of Pheromone Trap According to Pest and Crop &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:16&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.plantarchives.org/article/200-%20Pheromone%20Traps%20in%20Insect%20Pest%20Management%20A%20Comprehensive%20Review%20of%20Their%20Applications,%20Efficacy%20and%20Future%20Directions%20in%20Integrated%20Pest%20Management.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
!Type of trap&lt;br /&gt;
!Targeted pests&lt;br /&gt;
!Crops concerned&lt;br /&gt;
!Type of pheromone&lt;br /&gt;
!Usage Objective&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Delta trap 22.png|131x131px]]Delta trap&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;- Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (tortrix moths, cutworms, clothes moths)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable crops&#039;&#039;&#039; under greenhouse or tunnel&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Orchards&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Monitoring&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Funnel noirs1.jpg|140x140px]]Multiple funneltrap&lt;br /&gt;
| -&#039;&#039;&#039;Wood-boring beetles&#039;&#039;&#039; (bark beetles, longhorn beetles...)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Forests&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Palm groves&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Aggregation pheromone&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Funnel sachet1.jpg|151x151px]]Funnel trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (moths, migratory butterflies)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-scale crops&#039;&#039;&#039; (corn, cotton, soy)&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Open field&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Funnel jaune vert1.png|150x150px]]Bucket trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (moths, migratory butterflies)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Large crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Tropical orchards&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Bouteille pheromone1.jpg|136x136px]]Bottle trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Diptera&#039;&#039;&#039; (fruit flies)&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Coleoptera&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Lepidoptera&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;-Vegetable crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Tropical crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sex Pheromones&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Monitoring&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Artisanal mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Piege punaise diabolique.png|182x182px]]Aggregation trap&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Beetles&#039;&#039;&#039; (weevils, bark beetles)&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;True bugs&#039;&#039;&#039; (stink bugs)&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Field crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Orchards&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- &#039;&#039;&#039;Ornamental crops&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Aggregation pheromone&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
| - &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How to use pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
For optimal use, traps or dispensers should be installed at the start of the season, before the first pest flights. The choice of device should be suited to the target species: funnel traps, delta traps, buckets, bottles, or other specific models.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromone capsules must be replaced regularly, generally every 4 to 6 weeks depending on environmental conditions. In greenhouses or under tunnels, heat increases evaporation and speeds up pheromone degradation, so it is recommended to change the capsules every 4 weeks. In open fields or orchards, where conditions are often cooler and more stable, their effective duration can sometimes reach 6 to 8 weeks &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:13&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:15&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Used capsules may still contain remnants of pheromones, which are considered as biopesticides, so they should not be thrown into regular trash or discarded in nature. The best practice would be to gather the used capsules in a sealed bag or container and then deposit them in the specific agricultural waste stream, through a system such as [https://www.adivalor.fr/ ADIVALOR] or collection of plant protection waste (at authorized distributors, cooperatives, chambers of agriculture, etc.).If no specific collection exists, they should be treated as non-hazardous chemical waste: at a waste disposal site, specifying that it is &amp;quot;used [[biocontrol]] material.&amp;quot; Some companies that supply the capsules (e.g., [https://www.biobest.com/fr-FR &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Biobest&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://www.sumiagro.fr/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SumiAgro&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://russellipm.com/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Russell IPM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;]…) offer take-back or recovery programs for used capsules &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:16&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where to use pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones can be used on a wide range of crops:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans vignes1.png|thumb|168x168px|Vineyards ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans tunnel1.png|left|thumb|144x144px|Protected crops (tunnels, greenhouses) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:17&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Khaled-Abbes/publication/257224255_First_estimate_of_the_damage_of_Tuta_absoluta_Povolny_Lepidoptera_Gelecheiidae_and_evaluation_of_the_efficacy_of_sex_pheromone_traps_in_greenhouses_of_tomato_crops_in_the_Bekalta_Region_Tunisia/links/00b7d524e957f121ec000000/First-estimate-of-the-damage-of-Tuta-absoluta-Povolny-Lepidoptera-Gelecheiidae-and-evaluation-of-the-efficacy-of-sex-pheromone-traps-in-greenhouses-of-tomato-crops-in-the-Bekalta-Region-Tunisia.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans arbre 22.jpg|center|thumb|215x215px|Orchards &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:18&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/10/791&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:19&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/jee/article-abstract/100/6/1797/2198752?login=false&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Piege dans champs.png|left|thumb|266x266px|Large-scale crops &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:20&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.vinopole.com/docs/confusion-sexuellecochylis-cryptoblabes-eudemis/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Funnel dans foret1.png|center|thumb|204x204px|Forest &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:21&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1025767217376&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are effective in both organic and conventional production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== When to use pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
The installation depends on the pest&#039;s life cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general, pheromones are placed: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pestcontrold.com/home-garden/the-role-of-pheromones-in-modern-pest-control/?utm_source#A_Species_Resistance&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Before the first flights (spring) for lepidopterans to prevent mating  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuously, for pests present throughout the season  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* And adjustments are made based on trapping observations&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How can one obtain pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones and their traps are available: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* At agricultural cooperatives ([https://www.coop-valsiagne.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/cata-WEB_valsiagne_Lutte-biologique-2020.pdf?utm_source &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Coopérative Valsiagne Pro&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://uneal.com/phyto/1001/10014/p/U000215/insecticide-ginko-pac-400-sachets-diff?utm_source &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Unéal&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;]…)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* From suppliers specializing in [[biological control]] and integrated protection ([https://www.biobest.com/fr-FR &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Biobest&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://www.koppert.fr/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Koppert&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://www.sumiagro.fr/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;SumiAgro&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], [https://russellipm.com/ &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Russell IPM&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;], etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* On certain authorized professional specialized websites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How much do pheromones cost? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Costs vary depending on several factors: the crop to be protected, its size, the targeted pest species, and the strategy: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Pheromone capsule:&#039;&#039;&#039; €3 to €10 each, approximately 30 to 100 € per hectare, depending on the number of traps installed (often 10 to 20 traps/ha for monitoring) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:23&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.gammvert.fr/p/decamp-piege-a-pheromones-universel-67580daf386740fc4cf1a87c?utm_source&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Complete trap:&#039;&#039;&#039; €10 to €30 depending on the model around €100 to €300 per hectare for a standard monitoring network &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:24&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.andermatt.fr/pheromones/52-piege-funnel.html?utm_source&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mating disruption:&#039;&#039;&#039; approximately €80 to €250 per hectare &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:25&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.diproclean.com/pheromone-carpocapse-fruits-pepins-xml-274_498_521-2460.html?utm_source&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages of using pheromones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the producer: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Significant reduction in pest populations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Fewer chemical insecticide treatments used → cost savings and better production image.&lt;br /&gt;
* Compatible with other biological control methods.&lt;br /&gt;
* Easy to use and integrate into an overall strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the environment: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Species-specific (no impact on [[Beneficial organisms|beneficial insects]], helpful organisms, [[Pollinator|pollinators]], or humans).&lt;br /&gt;
* No chemical residues or toxic compounds left in the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
* Preservation of [[biodiversity]] and ecological balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitation on the use of pheromones ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the producer: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Initial cost higher than a conventional insecticide (Higher initial cost but often offset in the long term by a reduction in the number of treatments, resulting in a lower cost per treatment and better durability of results)&lt;br /&gt;
* Effectiveness depends on pest density and the size of the treated area (better on a large scale)&lt;br /&gt;
* Requires good knowledge of the pest&#039;s life cycle to know when to apply the pheromone precisely&lt;br /&gt;
* Some species do not yet have an available pheromone&lt;br /&gt;
* Some pests can develop resistance to the pheromones used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the environment: &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Little direct impact if the pest migrates from untreated areas&lt;br /&gt;
* Sensitive to weather conditions (heat, wind)&lt;br /&gt;
* Regular monitoring is necessary to prevent recurrences&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique}}&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Phéromone. In: Wikipédia [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 30]. Available from: https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ph%C3%A9romone&amp;amp;oldid=230965319&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Kaissling KE. Pheromone Reception in Insects: The Example of Silk Moths. In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editor. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication [Internet]. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor &amp;amp; Francis; 2014 [cited 2025 Nov 30]. (Frontiers in Neuroscience).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rizvi SAH, George J, Reddy GVP, Zeng X, Guerrero A. Latest Developments in Insect Sex Pheromone Research and Its Application in Agricultural Pest Management. Insects. 2021 May 23;12(6):484.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Cardé RT. Defining Attraction and Aggregation Pheromones: Teleological Versus Functional Perspectives. J Chem Ecol. 2014 June 1;40(6):519–20.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Czaczkes TJ, Grüter C, Ratnieks FLW. Trail Pheromones: An Integrative View of Their Role in Social Insect Colony Organization. Annual Review of Entomology. 2015 Jan 7;60(Volume 60, 2015):581–99.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Hasan MM, Mahroof RM, Aikins MJ, Athanassiou CG, Phillips TW. Pheromone-based auto-confusion for mating disruption of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in structures with raw and processed grain products. Journal of Stored Products Research. 2023 Dec 1;104:102201.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Potential of Mass Trapping for Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species | Journal of Economic Entomology | Oxford Academic [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 30].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Chaudhary M, Choudhary B, Deshmukh S, Krupnik T, Rakshit S, Davis T. Awareness creation on Fall Armyworm, and IPM capacity development efforts in Asia. In 2021. p. 154–71.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Larsson MC. Pheromones and Other Semiochemicals for Monitoring Rare and Endangered Species. J Chem Ecol. 2016 Sept 1;42(9):853–68.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rice K, Short B, Leskey T. Development of an Attract-and-Kill Strategy for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): Evaluation of Attracticidal Spheres Under Laboratory and Field Conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology. 2017 Mar 7;110.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Mfuti DK, Niassy S, Subramanian S, du Plessis H, Ekesi S, Maniania NK. Lure and infect strategy for application of entomopathogenic fungus for the control of bean flower thrips in cowpea. Biological Control. 2017 Apr 1;107:70–6.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:11&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Viklund L, Bång J, Schroeder M, Hedenström E. New Insights into the Composition of Aggregation Pheromones in Polygraphus poligraphus, Polygraphus punctifrons, Polygraphus subopacus and Polygraphus proximus. J Chem Ecol. 2025;51(1):25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:12&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA. The Use of Push-Pull Strategies in Integrated Pest Management. Annual Review of Entomology. 2007 Jan 1;52(Volume 52, 2007):375–400.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:13&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; GUIDE DES BONNES PRATIQUES D’UTILISATION DES PIÈGES À PHÉROMONES&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:14&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Pièges et Phéromones anti nuisibles - achatnature.com [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:15&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Pheromone Traps In Agriculture, Agriculture Maps: Top 2025 [Internet]. 2025&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:16&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; PHEROMONE TRAPS IN INSECT PEST MANAGEMENT: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THEIR APPLICATIONS, EFFICACY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS IN INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT. PA [Internet]. 2025 Mar 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:17&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Brahim C, Abbes K, Aoun M, Ben. Othmen S, Ouhibi M, Gamoon W, et al. First estimate of the damage of Tuta absoluta (Povolny) (Lepidoptera: Gelecheiidae) and evaluation of the efficacy of sex pheromone traps in greenhouses of tomato crops in the Bekalta Region, Tunisia. African Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology. 2009 Jan 1;3:49–52.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:18&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Carnio V, Favaro R, Preti M, Angeli S. Impact of Aggregation Pheromone Traps on Spatial Distribution of Halyomorpha halys Damage in Apple Orchards. Insects. 2024 Oct;15(10):791.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:20&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Phéromones | Wiki Biocontrôle en Viticulture [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:19&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Monitoring of European Corn Borer with Pheromone-Baited Traps: Review of Trapping System Basics and Remaining Problems | Journal of Economic Entomology | Oxford Academic [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:21&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Schlyter F, Zhang QH, Liu GT, Ji LZ. A successful Case of Pheromone Mass Trapping of the Bark Beetle Ips duplicatus in a Forest Island, Analysed by 20-year Time-Series Data. Integrated Pest Management Reviews. 2001 Sept 1;6(3):185–96.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  Grant R. The Role Of Pheromones In Modern Pest Control | Pest Control’d [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:23&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Forestier jean pierre. Diproclean.com. [cited 2025 Nov 30]. Phéromone Papillons des Fruits Pépins - Carpocapses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:24&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Décamp’ - Piège à phéromones Universel - Gamm vert [Internet].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:25&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Andermatt France [Internet]. [cited 2025 Nov 30]. Piège phéromone Funnel - piège insectes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mating_disruption_for_codling_moth_control_using_pheromones&amp;diff=10588</id>
		<title>Mating disruption for codling moth control using pheromones</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mating_disruption_for_codling_moth_control_using_pheromones&amp;diff=10588"/>
		<updated>2025-12-04T10:16:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = CMLarvae.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Codling moth (Cydia pomonella), a key pest of apple, pear, and walnut orchards&lt;br /&gt;
| Type de production = Arboriculture@ Grandes cultures&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Réduction des IFT@ Productivité&lt;br /&gt;
| Glyph = eb66, ea06&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = pheromone, biocontrol, lepidoptera, codling moth, apple, mating disruption&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Carpocapse des pommes et des poires (Cydia pomonella)|Codling moth]] (&#039;&#039;Cydia pomonella&#039;&#039;) is a major pest in apple, pear, and walnut orchards, capable of destroying up to 70-90% of fruit if uncontrolled&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Miller JR, Gut LJ. General principles of attraction and competitive attraction in mating disruption. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 28. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2806766/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benelli G, Lucchi A, Thomson D, Ioriatti C. Sex Pheromone Aerosol Devices for Mating Disruption: Challenges for a Brighter Future. Insects. 2019;10(10):308.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Managing this pest traditionally involves 6-10 insecticide applications per season, which leads to high costs, pesticide resistance, and environmental harm&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The Effect of Mating Disruption Pheromone Dispensers on the Control of the Codling Moth in Lake District Apple Orchards. 2023 Oct. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.51532/meyve.1367991&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Atakan E, Canhilal R. Application of the Mating Disruption Technique Against Codling Moth in Kahramanmaraş Province. ANAJAS. 2022. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/doi/10.7161/omuanajas.1066972&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Pheromone-based mating disruption offers a sustainable alternative that reduces chemical use while effectively controlling pests.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CODM5.jpg|center|thumbnail|493x493px|Figure 2: Codling moth (&#039;&#039;Cydia pomonella)&#039;&#039;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What are pheromones? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromones are chemical substances &#039;&#039;&#039;released by insects that trigger specific behavioural responses&#039;&#039;&#039; in other members of the same species, particularly for mating&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rizvi SAH, George J, Reddy GVP, Zeng X, Guerrero A. Latest Developments in Insect Sex Pheromone Research and Its Application in Agricultural Pest Management. Insects. 2021;12(6):484. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12060484&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. For codling moth, the key pheromone is &#039;&#039;&#039;[[wikt:codlemone|codlemone]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, a synthetic version of the natural female sex pheromone that attracts males&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;UC IPM. Codling Moth Management Guidelines. University of California. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ipm.ucanr.edu/agriculture/walnut/codling-moth/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== How does mating disruption work? ==&lt;br /&gt;
The orchard is saturated with synthetic pheromones released from dispensers placed throughout the trees. This &#039;&#039;&#039;confuses male moths&#039;&#039;&#039;, making it i&#039;&#039;&#039;mpossible for them to locate real females&#039;&#039;&#039; for mating&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Suterra. Mating Disruption - Premium Pheromone Pest Control. 2021. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.suterra.com/mating-disruption&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two action modes: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Males follow false pheromone trails created by dispensers rather than real females.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pheromone saturation masks natural female signals, blocking male detection&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Steyn DMV, et al. Experimental quantification of mating disruption for false codling moth. Crop Protection. 2024;180:106650. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219424001650&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pheromone-and-Mating-Disruption-101---False-trail-following.png.jpg|center|thumbnail|500x500px|Figure 3 : Mating disruption simplified &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://blog.semios.com/pheromones-and-mating-disruption-101&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Dispenser types ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hand-applied dispensers (twist-ties, ropes): &#039;&#039;&#039;300-400 per acre&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;750-1,000 per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Capture d’écran 2025-11-28 à 17.48.21.png|center|thumbnail|534x534px|Figure 4: Examples of the different pheromones dispensers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.novagrica.com/shop/pheromones/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Aerosol puffers: 2-5 per hectare, programmable for timed releases&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Knight AL. Addition of Pear Ester With Sex Pheromone Enhances Disruption of Mating by Female Codling Moth. Environ Entomol. 2017. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/ee/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ee/nvw168&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Capture d’écran 2025-11-28 à 17.49.30.png|center|thumbnail|Figure 5  : Aerosol pheromones dispensers&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:9&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Implementation guide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== When to apply ===&lt;br /&gt;
Install dispensers in early spring &#039;&#039;&#039;(March-April) before the first adult moth flight&#039;&#039;&#039;. Late application compromises effectiveness&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Murray M, Alston D. Codling Moth Mating Disruption. Utah State University Extension. 2024 Jul. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://extension.usu.edu/planthealth/research/codling-moth-mating-disruption&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Where It works ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Minimum effective area: approximately 4 hectares&lt;br /&gt;
* Best in square-shaped orchards rather than narrow strips.&lt;br /&gt;
* Most &#039;&#039;&#039;effective when neighboring orchards&#039;&#039;&#039; also &#039;&#039;&#039;use mating disruption&#039;&#039;&#039; (area-wide programs)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Less effective in small&#039;&#039;&#039;, isolated blocks with moth immigration from untreated areas &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Effect of mating disruption in walnut orchards under organic farming. J Biopestic. 2021 May. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.jbiopestic.com/archivesbrief.php?id=125&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Application details ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Hand-applied dispensers (twist-ties, ropes): approximately 500-1000 dispensers per hectare approximately , based on extension service recommendations and field trials&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Kovanci O.B. &#039;&#039;Comparison of the costs of mating disruption with traditional insecticide applications for control of codling moth in apple orchards in Turkey.&#039;&#039; Scientific Papers. Series B, Horticulture. 2017;61:455–459. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://horticulturejournal.usamv.ro/pdf/2017/Art67.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* Aerosol puffers: 5-10 per hectare; programmable for timed pheromone release&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most dispensers release effective pheromone levels for approximately &#039;&#039;&#039;140 days,&#039;&#039;&#039; covering the entire growing season&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. After this period, pheromone is depleted, necessitating replacement or refill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While many traditional hand-applied dispensers are single-use, newer systems &#039;&#039;&#039;often feature refillable dispensers&#039;&#039;&#039;. Growers can replace pheromone cartridges within the dispenser unit rather than discarding the entire device. Aerosol puffers similarly use refillable cartridges. This reduces waste and may lower long-term costs. Biodegradable dispensers are also available, which break down naturally in orchards, minimizing waste concerns &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:3&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Witzgall P, Kirsch P, Cork A. &#039;&#039;Sex pheromones and their impact on pest management.&#039;&#039;Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2010;36(1):80–100. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9737-y. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29352393/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Waste Management and Recycling ==&lt;br /&gt;
Responsible disposal of used dispensers and cartridges is essential. Many manufacturers and cooperative programs offer recycling initiatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In France, the &#039;&#039;&#039;AgriPlastic Recycling i&#039;&#039;&#039;nitiative organises the collection and recycling of agricultural plastics, including pheromone dispensers, through cooperatives and designated centers. This program helps farmers reduce plastic waste and promotes sustainable disposal practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Growers should consult local extension services or suppliers for guidance on disposal or recycling options in their region&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ADIVALOR. &#039;&#039;Agriculteurs, Distributeurs, Industriels pour la VALORisation des déchets agricoles.&#039;&#039; ADIVALOR – éco-organisme pour la collecte et le recyclage des déchets agricoles. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.adivalor.fr&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Integration with other controls ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Combine mating disruption&#039;&#039;&#039; with 2-3 applications of &#039;&#039;Bacillus thuringiensis&#039;&#039; (Bt) targeting larvae for optimal results. In high-pressure orchards, supplemental border sprays may be necessary&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lacey LA, Unruh TR. &#039;&#039;Biological control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella, Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and its role in integrated pest management, with emphasis on entomopathogens.&#039;&#039; Vedalia. 2005;12(1):33–60. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/20920000/publicationlists/lacey_extra/lacey-unruh-bc-cm.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Or with traps, trap &amp;amp; Kill strategy&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:8&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Agronomy-13-00047-g001.png|center|thumbnail|732x732px|Figure 1. Three kinds of conventional traps, installation positions of pheromone lure and their insect collection devices. (a) Trap YL-HEMT; (b) Trap YL-NMT; (c) Trap YL-VT; (d–f) Pheromone lure installation device and location&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For farmers ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduces insecticide applications by 40-56%&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:10&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Gut LJ, Stelinski LL, Thomson DR, Miller JR. Quantifying the Benefits of Areawide Pheromone Mating Disruption Programs. Am Entomol. 2011;57(2):94-100. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://academic.oup.com/ae/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ae/57.2.94&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brinza L, Boulay T, Waters SM, Boisvert M. Economic Benefits of Using Sterile Insect Technique and Mating Disruption to Control Codling Moth. J Agric Sci. 2015;7(6):72-80. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/49352&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Compatible with organic certification&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Improves fruit quality: 87-90% achieve premium grade&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduces pesticide resistance risk&lt;br /&gt;
* Net benefit of €253/hectare vs. €232/hectare for sterile insect technique&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== For the environment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Species-specific with minimal non-target effects&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserves beneficial insects and pollinators&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduces soil and water contamination&lt;br /&gt;
* Supports biodiversity &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;A Comprehensive Review of Advances in Semiochemical Exploitation for Insect Pest Management.&#039;&#039; OpenAccess Journals4Promo. Available at: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;http://openaccess.journals4promo.com/id/eprint/1554/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Higher labor required for annual installation&lt;br /&gt;
* Small orchards (&amp;lt;4hectares) show poor results&lt;br /&gt;
* Requires consistent monitoring to detect outbreaks&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:4&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:7&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Initial material costs €90-€180 more per hectare than conventional insecticides (costs equalize after 2-3 years&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:6&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Products and suppliers ==&lt;br /&gt;
Available products: NoMate®, Isomate®, CIDETRAK® &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gemplers. NoMate® Codling Moth Mating Disruption, 400 count. 2025. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://gemplers.com/products/nomate-codling-moth-mating-disruption-400-count&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andermatt Garden. Codling moth trap refill. 2023-2024. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://andermattgarden.co.uk/products/codling-moth-trap-refill&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where to purchase:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Agricultural supply companies (Gemplers, local distributors)&lt;br /&gt;
* Grower cooperatives&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Real-World results ==&lt;br /&gt;
Turkey (Kahramanmaraş Province, 2018-2019): Orchards using mating disruption + 2-3 Bt applications showed 8.4-9.1% fruit damage vs. 43.7% in conventional orchards with 6 insecticide applications. Trap catches dropped from 1,136 moths (conventional) to 18-37 moths (mating disruption)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulgaria (Pazardzhik Region, 2018-2019): Organic walnut orchards with mating disruption (no insecticides) had lower fruit damage than conventional orchards receiving 9-10 insecticide treatment&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:5&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
Pheromone-based mating disruption offers a sustainable, pesticide-free solution for managing codling moth in apple, pear, and walnut orchards. By confusing males and preventing mating, it significantly lowers pest pressure and reduces insecticide use by up to 50%. This technique is most effective in large, coordinated orchard areas and fits perfectly within Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs. With refillable or biodegradable dispensers and proven field success, it represents a key step toward eco-friendly, high-quality fruit production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== References ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Lutter contre le carpocapse des pommes avec la confusion sexuelle par phéromones]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila&amp;diff=10579</id>
		<title>Drosophila</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila&amp;diff=10579"/>
		<updated>2025-12-02T15:29:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): Astrid Robette (1886608933) moved page Drosophila to Drosophila susukii: Complément au titre&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Drosophila susukii]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_susukii&amp;diff=10578</id>
		<title>Drosophila susukii</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Drosophila_susukii&amp;diff=10578"/>
		<updated>2025-12-02T15:29:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): Astrid Robette (1886608933) moved page Drosophila to Drosophila susukii: Complément au titre&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bioagresseur&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Latin = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Drosophila_pseudoobscura-Male.png&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Drosophila&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-categorie = &lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés=Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, Fruits pests, Biological control of fruits pests, Fruits production&lt;br /&gt;
| type = Pests}}&lt;br /&gt;
Over the past two decades, Drosophila suzukii, commonly known as the Spotted Wing Drosophila, has become one of the most destructive insect pests of soft fruits worldwide (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Native to Southeast Asia, the species has expanded rapidly into Europe, North America, South America, and Africa, where it has caused major economic losses in fruit production systems (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Deprá, Poppe, Schmitz, De Toni, &amp;amp; Valente, 2014). Unlike most species in the Drosophila genus that colonize damaged or fermenting fruits, D. suzukii possesses a serrated ovipositor that allows females to lay eggs inside healthy, ripening fruits, making management exceptionally challenging (Walsh, Bolda, Goodhue, Dreves, Lee, Bruck, Walton, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Biology and Identification&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; belongs to the family Drosophilidae, and adults are generally small, measuring about 2 to 3 millimeters with red eyes and a yellowish brown body (Hauser, 2011). The species is easily recognized by the serrated ovipositor of the female, a saw like structure that enables her to penetrate the skin of healthy fruits during oviposition (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Males can be distinguished by the presence of a dark spot near the tip of each wing, which is the basis for the common name Spotted Wing Drosophila (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). The insect has a rapid life cycle that typically spans 10 to 14 days under favorable conditions, supporting several overlapping generations annually (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Larvae develop inside the fruit after hatching, feeding on the pulp and rendering the fruit unmarketable within a short period (Lee, Bruck, Curry, Edwards, &amp;amp; Haviland, 2011).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life circle of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Host Range and Crop Damage&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pest attacks a wide variety of soft skinned fruits, including strawberries (Fragaria spp.), blueberries (Vaccinium spp.), raspberries (Rubus spp.), cherries (Prunus spp.) and grapes (Vitis vinifera), all of which have been confirmed as preferred hosts of Drosophila suzukii (Lee &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2011; Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012). Females lay eggs in ripening fruits, where the larvae develop and feed, causing softening, collapse, and encouraging secondary infection by fungi and bacteria (Mazzetto, Marchetti, &amp;amp; Isaia, 2015). The damage is often not visible in the early stages, which leads to contamination during harvest and rejection at markets (Walsh &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2011). In regions with severe infestations, yield losses can reach up to 80 percent depending on the crop and prevailing climatic conditions (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Ecology and Distribution&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally described in Japan in 1916, Drosophila suzukii has since spread across almost every continent except Antarctica, making it one of the most successful invasive fruit pests known today (Kanzawa, 1939; Asplen &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2015). Its global expansion is supported by several biological and ecological advantages, including high reproductive rates, a wide host range, adaptability to diverse climatic conditions, and the accelerating movement of fruits and plant materials through international trade (Cini, Ioriatti, &amp;amp; Anfora, 2012; Fraimout &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2017). Population growth is typically favored in warm and humid regions, yet the species can withstand mild winters and persist in protected environments such as greenhouses and sheltered microclimates (Enriquez &amp;amp; Colinet, 2017).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Impact on Global Agriculture&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rapid spread of Drosophila suzukii has disrupted fruit industries in many countries, placing considerable pressure on production systems and supply chains (Asplen &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2015). In Europe and the United States, annual control costs combined with crop losses amount to several hundreds of millions of dollars due to the pest’s aggressive infestation of marketable fruits (Bolda, Goodhue, &amp;amp; Zalom, 2010; De Ros &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2013). The threat is even more severe for smallholder farmers in developing regions, where limited surveillance capacity and inadequate access to control measures leave fruit crops highly vulnerable (Mazzi &amp;amp; Dorn, 2012). Climate change is expected to intensify these challenges by expanding suitable habitats and lengthening periods of pest activity, making D. suzukii a growing global concern for horticulture and food security (Gutierrez &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2016).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Detection and Monitoring&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early detection is crucial for managing &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; populations. Monitoring is commonly done using:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Apple cider vinegar or yeast-sugar traps&lt;br /&gt;
* Commercial lures containing fermentation based attractions&lt;br /&gt;
* Visual inspection of ripening fruits and leaves&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traps are usually placed at canopy level and checked weekly. Monitoring results guides the timing of control measures, reducing unnecessary pesticide applications and helping integrate control strategies effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Management Strategies&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Biological Control Using Parasitic Wasps&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the most promising natural enemies identified for managing Drosophila suzukii are two parasitic wasps, Trichopria drosophilae and Leptopilina japonica. These beneficial insects have been widely investigated for their ability to suppress D. suzukii populations, and several studies have demonstrated their effectiveness both in controlled laboratory experiments and in field environments (Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2020; Knoll, Herz, &amp;amp; Vogt, 2022). Their capacity to parasitize the pupal and larval stages of the pest makes them valuable candidates for incorporation into integrated biological control strategies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;1. &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera Diapridae)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; is a pupal parasitoid that targets the pupal stage of Drosophila suzukii within fruit or soil, making it an important natural enemy in biological control programs. The female wasp actively searches for infested fruit or substrates that contain D. suzukii pupae and deposits her eggs inside them. As the parasitoid larva develops, it consumes the host pupa from within and prevents the emergence of the adult fly (van Lenteren &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018; Knoll, Herz, and Vogt, 2022; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This mode of action provides a direct reduction in pest populations and supports its use in integrated pest management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                                            &#039;&#039;&#039;  &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== &#039;&#039;2. Ganaspis&#039;&#039; cf. &#039;&#039;brasiliensis&#039;&#039; (Hymenoptera, Figitidae) ====&lt;br /&gt;
A figitid wasp of the genus Ganaspis was the most frequently reared parasitoid of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in surveys conducted in China and Japan, appearing in every sample from which parasitoids emerged (Daane &#039;&#039;et a&#039;&#039;l., 2016; Girod &#039;&#039;et al&#039;&#039;., 2018). This species consistently achieved the highest parasitism rates across both countries, highlighting its strong association with the pest. The same parasitoid was also recovered from samples collected in Hubei Province, where &#039;&#039;Drosophila subpulchrella&#039;&#039; emerged in the absence of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;, indicating that G. cf. brasiliensis is capable of parasitizing this closely related host as well (Girod et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;3. Leptopilina japonica (Hymenoptera: Figitidae)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; is a larval parasitoid native to Asia and one of the most frequently encountered natural enemies associated with Drosophila suzukii in its region of origin. The female wasp parasitizes D. suzukii larvae while they are still developing inside fruits, inserting an egg directly into the host larval body. As the parasitoid embryo develops, it feeds internally and ultimately kills the fly larva before it can pupate (Kasuya et al., 2013; Girod &#039;&#039;et al.&#039;&#039;, 2018; Wang, Nance, and Daane, 2020). This lethal interaction makes L. japonica a promising candidate for biological control programs targeting D. suzukii.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophiliae&#039;&#039; as a Biological Control:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In Europe, particularly in Switzerland and Italy, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; has been mass reared and released in berry and cherry orchards as part of biological control programs.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field releases have shown parasitism rates ranging from 20–60%, depending on climatic conditions and pest density.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It integrates well into Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs because it targets the pest without affecting beneficial species or fruit quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; can be obtained from commercial biocontrol suppliers in Europe (e.g., Andermatt Biocontrol, Biobest, and Koppert Biological Systems).&lt;br /&gt;
* For research purposes, colonies can be maintained in laboratory insectaries using &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupae as hosts.&lt;br /&gt;
* When importing, users must comply with national quarantine and biosafety regulations to prevent unintended ecological effects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis and Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; as Biological Control:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; has been naturally associated with &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan, China, and South Korea and has recently established in parts of North America (Canada and the U.S.) as an adventive species.&lt;br /&gt;
* Field studies in British Columbia showed up to 65% larval parasitism in unmanaged fruit fields, suggesting it can contribute significantly to long-term population regulation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Advantages&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Researchers consider &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; a promising candidate for classical biological control, where it could be introduced to regions heavily affected by &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to Obtain It:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Currently, &#039;&#039;L. japonica&#039;&#039; is primarily available through research collaborations or biological control programs rather than commercial suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;
* Scientists in Europe and North America are studying its mass-rearing protocols and biosafety evaluations before wider release.&lt;br /&gt;
* Interested institutions can request cultures through international research networks such as the IOBC (International Organization for Biological Control).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Introduction of Parasitoid  into a Farm&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purchase from a certified biocontrol supplier such as Biobest, Koppert, Andernatt and BioControl companies specializing in Dipteran parasitoids. You typically buy &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* parasitized pupae&lt;br /&gt;
* or emerging adults&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Best time for release: ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Early in the season when SWD populations begin to build&lt;br /&gt;
* Continue releases throughout fruiting period (every 1–2 weeks)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Temperature requirement ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Optimal activity: 18–25°C&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid release during heavy rain or extreme heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;A.  Field Releases (Orchards, Berry Farms, Vineyards)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 1: Distribute release containers&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Place parasitoid release points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Near fruiting zones&lt;br /&gt;
* At field edges (SWD hotspots)&lt;br /&gt;
* Near shaded, humid spots (parasitoids avoid desiccation)&lt;br /&gt;
* In areas with fallen or damaged fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Recommended density:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,500–3,000 individuals per hectare per release&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 7–14 days during infestation peaks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 2 : Hang release cards/cups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Attach to branches at waist height&lt;br /&gt;
* Avoid direct sunlight&lt;br /&gt;
* Spread evenly (every 20–25 meters)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Step 3 : Reduce pesticide interference&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* STOP using broad-spectrum insecticides&lt;br /&gt;
* If needed, choose SWD-targeted sprays compatible with parasitoids (Spinosad is harmful; some biopesticides are safer)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;B. Greenhouse or High Tunnel Introductions&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These environments offer excellent establishment conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Method:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Release parasitoids close to fruit clusters&lt;br /&gt;
* Place containers in shaded corners&lt;br /&gt;
* Maintain humidity around 60–80%&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Release rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;500–1,000 parasitoids per 1,000 m²&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Repeat every 1–2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Enhance Their Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parasitoids need alternative food sources and shelter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provide:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Nectar plants (buckwheat, sweet alyssum)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Sugar sprays (10% sugar water for adult feeding)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ Mulch or leaf debris where SWD pupate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This increases parasitoid survival and parasitism rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrate With Other Management Tools (Highly Recommended)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Combine &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; releases with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Good sanitation&#039;&#039;&#039;: remove fallen/overripe fruit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Mass trapping&#039;&#039;&#039; (apple cider vinegar or yeast traps)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Exclusion netting&#039;&#039;&#039; on fruiting crops&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✔ &#039;&#039;&#039;Cold storage&#039;&#039;&#039; immediately after harvest&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These methods help keep SWD populations at levels parasitoids can manage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Monitor Parasitism Success&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To confirm establishment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;How to check:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Collect SWD pupae from soil or fallen fruit&lt;br /&gt;
* Rear them in containers&lt;br /&gt;
* Count parasitoid emergence vs. fly emergence&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A good establishment rate:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 15–40% parasitism depending on season and habitat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Testimonials:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# In Switzerland, farmers collaborating with the Agroscope research institute reported notable decreases in &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; infestation levels after repeated releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducted weekly to biweekly releases of &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; during the fruiting period.&lt;br /&gt;
* Released 1,500–3,000 adult parasitoids per hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
* Used multiple release points per field to ensure broad coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continued releases from early summer until the end of harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why it worked:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes the pupal stage of &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; in soil and fallen fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
* Continuous releases allowed the parasitoids to build a stable population in orchards and berry plantations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Farmers recorded lower SWD pupal survival, leading to reduced adult emergence.          &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     2. A study by Knoll et al. (2022) found that the wasp established well under greenhouse and field conditions, maintaining natural pest suppression even after releases ceased.What Knoll et al. (2022) Did to Control &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll et al. (2022) conducted one of the most important European studies on the use, establishment, and long-term effectiveness of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;, a pupal parasitoid against &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Their goal was to test whether repeated releases would allow the parasitoid to establish, persist, and continue providing natural biological control even after releases stopped. They combined controlled greenhouse experiments and real field trials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Repeated Releases of &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The core of their strategy was the augmentative release of the parasitoid in both greenhouse and field environments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What they did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Released &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; in multiple weekly rounds.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each release introduced several hundred to several thousand adult parasitoids.&lt;br /&gt;
* Releases were done during periods of high &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; pupal availability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitoids were released directly near fruiting plants and SWD hotspot zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To increase parasitoid numbers until they could self-establish in the environment and begin suppressing pupae naturally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Provided Host Pupae for Initial Establishment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Because &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; parasitizes SWD pupae, researchers ensured that enough D. suzukii pupae were present during early releases.&lt;br /&gt;
* They did this by:&lt;br /&gt;
* Allowing controlled infestation of fruit (greenhouses).&lt;br /&gt;
* Using natural SWD infestations (field orchards).&lt;br /&gt;
* Providing artificial pupation substrates in some experiments.&lt;br /&gt;
** This created a continuous host supply, helping the parasitoid population grow.&lt;br /&gt;
* Measured Parasitism Rates and Population Persistence&lt;br /&gt;
** To confirm establishment, Knoll et al. collected SWD pupae periodically and checked:&lt;br /&gt;
* How many parasitoids emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* How many SWD emerged&lt;br /&gt;
* Whether parasitoids persisted long after releases ended&lt;br /&gt;
** They found that parasitoid emergence continued even months after the last release, indicating successful:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ establishment  ✔ reproduction  ✔ overwintering (in outdoor settings)&lt;br /&gt;
** This demonstrated classical biological control potential.&lt;br /&gt;
* Evaluated Long-Term Suppression of SWD Populations&lt;br /&gt;
* Knoll et al. measured the impact on SWD density by comparing:&lt;br /&gt;
* control plots (no parasitoids)&lt;br /&gt;
* treated plots (with releases)&lt;br /&gt;
** Results:&lt;br /&gt;
* SWD populations were significantly lower in treated plots.&lt;br /&gt;
* Parasitism persisted even when the releases were stopped.&lt;br /&gt;
* In greenhouses, suppression was particularly strong due to stable conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
* In field sites, &#039;&#039;T. drosophilae&#039;&#039; successfully overwintered and reappeared in spring.&lt;br /&gt;
* This proved the parasitoid can provide self-sustaining natural suppression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Integrated Cultural and Monitoring Practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While the main focus was parasitoid release, they also implemented:&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Monitoring traps: To track adult SWD density over time.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Standard sanitation: Removing fallen fruit reducing breeding sites and increasing the parasitoids’ effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
** ✔ Habitat structure: Providing microhabitats (soil, leaf litter) where pupae accumulate, supporting parasitization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Research and Innovation&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Farm level control of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; now benefits from research on semio chemical traps, genetic approaches, and plant based defenses, but these ideas must be translated into simple actions farmers can apply directly in orchards and berry farms. The goal is to reduce fruit damage, cut pesticide use, and maintain yields through low cost, sustainable methods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;1. Use affordable semio chemical traps around the farm&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers have identified fruit volatiles that attract &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; adults. Farmers can apply this by installing homemade or commercial lure based traps at field borders and inside the orchard. Plastic bottles with small entry holes, baited with yeast sugar solution or vinegar fruit blends, can monitor and capture adult flies. Consistent weekly replacement of bait maintains trap strength. This reduces egg laying on ripening fruits and helps farmers detect pest arrival early before damage escalates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;2. Combine trapping with sanitation practices&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infested fruits are rich sources of volatiles that attract more &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Removing fallen fruits, overripe berries, and waste piles breaks the pest’s reproductive cycle. Farmers who combine traps with strict field sanitation often report reduced population build up since the flies lose breeding sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;3. Select and manage tolerant plant varieties&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some fruit varieties have firmer skins, higher acidity, or natural volatile profiles that discourage &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; oviposition. While breeding programs continue to develop resistant lines, farmers can already select varieties known to mature earlier or maintain tougher skin strength, reducing pest attack windows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;4. Encourage beneficial microbes and plant endophytes&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies show that certain microbial endophytes can affect fruit softness and volatile emissions, making fruits less attractive to &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039;. Farmers can support this naturally by using compost teas, organic amendments, and microbial inoculants that strengthen plant vigor. Healthy plants maintain firmer fruits, slowing larval penetration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;5. Apply botanical or biological products when pressure increases&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When trap counts rise, low toxicity biocontrols such as neem based products, spinosad preparations, or entomopathogenic fungi can be applied. These products target adults or larvae with low impact on natural enemies and align well with integrated pest management. Their effectiveness improves when used alongside good trapping and sanitation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;6. Integrate crop environment management&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dense canopies and high humidity favor &#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; survival. Pruning to increase airflow, reducing excessive irrigation, and harvesting fruits as soon as they ripen limits favorable conditions. Farms that adjust microclimate often see fewer eggs per fruit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;7. Future tools may include genetic control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although still under development, genetic strategies such as sterile male releases or gene based population suppression may one day complement farm management. For now, farmers can prepare by maintaining updated knowledge through extension programs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conclusion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; has transformed soft fruit pest management. Unlike most Drosophila species that infest damaged fruit, it uses a serrated ovipositor to lay eggs in healthy ripening fruit, making it uniquely destructive. Its fast reproduction, broad host range, and adaptability to varied climates have fueled its global spread and created persistent challenges for growers on multiple continents. The pest produces several overlapping generations each season, which increases damage and complicates control efforts (Lee et al., 2011; Asplen et al., 2015).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chemical control offers limited success because larvae develop inside fruit, adults remain present throughout the season, and resistance risks continue to rise. Regulatory demands for lower pesticide residues further emphasize the need for sustainable approaches (Haye et al., 2016). Effective management therefore depends on coordinated strategies that integrate ecological knowledge, biological solutions, and supportive policy frameworks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biological control has emerged as one of the most promising avenues. Trichopria drosophilae, a pupal parasitoid, and Leptopilina japonica, a larval parasitoid, target different developmental stages of the pest. Both species have demonstrated strong performance in laboratory and field studies and show consistent parasitism that supports long term suppression (Wang et al., 2016; Nomano et al., 2017; Knoll et al., 2022). Their complementary roles strengthen integrated biological control programs and reduce reliance on chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;D. suzukii&#039;&#039; reflects a broader shift toward sustainable pest management, where invasive species require multi layered responses. The integration of key parasitoids such as T. drosophilae and L. japonica represents an essential step toward lowering economic losses, reducing pesticide inputs, and building more resilient fruit production systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Références&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., Gibert, P., Gutierrez, A. P., Hoelmer, K. A., Hutchison, W. D., Isaacs, R., Jiang, Z. L., Kárpáti, Z., Kimura, M. T., Pascual, M., Philips, C. R., Plantamp, C., Ponti, L., Vétek, G., Vogt, H., Walton, V. M., Yu, Y., Zappalà, L., &amp;amp; Desneux, N. (2015). Invasion biology of spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Annual Review of Entomology, 60, 395 - 415.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asplen, M. K., Anfora, G., Biondi, A., Choi, D. S., Chu, D., Daane, K. M., et al. (2015). Invasion biology of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;: A global perspective and future priorities. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 469–494.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Haye, T., Girod, P., Barras, A., Borowiec, N., Charmillot, P. J., Cornuet, D., et al. (2016). Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 643–651.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll, V., Herz, A., Biondi, A., Chakraborty, R., Grabenweger, G., &amp;amp; Wang, X. G. (2022). Field performance of the pupal parasitoid &#039;&#039;Trichopria drosophilae&#039;&#039; in controlling &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039;. Biological Control, 165, 104795.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., Haviland, D. R., et al. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358–1367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nomano, F. Y., Kasuya, N., Matsuura, A., Suwito, A., Mitsui, H., Buffington, M. L., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2017). Genetic structure and natural parasitism by &#039;&#039;Leptopilina japonica&#039;&#039; of &#039;&#039;Drosophila suzukii&#039;&#039; in Japan. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 162, 270–277.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bulletin of Insectology, 65(1), 149 - 160.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deprá, M., Poppe, J. L., Schmitz, H. J., De Toni, D. C., &amp;amp; Valente, V. L. S. (2014). The first records of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii in the South American continent. Journal of Pest Science, 87, 379 - 383.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Walsh, D. B., Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., Dreves, A. J., Lee, J., Bruck, D. J., Walton, V. M., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2011). Drosophila suzukii as an emerging pest of soft fruit in North America. Pest Management Science, 67, 1349 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hauser, M. (2011). A historic account of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in the continental United States, with remarks on their identification. Pest Management Science, 67, 1352 - 1357.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lee, J. C., Bruck, D. J., Curry, H., Edwards, D., &amp;amp; Haviland, D. (2011). The susceptibility of small fruits and cherries to the spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Pest Management Science, 67, 1358 - 1367.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mazzetto, F., Marchetti, E., &amp;amp; Isaia, M. (2015). Drosophila suzukii infestations cause egg laying punctures that promote the growth of spot related fungi. Journal of Pest Science, 88, 693 - 703.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enriquez, T., &amp;amp; Colinet, H. (2017). Cold acclimation triggers major transcriptional changes in Drosophila suzukii. BMC Genomics, 18, 1 - 14.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraimout, A., Debat, V., Fellous, S., Hufbauer, R. A., Foucaud, J., Pudlo, P., Marin, J., Price, D. K., Cattel, J., Chen, X., Deprá, M., Rezende, V. B., Gautier, M., Vieira, C., Vitalis, R., &amp;amp; Estoup, A. (2017). Deciphering the routes of invasion of Drosophila suzukii by means of ABC random forest. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34, 980 - 996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kanzawa, T. (1939). Studies on Drosophila suzukii Matsumura. Review of Applied Entomology, 29, 622.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolda, M. P., Goodhue, R. E., &amp;amp; Zalom, F. G. (2010). Spotted wing drosophila: Potential economic impact on the California strawberry industry. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Agricultural and Resource Economics Update, 13, 5 - 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De Ros, G., Anfora, G., Grassi, A., Ioriatti, C., &amp;amp; Grassi, A. (2013). The economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits in Trentino, Italy. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 91, 219 to 223.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gutierrez, A. P., Ponti, L., Dalton, D. T., &amp;amp; Walton, V. M. (2016). Prospective analysis of the invasive potential of spotted wing drosophila in the United States. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 487 - 499.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mazzi, D., &amp;amp; Dorn, S. (2012). Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 160, 97 - 113.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knoll, V., Herz, A., &amp;amp; Vogt, H. (2022). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: Efficacy of native and exotic parasitoids under laboratory and field conditions. Biological Control, 170, 104931.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wang, X., Nance, A. H., &amp;amp; Daane, K. M. (2020). Biological control of Drosophila suzukii: A review of host parasitoid associations. Pest Management Science, 76, 1778 - 1790.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Van Lenteren, J. C., Bolckmans, K., Köhl, J., Ravensberg, W. J., &amp;amp; Urbaneja, A. (2018). Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms. Principles, practices and benefits. Wageningen Academic Publishers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daane, K. M., Wang, X. G., Biondi, A., Miller, B., Miller, J. C., Riedl, H., Shearer, P. W., Guerrieri, E., Giorgini, M., Buffington, M., van Achterberg, C., Song, Y., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2016). First exploration of parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in South Korea as potential classical biological control agents. Journal of Pest Science, 89, 823 - 835..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 to 39.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kasuya, N., Mitsui, H., Ideo, S., Watada, M., &amp;amp; Kimura, M. T. (2013). Ecological factors affecting the coexistence of larval parasitoids of frugivorous Drosophila. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 148, 188 to 199.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Girod, P., Rossignaud, L., Turlings, T. C. J., Kenis, M., &amp;amp; Haye, T. (2018). Development of Asian larval parasitoids of Drosophila suzukii in fruits of common host plants in Europe. Journal of Pest Science, 91, 29 - 39.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10572</id>
		<title>Flavescence dorée</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Flavescence_dor%C3%A9e&amp;diff=10572"/>
		<updated>2025-12-02T14:52:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Winegrowing&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Diseases&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
This article provides an overview of Flavescence dorée (FD), a quarantine disease of grapevine: how it spreads, how to recognize it, and which collective measures help to limit its propagation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== &#039;&#039;&#039;An incurable phytoplasma disease&#039;&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée is recognized as one of the most severe and damaging diseases affecting European vineyards. Classified as a quarantine organism under European regulations (Directive 2000/29/EC, A2 list), it is caused by the phytoplasma &#039;&#039;Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis&#039;&#039; and transmitted by &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;, the Flavescence dorée leafhopper &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Winetwork. (2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Guide des bonnes pratiques de gestion de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. https://www.vignevin-occitanie.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Winetwork-projet-Guide-des-bonnes-pratiques-de-gestion-de-la-FD.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This phytoplasma is a wall-less bacterium that lives and multiplies exclusively within the phloem of grapevine. By disrupting the transport of assimilates, it blocks the plant’s metabolic exchanges and leads to progressive decline, often resulting in the complete death of the vine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First reported in the 1950s in the Armagnac region of southwestern France, Flavescence dorée is now present in at least 18 European countries, including France, Italy, Spain and Switzerland &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EFSA Panel on Plant Health.&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;(2016).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Risk to plant health of Flavescence dorée for the EU territory&#039;&#039;. EFSA Journal, 14(12), Article e04603. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4603&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;EPPO. (2022).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Grapevine flavescence dorée phytoplasma – Datasheet&#039;&#039;. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PHYP64&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Repartition map.png|center|frameless|865x865px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 1:&#039;&#039;&#039; Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in Europe &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;IFV – Institut Français de la Vigne et du Vin. (2014).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;État des lieux de la Flavescence dorée&#039;&#039;. Techniloire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://techniloire.com/sites/default/files/etat_des_lieux_de_la_flavescence_doree.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Situation in France ====&lt;br /&gt;
In France, the situation of Flavescence dorée varies greatly between wine-growing regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Endemic areas:&#039;&#039;&#039; Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie and Savoie are persistently affected, with long-standing and recurrent outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Partial presence:&#039;&#039;&#039; Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur (PACA), Corsica, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes and Bourgogne-Franche-Comté show localized outbreaks that emerged in the 2000s.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Recent outbreaks:&#039;&#039;&#039; Champagne and the Loire Valley have experienced a more recent spread of the disease, while isolated cases have been reported in Alsace, where the vector &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is still absent &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date, Lorraine remains the only major French wine-growing region with no confirmed detections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From one season to the next, monitoring reveals a wave-like dynamic, with new outbreaks appearing at the edges of already contaminated zones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Loire Valley, the contaminated surface increased from 56 to 78 plots between 2022 and 2023, despite the uprooting of infected vines and the implementation of a coordinated action plan managed by the Plant Health Organizations (OVS – FREDON, Polleniz) and regional wine federations &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:1&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:France map e.png|center|frameless|650x650px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 2:&#039;&#039;&#039; Evolution of Flavescence dorée outbreaks in France &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Dubois, A. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. GDON de Gironde, YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Main vector: &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; ===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary agent responsible for the epidemic transmission of Flavescence dorée from vine to vine is the Flavescence dorée leafhopper (&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;). This insect, native to North America, was accidentally introduced into Europe, most likely through the importation of American rootstocks in the early 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is a univoltine species (one generation per year) and, in Europe, is strictly associated with grapevine (&#039;&#039;Vitis vinifera&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Life cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
In France, &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; completes its full life cycle between April and the first autumn frosts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; laid at the end of summer in old wood (cane internodes). They overwinter in this stage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hatching:&#039;&#039;&#039; from mid-April to early May, depending on temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Larvae (L1 to L5):&#039;&#039;&#039; five larval stages follow one another from May to June. Larvae cannot fly but are highly active on the foliage.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Adults:&#039;&#039;&#039; appear from late June to July; they are capable of flight, enabling broader dispersion within the vineyard and towards neighbouring outbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;End of cycle:&#039;&#039;&#039; adults survive until the first frosts (late September–early October) &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cycle de vie en.png|center|frameless|550x550px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 3:&#039;&#039;&#039; Life cycle of the Flavescence dorée leafhopper on its host plant &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chuche, J., &amp;amp; Mazzetto, F. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus up-to-the-minute: Biology, ecology, and role as a vector&#039;&#039;. Entomologia Generalis, 44(3). &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2023/2597&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Acquisition and transmission of the phytoplasma ===&lt;br /&gt;
Contamination follows a strict sequence:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Acquisition:&#039;&#039;&#039; A healthy leafhopper becomes infected when feeding on an infected vine (stylet probing and ingestion from the phloem sap).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Latent period (10 to 45 days depending on temperature):&#039;&#039;&#039; During this phase, the phytoplasma circulates through the haemolymph and then colonizes the salivary glands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Infectious insect:&#039;&#039;&#039; Once the salivary glands are colonized, the leafhopper remains infectious for life. It transmits the phytoplasma to every healthy plant on which it feeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;No transmission to eggs:&#039;&#039;&#039; There is no transovarial transmission. Larvae hatching in spring are always healthy, even when originating from an infected female &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Recognition: Key symptoms and possible confusion ===&lt;br /&gt;
Symptoms of Flavescence dorée are generally not visible during the year of infection (N) but appear the following year (N+1), or even several years later. They are most noticeable at the &#039;&#039;&#039;end of summer&#039;&#039;&#039; (late July–August).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To suspect a phytoplasma disease, growers should look for three characteristic symptoms on the same shoot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1. On leaves: ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Discoloration:&#039;&#039;&#039; Yellowing occurs on white cultivars and reddening on red cultivars. The discoloration may be complete or partial, and sometimes follows the veins.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Deformation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaves roll downward, become abnormally rigid, and feel brittle when touched.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 1.png|center|frameless|950x950px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 4:&#039;&#039;&#039; Leaf reddening on red cultivars, yellowing on white cultivars, and downward leaf rolling&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. On shoots ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of lignification:&#039;&#039;&#039; Shoots show poor lignification (“non-ripening”). They remain green, soft and flexible (rubbery), instead of hardening and snapping like normally ripened canes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. On clusters ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Desiccation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Inflorescences and berries wilt and then dry out partially or completely. This can result in yield losses of up to 100%.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Symptomes 2 e.png|center|frameless|970x970px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 5:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poor shoot lignification (“non-ripening”) and wilting/drying of grape clusters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because these symptoms can be confused with those caused by Bois Noir (BN), confirmation of the diagnosis relies on PCR analysis performed by an accredited laboratory, which is the only method capable of identifying &#039;&#039;‘Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis’&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté alimentaire. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Laboratoires officiels et reconnus en santé des végétaux&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mandatory collective control: The three pillars ===&lt;br /&gt;
In France, control of Flavescence dorée is permanently mandatory across the entire national vineyard as soon as the disease is detected. The strategy is based on three coordinated components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1. Ensuring the health of planting material ===&lt;br /&gt;
Using certified planting material, controlled by FranceAgriMer and the Official Certification Service (SOC), is the first barrier against Flavescence dorée. This plant material is traceable, inspected, and guaranteed free of infection before planting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Importing plant material from other EU countries is permitted, provided it carries a phytosanitary passport compliant with Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further reduce the risk of introducing the phytoplasma, nurseries apply Hot Water Treatment (HWT), which consists of immersing planting material at 50 °C for 45 minutes. Mandatory in certain regulated zones, this treatment significantly reduces the risk of transmitting the phytoplasma through planting stock &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TEC eng.jpg|center|frameless|450x450px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 6:&#039;&#039;&#039; Hot Water Treatment  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Vitisphere. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Traitement à l’eau chaude des bois et plants de vigne : une organisation bien huilée chez les pépinières Viaud&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.vitisphere.com/actualite-101189-traitement-a-leau-chaude-des-bois-et-plants-de-vigne-une-organisation-bien-huilee-chez-les-pepinieres-viaud.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. Vector control (insecticide-based measures) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Control of &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; is mandatory within regulated areas, previously called &#039;&#039;Périmètres de Lutte Obligatoire&#039;&#039;(PLO) and now generally referred to as &#039;&#039;Zones Délimitées&#039;&#039; (ZD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Conventional strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regulations typically require three insecticide treatments, with application dates determined each year by the regional plant health authorities (DRAAF/SRAL) according to the sanitary risk &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée – Informations officielles.&#039;&#039; Ministère de l’Agriculture. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The first treatment (T1) must be applied roughly one month after the first egg hatch, targeting the young larval stages (ideally L2–L3) before they become infectious.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cid1 eng.png|center|frameless|693x693px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 7:&#039;&#039;&#039; Larvae are identified by two symmetrical black dots located dorso-laterally at the posterior end of the abdomen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The second treatment (T2) is applied at the end of the residual activity of the first one (around 10 days after T1).&lt;br /&gt;
* The third treatment (T3) targets adults, if required.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cic 2 e.png|center|frameless|753x753px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figure 8:&#039;&#039;&#039; Adult &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, the active substances authorised in France belong mainly to the pyrethroid family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These insecticides act by contact and aim to eliminate young larvae before they become infectious. Their performance is highly dependent on the timing of application (more effective in the evening) and on spray quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Biological strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039; The only plant protection products authorised against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039; are natural pyrethrin and paraffinic oils, which are primarily effective on the earliest larval stages (L1–L2) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;DRAAF PACA. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Modalités de lutte contre la cicadelle de la Flavescence dorée de la vigne – Campagne 2025.&#039;&#039;Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Souveraineté Alimentaire. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (conventionnels).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;ANSES. (2025).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Base Ephy – Produits phytopharmaceutiques : usages “cicadelles de la Flavescence dorée” (biologiques).&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Associated prophylactic measures:&#039;&#039;&#039;Early shoot removal (&#039;&#039;épamprage&#039;&#039;) must be carried out before T1, as basal shoots provide refuge zones for larvae that are poorly covered by insecticide sprays  &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Role of GDONs:&#039;&#039;&#039; The &#039;&#039;Groupements de Défense contre les Organismes Nuisibles&#039;&#039; (GDONs) play a key role in organising this collective control strategy. Through larval counts and adult trapping, GDONs can authorise exemptions from T1 and/or T2 treatments, providing important economic and environmental benefits &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:22&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON de Gironde. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Flavescence dorée : état des lieux et gestion territoriale&#039;&#039; [Vidéo]. YouTube. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;GDON des Bordeaux. (2024).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Missions du GDON des Bordeaux : organisation de la surveillance et de la lutte contre la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.gdon-bordeaux.fr/le-gdon/missions/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. Monitoring and eradication (vine removal) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Once infected, a vine remains diseased and contagious. There is no method to cure an infected plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Detection and destruction:&#039;&#039;&#039; Any vine confirmed as infected must be uprooted or destroyed, including the rootstock. The operation must be completed no later than 31 March following detection, before the vegetative restart and before larval emergence.&lt;br /&gt;
** If the infection rate of a plot exceeds a threshold (often set at 20% of affected vines), complete uprooting of the entire vineyard block is required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rootstocks and regrowth:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rootstocks may act as symptomless carriers (infected but expressing few or no symptoms). Removal must therefore be thorough to eliminate all regrowth that could remain a reservoir for phytoplasmas.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Wild vines:&#039;&#039;&#039; Abandoned or wild vines located within the regulated area must be removed, as they serve as refuges for the leafhopper and potential reservoirs of the phytoplasma &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:03&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Economic consequences and challenges ===&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée generates significant costs due to mandatory insecticide treatments, vine removal, and replanting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Direct economic impact:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A simulation based on data from the Occitanie region shows that, in the absence of control measures, a contaminated vineyard block may require complete uprooting within three years. This leads to substantial yield losses and high replanting and maintenance costs, severely compromising the long-term viability of the vineyard &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;CRAO – Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture Occitanie. (2020).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Tout savoir sur la Flavescence dorée.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://occitanie.chambres-agriculture.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/265_chambre_dagriculture_-_occitanie/Interface/Doc/Publications/ToutSavoirSurLaFD-CRAO2020.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conclusion and perspectives ===&lt;br /&gt;
Flavescence dorée remains a major threat to grapevine, and its control still relies on an essential foundation: certified planting material, coordinated monitoring, removal of infected vines, and mandatory insecticide treatments against &#039;&#039;Scaphoideus titanus&#039;&#039;. These measures are effective, but their repeated use raises concerns regarding ecological and economic sustainability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research efforts primarily aim to reduce dependence on insecticides. Mineral products such as kaolin show a disruptive effect on young larvae, but their efficacy remains variable &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Favre, A., Mittaz, C., &amp;amp; Kehrli, P. (2023).&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;Controlling Scaphoideus titanus with kaolin: Summary of four years of field trials in Switzerland (Open Access).&#039;&#039; Agroscope. &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371304680_Controlling_Scaphoideus_titanus_with_kaolin_Summary_of_four_years_of_field_trials_in_Switzerland_OPEN_ACCESS&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Behaviour-based approaches, including vibrational or chemical signalling disruption, also offer promising avenues, although they are still at an experimental stage. In the long term, these strategies could strengthen integrated protection by improving the precision of interventions &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Genetic tolerance is another exploratory avenue: some cultivars appear less sensitive, but graft–rootstock interactions and the risk of asymptomatic reservoirs currently limit practical application. Marker-assisted selection could accelerate progress, but this approach remains a long-term perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the short and medium term, the most realistic advances concern the optimisation of sanitary decision-making: earlier detection of outbreaks, better-targeted interventions, and a reasoned use of physical and biological alternatives. Behaviour-based and genetic innovations will complement—rather than replace—the current core measures of disease management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Useful links ===&lt;br /&gt;
To explore further, here is a selection of reliable and up-to-date resources on Flavescence dorée and its management in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;A – Understanding the disease and collective control&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Full webinar on the current status of Flavescence dorée in France / GDON example in Gironde – Antoine (Min 12:48–25:05)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOIyR9VeTk&amp;amp;t=376s&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;B – Diagnostic: accredited laboratories&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updated list of laboratories accredited for phytoplasma detection (French Ministry of Agriculture)                                                                                                              &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://agriculture.gouv.fr/laboratoires-officiels-et-reconnus-en-sante-des-vegetaux&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;C – Insecticides and authorised products&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2025 list of authorised products (DRAAF PACA)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/modalites-de-lutte-contre-la-cicadelle-de-la-flavescence-doree-de-la-vigne-pour-a1407.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – conventional products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A652795&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=usg%3A4283&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Q2ljYWRlbGxlcyZtb2RlPSZmJTVCMCU1RD1saXN0X3R5cGVfdXNhZ2UlM0EyMDEwMDQwMTAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMQ%3D%3D&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ephy database – organic products&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://ephy.anses.fr/resultats_recherche/produits?f%5B%5D=usg%3A733159&amp;amp;uop=or&amp;amp;f%5B%5D=list_type_usage%3A20100401000000000001&amp;amp;origin=Y3VsdHVyZTE9VmlnbmUmY3VsdHVyZTI9Jm51aXNpYmxlMT1DaWNhZGVsbGVzJTIwZGUlMjBsYSUyMGZsYXZlc2NlbmNlJTIwZG9yJUMzJUE5ZSZudWlzaWJsZTI9Jm1vZGU9JmYlNUIwJTVEPWxpc3RfdHlwZV91c2FnZSUzQTIwMTAwNDAxMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAx&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Estimated pesticide prices&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://www.coutdesfournitures.fr/sites/default/files/page_39_0.pdf&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;D – Regulations and official documents&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DRAAF PACA – Official information on Flavescence dorée&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://draaf.paca.agriculture.gouv.fr/flavescence-doree-r37.html&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Flavescence dorée]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7421</id>
		<title>Improved land clearing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7421"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:38:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): /* Cost per hectare */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba).&lt;br /&gt;
|Main productions =Polyculture-élevage&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &#039;&#039;&#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&#039;&#039;&#039; during field preparation or weeding operations. Instead, it focuses on &#039;&#039;&#039;selecting and allowing one to three shoots per stump&#039;&#039;&#039; to grow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the &#039;&#039;&#039;carbon sequestration capacity&#039;&#039;&#039; of agroecosystems&lt;br /&gt;
* Create a &#039;&#039;&#039;green screen&#039;&#039;&#039; that serves as a [[Vigorous windbreak|windbreak]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve &#039;&#039;&#039;agricultural production&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensure &#039;&#039;&#039;forest seed sources&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserve a few trees in fields for &#039;&#039;&#039;seed production&#039;&#039;&#039; and/or &#039;&#039;&#039;agroforestry benefits&#039;&#039;&#039;, including wind reduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhance &#039;&#039;&#039;[[biodiversity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environmental context / Site conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is a practice &#039;&#039;&#039;suitable for all land and soil types&#039;&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Sahelian and Sudanian climates&#039;&#039;&#039; (400 to 1100 mm rainfall). It is done on &#039;&#039;&#039;individual or collective farms&#039;&#039;&#039; mainly for rainfed agriculture, while respecting tree densities appropriate for crops. It is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;within two months before the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;during weeding operations&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Identify the shoots to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039;, regardless of age — ideally prioritizing nitrogen-fixing and multipurpose species&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mark young shoots&#039;&#039;&#039; using stakes&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Thin out&#039;&#039;&#039; if needed (keep 2 to 3 shoots per stump) to maintain proper density&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tree density&#039;&#039;&#039;: The &#039;&#039;&#039;ideal density for cereal association&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;50–100 trees per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;. In Niger, density ranges from 25 to 400 trees/ha depending on species and crown size&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Prosopis africana&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Faidherbia albida&#039;&#039;): 25–40 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Medium-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Balanites aegyptiaca&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;): 100 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Combretaceae&#039;&#039;): 400 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing and frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once before the rainy season, and possibly a second time mid-season if needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe (daba)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Axe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rake&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership &amp;amp; Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose the &#039;&#039;&#039;shoots to retain&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cut all others&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Scatter the cut material&#039;&#039;&#039; around the stump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
* Creates a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Prevents water and wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Improves crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restores biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; (flora and fauna)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Provides forage and wood&#039;&#039;&#039; for various uses at the time of clearing&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhances the &#039;&#039;&#039;growth of woody species&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages / Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Limited knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; of local species&#039; biology and physiology&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Risk of disease and plant death&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Illegal cutting&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal intrusion&#039;&#039;&#039; (grazing damage)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cost per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
 {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Items&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit Price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Workforce &lt;br /&gt;
|M/D&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Machete&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daba&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Axe&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rake&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3 000&lt;br /&gt;
|6 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;22 000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Note:&#039;&#039;&#039; These costs are indicative and may vary depending on the context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifespan==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;annually&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://niger-gdte.net/books/3-techniques-agroforestieres-et-de-valorisation-et-ou-conservation-des-productions-forestieres/page/31-defrichement-ameliore Défrichement amélioré - Niger GDTE].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7420</id>
		<title>Improved land clearing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7420"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:38:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba).&lt;br /&gt;
|Main productions =Polyculture-élevage&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &#039;&#039;&#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&#039;&#039;&#039; during field preparation or weeding operations. Instead, it focuses on &#039;&#039;&#039;selecting and allowing one to three shoots per stump&#039;&#039;&#039; to grow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the &#039;&#039;&#039;carbon sequestration capacity&#039;&#039;&#039; of agroecosystems&lt;br /&gt;
* Create a &#039;&#039;&#039;green screen&#039;&#039;&#039; that serves as a [[Vigorous windbreak|windbreak]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve &#039;&#039;&#039;agricultural production&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensure &#039;&#039;&#039;forest seed sources&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserve a few trees in fields for &#039;&#039;&#039;seed production&#039;&#039;&#039; and/or &#039;&#039;&#039;agroforestry benefits&#039;&#039;&#039;, including wind reduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhance &#039;&#039;&#039;[[biodiversity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environmental context / Site conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is a practice &#039;&#039;&#039;suitable for all land and soil types&#039;&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Sahelian and Sudanian climates&#039;&#039;&#039; (400 to 1100 mm rainfall). It is done on &#039;&#039;&#039;individual or collective farms&#039;&#039;&#039; mainly for rainfed agriculture, while respecting tree densities appropriate for crops. It is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;within two months before the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;during weeding operations&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Identify the shoots to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039;, regardless of age — ideally prioritizing nitrogen-fixing and multipurpose species&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mark young shoots&#039;&#039;&#039; using stakes&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Thin out&#039;&#039;&#039; if needed (keep 2 to 3 shoots per stump) to maintain proper density&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tree density&#039;&#039;&#039;: The &#039;&#039;&#039;ideal density for cereal association&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;50–100 trees per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;. In Niger, density ranges from 25 to 400 trees/ha depending on species and crown size&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Prosopis africana&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Faidherbia albida&#039;&#039;): 25–40 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Medium-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Balanites aegyptiaca&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;): 100 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Combretaceae&#039;&#039;): 400 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing and frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once before the rainy season, and possibly a second time mid-season if needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe (daba)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Axe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rake&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership &amp;amp; Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose the &#039;&#039;&#039;shoots to retain&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cut all others&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Scatter the cut material&#039;&#039;&#039; around the stump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
* Creates a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Prevents water and wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Improves crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restores biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; (flora and fauna)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Provides forage and wood&#039;&#039;&#039; for various uses at the time of clearing&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhances the &#039;&#039;&#039;growth of woody species&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages / Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Limited knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; of local species&#039; biology and physiology&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Risk of disease and plant death&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Illegal cutting&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal intrusion&#039;&#039;&#039; (grazing damage)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cost per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
 {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Items&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit Price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Workforce &lt;br /&gt;
|M/D&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Machete&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daba&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Axe&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rake&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3 000&lt;br /&gt;
|6 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;22 000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: These costs are indicative and may vary depending on the context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifespan==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;annually&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://niger-gdte.net/books/3-techniques-agroforestieres-et-de-valorisation-et-ou-conservation-des-productions-forestieres/page/31-defrichement-ameliore Défrichement amélioré - Niger GDTE].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7419</id>
		<title>Improved land clearing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7419"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:37:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba).&lt;br /&gt;
|Main productions =Polyculture-élevage&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &#039;&#039;&#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&#039;&#039;&#039; during field preparation or weeding operations. Instead, it focuses on &#039;&#039;&#039;selecting and allowing one to three shoots per stump&#039;&#039;&#039; to grow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the &#039;&#039;&#039;carbon sequestration capacity&#039;&#039;&#039; of agroecosystems&lt;br /&gt;
* Create a &#039;&#039;&#039;green screen&#039;&#039;&#039; that serves as a [[Vigorous windbreak|windbreak]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve &#039;&#039;&#039;agricultural production&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensure &#039;&#039;&#039;forest seed sources&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserve a few trees in fields for &#039;&#039;&#039;seed production&#039;&#039;&#039; and/or &#039;&#039;&#039;agroforestry benefits&#039;&#039;&#039;, including wind reduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhance &#039;&#039;&#039;[[biodiversity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environmental context / Site conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is a practice &#039;&#039;&#039;suitable for all land and soil types&#039;&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Sahelian and Sudanian climates&#039;&#039;&#039; (400 to 1100 mm rainfall). It is done on &#039;&#039;&#039;individual or collective farms&#039;&#039;&#039; mainly for rainfed agriculture, while respecting tree densities appropriate for crops. It is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;within two months before the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;during weeding operations&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Identify the shoots to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039;, regardless of age — ideally prioritizing nitrogen-fixing and multipurpose species&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mark young shoots&#039;&#039;&#039; using stakes&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Thin out&#039;&#039;&#039; if needed (keep 2 to 3 shoots per stump) to maintain proper density&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tree density&#039;&#039;&#039;: The &#039;&#039;&#039;ideal density for cereal association&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;50–100 trees per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;. In Niger, density ranges from 25 to 400 trees/ha depending on species and crown size&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Prosopis africana&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Faidherbia albida&#039;&#039;): 25–40 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Medium-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Balanites aegyptiaca&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;): 100 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Combretaceae&#039;&#039;): 400 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing and frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once before the rainy season, and possibly a second time mid-season if needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe (daba)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Axe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rake&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership &amp;amp; Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose the &#039;&#039;&#039;shoots to retain&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cut all others&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Scatter the cut material&#039;&#039;&#039; around the stump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
* Creates a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Prevents water and wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Improves crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restores biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; (flora and fauna)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Provides forage and wood&#039;&#039;&#039; for various uses at the time of clearing&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhances the &#039;&#039;&#039;growth of woody species&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages / Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Limited knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; of local species&#039; biology and physiology&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Risk of disease and plant death&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Illegal cutting&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal intrusion&#039;&#039;&#039; (grazing damage)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cost per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
 {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Items&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit Price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Workforce &lt;br /&gt;
|M/D&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Machete&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daba&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Axe&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rake&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3 000&lt;br /&gt;
|6 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;22 000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: These costs are indicative and may vary depending on the context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifespan==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;annually&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://niger-gdte.net/books/3-techniques-agroforestieres-et-de-valorisation-et-ou-conservation-des-productions-forestieres/page/31-defrichement-ameliore Défrichement amélioré - Niger GDTE].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7418</id>
		<title>Improved land clearing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7418"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:34:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba).&lt;br /&gt;
|Main productions =Polyculture-élevage&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &#039;&#039;&#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&#039;&#039;&#039; during field preparation or weeding operations. Instead, it focuses on &#039;&#039;&#039;selecting and allowing one to three shoots per stump&#039;&#039;&#039; to grow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the &#039;&#039;&#039;carbon sequestration capacity&#039;&#039;&#039; of agroecosystems&lt;br /&gt;
* Create a &#039;&#039;&#039;green screen&#039;&#039;&#039; that serves as a [[Vigorous windbreak|windbreak]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve &#039;&#039;&#039;agricultural production&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensure &#039;&#039;&#039;forest seed sources&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserve a few trees in fields for &#039;&#039;&#039;seed production&#039;&#039;&#039; and/or &#039;&#039;&#039;agroforestry benefits&#039;&#039;&#039;, including wind reduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhance &#039;&#039;&#039;[[biodiversity]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environmental context / Site conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is a practice &#039;&#039;&#039;suitable for all land and soil types&#039;&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Sahelian and Sudanian climates&#039;&#039;&#039; (400 to 1100 mm rainfall). It is done on &#039;&#039;&#039;individual or collective farms&#039;&#039;&#039; mainly for rainfed agriculture, while respecting tree densities appropriate for crops. It is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;within two months before the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;during weeding operations&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Identify the shoots to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039;, regardless of age — ideally prioritizing nitrogen-fixing and multipurpose species&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mark young shoots&#039;&#039;&#039; using stakes&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Thin out&#039;&#039;&#039; if needed (keep 2 to 3 shoots per stump) to maintain proper density&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tree density&#039;&#039;&#039;: The &#039;&#039;&#039;ideal density for cereal association&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;50–100 trees per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;. In Niger, density ranges from 25 to 400 trees/ha depending on species and crown size&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Prosopis africana&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Faidherbia albida&#039;&#039;): 25–40 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Medium-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Balanites aegyptiaca&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;): 100 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Combretaceae&#039;&#039;): 400 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing and frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once before the rainy season, and possibly a second time mid-season if needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe (daba)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Axe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rake&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership &amp;amp; Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose the &#039;&#039;&#039;shoots to retain&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cut all others&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Scatter the cut material&#039;&#039;&#039; around the stump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
* Creates a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Prevents water and wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Improves crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restores biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; (flora and fauna)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Provides forage and wood&#039;&#039;&#039; for various uses at the time of clearing&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhances the &#039;&#039;&#039;growth of woody species&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages / Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Limited knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; of local species&#039; biology and physiology&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Risk of disease and plant death&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Illegal cutting&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal intrusion&#039;&#039;&#039; (grazing damage)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cost per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
 {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Items&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit Price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Workforce &lt;br /&gt;
|M/D&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Machete&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daba&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Axe&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rake&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3 000&lt;br /&gt;
|6 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;22 000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7417</id>
		<title>Improved land clearing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7417"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:31:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): /* Technical characteristics */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba).&lt;br /&gt;
|Main productions =Polyculture-élevage&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &#039;&#039;&#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&#039;&#039;&#039; during field preparation or weeding operations. Instead, it focuses on &#039;&#039;&#039;selecting and allowing one to three shoots per stump&#039;&#039;&#039; to grow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the &#039;&#039;&#039;carbon sequestration capacity&#039;&#039;&#039; of agroecosystems&lt;br /&gt;
* Create a &#039;&#039;&#039;green screen&#039;&#039;&#039; that serves as a [windbreak](f)&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve &#039;&#039;&#039;agricultural production&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensure &#039;&#039;&#039;forest seed sources&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserve a few trees in fields for &#039;&#039;&#039;seed production&#039;&#039;&#039; and/or &#039;&#039;&#039;agroforestry benefits&#039;&#039;&#039;, including wind reduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhance &#039;&#039;&#039;[biodiversity](f)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environmental context / Site conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is a practice &#039;&#039;&#039;suitable for all land and soil types&#039;&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Sahelian and Sudanian climates&#039;&#039;&#039; (400 to 1100 mm rainfall). It is done on &#039;&#039;&#039;individual or collective farms&#039;&#039;&#039; mainly for rainfed agriculture, while respecting tree densities appropriate for crops. It is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;within two months before the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;during weeding operations&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Identify the shoots to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039;, regardless of age — ideally prioritizing nitrogen-fixing and multipurpose species&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mark young shoots&#039;&#039;&#039; using stakes&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Thin out&#039;&#039;&#039; if needed (keep 2 to 3 shoots per stump) to maintain proper density&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tree density&#039;&#039;&#039;: The &#039;&#039;&#039;ideal density for cereal association&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;50–100 trees per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;. In Niger, density ranges from 25 to 400 trees/ha depending on species and crown size&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Prosopis africana&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Faidherbia albida&#039;&#039;): 25–40 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Medium-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Balanites aegyptiaca&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;): 100 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Combretaceae&#039;&#039;): 400 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing and frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once before the rainy season, and possibly a second time mid-season if needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe (daba)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Axe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rake&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership &amp;amp; Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose the &#039;&#039;&#039;shoots to retain&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cut all others&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Scatter the cut material&#039;&#039;&#039; around the stump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
* Creates a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Prevents water and wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Improves crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restores biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; (flora and fauna)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Provides forage and wood&#039;&#039;&#039; for various uses at the time of clearing&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhances the &#039;&#039;&#039;growth of woody species&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages / Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Limited knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; of local species&#039; biology and physiology&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Risk of disease and plant death&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Illegal cutting&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal intrusion (grazing damage)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cost per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
 {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Items&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit Price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Workforce &lt;br /&gt;
|M/D&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Machete&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daba&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Axe&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rake&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3 000&lt;br /&gt;
|6 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;22 000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7416</id>
		<title>Improved land clearing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Improved_land_clearing&amp;diff=7416"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:30:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): Created page with &amp;quot; {{Pratique |Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png |ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba). |Main productions =Polyculture-élevage |Objectif=Soil preservation |Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity }} Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&amp;#039;...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
|Image=Defrichement_FarinBaki.png&lt;br /&gt;
|ImageCaption=Démonstration du défrichement amélioré à Farin Baki (Commune de Korahane-Maradi) (Photo : Sidikou Baba).&lt;br /&gt;
|Main productions =Polyculture-élevage&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés=Windbreak, Carbon sequestration, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is the first step in implementing assisted natural regeneration. It involves &#039;&#039;&#039;not uprooting, burning, or cutting shrubs or young trees at ground level&#039;&#039;&#039; during field preparation or weeding operations. Instead, it focuses on &#039;&#039;&#039;selecting and allowing one to three shoots per stump&#039;&#039;&#039; to grow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
* Increase the &#039;&#039;&#039;carbon sequestration capacity&#039;&#039;&#039; of agroecosystems&lt;br /&gt;
* Create a &#039;&#039;&#039;green screen&#039;&#039;&#039; that serves as a [windbreak](f)&lt;br /&gt;
* Improve &#039;&#039;&#039;agricultural production&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Ensure &#039;&#039;&#039;forest seed sources&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Preserve a few trees in fields for &#039;&#039;&#039;seed production&#039;&#039;&#039; and/or &#039;&#039;&#039;agroforestry benefits&#039;&#039;&#039;, including wind reduction&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhance &#039;&#039;&#039;[biodiversity](f)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environmental context / Site conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
Improved land clearing is a practice &#039;&#039;&#039;suitable for all land and soil types&#039;&#039;&#039; in &#039;&#039;&#039;Sahelian and Sudanian climates&#039;&#039;&#039; (400 to 1100 mm rainfall). It is done on &#039;&#039;&#039;individual or collective farms&#039;&#039;&#039; mainly for rainfed agriculture, while respecting tree densities appropriate for crops. It is carried out &#039;&#039;&#039;within two months before the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;during weeding operations&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Identify the shoots to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039;, regardless of age — ideally prioritizing nitrogen-fixing and multipurpose species&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mark young shoots&#039;&#039;&#039; using stakes&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Thin out&#039;&#039;&#039; if needed (keep 2 to 3 shoots per stump) to maintain proper density&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tree density&#039;&#039;&#039;: The &#039;&#039;&#039;ideal density for cereal association&#039;&#039;&#039; is &#039;&#039;&#039;50–100 trees per hectare&#039;&#039;&#039;. In Niger, density ranges from 25 to 400 trees/ha depending on species and crown size&lt;br /&gt;
  * &#039;&#039;&#039;Large-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Prosopis africana&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Faidherbia albida&#039;&#039;): 25–40 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
  * &#039;&#039;&#039;Medium-canopy species&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Balanites aegyptiaca&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;): 100 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
  * &#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species&#039;&#039;&#039; (e.g., &#039;&#039;Combretaceae&#039;&#039;): 400 trees/ha&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Timing and frequency&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once before the rainy season, and possibly a second time mid-season if needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required tools===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe (daba)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Axe&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rake&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership &amp;amp; Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
* Choose the &#039;&#039;&#039;shoots to retain&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cut all others&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Scatter the cut material&#039;&#039;&#039; around the stump&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
* Creates a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Prevents water and wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Improves crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restores biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; (flora and fauna)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Provides forage and wood&#039;&#039;&#039; for various uses at the time of clearing&lt;br /&gt;
* Enhances the &#039;&#039;&#039;growth of woody species&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages / Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Limited knowledge&#039;&#039;&#039; of local species&#039; biology and physiology&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Risk of disease and plant death&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Illegal cutting&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal intrusion (grazing damage)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cost per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
 {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Items&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit Price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Workforce &lt;br /&gt;
|M/D&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Machete&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daba&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Axe&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|2 000&lt;br /&gt;
|4 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rake&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|3 000&lt;br /&gt;
|6 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;22 000&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Vigorous_windbreak&amp;diff=7415</id>
		<title>Vigorous windbreak</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Vigorous_windbreak&amp;diff=7415"/>
		<updated>2025-06-19T08:19:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = BriseVent_HaieNiger.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Brise vent sur le périmètre irrigué de Daibéri, Tillabéri-Niger (Photo A. Sabra 2010).&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Field crops&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Soil preservation&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Hedge, Agroforestry, Water management, Crop protection&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Windbreaks are linear structures, most often multi-layered and living, composed mainly of woody species and sometimes herbaceous plants. They are arranged in such a way that they protect cultivated areas, pastures, homes, or infrastructures (roads, water points, schools) from the harmful effects of prevailing winds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A windbreak separates two zones: the &amp;quot;windward&amp;quot; zone, located on the side from which the wind blows, and the &amp;quot;leeward&amp;quot; zone, situated on the side where the wind moves towards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Reduce wind speed on both sides:&#039;&#039;&#039; windward and leeward, without increasing turbulence.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Reduce or eliminate wind erosion&#039;&#039;&#039; within the protected area.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Trap the solid load of the wind,&#039;&#039;&#039; thus limiting soil (and often fertility) transfers from one zone to another.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Significantly reduce potential evapotranspiration&#039;&#039;&#039; (PET).&lt;br /&gt;
*Help &#039;&#039;&#039;improve crop yields&#039;&#039;&#039; in the protected zone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The protected area behind the windbreak is &#039;&#039;&#039;greater on the leeward side than on the windward side&#039;&#039;&#039;. Downwind, protection extends over &#039;&#039;&#039;15 times the height&#039;&#039;&#039; of the windbreak, and on the windward side, it’s &#039;&#039;&#039;5 times the height&#039;&#039;&#039; of the windbreak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Context / Environmental Conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Windbreaks can be established &#039;&#039;&#039;on all types of land and soil&#039;&#039;&#039; and are used in &#039;&#039;&#039;all climates,&#039;&#039;&#039; particularly in Sahelian and Sudanian regions. Windbreaks can be particularly installed to protect &#039;&#039;&#039;irrigated perimeters, rainfed agricultural lands, and fixed dunes.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation Steps==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Determine the area to be protected&#039;&#039;&#039; (length and width of the area).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Choose woody species&#039;&#039;&#039; according to the height of the future windbreak. If H is the height of the future windbreak, it will protect the leeward zone over a distance of 15 times H and the windward zone over a distance of 5 times H.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Acquire&#039;&#039;&#039; the selected woody species.&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish the type of windbreak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Characteristics===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Orientation of the windbreak:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Perpendicular&#039;&#039;&#039; to the direction of prevailing winds.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Height:&#039;&#039;&#039; According to the relationship: protected distance = 10 to 15 times the height of the windbreak.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Length&#039;&#039;&#039; of the protected area: &#039;&#039;&#039;11-12 times the height&#039;&#039;&#039; of the future windbreak (to avoid turbulence on the sides).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Permeability:&#039;&#039;&#039; Estimated at &#039;&#039;&#039;50% void&#039;&#039;&#039; for optimal windbreak effect.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Linear planting arranged in 4 rows&#039;&#039;&#039; (of trees and shrubs) &#039;&#039;&#039;in staggered formation&#039;&#039;&#039; over a strip 12 m wide.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Spacing between trees and shrubs depends on the species&#039;&#039;&#039; and should match the &#039;&#039;&#039;canopy diameter&#039;&#039;&#039; of the chosen species for the windbreak.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Density:&#039;&#039;&#039; Depends on the species. For woody plants with a &#039;&#039;&#039;canopy diameter of 4 m, 250 plants per km per row&#039;&#039;&#039; are required, or 1,000 trees for the 4 rows of the windbreak.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Planting hole dimensions:&#039;&#039;&#039; 0.40 m x 0.40 m x 0.40 m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Characteristics of Woody Species====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tall species:&#039;&#039;&#039; Neem (&#039;&#039;Azadirachta indica&#039;&#039;), eucalyptus (&#039;&#039;Eucalyptus camaldulensis&#039;&#039;), acacia (&#039;&#039;Acacia tortilis ssp raddiana&#039;&#039;), Siamese cassia (&#039;&#039;Cassia siamea&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Shrubby species:&#039;&#039;&#039; Cashew (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), false mimosa (&#039;&#039;Leucaena leucocephala&#039;&#039;), &#039;&#039;Bauhinia rufescens&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Acacia holosericea&#039;&#039;, Mauritius jujube (&#039;&#039;Ziziphus mauritiana&#039;&#039;), [[moringa]] (&#039;&#039;Moringa oleifera&#039;&#039;), siwak (&#039;&#039;Salvadora persica&#039;&#039;), &#039;&#039;[[Euphorbia]] balsamifera&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Acacia [[senegal]]&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;Acacia laeta&#039;&#039;, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Community Training and Worksite Organization===&lt;br /&gt;
The beneficiary communities should be trained to &#039;&#039;&#039;follow the technical standards for windbreaks&#039;&#039;&#039;. During the establishment of windbreaks, a reminder of the worksite organization should be given to the entire team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organization includes: a &#039;&#039;&#039;site manager&#039;&#039;&#039;, a &#039;&#039;&#039;supervisor&#039;&#039;&#039; or pointer, a &#039;&#039;&#039;team of tracers&#039;&#039;&#039; (usually 8 members), and &#039;&#039;&#039;other participants&#039;&#039;&#039; organized into teams of 10 to 20 people per hectare. Each team is led by a team leader. The supervisor or pointer oversees the teams and ensures compliance with the technical standards for the windbreak construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Materials===&lt;br /&gt;
*Shovels.&lt;br /&gt;
*Picks.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ropes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Measuring tapes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Machetes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pruning shears.&lt;br /&gt;
*Personal protective equipment (PPE): boots, gloves, and face masks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Management, Ownership, and Sustainability Measures==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Maintain&#039;&#039;&#039; the windbreaks.&lt;br /&gt;
*Set up a &#039;&#039;&#039;site management committee&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Develop a &#039;&#039;&#039;windbreak management plan&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sign a &#039;&#039;&#039;local agreement between the Ministry of the Environment and the site operator&#039;&#039;&#039; or the group of site operators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages and Disadvantages/Constraints==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advantages===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Effective and durable protection&#039;&#039;&#039; against wind.&lt;br /&gt;
*Creation of a favorable &#039;&#039;&#039;microclimate&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Increase in &#039;&#039;&#039;agro-sylvo-pastoral production&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Increase in the &#039;&#039;&#039;availability of wood, fruit, medicine&#039;&#039;&#039;, and other &#039;&#039;&#039;ecosystem services&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Technique &#039;&#039;&#039;easy to master&#039;&#039;&#039; in rural areas.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon sequestration&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disadvantages/Constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
*Requirement for &#039;&#039;&#039;protection of planted trees&#039;&#039;&#039; from animals.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Habitat for crop predators&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Negative shading effect&#039;&#039;&#039; on some farmed areas.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Occupies space&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Costs of the technique per hectare==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Categories&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Quantity&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Unit price (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Amount (FCFA)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hole digging&lt;br /&gt;
|Unit&lt;br /&gt;
|1000&lt;br /&gt;
|100&lt;br /&gt;
|100 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Small equipment kit (shovel, pickaxe, rope, &lt;br /&gt;
measuring tape, machete/pruning shears, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
|Flat Rate&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|3 500&lt;br /&gt;
| 3 500   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Personal protective equipment (PPE): &lt;br /&gt;
boots, face masks, and gloves&lt;br /&gt;
|Flat Rate&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2*&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|300&lt;br /&gt;
|300&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Forest plants&lt;br /&gt;
|Plants&lt;br /&gt;
|1 000&lt;br /&gt;
| 100&lt;br /&gt;
|100 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Transportation&lt;br /&gt;
|Plants&lt;br /&gt;
|1 000&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|30 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Planting&lt;br /&gt;
|Plants&lt;br /&gt;
|1 000&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
|30 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Replanting in the second year (purchase &lt;br /&gt;
of plants, transportation, and planting)&lt;br /&gt;
|Man/D&lt;br /&gt;
|333&lt;br /&gt;
|160&lt;br /&gt;
|53 280&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Guarding/security (for 3 years) &lt;br /&gt;
|Man/Year&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|20 000&lt;br /&gt;
| 60 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|Man/Day&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|7 000&lt;br /&gt;
| 7 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;384 080&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Guarding/security (for 3 years) &lt;br /&gt;
|Man/Year&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|20 000&lt;br /&gt;
| 60 000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Total investment&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;564 720&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Note|The costs must be contextualized based on local realities:&lt;br /&gt;
1*: This cost is calculated based on a team of 60 people using a set of tools (shovels, pickaxes, daba [hoe], water level cord, etc.) costing 350,000 FCFA and amortized over 100 hectares in one year.&lt;br /&gt;
2*: This cost is calculated based on a team of 60 people using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (gloves, boots, masks, etc.) costing 30,000 FCFA and amortized over 100 hectares in one year.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lifespan==&lt;br /&gt;
A windbreak can last &#039;&#039;&#039;30 years or more if well managed&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://niger-gdte.net/books/2-techniques-biologiques-de-conservation-des-eaux-et-des-solsdefense-et-restauration-des-sols/page/23-brise-vent-vif Brise vent vif - Niger GDTE.]&lt;br /&gt;
*Ministry of Agricultural Development (MDA), 2006. Technical Guidebook on Natural Resource Management and Agro-Sylvo-Pastoral Production, Niamey, Niger, Community Action Program (PAC). 270 p.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mille, G., &amp;amp; Louppe, D. 2015. Memento of the Tropical Forester. Versailles, France, Quae Editions. 1203 p. Centre technique forestier tropical (CTFT), 1989. Memento of the Forester. 1257 p.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://niger-gdte.net/books/2-techniques-biologiques-de-conservation-des-eaux-et-des-solsdefense-et-restauration-des-sols/page/23-brise-vent-vif Brise vent vif - Niger GDTE.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Brise vent vif]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Dwara%27s_farm&amp;diff=7322</id>
		<title>Orou Dwara&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Dwara%27s_farm&amp;diff=7322"/>
		<updated>2025-05-13T09:01:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): Astrid Robette (1886608933) moved page Orou Dwara&amp;#039;s farm to Orou Douarou&amp;#039;s farm: Faute d&amp;#039;orthographe dans le titre&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Orou Douarou&#039;s farm]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Douarou%27s_farm&amp;diff=7321</id>
		<title>Orou Douarou&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Douarou%27s_farm&amp;diff=7321"/>
		<updated>2025-05-13T09:01:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): Astrid Robette (1886608933) moved page Orou Dwara&amp;#039;s farm to Orou Douarou&amp;#039;s farm: Faute d&amp;#039;orthographe dans le titre&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Ferme d&#039;Orou Douarou Assouma&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology, crop diversity, soil fertility, pasture&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Orou Douarou Assouma&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = Assouma_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = Assouma_OrouAssouma.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Benin&lt;br /&gt;
| Coordonnées GPS = 9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy-loam&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Crop-livestock farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Tomato@ Lentil@ Peanut@ Cowpea@ @ Sorghum@ Cassava@ Corn@ Soybean@ Shea@ Cashew nut@ Teak@ Poultry breeding@ Dairy sheep farming@ Goat farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Titre court = Orou Douarou Assouma&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Régénération des sols&lt;br /&gt;
| Programme = Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = Assouma_ArachideAnacardier.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}{{A la une}}&lt;br /&gt;
Orou Douarou Assouma, a farmer from Guéssou (Gbégourou) in [[Benin]], cultivates his land and raises livestock following agroecological principles. Here’s a portrait of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Orou Douarou Assouma.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workforce:&#039;&#039;&#039; 3 permanent workers assisted by their 2 sons. Additionally, 3 of their wives occasionally help, mainly during harvests, which benefit the family.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Production:&#039;&#039;&#039; Mainly for family consumption:  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Tomato]], [[lentil]], [[peanut]], [[cowpea]], pigeon [[pea]], and velvet bean (mucuna).  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Food crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Cassava]], [[sorghum]], [[maize]], [[soybean]].  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit and forest trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Shea|Shea tree]], [[Cashew nut|cashew tree]], [[teak]] (Gmelina arborea, also known as white teak) for field boundaries.  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Livestock:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poultry (50 birds), goats (4), sheep (6).  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guessou-Nord has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw classification according to Köppen-Geiger). The average annual temperature is 27.8°C, with 904.9 mm of rainfall. Winds appear toward the end of the rainy season.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Education/training/background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Orou learned agriculture from his parents and still applies the traditional techniques and methods they taught him. He has no formal education in agriculture or agronomy; his knowledge is empirical. Since last year, through the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039;, he has started combining traditional and agroecological approaches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
Orou’s interest in [[agroecology]] emerged a year ago with the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039; and support from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Consultancy&#039;&#039;&#039; (an agricultural advisory firm).  &lt;br /&gt;
One of Orou’s goals is to implement the techniques introduced by the ProSilience project. Before this, he lacked knowledge [[about]] agroecology, such as enriching the soil with pigeon pea, mucuna, and other suitable legumes. He recognizes their significant benefits for himself and future generations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_PlanchesEnfouissement.jpg|Légende=Tilling and ridge formation|Alignement=Right}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
* Orou improves soil fertility by &#039;&#039;&#039;planting maize before mucuna&#039;&#039;&#039; and rotating crops to enhance soil quality between maize cycles.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing and burying weeds&#039;&#039;&#039; into ridges enriches the soil with &#039;&#039;&#039;nitrogen&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[organic matter]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* With the ProSilience project, he began &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|rotating crops]]&#039;&#039;&#039; on different plots—for example, avoiding maize on maize sequences this year.  &lt;br /&gt;
* He now practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop association&#039;&#039;&#039;, such as:  &lt;br /&gt;
** Cassava and maize.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Cowpea and maize.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Sorghum and peanut.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Pigeon pea and peanut under cashew trees.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Orou values his land by cultivating pigeon pea and mucuna, which not only enhance soil fertility but can also be consumed after processing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_MaisNiebe.jpg|Cowpea and maize association&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_MaisSorgho.jpg|Maize and sorhum association&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_AssociationsCulturales.jpg|Crop associations&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil management====&lt;br /&gt;
Orou plows his fields annually. Recently, he began &#039;&#039;&#039;leaving some plots unplowed as a test&#039;&#039;&#039;, saving time and enabling mulching (adding organic litter at the base of crops like soybean, sorghum, and maize).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plowing methods include:  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using oxen-drawn plows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Manual plowing.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using a tiller.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_Labour.jpg|Légende=Plow|Alignement=Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Corn]] borers:&#039;&#039;&#039; These pests damage maize by eating its male inflorescence, disrupting reproduction.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Locusts]].&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_DegatsPyraleMais.jpg|Légende=Damage caused by corn borers on maize|Alignement=Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Strategies to address challenges====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of resources&#039;&#039;&#039; for plowing and insufficient equipment, which delays crop establishment: His solution is to&#039;&#039;&#039; use multiple tools/methods&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Against [[caterpillars]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; Through the project, he learned to produce [[Producing biopesticides based on neem leaves and seeds|biopesticides]] using local vegetation, such as neem, [[tobacco]] leaves, traditional soap, and crushed chili peppers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water system====&lt;br /&gt;
There is &#039;&#039;&#039;no irrigation &#039;&#039;&#039;system in place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction/dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; Work intensity varies throughout the year, especially during plowing (June, July) and sowing, which are labor-intensive periods.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Living conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fields are 4 km away, which Orou finds reasonable compared to other farmers with plots up to 16 km away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
====Technical support/assistance====&lt;br /&gt;
* By the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Consultancy&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Through the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Past support from the national structure on communal development for agricultural outreach on conventional and field-developed techniques.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Collaboration with &#039;&#039;&#039;Hunger Project&#039;&#039;&#039;, focusing on climate change adaptation in farm management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cooperation with other farmers====&lt;br /&gt;
* Orou is part of a &#039;&#039;&#039;farmers’ group&#039;&#039;&#039; addressing common issues, such as the &#039;&#039;&#039;cotton producers’ association&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is well*organized. Otherwise, there are no other significant associations.  &lt;br /&gt;
* A working group tackles shared challenges with support from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado office&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Monthly income:&#039;&#039;&#039; None, as it’s a family farm, and no direct salaries are drawn.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Land cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare costs 500,000 FCFA, decreasing with distance from the village.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Hoe, a plow, but no oxen currently.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Financial assistance/donations:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Labor costs for plowing are the highest, amounting to 280,000 FCFA for the entire farm.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Revenue:&#039;&#039;&#039; Primary focus is &#039;&#039;&#039;personal consumption&#039;&#039;&#039; before selling surplus. &#039;&#039;&#039;Soybeans&#039;&#039;&#039; are the most profitable, with 8 sacks of 50 kg sold annually at 22,000 FCFA per sack.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Marketing strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sales are made to local retailers or individuals who buy directly from the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advice from the farmer==&lt;br /&gt;
To preserve soil health, it’s essential to minimize mechanical interventions, practice crop rotation, and adopt soil conservation techniques. Orou is willing to guide others interested in starting farming by sharing his management methods and soil conservation techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Orou Douarou Assouma conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme d&#039;Orou Douarou Assouma]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7213</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7213"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T14:26:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agrocology, crop diversity, soil fertility, compost, crop rotation, crop association&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Benin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16.08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Market gardening&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomato@ Okra@ Chili pepper@ Sorghum@ Maize@ Soybean@ Peanut@ Yam@ Cashew nut@ Shea@ Beekeeping&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire Bio Allagbe, a farmer in Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin, cultivates his land and raises bees following agroecology principles. Here is a profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire Bio Allagbe.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou, Benin.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Date of Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1994. He took over the family farm 30 years ago.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 16,08 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of Workers on the Farm (FTE):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average annual temperature is 26.8°C, and rainfall averages 1,023.6 mm.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Born to farming parents, Grégoire began learning traditional Beninese farming techniques as a child. He attended school up to fifth grade and has been a farmer for 30 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Okra]], [[chili pepper]], [[tomato]], jute mallow(C&#039;&#039;orchorus olitorius L&#039;&#039;.).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Staple crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Maize]], [[sorghum]], [[yam]], [[soybean]], [[peanut]].  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Cashew nut]] (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), African mahogany (&#039;&#039;Khaya senegalensis&#039;&#039;), kapok (&#039;&#039;Ceiba pentandra&#039;&#039;), [[shea]] (&#039;&#039;Vitellaria paradoxa&#039;&#039;).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Gombo.jpg|Okra.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Igname.jpg|Yam.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Karite2.jpg|Shea.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Beekeeping]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 hives, but Grégoire lacks equipment, such as protective clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Ruche.jpg  | Alignement = Center | Cadre = True | Légende = Wooden Kenyan hive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Motivations and goals===&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire discovered agroecology through the &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/projects/desira/info/prosilience_en ProSilience project]&#039;&#039;&#039; two years ago. He is highly motivated and applies techniques to combat &#039;&#039;&#039;[[soil erosion]]&#039;&#039;&#039; and manage &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Irrigation in market gardening|irrigation]]&#039;&#039;&#039; and water flow through his fields.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;His objectives include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using &#039;&#039;&#039;improved seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; to achieve &#039;&#039;&#039;better germination&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;production&#039;&#039;&#039;, and &#039;&#039;&#039;yield&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Improving honey production&#039;&#039;&#039; through beekeeping.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing &#039;&#039;&#039;vegetable gardens&#039;&#039;&#039; near a nearby water source; currently, only family-level production occurs near the water.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Collaborating with another farmer to begin &#039;&#039;&#039;intensive livestock farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, with plans for 10 sheep and 8 goats.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Association.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Maize - yams association.}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
*Uses chemical or organic fertilizers based on availability.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Cow dung is used for crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Shea trees are preserved in fields for multi-layered cropping, [[organic matter]] input, and erosion control.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Practices &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop rotation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  such as planting chili before soybeans and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop association]]&#039;&#039;&#039; such as yams with maize early in the cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Leaves 2 hectares fallow with &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon peas&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;to add nitrogen and organic matter to the soil&#039;&#039;&#039;. After two years, the field is plowed and replanted.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insects are the main pests&#039;&#039;&#039;, though their names are unknown. A caterpillar, possibly the &#039;&#039;&#039;fall armyworm&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Spodoptera frugiperda&#039;&#039;), damages maize&#039;s terminal buds before flowering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest control strategies include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Pesticides:&#039;&#039;&#039; Selective herbicides for soybeans, [https://ephy.anses.fr/substance/glyphosate glyphosate].  &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Repellents:&#039;&#039;&#039; Homemade [[Producing biopesticides based on neem leaves and seeds|biopesticides]] using &#039;&#039;&#039;neem&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[tobacco]] leaves&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_IgnamesButtes.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Yam cultivation on mounds.}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil work====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tillage and weeding:&#039;&#039;&#039; For tuber crops ([[cassava]], yam), planting is done in furrows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deep hoeing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Performed at the end of the rainy season to create mounds.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Ridging:&#039;&#039;&#039; Flat plowing with rented tractors; mounds are made for tuber crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing perpendicular to the slope:&#039;&#039;&#039; Reduces water erosion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Challenges and strategies====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing costs are high&#039;&#039;&#039; over a short period. Tractors are often unavailable during peak plowing times, so he resorts to &#039;&#039;&#039;manual plowing or animal-drawn plowing&#039;&#039;&#039;. When these are not possible, &#039;&#039;&#039;direct seeding&#039;&#039;&#039; is done.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water management====&lt;br /&gt;
*No irrigation system.  &lt;br /&gt;
*No manual watering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*The Okpara River flows near the plots, but its water is not yet used for irrigation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction and dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; June/July is very busy. Four people work on the farm regularly, increasing to six during plowing and harvest.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economics:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire does not take a salary; it’s a family-run operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; Basic and challenging.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social structure:&#039;&#039;&#039; Family-based.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fields are 4 km from his home, which he considers manageable.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical support:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only from the [[Cabinet Monrado&#039;s experimental farm|&#039;&#039;&#039;Cabinet&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado’s experimental farm&#039;&#039;&#039;]] via the ProSilience Project.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaboration with Other Farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; No cooperatives, but collaborates with the Cabinet Monrado on shared challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare = 450,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plow (125,000 FCFA) and traction system for oxen (15,000 FCFA).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Subsidies/Financial Aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plowing costs up to 450,000 FCFA for 7 hectares, with total expenses of 700,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Income:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soybean is the most profitable crop, yielding 16,000 FCFA per bag, totaling &#039;&#039;&#039;960,000 FCFA for 60 bags.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marketing strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers visit the farm to purchase directly for resale at the market.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Commercial strategy / Market opportunities==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers come directly to the farm to purchase products for resale at the market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer’s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone venturing into farming must ensure they have enough capital to get started.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7212</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7212"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T14:23:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): /* Context */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agrocology, crop diversity, soil fertility, compost, crop rotation, crop association&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Benin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16.08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Market gardening&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomato@ Okra@ Chili pepper@ Sorghum@ Maize@ Soybean@ Peanut@ Yam@ Cashew nut@ Shea@ Beekeeping&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire Bio Allagbe, a farmer in Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin, cultivates his land and raises bees following agroecology principles. Here is a profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire Bio Allagbe.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou, Benin.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Date of Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1994. He took over the family farm 30 years ago.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 16,08 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of Workers on the Farm (FTE):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average annual temperature is 26.8°C, and rainfall averages 1,023.6 mm.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Born to farming parents, Grégoire began learning traditional Beninese farming techniques as a child. He attended school up to fifth grade and has been a farmer for 30 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Okra]], [[chili pepper]], [[tomato]], jute mallow(C&#039;&#039;orchorus olitorius L&#039;&#039;.).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Staple crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Maize]], [[sorghum]], [[yam]], [[soybean]], [[peanut]].  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Cashew nut]] (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), African mahogany (&#039;&#039;Khaya senegalensis&#039;&#039;), kapok (&#039;&#039;Ceiba pentandra&#039;&#039;), [[shea]] (&#039;&#039;Vitellaria paradoxa&#039;&#039;).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Gombo.jpg|Okra.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Igname.jpg|Yam.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Karite2.jpg|Shea.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Beekeeping]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 hives, but Grégoire lacks equipment, such as protective clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Ruche.jpg  | Alignement = Center | Cadre = True | Légende = Wooden Kenyan hive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Motivations and goals===&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire discovered agroecology through the &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/projects/desira/info/prosilience_en ProSilience project]&#039;&#039;&#039; two years ago. He is highly motivated and applies techniques to combat &#039;&#039;&#039;[[soil erosion]]&#039;&#039;&#039; and manage &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Irrigation in market gardening|irrigation]]&#039;&#039;&#039; and water flow through his fields.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;His objectives include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using &#039;&#039;&#039;improved seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; to achieve &#039;&#039;&#039;better germination&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;production&#039;&#039;&#039;, and &#039;&#039;&#039;yield&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Improving honey production&#039;&#039;&#039; through beekeeping.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing &#039;&#039;&#039;vegetable gardens&#039;&#039;&#039; near a nearby water source; currently, only family-level production occurs near the water.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Collaborating with another farmer to begin &#039;&#039;&#039;intensive livestock farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, with plans for 10 sheep and 8 goats.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Association.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Maize - yams association.}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
*Uses chemical or organic fertilizers based on availability.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Cow dung is used for crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Shea trees are preserved in fields for multi-layered cropping, [[organic matter]] input, and erosion control.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Practices &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop rotation]]&#039;&#039;&#039;  such as planting chili before soybeans and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop association]]&#039;&#039;&#039; such as yams with maize early in the cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Leaves 2 hectares fallow with &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon peas&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;to add nitrogen and organic matter to the soil&#039;&#039;&#039;. After two years, the field is plowed and replanted.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insects are the main pests&#039;&#039;&#039;, though their names are unknown. A caterpillar, possibly the &#039;&#039;&#039;fall armyworm&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Spodoptera frugiperda&#039;&#039;), damages maize&#039;s terminal buds before flowering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest control strategies include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Pesticides:&#039;&#039;&#039; Selective herbicides for soybeans, [https://ephy.anses.fr/substance/glyphosate glyphosate].  &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Repellents:&#039;&#039;&#039; Homemade [[Producing biopesticides based on neem leaves and seeds|biopesticides]] using &#039;&#039;&#039;neem&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[tobacco]] leaves&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_IgnamesButtes.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Yam cultivation on mounds.}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil work====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tillage and weeding:&#039;&#039;&#039; For tuber crops ([[cassava]], yam), planting is done in furrows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deep hoeing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Performed at the end of the rainy season to create mounds.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Ridging:&#039;&#039;&#039; Flat plowing with rented tractors; mounds are made for tuber crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing perpendicular to the slope:&#039;&#039;&#039; Reduces water erosion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Challenges and strategies====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing costs are high&#039;&#039;&#039; over a short period. Tractors are often unavailable during peak plowing times, so he resorts to &#039;&#039;&#039;manual plowing or animal-drawn plowing&#039;&#039;&#039;. When these are not possible, &#039;&#039;&#039;direct seeding&#039;&#039;&#039; is done.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water management====&lt;br /&gt;
*No irrigation system.  &lt;br /&gt;
*No manual watering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*The Okpara River flows near the plots, but its water is not yet used for irrigation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction and dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; June/July is very busy. Four people work on the farm regularly, increasing to six during plowing and harvest.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economics:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire does not take a salary; it’s a family-run operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; Basic and challenging.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social structure:&#039;&#039;&#039; Family-based.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fields are 4 km from his home, which he considers manageable.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical support:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only from the [[Cabinet Monrado&#039;s experimental farm|&#039;&#039;&#039;Cabinet&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado’s experimental farm&#039;&#039;&#039;]] via the ProSilience Project.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaboration with Other Farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; No cooperatives, but collaborates with the Cabinet Monrado on shared challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare = 450,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plow (125,000 FCFA) and traction system for oxen (15,000 FCFA).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Subsidies/Financial Aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plowing costs up to 450,000 FCFA for 7 hectares, with total expenses of 700,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Income:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soybean is the most profitable crop, yielding 16,000 FCFA per bag, totaling &#039;&#039;&#039;960,000 FCFA for 60 bags.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marketing strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers visit the farm to purchase directly for resale at the market.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer’s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone venturing into farming must ensure they have enough capital to get started.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Douarou%27s_farm&amp;diff=7211</id>
		<title>Orou Douarou&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Douarou%27s_farm&amp;diff=7211"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T14:17:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Ferme d&#039;Orou Douarou Assouma&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology, crop diversity, soil fertility, pasture&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Orou Douarou Assouma&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = Assouma_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = Assouma_OrouAssouma.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Benin&lt;br /&gt;
| Coordonnées GPS = 9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy-loam&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Crop-livestock farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Tomato@ Lentil@ Peanut@ Cowpea@ @ Sorghum@ Cassava@ Corn@ Soybean@ Shea@ Cashew nut@ Teak@ Poultry breeding@ Dairy sheep farming@ Goat farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Titre court = Orou Douarou Assouma&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Régénération des sols&lt;br /&gt;
| Programme = Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = Assouma_ArachideAnacardier.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{A la une}}&lt;br /&gt;
Orou Douarou Assouma, a farmer from Guéssou (Gbégourou) in [[Benin]], cultivates his land and raises livestock following agroecological principles. Here’s a portrait of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Orou Douarou Assouma.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workforce:&#039;&#039;&#039; 3 permanent workers assisted by their 2 sons. Additionally, 3 of their wives occasionally help, mainly during harvests, which benefit the family.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Production:&#039;&#039;&#039; Mainly for family consumption:  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Tomato]], [[lentil]], [[peanut]], [[cowpea]], pigeon [[pea]], and velvet bean (mucuna).  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Food crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Cassava]], [[sorghum]], [[maize]], [[soybean]].  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit and forest trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Shea|Shea tree]], [[Cashew nut|cashew tree]], [[teak]] (Gmelina arborea, also known as white teak) for field boundaries.  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Livestock:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poultry (50 birds), goats (4), sheep (6).  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guessou-Nord has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw classification according to Köppen-Geiger). The average annual temperature is 27.8°C, with 904.9 mm of rainfall. Winds appear toward the end of the rainy season.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Education/training/background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Orou learned agriculture from his parents and still applies the traditional techniques and methods they taught him. He has no formal education in agriculture or agronomy; his knowledge is empirical. Since last year, through the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039;, he has started combining traditional and agroecological approaches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
Orou’s interest in [[agroecology]] emerged a year ago with the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039; and support from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Consultancy&#039;&#039;&#039; (an agricultural advisory firm).  &lt;br /&gt;
One of Orou’s goals is to implement the techniques introduced by the ProSilience project. Before this, he lacked knowledge [[about]] agroecology, such as enriching the soil with pigeon pea, mucuna, and other suitable legumes. He recognizes their significant benefits for himself and future generations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_PlanchesEnfouissement.jpg|Légende=Tilling and ridge formation|Alignement=Right}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
* Orou improves soil fertility by &#039;&#039;&#039;planting maize before mucuna&#039;&#039;&#039; and rotating crops to enhance soil quality between maize cycles.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing and burying weeds&#039;&#039;&#039; into ridges enriches the soil with &#039;&#039;&#039;nitrogen&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[organic matter]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* With the ProSilience project, he began &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|rotating crops]]&#039;&#039;&#039; on different plots—for example, avoiding maize on maize sequences this year.  &lt;br /&gt;
* He now practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop association&#039;&#039;&#039;, such as:  &lt;br /&gt;
** Cassava and maize.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Cowpea and maize.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Sorghum and peanut.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Pigeon pea and peanut under cashew trees.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Orou values his land by cultivating pigeon pea and mucuna, which not only enhance soil fertility but can also be consumed after processing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_MaisNiebe.jpg|Cowpea and maize association&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_MaisSorgho.jpg|Maize and sorhum association&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_AssociationsCulturales.jpg|Crop associations&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil management====&lt;br /&gt;
Orou plows his fields annually. Recently, he began &#039;&#039;&#039;leaving some plots unplowed as a test&#039;&#039;&#039;, saving time and enabling mulching (adding organic litter at the base of crops like soybean, sorghum, and maize).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plowing methods include:  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using oxen-drawn plows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Manual plowing.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using a tiller.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_Labour.jpg|Légende=Plow|Alignement=Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Corn]] borers:&#039;&#039;&#039; These pests damage maize by eating its male inflorescence, disrupting reproduction.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Locusts]].&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_DegatsPyraleMais.jpg|Légende=Damage caused by corn borers on maize|Alignement=Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Strategies to address challenges====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of resources&#039;&#039;&#039; for plowing and insufficient equipment, which delays crop establishment: His solution is to&#039;&#039;&#039; use multiple tools/methods&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Against [[caterpillars]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; Through the project, he learned to produce [[Producing biopesticides based on neem leaves and seeds|biopesticides]] using local vegetation, such as neem, [[tobacco]] leaves, traditional soap, and crushed chili peppers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water system====&lt;br /&gt;
There is &#039;&#039;&#039;no irrigation &#039;&#039;&#039;system in place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction/dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; Work intensity varies throughout the year, especially during plowing (June, July) and sowing, which are labor-intensive periods.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Living conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fields are 4 km away, which Orou finds reasonable compared to other farmers with plots up to 16 km away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
====Technical support/assistance====&lt;br /&gt;
* By the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Consultancy&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Through the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Past support from the national structure on communal development for agricultural outreach on conventional and field-developed techniques.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Collaboration with &#039;&#039;&#039;Hunger Project&#039;&#039;&#039;, focusing on climate change adaptation in farm management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cooperation with other farmers====&lt;br /&gt;
* Orou is part of a &#039;&#039;&#039;farmers’ group&#039;&#039;&#039; addressing common issues, such as the &#039;&#039;&#039;cotton producers’ association&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is well*organized. Otherwise, there are no other significant associations.  &lt;br /&gt;
* A working group tackles shared challenges with support from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado office&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Monthly income:&#039;&#039;&#039; None, as it’s a family farm, and no direct salaries are drawn.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Land cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare costs 500,000 FCFA, decreasing with distance from the village.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Hoe, a plow, but no oxen currently.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Financial assistance/donations:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Labor costs for plowing are the highest, amounting to 280,000 FCFA for the entire farm.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Revenue:&#039;&#039;&#039; Primary focus is &#039;&#039;&#039;personal consumption&#039;&#039;&#039; before selling surplus. &#039;&#039;&#039;Soybeans&#039;&#039;&#039; are the most profitable, with 8 sacks of 50 kg sold annually at 22,000 FCFA per sack.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Marketing strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sales are made to local retailers or individuals who buy directly from the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advice from the farmer==&lt;br /&gt;
To preserve soil health, it’s essential to minimize mechanical interventions, practice crop rotation, and adopt soil conservation techniques. Orou is willing to guide others interested in starting farming by sharing his management methods and soil conservation techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Orou Douarou Assouma conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme d&#039;Orou Douarou Assouma]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7210</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7210"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T14:05:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agrocology, crop diversity, soil fertility, compost, crop rotation, crop association&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Benin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16.08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Market gardening&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomato@ Okra@ Chili pepper@ Sorghum@ Maize@ Soybean@ Peanut@ Yam@ Cashew nut@ Shea@ Beekeeping&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire Bio Allagbe, a farmer in Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin, cultivates his land and raises bees following agroecology principles. Here is a profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire Bio Allagbe  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou, Benin  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Date of Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1994. He took over the family farm 30 years ago.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 16,08 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of Workers on the Farm (FTE):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average annual temperature is 26.8°C, and rainfall averages 1,023.6 mm.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Born to farming parents, Grégoire began learning traditional Beninese farming techniques as a child. He attended school up to fifth grade and has been a farmer for 30 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Okra, chili peppers, tomatoes, Crincrin (C&#039;&#039;orchorus olitorius L&#039;&#039;., also known as jute mallow).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Staple Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Maize, sorghum, yams, soybeans, peanuts.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit Trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; Cashew (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), African mahogany (&#039;&#039;Khaya senegalensis&#039;&#039;), kapok (&#039;&#039;Ceiba pentandra&#039;&#039;), shea (&#039;&#039;Vitellaria paradoxa&#039;&#039;).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Gombo.jpg|Okra.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Igname.jpg|Yam.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Karite2.jpg|Shea.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Beekeeping:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 hives, but Grégoire lacks equipment, such as protective clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Ruche.jpg  | Alignement = Center | Cadre = True | Légende = Wooden Kenyan hive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Motivations and goals===&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire discovered agroecology through the &#039;&#039;&#039;[ProSilience Project](https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/projects/desira/info/prosilience_en)&#039;&#039;&#039; two years ago. He is highly motivated and applies techniques to combat &#039;&#039;&#039;soil erosion&#039;&#039;&#039; and manage &#039;&#039;&#039;irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039; and water flow through his fields.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;His objectives include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using &#039;&#039;&#039;improved seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; to achieve better germination, production, and yield.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Improving honey production through beekeeping.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing vegetable gardens near a nearby water source; currently, only family-level production occurs near the water.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Collaborating with another farmer to begin &#039;&#039;&#039;intensive livestock farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, with plans for 10 sheep and 8 goats.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Association.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Maize - yams association.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Uses chemical or organic fertilizers based on availability.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Cow dung is used for crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Shea trees are preserved in fields for multi-layered cropping, organic matter input, and erosion control.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop rotation and intercropping&#039;&#039;&#039;, e.g., planting chili before soybeans and intercropping yams with maize early in the cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Leaves 2 hectares fallow with &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon peas&#039;&#039;&#039; to add nitrogen and organic matter to the soil. After two years, the field is plowed and replanted.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insects are the main pests&#039;&#039;&#039;, though their names are unknown. A caterpillar, possibly the &#039;&#039;&#039;fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)&#039;&#039;&#039;, damages maize&#039;s terminal buds before flowering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest control strategies include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Pesticides: Selective herbicides for soybeans, glyphosate.  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Repellents: Homemade biopesticides using &#039;&#039;&#039;neem&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;tobacco leaves&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil work====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_IgnamesButtes.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Yam cultivation on mounds.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tillage and weeding:&#039;&#039;&#039; For tuber crops (cassava, yam), planting is done in furrows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deep hoeing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Performed at the end of the rainy season to create mounds.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Ridging:&#039;&#039;&#039; Flat plowing with rented tractors; mounds are made for tuber crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing perpendicular to the slope:&#039;&#039;&#039; Reduces water erosion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Challenges and strategies====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing costs are high&#039;&#039;&#039; over a short period. Tractors are often unavailable during peak plowing times, so he resorts to &#039;&#039;&#039;manual plowing or animal-drawn plowing&#039;&#039;&#039;. When these are not possible, &#039;&#039;&#039;direct seeding&#039;&#039;&#039; is done.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water management====&lt;br /&gt;
*No irrigation system.  &lt;br /&gt;
*No manual watering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*The Okpara River flows near the plots, but its water is not yet used for irrigation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction and dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; June/July is very busy. Four people work on the farm regularly, increasing to six during plowing and harvest.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economics:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire does not take a salary; it’s a family-run operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work Comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; Basic and challenging.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social Structure:&#039;&#039;&#039; Family-based.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living Conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fields are 4 km from his home, which he considers manageable.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical Support:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Firm’s Experimental Farm&#039;&#039;&#039; via the ProSilience Project.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaboration with Other Farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; No cooperatives, but collaborates with the Monrado Firm on shared challenges.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land Cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare = 450,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plow (125,000 FCFA) and traction system for oxen (15,000 FCFA).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Subsidies/Financial Aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plowing costs up to 450,000 FCFA for 7 hectares, with total expenses of 700,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Income:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soybean is the most profitable crop, yielding 16,000 FCFA per bag, totaling &#039;&#039;&#039;960,000 FCFA for 60 bags.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marketing strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers visit the farm to purchase directly for resale at the market.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer’s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone venturing into farming must ensure they have enough capital to get started.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7209</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7209"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T14:03:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agroécologie, diversité des cultures, fertilité des sols, compost, rotation des cultures&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Bénin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16.08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Market gardening&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomato@ Okra@ Chili pepper@ Sorghum@ Maize@ Soybean@ Peanut@ Yam@ Cashew nut@ Shea@ Beekeeping&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire Bio Allagbe, a farmer in Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin, cultivates his land and raises bees following agroecology principles. Here is a profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire Bio Allagbe  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou, Benin  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Date of Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1994. He took over the family farm 30 years ago.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 16,08 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of Workers on the Farm (FTE):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average annual temperature is 26.8°C, and rainfall averages 1,023.6 mm.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Born to farming parents, Grégoire began learning traditional Beninese farming techniques as a child. He attended school up to fifth grade and has been a farmer for 30 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Okra, chili peppers, tomatoes, Crincrin (C&#039;&#039;orchorus olitorius L&#039;&#039;., also known as jute mallow).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Staple Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Maize, sorghum, yams, soybeans, peanuts.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit Trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; Cashew (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), African mahogany (&#039;&#039;Khaya senegalensis&#039;&#039;), kapok (&#039;&#039;Ceiba pentandra&#039;&#039;), shea (&#039;&#039;Vitellaria paradoxa&#039;&#039;).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Gombo.jpg|Okra.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Igname.jpg|Yam.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Karite2.jpg|Shea.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Beekeeping:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 hives, but Grégoire lacks equipment, such as protective clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Ruche.jpg  | Alignement = Center | Cadre = True | Légende = Wooden Kenyan hive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Motivations and goals===&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire discovered agroecology through the &#039;&#039;&#039;[ProSilience Project](https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/projects/desira/info/prosilience_en)&#039;&#039;&#039; two years ago. He is highly motivated and applies techniques to combat &#039;&#039;&#039;soil erosion&#039;&#039;&#039; and manage &#039;&#039;&#039;irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039; and water flow through his fields.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;His objectives include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using &#039;&#039;&#039;improved seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; to achieve better germination, production, and yield.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Improving honey production through beekeeping.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing vegetable gardens near a nearby water source; currently, only family-level production occurs near the water.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Collaborating with another farmer to begin &#039;&#039;&#039;intensive livestock farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, with plans for 10 sheep and 8 goats.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Association.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Maize - yams association.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Uses chemical or organic fertilizers based on availability.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Cow dung is used for crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Shea trees are preserved in fields for multi-layered cropping, organic matter input, and erosion control.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop rotation and intercropping&#039;&#039;&#039;, e.g., planting chili before soybeans and intercropping yams with maize early in the cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Leaves 2 hectares fallow with &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon peas&#039;&#039;&#039; to add nitrogen and organic matter to the soil. After two years, the field is plowed and replanted.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insects are the main pests&#039;&#039;&#039;, though their names are unknown. A caterpillar, possibly the &#039;&#039;&#039;fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)&#039;&#039;&#039;, damages maize&#039;s terminal buds before flowering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest control strategies include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Pesticides: Selective herbicides for soybeans, glyphosate.  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Repellents: Homemade biopesticides using &#039;&#039;&#039;neem&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;tobacco leaves&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil work====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_IgnamesButtes.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Yam cultivation on mounds.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tillage and weeding:&#039;&#039;&#039; For tuber crops (cassava, yam), planting is done in furrows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deep hoeing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Performed at the end of the rainy season to create mounds.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Ridging:&#039;&#039;&#039; Flat plowing with rented tractors; mounds are made for tuber crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing perpendicular to the slope:&#039;&#039;&#039; Reduces water erosion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Challenges and strategies====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing costs are high&#039;&#039;&#039; over a short period. Tractors are often unavailable during peak plowing times, so he resorts to &#039;&#039;&#039;manual plowing or animal-drawn plowing&#039;&#039;&#039;. When these are not possible, &#039;&#039;&#039;direct seeding&#039;&#039;&#039; is done.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water management====&lt;br /&gt;
*No irrigation system.  &lt;br /&gt;
*No manual watering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*The Okpara River flows near the plots, but its water is not yet used for irrigation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction and dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; June/July is very busy. Four people work on the farm regularly, increasing to six during plowing and harvest.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economics:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire does not take a salary; it’s a family-run operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work Comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; Basic and challenging.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social Structure:&#039;&#039;&#039; Family-based.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living Conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fields are 4 km from his home, which he considers manageable.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical Support:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Firm’s Experimental Farm&#039;&#039;&#039; via the ProSilience Project.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaboration with Other Farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; No cooperatives, but collaborates with the Monrado Firm on shared challenges.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land Cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare = 450,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plow (125,000 FCFA) and traction system for oxen (15,000 FCFA).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Subsidies/Financial Aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plowing costs up to 450,000 FCFA for 7 hectares, with total expenses of 700,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Income:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soybean is the most profitable crop, yielding 16,000 FCFA per bag, totaling &#039;&#039;&#039;960,000 FCFA for 60 bags.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marketing strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers visit the farm to purchase directly for resale at the market.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer’s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone venturing into farming must ensure they have enough capital to get started.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7208</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7208"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T14:00:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agroécologie, diversité des cultures, fertilité des sols, compost, rotation des cultures&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Bénin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9,44814, 2,74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16,08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Market gardening&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomato@ Okra@ Chili pepper@ Sorghum@ Maize@ Soybean@ Peanut@ Yam@ Cashew nut@ Shea@ Beekeeping&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire Bio Allagbe, a farmer in Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin, cultivates his land and raises bees following agroecology principles. Here is a profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire Bio Allagbe  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou, Benin  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Date of Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1994. He took over the family farm 30 years ago.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 16,08 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of Workers on the Farm (FTE):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average annual temperature is 26.8°C, and rainfall averages 1,023.6 mm.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Born to farming parents, Grégoire began learning traditional Beninese farming techniques as a child. He attended school up to fifth grade and has been a farmer for 30 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Okra, chili peppers, tomatoes, Crincrin (C&#039;&#039;orchorus olitorius L&#039;&#039;., also known as jute mallow).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Staple Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Maize, sorghum, yams, soybeans, peanuts.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit Trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; Cashew (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), African mahogany (&#039;&#039;Khaya senegalensis&#039;&#039;), kapok (&#039;&#039;Ceiba pentandra&#039;&#039;), shea (&#039;&#039;Vitellaria paradoxa&#039;&#039;).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Gombo.jpg|Okra.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Igname.jpg|Yam.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Karite2.jpg|Shea.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Beekeeping:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 hives, but Grégoire lacks equipment, such as protective clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Ruche.jpg  | Alignement = Center | Cadre = True | Légende = Wooden Kenyan hive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Motivations and goals===&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire discovered agroecology through the &#039;&#039;&#039;[ProSilience Project](https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/projects/desira/info/prosilience_en)&#039;&#039;&#039; two years ago. He is highly motivated and applies techniques to combat &#039;&#039;&#039;soil erosion&#039;&#039;&#039; and manage &#039;&#039;&#039;irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039; and water flow through his fields.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;His objectives include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using &#039;&#039;&#039;improved seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; to achieve better germination, production, and yield.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Improving honey production through beekeeping.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing vegetable gardens near a nearby water source; currently, only family-level production occurs near the water.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Collaborating with another farmer to begin &#039;&#039;&#039;intensive livestock farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, with plans for 10 sheep and 8 goats.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Association.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Maize - yams association.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Uses chemical or organic fertilizers based on availability.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Cow dung is used for crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Shea trees are preserved in fields for multi-layered cropping, organic matter input, and erosion control.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop rotation and intercropping&#039;&#039;&#039;, e.g., planting chili before soybeans and intercropping yams with maize early in the cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Leaves 2 hectares fallow with &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon peas&#039;&#039;&#039; to add nitrogen and organic matter to the soil. After two years, the field is plowed and replanted.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insects are the main pests&#039;&#039;&#039;, though their names are unknown. A caterpillar, possibly the &#039;&#039;&#039;fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)&#039;&#039;&#039;, damages maize&#039;s terminal buds before flowering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest control strategies include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Pesticides: Selective herbicides for soybeans, glyphosate.  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Repellents: Homemade biopesticides using &#039;&#039;&#039;neem&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;tobacco leaves&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil work====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_IgnamesButtes.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Yam cultivation on mounds.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tillage and weeding:&#039;&#039;&#039; For tuber crops (cassava, yam), planting is done in furrows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deep hoeing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Performed at the end of the rainy season to create mounds.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Ridging:&#039;&#039;&#039; Flat plowing with rented tractors; mounds are made for tuber crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing perpendicular to the slope:&#039;&#039;&#039; Reduces water erosion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Challenges and strategies====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing costs are high&#039;&#039;&#039; over a short period. Tractors are often unavailable during peak plowing times, so he resorts to &#039;&#039;&#039;manual plowing or animal-drawn plowing&#039;&#039;&#039;. When these are not possible, &#039;&#039;&#039;direct seeding&#039;&#039;&#039; is done.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water management====&lt;br /&gt;
*No irrigation system.  &lt;br /&gt;
*No manual watering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*The Okpara River flows near the plots, but its water is not yet used for irrigation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction and dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; June/July is very busy. Four people work on the farm regularly, increasing to six during plowing and harvest.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economics:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire does not take a salary; it’s a family-run operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work Comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; Basic and challenging.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social Structure:&#039;&#039;&#039; Family-based.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living Conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fields are 4 km from his home, which he considers manageable.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical Support:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Firm’s Experimental Farm&#039;&#039;&#039; via the ProSilience Project.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaboration with Other Farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; No cooperatives, but collaborates with the Monrado Firm on shared challenges.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land Cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare = 450,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plow (125,000 FCFA) and traction system for oxen (15,000 FCFA).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Subsidies/Financial Aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plowing costs up to 450,000 FCFA for 7 hectares, with total expenses of 700,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Income:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soybean is the most profitable crop, yielding 16,000 FCFA per bag, totaling &#039;&#039;&#039;960,000 FCFA for 60 bags.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marketing strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers visit the farm to purchase directly for resale at the market.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer’s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone venturing into farming must ensure they have enough capital to get started.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7207</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7207"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T13:59:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agroécologie, diversité des cultures, fertilité des sols, compost, rotation des cultures&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Bénin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16,08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Market gardening&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomato@ Okra@ Chili pepper@ Sorghum@ Maize@ Soybean@ Peanut@ Yam@ Cashew nut@ Shea@ Beekeeping&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grégoire Bio Allagbe, a farmer in Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin, cultivates his land and raises bees following agroecology principles. Here is a profile of his farm.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire Bio Allagbe  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou, Benin  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Date of Establishment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1994. He took over the family farm 30 years ago.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 16,08 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of Workers on the Farm (FTE):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average annual temperature is 26.8°C, and rainfall averages 1,023.6 mm.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Born to farming parents, Grégoire began learning traditional Beninese farming techniques as a child. He attended school up to fifth grade and has been a farmer for 30 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Okra, chili peppers, tomatoes, Crincrin (C&#039;&#039;orchorus olitorius L&#039;&#039;., also known as jute mallow).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Staple Crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; Maize, sorghum, yams, soybeans, peanuts.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit Trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; Cashew (&#039;&#039;Anacardium occidentale&#039;&#039;), African mahogany (&#039;&#039;Khaya senegalensis&#039;&#039;), kapok (&#039;&#039;Ceiba pentandra&#039;&#039;), shea (&#039;&#039;Vitellaria paradoxa&#039;&#039;).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Gombo.jpg|Okra.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Igname.jpg|Yam.&lt;br /&gt;
File:Allagbe_Karite2.jpg|Shea.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal production===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Beekeeping:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 hives, but Grégoire lacks equipment, such as protective clothing.  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Image of a wooden Kenyan hive included.*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Ruche.jpg  | Alignement = Center | Cadre = True | Légende = Wooden Kenyan hive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Motivations and goals===&lt;br /&gt;
Grégoire discovered agroecology through the &#039;&#039;&#039;[ProSilience Project](https://capacity4dev.europa.eu/projects/desira/info/prosilience_en)&#039;&#039;&#039; two years ago. He is highly motivated and applies techniques to combat &#039;&#039;&#039;soil erosion&#039;&#039;&#039; and manage &#039;&#039;&#039;irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039; and water flow through his fields.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;His objectives include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using &#039;&#039;&#039;improved seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; to achieve better germination, production, and yield.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Improving honey production through beekeeping.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Establishing vegetable gardens near a nearby water source; currently, only family-level production occurs near the water.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Collaborating with another farmer to begin &#039;&#039;&#039;intensive livestock farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, with plans for 10 sheep and 8 goats.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
====Fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_Association.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Maize - yams association.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Uses chemical or organic fertilizers based on availability.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Cow dung is used for crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Shea trees are preserved in fields for multi-layered cropping, organic matter input, and erosion control.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop rotation and intercropping&#039;&#039;&#039;, e.g., planting chili before soybeans and intercropping yams with maize early in the cycle.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Leaves 2 hectares fallow with &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon peas&#039;&#039;&#039; to add nitrogen and organic matter to the soil. After two years, the field is plowed and replanted.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insects are the main pests&#039;&#039;&#039;, though their names are unknown. A caterpillar, possibly the &#039;&#039;&#039;fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)&#039;&#039;&#039;, damages maize&#039;s terminal buds before flowering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest control strategies include:&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Pesticides: Selective herbicides for soybeans, glyphosate.  &lt;br /&gt;
  *Repellents: Homemade biopesticides using &#039;&#039;&#039;neem&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;tobacco leaves&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil work====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image | Image = Allagbe_IgnamesButtes.jpg | Alignement = Right | Cadre = True | Légende = Yam cultivation on mounds.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Tillage and weeding:&#039;&#039;&#039; For tuber crops (cassava, yam), planting is done in furrows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Deep hoeing:&#039;&#039;&#039; Performed at the end of the rainy season to create mounds.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Ridging:&#039;&#039;&#039; Flat plowing with rented tractors; mounds are made for tuber crops.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing perpendicular to the slope:&#039;&#039;&#039; Reduces water erosion.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Challenges and strategies====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing costs are high&#039;&#039;&#039; over a short period. Tractors are often unavailable during peak plowing times, so he resorts to &#039;&#039;&#039;manual plowing or animal-drawn plowing&#039;&#039;&#039;. When these are not possible, &#039;&#039;&#039;direct seeding&#039;&#039;&#039; is done.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water management====&lt;br /&gt;
*No irrigation system.  &lt;br /&gt;
*No manual watering.  &lt;br /&gt;
*The Okpara River flows near the plots, but its water is not yet used for irrigation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction and dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; June/July is very busy. Four people work on the farm regularly, increasing to six during plowing and harvest.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economics:&#039;&#039;&#039; Grégoire does not take a salary; it’s a family-run operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work Comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; Basic and challenging.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social Structure:&#039;&#039;&#039; Family-based.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living Conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; The fields are 4 km from his home, which he considers manageable.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical Support:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Firm’s Experimental Farm&#039;&#039;&#039; via the ProSilience Project.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Collaboration with Other Farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; No cooperatives, but collaborates with the Monrado Firm on shared challenges.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land Cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare = 450,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plow (125,000 FCFA) and traction system for oxen (15,000 FCFA).  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Subsidies/Financial Aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Plowing costs up to 450,000 FCFA for 7 hectares, with total expenses of 700,000 FCFA.  &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Income:&#039;&#039;&#039; Soybean is the most profitable crop, yielding 16,000 FCFA per bag, totaling &#039;&#039;&#039;960,000 FCFA for 60 bags.&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marketing strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
Retailers visit the farm to purchase directly for resale at the market.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer’s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone venturing into farming must ensure they have enough capital to get started.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7206</id>
		<title>Gregoire Bio Allagbe&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Gregoire_Bio_Allagbe%27s_farm&amp;diff=7206"/>
		<updated>2025-01-28T13:31:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): Created page with &amp;quot;{{Portrait de ferme |Nom de l&amp;#039;exploitation=Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe |Sous-titre=Agroécologie, diversité des cultures, fertilité des sols, compost, rotation des cultures |Nom de l&amp;#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe |Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg |Photo de l&amp;#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg |Département=Bénin |Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535 |SAU=16,08 |UTH=4 |Texture du sol=Sable limoneux |Description de sol=Sablo limoneux |Type de production=Maraîchage |Cul...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;exploitation=Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Sous-titre=Agroécologie, diversité des cultures, fertilité des sols, compost, rotation des cultures&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom de l&#039;agriculteur=Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Bannière=Allagbe_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo de l&#039;agriculteur=Allagbe_Gregoire.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Département=Bénin&lt;br /&gt;
|Coordonnées GPS=9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
|SAU=16,08&lt;br /&gt;
|UTH=4&lt;br /&gt;
|Texture du sol=Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Description de sol=Sablo limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
|Type de production=Maraîchage&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultures=Tomate@ Gombo@ Piment@ Sorgho@ Maïs@ Soja@ Arachide@ Igname@ Noix de cajou@ Karité@ Apiculture&lt;br /&gt;
|Titre court=Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe&lt;br /&gt;
|Objectif=Productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|Programme=Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
|Date de mise en œuvre=1994&lt;br /&gt;
|Photo d&#039;illustration=Allagbe_Illustration.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|Mots-clés= Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Crop rotation, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Grégoire Bio Allagbe conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Grégoire Bio Allagbe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Insecticidal_Soaps:_An_effective_and_eco-friendly_pest_control_method_for_sustainable_agriculture&amp;diff=7205</id>
		<title>Insecticidal Soaps: An effective and eco-friendly pest control method for sustainable agriculture</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Insecticidal_Soaps:_An_effective_and_eco-friendly_pest_control_method_for_sustainable_agriculture&amp;diff=7205"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:52:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Organisme = MSc Biocontrol Solutions For Plant Health - BOOST&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = Insecticidal soap.png&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Insecticidal soap is safe alternatives to chemical pesticides.&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Biocontrol, Insecticidal soap&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{A la une}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Insecticidal soaps&#039;&#039;&#039;, also known as &#039;&#039;&#039;potassium salts of fatty acids&#039;&#039;&#039;, are &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Producing biopesticides based on neem leaves and seeds|biopesticides]]&#039;&#039;&#039; used as insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, and algaecides. They are produced by &#039;&#039;&#039;combining potassium hydroxide with fatty acids&#039;&#039;&#039; derived from animal fats and plant oils, such as palm, [[coconut]], [[olive]], castor, and cottonseed. They work through various mechanisms, offering farmers &#039;&#039;&#039;safe alternatives to chemical pesticides&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
Soap was first discovered and used by the Chinese as a pesticide in 1101 A.D and it has also  been used as an insecticide in Europe since 1787. Before 1900, fish or whale oil soaps were the most commonly used insecticidal soaps. Although the first pesticide product containing soap salts was registered for use in 1947 (USEPA, 1992). [https://extension.psu.edu/a-short-history-of-pest-management]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticidal soaps are &#039;&#039;&#039;biodegradable&#039;&#039;&#039; and  specifically designed for &#039;&#039;&#039;pest control&#039;&#039;&#039; and are &#039;&#039;&#039;widely used in organic farming&#039;&#039;&#039;. The solution is sprayed directly on pests, &#039;&#039;&#039;killing them upon contact&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is less toxic for humans and short lived in the  environment and &#039;&#039;&#039;does not leave harmful residues on crops&#039;&#039;&#039;. [https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/psfatech.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Composition and molecular structure for Potassium salt of long chain fatty acids==&lt;br /&gt;
Soap is technically &#039;&#039;&#039;sodium or potassium salt of a fatty acid&#039;&#039;&#039;. Soap is produced as a result of the chemical reaction called &#039;&#039;&#039;saponification&#039;&#039;&#039;. This takes place when fatty acids (plant oils, butters or animal fats) are emulsified with a sodium or potassium hydroxide solution. For &#039;&#039;&#039;insecticidal soap&#039;&#039;&#039;, the active ingredient is most often a &#039;&#039;&#039;potassium salt&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;of long chain fatty acids&#039;&#039;&#039;.[https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?6SkaA3 (Ahmad et al., 2020)] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Composition and molecular structure for Potassium salt of long chain fatty acids.png|Alignement=center|Légende=[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346522943_Optimum_Composition_of_Developed_Additive_Based_Insect_Repellent_Paint/figures?lo=1 Composition and molecular structure for Potassium salt of long chain fatty acids]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Traditional DIY insecticidal soap==&lt;br /&gt;
Soap is an effective and eco-friendly solution, simply mix and pour into a spray bottle for easy application.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The ingredients:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
*2.5 tablespoons (37 ml) pure liquid soap (not detergent), advisably castile soap.&lt;br /&gt;
*1 gallon (3.8 L) warm water (distilled or tap, but not hard).&lt;br /&gt;
*2.5 tablespoons (37 ml) vegetable oil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Procedure to follow when making insecticidal soaps====&lt;br /&gt;
To make a homemade insecticidal soap: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Start by measuring 2.5 tablespoons (37 ml) of vegetable oil and 2.5 tablespoons (37 ml) of pure liquid soap.&lt;br /&gt;
*In a large container or directly in a spray bottle, add 1 gallon (3.8 L) of warm water, which helps dissolve the ingredients.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pour the measured oil and soap into the water and stir gently to combine, avoiding excessive bubbles. If using a container, transfer the mixture carefully into a clean spray bottle.&lt;br /&gt;
*Before each use, shake the spray bottle to ensure the oil and soap are evenly mixed, as they may separate over time. [https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/plant-problems/pests/pesticides/homemade-soap-spray.htm#:~:text=Traditional%20Homemade%20Insecticidal%20Soap&amp;amp;text=Mix%20together%20and%20pour%20into,or%20tap%2C%20but%20not%20hard]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Video on how to make homemade insecticidal soap&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Youtube|id=https://youtu.be/0FKIyXlKmh0?si=n8T2tDBLD5vuATAG}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Insecticidal soap products available on the market==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.saferbrand.com/store/omri-listed-solutions Safer] leads the market in insecticidal soaps with its OMRI-listed [https://www.saferbrand.com/safer-brand-insect-killing-soap-concentrate-16-oz-5118-6 Insect Killing Soap], popular for organic gardening. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.gardensafe.com/Tips/DIY-Gardening/The-Dirt-On-Insecticidal-Soap.aspx Garden Safe] and [https://www.espoma.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Insecticidal.Soap_.RTU_.pdf Espoma&#039;s Earth-tone] line also offer trusted, eco-friendly options for natural pest control, while [https://natria.bioadvanced.com/catalogsearch/result/?q=Insecticidal%20Soap Natria] by Bayer provides effective solutions tailored to home gardeners seeking safe, sustainable pest management. [https://www.saferbrand.com/store/omri-listed-solutions]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The cost of purchasing insecticidal soap==&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticidal soap products vary in price depending on the &#039;&#039;&#039;brand and packaging size&#039;&#039;&#039;. However the price range for insecticidal soap products from leading brands generally falls between 6.50 € and 46 € for 709 ml to 1 liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Safer Brand [[Insect]] Killing Soap, ranges from [[about]] 11 € for a 16-ounce (473 ml) concentrate (makes up to 6 gallons) to around 46 € for larger ready-to-use versions with multiple spray bottles​ and Garden Safe Insecticidal Soap, priced at approximately 6.50 € for a 24-ounce (710 ml) ready-to-use bottle (Prices are converted from Dollar to Euro) [https://www.thisoldhouse.com/pest-control/89645/best-insecticidal-soap]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, &#039;&#039;&#039;making insecticidal soap at home can be affordable and simple with basic household ingredients&#039;&#039;&#039;. When compared to commercial options, homemade insecticidal soap offers a cost-effective and organic pest control method for gardeners looking to reduce expenses and avoid synthetic chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mode of action==&lt;br /&gt;
The mode of action of soaps is still not well-understood although there are &#039;&#039;&#039;four ways by which soaps may kill insect and mite pests&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Soaps may &#039;&#039;&#039;penetrate through the fatty acids present in the insect’s outer covering (cuticle) thus dissolving or disrupting cell membranes&#039;&#039;&#039;. This impairs cell integrity causing cells to leak and collapse, destroying respiratory functions, and resulting in dehydration and death of the insect or mite pests.&lt;br /&gt;
*Soaps may &#039;&#039;&#039;block the spiracles&#039;&#039;&#039; (breathing pores), &#039;&#039;&#039;interfering with respiration&#039;&#039;&#039; thus leading to suffocation.&lt;br /&gt;
* Soaps &#039;&#039;&#039;interfere with insect growth regulators&#039;&#039;&#039;, interfering with cellular metabolism and the production of growth hormones during metamorphosis.&lt;br /&gt;
*Soaps may &#039;&#039;&#039;uncouple oxidative phosphorylation or inhibit the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)&#039;&#039;&#039;, which reduces energy production, (“Insecticidal Soap,” 2024; Makenzie, 2024). &lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Mode of action.png|Alignement=center|Légende=Mode of action of insecticidal [https://youtu.be/-qS6nt1zuq8?si=MyfGEdVg9NrBIPXj soap]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Here is a guiding video of the mechanism of insecticidal soap on insects:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qS6nt1zuq8}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How to use insecticidal soap==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Application ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Application of insecticidal soap.png|alt=Application of insecticidal soap|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Spray directly the infected plant&#039;&#039;&#039;, it is important to spray both the &#039;&#039;&#039;top surface&#039;&#039;&#039; and, especially, the &#039;&#039;&#039;underside of the leaves&#039;&#039;&#039; as many of the pests will be found. Because of the relatively short residual action and the fact that the insects must be in contact with the soap to be effective, repeat applications may be necessary &#039;&#039;&#039;every 4 to 7 days&#039;&#039;&#039; (follow the label directions) until the pests are eliminated.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Avoid excessive applications&#039;&#039;&#039; as leaf damage may accumulate with repeated exposure. Always follow the directions on the label. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Water ====&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Approximate quantities to produce various dilute soap sprays.png|Alignement=Right|Légende=Approximate quantities to produce various dilute soap sprays}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the water you are using should be considered when using insecticidal soaps. &#039;&#039;&#039;Hard water reduces the effectiveness&#039;&#039;&#039; of the insecticidal soap. It is important to use the &#039;&#039;&#039;purest water&#039;&#039;&#039; as possible.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can determine if your tap water is compatible by mixing the recommended concentration of soap that you want to use with the appropriate amount of water in a glass jar. Agitate and let the mixture stand for 15 minutes. &#039;&#039;&#039;If the mix remains uniform and milky, the water quality is fine&#039;&#039;&#039; for the spray. If there is scum on the surface, you should use distilled or bottled water, (Cranshaw, n.d.; Features, 2013). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency ====&lt;br /&gt;
Reapply &#039;&#039;&#039;every 7-10 days, or as needed&#039;&#039;&#039;, to maintain control over pest populations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://yardsimproved.com/gardening/insecticidal-soap-safe-and-effective/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reapplying insecticidal soap is necessary to maintain its effectiveness against pest infestations. Typically, it should be reapplied every 7–10 days, especially during severe infestations. This frequency ensures that &#039;&#039;&#039;any newly hatched pests are targeted before they can reproduce&#039;&#039;&#039;. It’s important to &#039;&#039;&#039;follow label instructions&#039;&#039;&#039;, as &#039;&#039;&#039;excessive use can harm plants&#039;&#039;&#039; or reduce the effectiveness of the treatment. Applying it &#039;&#039;&#039;early in the morning or late in the evening&#039;&#039;&#039; is recommended to prevent potential plant stress from sunlight exposure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Where  insecticidal soap is used? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticidal soaps can be used in &#039;&#039;&#039;vegetable gardens, orchards, greenhouses&#039;&#039;&#039;, and even on &#039;&#039;&#039;houseplants&#039;&#039;&#039;. They are particularly effective on crops like [[Tomato|tomatoes]], [[Cucumber|cucumbers]], leafy greens, and fruit trees.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Use and targeted pest==&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticidal soap can be used as an &#039;&#039;&#039;insecticide, fungicides&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://laidbackgardener.blog/2018/04/12/insecticidal-soap-is-also-a-fungicide/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;, algaecide and herbicide&#039;&#039;&#039; for example M-Pede Fungicide used as  biological fungicide, specifically in controlling powdery mildew. In the United States, for one, insecticide soap has been officially approved for use as a fungicide, specifically in powdery mildew on vegetables and roses (Hodgson (1954-2022), 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Insecticidal soap works best on soft-bodied insects and other arthropods such as:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Insecticidal soap works best on soft-bodied insects and other arthropods..png|Alignement=center|Légende=Insecticidal soap works best on soft-bodied insects and other [[Arthropod|arthropods]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It can also be used for [[caterpillars]] and leafhoppers, but these large-bodied insects can be more difficult to control with soaps alone. (Cranshaw,W.S. (2008; “Insecticidal Soap,” 2024). [https://laidbackgardener.blog/2018/04/12/insecticidal-soap-is-also-a-fungicide/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==When to use it==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Timing ====&lt;br /&gt;
Use insecticidal soaps during the &#039;&#039;&#039;early morning or late afternoon to avoid direct sunlight&#039;&#039;&#039;, which can cause plant damage (phytotoxicity).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticidal soap is &#039;&#039;&#039;generally effective only when it remains wet on the plant surface&#039;&#039;&#039;. While it’s wet, the soap targets soft-bodied insects by penetrating their cell membranes and dehydrating them, which leads to their elimination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once the soap dries, its insecticidal properties are no longer active and it becomes far less likely to impact insects. This is why &#039;&#039;&#039;reapplication is sometimes recommended after rain&#039;&#039;&#039;, as the product may wash away and reduce effectiveness if it hasn’t had time to work while wet. For those concerned about non-target insects on the ground, &#039;&#039;&#039;dried insecticidal soap residue&#039;&#039;&#039; is less harmful and generally safe, as it &#039;&#039;&#039;loses its ability to affect insect cell membranes&#039;&#039;&#039; once it’s no longer in liquid form. [https://blogs.ifas.ufl.edu/charlotteco/2019/08/20/insecticidal-soap-in-the-garden-use-the-right-material/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it rains soon after applying insecticidal soap, the spray could potentially wash off and reach the ground. Insecticidal soaps are generally designed to have &#039;&#039;&#039;minimal impact on non-target organisms&#039;&#039;&#039;, and they degrade quickly without residual action once dried. [https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/insects/insect-control-soaps-and-detergents-5-547/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest Life cycle:&#039;&#039;&#039; Best used when &#039;&#039;&#039;pest populations are still small&#039;&#039;&#039;. Monitor plants regularly for early signs of infestation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advantages==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Environmentally friendly:&#039;&#039;&#039; Insecticidal soaps are biodegradable and have minimal impact on non-target organisms, making them safe for beneficial insects like ladybugs and pollinators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Organic certification:&#039;&#039;&#039; Approved for use in certified organic farming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Safe to use:&#039;&#039;&#039; Non-toxic to humans, animals, and plants when used properly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cost-effective:&#039;&#039;&#039; A cheaper alternative to synthetic pesticides,(Ryan, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The limits ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Leaf damage to squash leaves after applying soap spray on an excessively hot day.png|Alignement=Right|Légende=[https://laidbackgardener.blog/2017/01/22/so-what-is-insecticidal-soap-exactly/#:~:text=Insecticidal%20soap%20is%20an%20organic,soap%2C%20with%20no%20other%20ingredients Leaf damage] to [[squash]] leaves after applying soap spray on an excessively hot day}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Limited spectrum:&#039;&#039;&#039; Only effective against soft-bodied insects and requires direct contact, so it’s not useful for hard-shelled pests like beetles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Phytotoxicity:&#039;&#039;&#039; Overuse or improper application can cause plant damage. Potential to cause plant injury. Hairy leaf plants may hold the soap on their surfaces longer, resulting in a burn, (Ryan, 2013).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Weather sensitivity:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rain can wash away the soap, reducing effectiveness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Detrimental to some beneficial organisms.&#039;&#039;&#039; Soap will kill predatory mites that may help control [[spider]] mites. Also, the soft-bodied aphid-eating larvae of lady beetles, [[Neuroptera|lacewing]], and hoverflies may be affected negatively. According to one study a single soap application killed about 15% of lacewing and lady-[[beetle]] larvae, and about 65% of predatory mites ([[Amblyseius]] andersoni). Toxic to aquatic invertebrates, and slightly toxic to cold-water and warm-water fish. [https://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/psfatech.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How to get insecticidal soap==&lt;br /&gt;
Insecticidal soaps are widely available at garden centers, agricultural supply stores, and online retailers. Brands like Safer and Bonide offer organic-certified insecticidal soap products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some relevant links to purchase different brands of insecticidal soap&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*https://vegetalbioplant.com/en/protection-stress/61-potassium-soap-premium.html?srsltid=AfmBOoowHSMVKc7dMFz_uqtWQYGQ4HlEykXxJDdueAfzHIUPoHYmZQjv&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://bonide.com/product/insecticidal-soap-rtu/ Insecticidal Soap RTU - Bonide]&lt;br /&gt;
*https://bioadvanced.com/natria-insecticidal-soap-ready-to-use-24-oz.html&lt;br /&gt;
*https://bowoodfarms.com/products/insecticidal-soap-spray-16oz-con&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Current regulation of insecticidal soaps==&lt;br /&gt;
In the EU, insecticidal soaps are regulated to ensure they are safe and effective, especially on edible crops. Overseen by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), these soaps, recognized as low-risk due to their natural composition, must meet &#039;&#039;&#039;strict pesticide standards&#039;&#039;&#039; to be approved. EFSA requires extensive testing to confirm that these products effectively target pests without harming non-target species, human health, or the environment.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once approved, insecticidal soaps are &#039;&#039;&#039;monitored continuously&#039;&#039;&#039;, aligning with the EU’s sustainable agriculture goals, including Integrated Pest Management (IPM), which encourages reduced chemical use and safer pest control methods.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Approved for use in EU organic agriculture under EU Regulation (EC) No 889/2008.&lt;br /&gt;
*In the European pesticide registration, its use as an insecticide as listed for [[aphids]], white [[fly]], and spider mites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 2011, insecticidal soap has also been approved in the United States for use against powdery mildew, (farmonaut, n.d.; Hodgson (1954-2022), 2018; How Pesticides Are Regulated in the EU - EFSA and the Assessment of Active Substances | EFSA, 2018; Insecticidal Soaps | Agricultural Marketing Service, n.d.; Pesticide Evaluations, n.d.; Sustainable Use of Pesticides - European Commission, n.d.). [https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/applications/pesticides/regulationsandguidance]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Example of experimental test done on insecticidal soap as a fungicide.==&lt;br /&gt;
Use of organic olive soap in squash cultivation to control powdery mildew:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cultural practices===&lt;br /&gt;
The application of organic olive soap not only serves as a fungicide but also complements sustainable agricultural practices by reducing the need for conventional chemical treatments. Used to manage powdery mildew, a common fungal pathogen in squash and other vegetable crops, these soaps &#039;&#039;&#039;disrupt fungal cell membranes&#039;&#039;&#039;, curbing the pathogen’s spread on plant surfaces. When &#039;&#039;&#039;combined with other cultural practices&#039;&#039;&#039;, such as ensuring proper air circulation and reducing excess leaf moisture, the application of organic olive soap &#039;&#039;&#039;can significantly improve the effectiveness of powdery mildew control strategies&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Specific efficacy against powdery mildew===&lt;br /&gt;
In a controlled greenhouse study, organic olive soap applications in squash crops led to a noticeable reduction in powdery mildew infections. The study explored various application regimens, finding that applying the soap &#039;&#039;&#039;preventively, or at the first signs of mildew&#039;&#039;&#039;, &#039;&#039;&#039;offered the best results&#039;&#039;&#039;. Regular treatments, applied every 7–10 days, helped keep the disease under control, especially when integrated with preventive measures like reducing dense plant growth and removing infected leaves. These combined efforts help create an environment less conducive to mildew proliferation, offering a holistic solution to managing fungal infections.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=An overview of the experimental field.png|Alignement=Center|Légende=An overview of the experimental field.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Greenhouse experiment conditions ===&lt;br /&gt;
The research was conducted under the following experimental conditions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Spacing and application:&#039;&#039;&#039; Squash plants were sprayed with organic olive soap solutions at regular intervals, while untreated control plants served as a comparison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Application frequency:&#039;&#039;&#039; For best efficacy, treatments were reapplied at intervals, ensuring the active ingredients reached the leaves and stems most vulnerable to powdery mildew.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This study highlights the role of organic olive soap in sustainable pest management systems, particularly valuable in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The minimal environmental footprint of these soaps makes them ideal for organic farming and eco-conscious agriculture, supporting the health of beneficial organisms while targeting pathogenic fungi&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frem et al., 2022&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Reduction in powdery mildew incidence on Lebanese squash, cv Julienne, as affected by the different organic treatments.png|Alignement=Center|Légende=Reduction in powdery mildew incidence on Lebanese squash, cv Julienne, as affected by the different organic treatments}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Testimonials from farmers ====&lt;br /&gt;
Review from farmer on the use of SAFER Insecticidal soap products:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOPR357oMwo}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Review on garden safe insecticidal soap products:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Youtube|id=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZMGBrXkDQc&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources== &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://npic.orst.edu/factsheets/archive/psfatech.pdf Potassium Salts of Fatty Acids]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://extension.psu.edu/a-short-history-of-pest-management A Short History of Pest Management]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://blogs.k-state.edu/kansasbugs/2020/06/12/fundamentals-of-using-soaps-as-insecticides/ Fundamentals of Using Soaps as Insecticides]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-98595/v1 Ahmad, Z., Noor, S., Ahmad, M., &amp;amp; Rashid, K. (2020). Optimum Composition of Developed Additive Based Insect Repellent Paint] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thisoldhouse.com/pest-control/89645/best-insecticidal-soap Bentley, R. (2023, June 19). 5 Best Insecticidal Soaps (2024 Guide). This Old House] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Cloyd, R. A. (2023). Horticultural Entomology and Plant Protection Specialist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Cranshaw, W. (n.d.). Insect Control: Soaps and Detergents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://farmonaut.com/europe/eu-agricultural-policy-update-efsas-2024-procurement-process-for-food-safety-and-sustainable-farming/ Farmonaut. (n.d.). EU Agricultural Policy Update: EFSA’s 2024 Procurement Process for Food Safety and Sustainable Farming. Retrieved November 3, 2024]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/plant-problems/pests/pesticides/homemade-soap-spray.htm Features, A. G. last updated in. (2013, January 11). A Complete Guide To Homemade Insecticidal Soap. Gardeningknowhow]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052811 Frem, M., Nigro, F., Medawar, S., &amp;amp; Moujabber, M. E. (2022). Biological Approaches Promise Innovative and Sustainable Management of Powdery Mildew in Lebanese Squash. Sustainability, 14(5), Article 5]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://laidbackgardener.blog/2018/04/12/insecticidal-soap-is-also-a-fungicide/ Hodgson (1954-2022), L. (2018, April 12). Insecticidal Soap Is Also a Fungicide. Laidback Gardener] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/pesticides-ebook-180424 How pesticides are regulated in the EU - EFSA and the assessment of active substances | EFSA. (2018, April 24)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insecticidal_soap&amp;amp;oldid=1229181943 Insecticidal soap]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/organic/petitioned-substances/insecticidal-soaps Insecticidal Soaps | Agricultural Marketing Service. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2024]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://rose.org/soaps-and-detergents-should-they-be-used-on-roses/ Makenzie. (2024, September 5). “Soaps” and Detergents: Should They Be Used on Roses? American Rose Society] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/applications/pesticides/regulationsandguidance Pesticide evaluations: Regulations and guidance | EFSA. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2024]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.farmersweekly.co.za/crops/field-crops/insecticidal-soap/ Ryan, J. (2013, August 5). Insecticidal soap. Farmer’s Weekly] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://food.ec.europa.eu/plants/pesticides/sustainable-use-pesticides_en Sustainable use of pesticides—European Commission. (n.d.). Retrieved November 3, 2024]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat&lt;br /&gt;
|URL Partenaire = https://univ-cotedazur.eu/msc/msc-boost&lt;br /&gt;
|Logo Partenaire = Logo Boost.png&lt;br /&gt;
|Nom partenaire = Msc Boost}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Pages liées}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mamadou_Diagne%27s_farm&amp;diff=7204</id>
		<title>Mamadou Diagne&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mamadou_Diagne%27s_farm&amp;diff=7204"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:34:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Ferme école de Kaydara&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology, diversity of crops, animal production, compost, intercropping&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = MamadouDiagne_Papayers.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = &lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = MamadouDiagne.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| URL = https://www.facebook.com/fermedesgobettes&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Mamadou Diagne&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Senegal&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Date de mise en œuvre = 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Crop-livestock farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sableux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy&lt;br /&gt;
| Cahier des charges = &lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Market gardening@ Mango@ Coconut@ Lemon@ Orange@ Soursop@ Guava@ Cinnamon apple@Pomegranate@ Cassava@ Papaya&lt;br /&gt;
| Latitude = 14.3858774&lt;br /&gt;
| Longitude = -16.8297976&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Mamadou Diagne, a farmer in M&#039;bou, [[Senegal]], cultivates his lands according to the principles of [[agroecology]]. Here is a portrait of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name: &#039;&#039;&#039;Mamadou Diagne.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; M&#039;bour, Senegal.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Farm name:&#039;&#039;&#039; [https://jardins-afrique.org/ferme-ecole-kaydara Kaydara Farm School].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Establishment date:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil type:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy soil.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of people working on the farm:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Productions:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Market gardening]], [[mango]], [[coconut]], [[lemon]], [[orange]], [[soursop]], [[guava]], [[cinnamon apple]], [[pomegranate]], [[cassava]], [[papaya]], cows.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Variable depending on the year. Significant wind.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Life Path:&#039;&#039;&#039; Attended a normal school until the 9th grade. His siblings are in university, but he felt that formal education was not suitable for him. He wanted to pursue training in agroecology, but his father disagreed because he has been a farmer for a long time and didn&#039;t believe it would work. Mamadou wanted to change and practice a different type of agriculture through agroecology. He met Gora Ndiaye, the director of the [https://jardins-afrique.org/ferme-ecole-kaydara/ Kaydara Agroecology School] and underwent training in 2015-2016. His mother had a vegetable garden, so he found joy and love for market gardening.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Challenges faced:&#039;&#039;&#039; Dead soil and significant wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Demonstrate to the village that agroecology works&#039;&#039;&#039; and that one can succeed and achieve &#039;&#039;&#039;self-sufficiency&#039;&#039;&#039; on these lands.&lt;br /&gt;
*Families here often have large hectares (50-60 ha) and only cultivate during winter. In fact, people come from everywhere to work during the rainy season. The goal is to be able to &#039;&#039;&#039;farm all year round&#039;&#039;&#039;. He knows that for this, &#039;&#039;&#039;the land needs care and nourishment&#039;&#039;&#039; to thrive.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Become an ambassador&#039;&#039;&#039; and share the knowledge.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Earn a decent&#039;&#039;&#039; and honest living and live with one&#039;s family thanks to their production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect== &lt;br /&gt;
===Plant productions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Diversity of [[vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; This year (2023), only onions, but in other years, a variety of crops are grown.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Diversity of fruit trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; 37 mango trees, 20 coconut palms, citrus: 5 lemon trees, 2 orange trees, 2 soursop trees, 2 guava trees, 2 cinnamon [[apple]] trees, 2 pomegranate trees, cassava, and papaya.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Seeds:&#039;&#039;&#039; Seeds are received from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Kaydara School&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is challenging to buy seeds everywhere because they are not always organic. Kaydara School has a &#039;&#039;&#039;seed bank&#039;&#039;&#039; and provides seeds. Vegetable seedlings are homegrown. A portion is reserved for reproduction to achieve self-sufficiency in seeds.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Photos gallery===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Agroecologie.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Manioc.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne RacinesManioc.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Desherbage.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne GrappeOranges.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Oranger.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne OrangesRecoltees.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Papaye.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Fraisiers.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
File:MamadouDiagne Poivrons.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal productions=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MamadouDiagne_Vaches.jpg|thumb|277x277px]]&lt;br /&gt;
He raises a few fattening cattle for 3 months each year. He buys them at 4-5 years old, lean, then &#039;&#039;&#039;feeds them with hay and food&#039;&#039;&#039; and sells them. He raises [[about]] 10 per year. He buys them for 300,000 CFA each and invests 50,000 CFA for fattening. They are sold for &#039;&#039;&#039;600,000 CFA&#039;&#039;&#039; each.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Agricultural practices===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil fertility management:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Compost is the priority.&#039;&#039;&#039; The &#039;&#039;&#039;manure is composted for about 15 days&#039;&#039;&#039; for 5 kg. The dosage is done according to the plant&#039;s needs and the appearance of deficiencies. These needs are not measured but can be observed with the naked eye. For example, if the plant is yellow, it lacks nitrogen. The amount of compost per tree is 5 kg, and it is continuously applied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The manure for compost comes from the &#039;&#039;&#039;village and family animals&#039;&#039;&#039;. A total of 12 tons of manure equivalent to 120 carts of 100 kg/year are used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Pest management:&#039;&#039;&#039; No quantification of losses due to pests. He considers it &#039;&#039;&#039;normal to have losses&#039;&#039;&#039;. He follows the law of nature, allowing insects and pests to have their share. Nature belongs to everyone. Initially, squirrels used to eat all the cassava. Some colleagues advised him to use products to kill the squirrels, but Mamadou refused. They eat less now, and over time, they stop. He develops &#039;&#039;&#039;alternative techniques like [[Intercropping of Fruit Trees and Associated Crops in Agroforestry Systems|intercropping]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Thus, plants drive away insects through scent, and flowers attract insects elsewhere. He has no issues with pests currently. &#039;&#039;&#039;Treatments are natural&#039;&#039;&#039; using solutions of [[garlic]], [[tobacco]], and neem. Everything is plant-based. Treatments are done &#039;&#039;&#039;every 10 days preventively&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil preparation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Preparation is done &#039;&#039;&#039;15 days before planting&#039;&#039;&#039;. The plot is marked and protected by &#039;&#039;&#039;windbreaks&#039;&#039;&#039; made of coconut or rônier leaves, for example, with a maximum height of 1.5m. The work is done in small rounds or according to the specific crop. Planks are set up with manure at the bottom, followed by &#039;&#039;&#039;10 days of watering before sowing or planting&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water System===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Source, volume, and flow rate: &#039;&#039;&#039;3 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and approximately 1.5 m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/h.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Irrigation method:&#039;&#039;&#039; Well with diesel and electric motor pump.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Watering frequency: &#039;&#039;&#039;Daily. Land divided into 2 parts, one watered in the morning, the other in the evening. 20-40 L/day/plant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{EChart Radar MSV&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de la ferme = Mamadou Diagne&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction économique = 5&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction sociale = 10&lt;br /&gt;
| Confort au travail = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| Cadre de vie = 9&lt;br /&gt;
| Coopération = 10&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economic:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5. Mamadou is not extremely satisfied, but he manages to meet his needs. Money comes in gradually.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Working comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1. The work is very hard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10. Content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living environment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 9. He likes the environment, the diversity, the birds, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Scale from 1 = very dissatisfied to 10 = very satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Technical support/aid: &#039;&#039;&#039;Often, people with specific knowledge about practices come to see the farm. There was a partnership with Kaydara for 5 years. Gora Ndiaye occasionally visits to provide advice on practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation with other farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10. Excellent cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Land===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Guaranteed access to the land provided to Mamadou. The land is valued at 4 million CFA/ha.&lt;br /&gt;
*He built a building for 300,000 CFA.&lt;br /&gt;
*The house is more expensive but was provided by partners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MamadouDiagne_PanneauxPhotovoltaiques.jpg|thumb|277x277px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*At the beginning, he had 0 CFA in his pocket and no means. Then he bought a pulley right from the start.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 1 year, he bought a pump with the proceeds from the sales of cassava, etc. This motor pump cost 85,000 CFA, with an unknown capacity in m&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;/h and running on diesel.&lt;br /&gt;
*After 6 months, he stopped using the motor pump and invested in solar power for 400,000 CFA. He kept the other one in case there was not enough sunlight or it malfunctioned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Donations, Financial Assistance===&lt;br /&gt;
He received assistance from the Kaydara Farm School in the form of plant capital, all tree seedlings, help with harvesting, and assistance for the well. He also receives support and follow-up assistance from the Kaydara Farm School. He received assistance from the [https://www.cariassociation.org/Organismes/Eau-Vive-Senegal Eau-vive] association with the donation of the well valued at 1 million CFA. Tree seedlings were given by the Kaydara School, totaling approximately 2 million CFA in value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expenses===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Purchase of cattle and feeding: 350,000 CFA (300,000 CFA for the cattle and 50,000 CFA for feed).&lt;br /&gt;
*No electricity or water charges. Just need about &#039;&#039;&#039;20 L/year of petrol&#039;&#039;&#039; for the pump.&lt;br /&gt;
*Seeds are exchanged with the Kaydara School, so no costs.&lt;br /&gt;
*He brings in &#039;&#039;&#039;motorcycles for shopping once a week for 6 months&#039;&#039;&#039;, costing around 1,000 CFA/ride, totaling about 25,000 CFA/year.&lt;br /&gt;
*Manure is free as it comes from family and his cattle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Products===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The cattle, after fattening, are sold for 600,000 CFA each, bringing in 250,000 CFA per cattle. He raises about 10 per year.&lt;br /&gt;
*For vegetables (cassava + vegetables), he sells for 1.5 million CFA, with half of the cassava being sold.&lt;br /&gt;
*For coconuts and mangoes, he hasn&#039;t had any production yet.&lt;br /&gt;
*For papayas, he produces 1.5 tons/year and sells them for 750 CFA/kg.&lt;br /&gt;
*For lemons, he sells for 30,000 CFA/tree (first year of production), totaling 150,000 CFA with his 5 trees.&lt;br /&gt;
*For oranges, it&#039;s only for personal consumption; in the future, he hopes to have 100 kg/tree (2 orange trees) and sell them for 1,000 CFA/kg.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, he works in orchards for other farmers and has &#039;&#039;&#039;orchard maintenance contracts&#039;&#039;&#039;. He maintains the orchards of friends (4-5 orchards) about every 15 days at 30,000 CFA/month per orchard. Maximum 1 hour of work per orchard, 2 times/month, and well-paid. He has stopped selling plants. &#039;&#039;&#039;Approximately 6.5 million CFA/year in revenue (estimated income: 6.1 million CFA/year&#039;&#039;&#039; = 9,000€/year&#039;&#039;&#039;)&#039;&#039;&#039; (average annual salary in Senegal = 858,845 CFA).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Business strategy/Outlets===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Market gardening&#039;&#039;&#039; was started to be self-sufficient and &#039;&#039;&#039;generate quick income&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Radishes]], beets, etc. are cultivated for self-sufficiency, and the &#039;&#039;&#039;surplus is sold to hotels&#039;&#039;&#039;. 100% of the sales are to hotels; he cannot meet the entire demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advice from the farmer==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Advice on agroecological practices:&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Take time to &#039;&#039;&#039;reactivate microbial life&#039;&#039;&#039;. First, plant &#039;&#039;&#039;fertility plants&#039;&#039;&#039;, then add &#039;&#039;&#039;compost and water&#039;&#039;&#039; to reactivate life.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**Install barriers to &#039;&#039;&#039;slow down the wind&#039;&#039;&#039; and plant &#039;&#039;&#039;vetivers&#039;&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;&#039;stabilize the soil&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Divide the land&#039;&#039;&#039; into boxes to start and store plant assets &#039;&#039;&#039;near the well&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
**Once the holes are made, put &#039;&#039;&#039;manure&#039;&#039;&#039; at the bottom, &#039;&#039;&#039;water it and wait for life to activate&#039;&#039;&#039;, then plant coconut palms and mango trees in interlines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After 2-3 years, a beautiful landscape can already be achieved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Advice for the economic model:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;Don&#039;t spend a lot and save money.&#039;&#039;&#039; Always amortize the tools and watch expenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Future prospects==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MamadouDiagne_Formation.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Expand and broaden the model to train other young people in the village.&lt;br /&gt;
*Create a farm similar to that of Kaydara.&lt;br /&gt;
*Establish partnerships with other organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources== &lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Mamadou Diagne conducted in February 2023 by the team of [[Structure:Ver de Terre production|Ver de Terre Production]] as part of the [[Urbane]] project. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo credits: Mamadou Diagne.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Mamadou Diagne]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Perichoux_farm&amp;diff=7203</id>
		<title>Perichoux farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Perichoux_farm&amp;diff=7203"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:34:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Ferme des Perichoux&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology, diversity of crops, soil fertility, compost, crop associations, mulching&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Damien Martin, Sathurnin Bossou&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = Perichoux_Ferme.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = Perichoux_DamienMartin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Logo = &lt;br /&gt;
| URL = https://www.facebook.com/fermeperichoux&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Benin&lt;br /&gt;
| Adresse = Koudjanada, Zè&lt;br /&gt;
| Latitude = 6.708898682250603&lt;br /&gt;
| Longitude = 2.3686070412520497&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 1.25&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 4&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy-silty&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Crop-livestock farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Maraîchage@ Arboriculture@ Poultry breeding@ Dairy sheep farming@ Élevage caprin@ Heliciculture&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Profitability&lt;br /&gt;
| Autres caractéristiques = Irrigated system&lt;br /&gt;
| Titre court = Ferme des Périchoux&lt;br /&gt;
| Programme = Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
| Date de mise en œuvre = 2016&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = Perichoux_Paillage.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Perichoux farm&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Soil fertility, Crop association, Compost, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{A la une}}&lt;br /&gt;
Damien Martin, a farmer in Koudjanada, [[Benin]], cultivates his land according to agroecological principles. He is supported by several employees, including Sathurnin Bossou. Here is the profile of their farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
===The farm===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Farmer&#039;s name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Damien Martin.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Farm&#039;s name: &#039;&#039;&#039;Perichoux farm.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Koudjanada, Zè, Benin.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Establishment date:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2016, Sathurnin joined as an employee in 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1.25 hectares.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy-loamy.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of people working on the farm (Full-time equivalent):&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1200 mm of rainfall per year in 2023. According to the Köppen-Geiger classification, the climate is of type Aw. There are significant wind gusts before storms, creating a venturi effect, which can bend the [[corn]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Perichoux_Haricots.jpg|thumb|Beans.]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Plant productions===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
A variety of [[:Category:Vegetable crops|vegetable crops]] (mainly for self-consumption): &#039;&#039;&#039;20 species of fruits, vegetables, and herbs including:&#039;&#039;&#039; Peppers (bird, Antillean, long pepper), [[lettuce]] (a &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; variety and a variety of lettuce similar to a local dandelion: yantoto, which multiplies by runners. Known locally but rarely used in salads, this plant does not need to be re-sown and bolts much slower than classic lettuce, thus having strong nutritional and agronomic value for the agroecosystem), tomatoes, [[okra]], turmeric, ginger, [[eggplant]] (white and purple), [[cucumber]], climbing beans (various varieties: pink, black, bicolor, white seeds. The beans are &#039;&#039;&#039;associated with fruit trees as supports&#039;&#039;&#039; and as a secondary production of the fruit trees). Occasionally, they also plant carrots and beets.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Food crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; &#039;&#039;&#039;15 species:&#039;&#039;&#039; Beans (varieties listed above), [[cassava]], [[yam]] (several varieties), sweet [[potato]], [[maize]], [[soybean]], taro, [[pineapple]], [[watermelon]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit trees: 40 different species:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Local varieties:&#039;&#039;&#039; Baobab, tamarind, velvet tamarind, star [[apple]], wild apple, nere, twin [[banana]], miracle fruit (endemic to Togo, Benin), egbe (local name), oil palm, banana (6 varieties: 2 plantains and 4 sweet bananas), sapodilla, jujube, egg tree.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Exotic varieties:&#039;&#039;&#039; Goïne vine, passion fruit, avocado, [[coconut]], lychee, longan, rambutan, [[guava]], [[papaya]], [[mango]], [[soursop]], custard apple, pepper, jackfruit, citrus ([[lemon]], [[orange]], [[grapefruit]]), cashew, kola nut (several local and exotic varieties), Calabar nut, palm nut, coffee, [[cocoa]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Medicinal plants: &#039;&#039;&#039;Over 100 species&#039;&#039;&#039;, many plants that grow spontaneously have medicinal properties. Among the most &amp;quot;remarkable&amp;quot; or used, they include: &#039;&#039;Artemisia afra&#039;&#039; (for malaria treatment), red [[pea]], neem, caïlcédrat ([[Senegal]] mahogany), African hyssop (&#039;&#039;Newbouldia laevis&#039;&#039;), [[moringa]], and other herbs used for animals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Perichoux_Volaille.jpg|thumb|Poultry.]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Animal productions ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Poultry production:&#039;&#039;&#039; They encountered health issues at the end of last year (2023) which reduced the flock, but the goal is to have &#039;&#039;&#039;[[breeding]] stock to ensure self-consumption&#039;&#039;&#039; of part of the animal production and to sell a few individuals if the predation pressure is not too high. They want the &#039;&#039;&#039;agroecosystem to be able to support the animal load&#039;&#039;&#039; instead of developing a large-scale poultry production operation.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Local poultry:&#039;&#039;&#039; 20.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Turkeys:&#039;&#039;&#039; 4-5.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Guinea fowls&#039;&#039;&#039;: 4-5.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Ducks:&#039;&#039;&#039; 4-5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Small ruminant and other animal productions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Goats, sheep:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10 (3 breeding stock for goats and the same for sheep.)&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Guinea pigs:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Gambian rats:&#039;&#039;&#039; 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Beekeeping]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; 4 species of local bees, &#039;&#039;&#039;6 hives&#039;&#039;&#039;. Following a fatal accident on the farm related to a [[bee]] attack, the decision was made to drastically reduce beekeeping activity and to raise &#039;&#039;&#039;meliponines&#039;&#039;&#039;, stingless bees, instead of the European bee species usually kept for honey production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Snails:&#039;&#039;&#039; Production &#039;&#039;&#039;in the open field&#039;&#039;&#039;, in enclosures. Production for &#039;&#039;&#039;self-consumption&#039;&#039;&#039;, in the experimental phase. Damien and his team started captive breeding conventionally, but it required a lot of time, and the rapid multiplication of snails caused overcrowding in the enclosures. They released the snails into an uncultivated field and will harvest them at the end of the two rainy seasons. After the harvest, they will perform a general weighing and keep 10% to reintroduce into the field. The idea is to &#039;&#039;&#039;utilize uncultivated spaces&#039;&#039;&#039; like fallows, hedges, etc. There is &#039;&#039;&#039;currently no impact on food crops&#039;&#039;&#039; from this type of &amp;quot;semi-natural&amp;quot; management. This form of breeding requires little work. At the end of this year&#039;s rainy season, they will conduct the first harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Studies/Education/Life path==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Damien Martin:&#039;&#039;&#039; Holds a BTS in aquaculture. He arrived in Benin in 2003 and has been cultivating his land since 2016. His mother is a researcher at INRAe, working on surface water themes, and she trained him in organic gardening. His father was a farm worker who passed away from generalized cancer, which led Damien to develop an aversion to chemicals and a desire to grow vegetables without using pesticides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sathurnin Bossou:&#039;&#039;&#039; Is the son of a farmer, he studied literature before gradually moving closer to the agricultural world. He learned agriculture through practice, and his knowledge is empirical. Sathurnin was the teacher of Damien&#039;s daughters, and they discovered a mutual interest in [[agroecology]], leading Damien to train him in these practices. Sathurnin has a reflective approach to agroecology inherent to the peasant agricultural world around him, and he participates in and leads agroecological volunteer days and awareness campaigns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Motivations and objectives ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Damien: &#039;&#039;&#039;His main goal is to &#039;&#039;&#039;sustain his farm&#039;&#039;&#039;. He aims to &#039;&#039;&#039;demonstrate the value of this type of agroecological farming&#039;&#039;&#039;, creating an agro-system that allows for significant and economically viable food production that can be replicated by a family of 5-6 people. The farm&#039;s objective is to focus on &#039;&#039;&#039;self-consumption&#039;&#039;&#039;. The sale of farm products only occurs if there are surpluses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sathurnin:&#039;&#039;&#039; His goal is to &#039;&#039;&#039;demonstrate the interest and multiple benefits of implementing agroecological practices&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is why he also applies them in his own half-hectare field.&lt;br /&gt;
Perichoux farm also aims to &#039;&#039;&#039;train new generations of farmers&#039;&#039;&#039;, functioning as an incubator to train young farmers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Agricultural practices===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Perichoux_Compost.jpg|thumb|Soil composting of organic waste]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
*They practice &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop association]] with legumes&#039;&#039;&#039; ([[Cowpea|cowpeas]], [[Peanut|peanuts]]). Some fruit trees are associated with annual crops of beans and other climbing legumes. The trees serve as &#039;&#039;&#039;stakes&#039;&#039;&#039; and the beans &#039;&#039;&#039;fix atmospheric nitrogen&#039;&#039;&#039; in their root nodules.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Planting of Fabaceae Family Trees (Legumes):&#039;&#039;&#039; Gliricidia sepium. Like annual legumes, this tree &#039;&#039;&#039;fixes atmospheric nitrogen&#039;&#039;&#039; in the nodules of its roots and contributes to &#039;&#039;&#039;soil fertilization&#039;&#039;&#039;. On the farm, they use mulching to protect the soil and reduce weeding actions (the leaves have an allelopathic effect and inhibit the growth of weeds).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil [[Producing organic fertilizers in Africa|composting]] by bringing all organic waste to the field &#039;&#039;&#039;(wood ash, urine, dry toilet compost, food scraps). &amp;quot;Depending on what is available, we put it directly in the field. We believe that &#039;&#039;&#039;wild [[biodiversity]] also plays a role in fertilization&#039;&#039;&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The preservation and maintenance of biodiversity is important on the farm. A wildlife inventory has been conducted:&lt;br /&gt;
{{PDF|Fichier=Inventaire de la biodiversité à la ferme des Périchoux.pdf|Largeur=600|Hauteur=400}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pest management===&lt;br /&gt;
Main pests are &#039;&#039;&#039;[[caterpillars]] and rodents&#039;&#039;&#039; on [[cereal]] crops and tubers, and &#039;&#039;&#039;grain-eating birds&#039;&#039;&#039; (weaver birds). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rodent control methods:&#039;&#039;&#039; Constructing sound scarecrows, which are structures with bottles that clink together. The sound scarecrow works well, although its effectiveness tends to decrease over time. Any noise-making device that catches the wind (CD-ROMs, empty bottles, cassette reels, bird-shaped scarecrows to cast a raptor-like shadow) needs to be moved periodically, otherwise, the pests get used to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They do not always know the specific rodent species affecting the crops, but these include the Gambian rat, bush mouse, and several squirrel species. They are considering &#039;&#039;&#039;hunting to consume&#039;&#039;&#039; the wildlife and &#039;&#039;&#039;reduce pest pressure&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Against grain-eating birds:&#039;&#039;&#039; Constructing &#039;&#039;&#039;raptors made of sheet metal&#039;&#039;&#039; and suspending them in trees with a piece of wood.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Against birds and rodents:&#039;&#039;&#039; Installing human-shaped scarecrows. This technique is less effective as it is immobile, so they need to be moved regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Soil work ===&lt;br /&gt;
Soil work on the farm is &#039;&#039;&#039;very limited&#039;&#039;&#039;. They work the soil in &#039;&#039;&#039;mounds&#039;&#039;&#039; for maize and yam. When they notice that the soil is poor underneath, they may do a surface till to incorporate organic matter and facilitate its decomposition.{{Image centrée|Perichoux_Billons.jpg|border|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Strategy for constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Mobile network access:&#039;&#039;&#039; There was &#039;&#039;&#039;no mobile phone network access until recently&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Electricity access:&#039;&#039;&#039; The remote location of the land means that access to the electricity grid is not possible, requiring self-sufficiency in electricity. However, since irrigation is manual, the farm&#039;s electricity needs are low.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Land size and price (6 million FCFA/ha):&#039;&#039;&#039; Anticipated purchases, knowing the owner to &#039;&#039;&#039;buy the land before it is publicly put on sale&#039;&#039;&#039;, and buying land in &#039;&#039;&#039;small pieces&#039;&#039;&#039; to avoid large investments.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Presence of Malian ants (army ants):&#039;&#039;&#039; These ants put heavy pressure on crops due to their frequent visits. No effective biological control method has yet been found on the farm.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Predators threatening livestock:&#039;&#039;&#039; Pythons and wild cats prey on poultry. The main breeding turkey was eaten this year. They purchased a camera trap to identify the animal attacking the poultry (probably a Ceba python or a crocodile). They conduct inventories on the fauna and flora (20 snakes have been identified, some of which are large enough to eat poultry).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Water erosion:&#039;&#039;&#039; This can cause the collapse of some steep agricultural areas. In areas of the farm with slopes, the strategy is to promote a very strong, &#039;&#039;&#039;multi-layered root system to retain the soil deeply&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Hedge]] planting:&#039;&#039;&#039; They plant hedges (Pride of China, acacia, fruit trees, annual vines such as passion fruit, plus everything that grows naturally through assisted natural regeneration) on old property boundaries, plus a &#039;&#039;&#039;herbaceous layer&#039;&#039;&#039; that they let establish &#039;&#039;&#039;spontaneously&#039;&#039;&#039; to limit erosion and improve water infiltration. Additionally, they plant herbaceous [[Cover crops usable in Africa|cover crops]] in a [[Zaï technique|half-moon pattern]]: Panicum C1, vetiver, parrot flower (an ornamental plant that multiplies and is used as forage for livestock).&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Small walls:&#039;&#039;&#039; These are placed in some areas to slow down erosion. The technique of rock placement is complicated in the region due to the lack of rocks; they recovered rocks from an adjacent road construction site.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Organic matter:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Organic matter]] is &#039;&#039;&#039;expensive and hard to find locally&#039;&#039;&#039; because the existing crops are mainly imported and chemically fertilized (such as pineapples). The strategy is &#039;&#039;&#039;to be self-sufficient&#039;&#039;&#039; on the farm by producing a large quantity of organic matter (animal, tree leaves, straw). &#039;&#039;&#039;Many areas are intentionally left fallow&#039;&#039;&#039; to collect foliage or benefit from tree litter to plant more demanding plants like maize, for example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water system===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Irrigation outside of the rainy season&#039;&#039;&#039; (November - April)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Borehole with a thermal pump:&#039;&#039;&#039; A generator fills a &#039;&#039;&#039;water tower&#039;&#039;&#039;. It is used to water &#039;&#039;&#039;green spaces&#039;&#039;&#039; and mainly for &#039;&#039;&#039;domestic use&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;Water from lowlands (marshes) is used for irrigating cultivated areas&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Irrigation method:&#039;&#039;&#039; Some plots are watered during the dry season, but this is &#039;&#039;&#039;limited to [[market gardening]] and young trees&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Watering frequency: &#039;&#039;&#039;Irrigation heavily depends on the time of year. It is reduced during the rainy season (April-October). In the dry season, they water the garden &#039;&#039;&#039;twice a day &#039;&#039;&#039;(with water from ponds) and &#039;&#039;&#039;young fruit trees every 3-4 days&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They aim to switch to a &#039;&#039;&#039;solar installation&#039;&#039;&#039; for the borehole now that affordable, high-quality equipment is available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction / Dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
{{EChart Radar MSV&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de la ferme = Damien Martin&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction économique = 5&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction sociale =7&lt;br /&gt;
| Confort au travail = 5&lt;br /&gt;
| Cadre de vie = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| Coopération = 9&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5. &#039;&#039;&#039;120 hours per week, including all labor&#039;&#039;&#039;. The complexity of the agro-system generates a lot of work. Hosting visitors at the farm adds an additional burden. Since the visit has a free pricing policy, deciding on charges is not always straightforward. They are not &amp;quot;afraid&amp;quot; of the work itself, but they have &#039;&#039;&#039;many questions&#039;&#039;&#039; [[about]] the workload because they want to create a reproducible model for a family of 5-6 people. These are questions they constantly ask themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Economic:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5. They consider themselves still in a &#039;&#039;&#039;development phase&#039;&#039;&#039; and have given themselves 5 years to test the agro-system. The further they progress, the more productive they will become, and they will be able to sell surplus produce on the market.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039; Social:&#039;&#039;&#039; 7. Workers live on-site but lead separate lives from their employers.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5. Damien gives a &amp;quot;privileged&amp;quot; viewpoint (according to his terms) because he is the boss. The on-site housing was already available, but he believes he could offer &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; accommodation for the workers.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Living environment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scale of 1 = very dissatisfied, to 10 = very satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical Support===&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, Damien was trained in market gardening by his mother. Today, Damien and Sathurnin provide &#039;&#039;&#039;support to other farmers&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooperation with Other Farmers===&lt;br /&gt;
They &#039;&#039;&#039;exchange a lot with other farmers&#039;&#039;&#039;, mainly regarding production methods. With neighboring farmers, they &#039;&#039;&#039;barter or donate seeds&#039;&#039;&#039;. Many discussions are underway to implement a &#039;&#039;&#039;peasant solidarity system&#039;&#039;&#039;, which would help others in case of disaster, lend equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Land:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5 million FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Multipurpose press and centrifuge: 100,000 FCFA (150 €), solar panel and battery.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Donations, financial aid:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Very few expenses, mainly equipment and labor.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Salary:&#039;&#039;&#039; 54,460 FCFA/month in the case of Sathurnin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commercial Strategy / Outlets===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Self-consumption before sale&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Honey is sold locally&#039;&#039;&#039;, while the rest of the production feeds the farm. They currently harvest 40 L per year, which is minimal for the size of the apiary. They had to scale back traditional beekeeping and &#039;&#039;&#039;shift to stingless melipona bees&#039;&#039;&#039; after a fatal worker attack. They &#039;&#039;&#039;consume part of the honey and transform the rest into mead&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* They mainly practice &#039;&#039;&#039;subsistence farming and aim for food self-sufficiency&#039;&#039;&#039;. Any &#039;&#039;&#039;surplus production is sold at the local market&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* An economic evaluation of everything consumed on the farm is conducted so they can understand its potential revenue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advice from the Farmer==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Damien:&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;It is important to question the values we assign to agriculture. Behind every consumption choice lies a political decision. Farmers are asked to put in a lot of effort, yet their jobs are very poorly remunerated. There is no support, no subsidy, to encourage farmers to use agroecological techniques.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sathurnin:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**&amp;quot;It is crucial to encourage respect for the environment. It is important to monitor plant health because it impacts human health. Our health depends on what we eat; we must eat healthily to live better. &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Do not focus on a single crop&#039;&#039;&#039;, preserving biodiversity for future generations is essential to promoting food sovereignty and resilience among crops. &lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Do not underestimate the role of biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is not well known but is important in pest control. For example, do not kill snakes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=45}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources== &lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Damien Martin and Sathurnin Bossou conducted in June 2024 by the team of [[Structure:Ver de Terre production|Ver de Terre Production]] as part of the [[Urbane]] project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photo credits: Damien Martin and Sathurnin Bossou.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme des Périchoux]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Douarou%27s_farm&amp;diff=7202</id>
		<title>Orou Douarou&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Orou_Douarou%27s_farm&amp;diff=7202"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:33:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Ferme d&#039;Orou Douarou Assouma&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous*titre = Agroécologie, diversité des cultures, fertilité des sols, pâturage&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Orou Douarou Assouma&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = Assouma_Banniere.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = Assouma_OrouAssouma.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Benin&lt;br /&gt;
| Coordonnées GPS = 9.44814, 2.74535&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sable limoneux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy-loam&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Crop-livestock farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Tomato@ Lentil@ Peanut@ Cowpea@ @ Sorghum@ Cassava@ Corn@ Soybean@ Shea@ Cashew nut@ Teak@ Poultry breeding@ Dairy sheep farming@ Goat farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Titre court = Orou Douarou Assouma&#039;s farm&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Régénération des sols&lt;br /&gt;
| Programme = Urbane&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = Assouma_ArachideAnacardier.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Crop association, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{A la une}}&lt;br /&gt;
Orou Douarou Assouma, a farmer from Guéssou (Gbégourou) in [[Benin]], cultivates his land and raises livestock following agroecological principles. Here’s a portrait of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Orou Douarou Assouma.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guéssou (Gbégourou), Benin.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8 hectares.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil Texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy loam.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workforce:&#039;&#039;&#039; 3 permanent workers assisted by their 2 sons. Additionally, 3 of their wives occasionally help, mainly during harvests, which benefit the family.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Production:&#039;&#039;&#039; Mainly for family consumption:  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Tomato]], [[lentil]], [[peanut]], [[cowpea]], pigeon [[pea]], and velvet bean (mucuna).  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Food crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Cassava]], [[sorghum]], [[maize]], [[soybean]].  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit and forest trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Shea|Shea tree]], [[Cashew nut|cashew tree]], [[teak]] (Gmelina arborea, also known as white teak) for field boundaries.  &lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Livestock:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poultry (50 birds), goats (4), sheep (6).  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Guessou-Nord has a savanna climate with a dry winter (Aw classification according to Köppen-Geiger). The average annual temperature is 27.8°C, with 904.9 mm of rainfall. Winds appear toward the end of the rainy season.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Education/training/background:&#039;&#039;&#039; Orou learned agriculture from his parents and still applies the traditional techniques and methods they taught him. He has no formal education in agriculture or agronomy; his knowledge is empirical. Since last year, through the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039;, he has started combining traditional and agroecological approaches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
Orou’s interest in [[agroecology]] emerged a year ago with the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039; and support from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Consultancy&#039;&#039;&#039; (an agricultural advisory firm).  &lt;br /&gt;
One of Orou’s goals is to implement the techniques introduced by the ProSilience project. Before this, he lacked knowledge [[about]] agroecology, such as enriching the soil with pigeon pea, mucuna, and other suitable legumes. He recognizes their significant benefits for himself and future generations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Farming practices===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_PlanchesEnfouissement.jpg|Légende=Tilling and ridge formation|Alignement=Right}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
* Orou improves soil fertility by &#039;&#039;&#039;planting maize before mucuna&#039;&#039;&#039; and rotating crops to enhance soil quality between maize cycles.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Plowing and burying weeds&#039;&#039;&#039; into ridges enriches the soil with &#039;&#039;&#039;nitrogen&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[organic matter]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* With the ProSilience project, he began &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|rotating crops]]&#039;&#039;&#039; on different plots—for example, avoiding maize on maize sequences this year.  &lt;br /&gt;
* He now practices &#039;&#039;&#039;crop association&#039;&#039;&#039;, such as:  &lt;br /&gt;
** Cassava and maize.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Cowpea and maize.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Sorghum and peanut.  &lt;br /&gt;
** Pigeon pea and peanut under cashew trees.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Orou values his land by cultivating pigeon pea and mucuna, which not only enhance soil fertility but can also be consumed after processing.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_MaisNiebe.jpg|Cowpea and maize association&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_MaisSorgho.jpg|Maize and sorhum association&lt;br /&gt;
File:Assouma_AssociationsCulturales.jpg|Crop associations&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil management====&lt;br /&gt;
Orou plows his fields annually. Recently, he began &#039;&#039;&#039;leaving some plots unplowed as a test&#039;&#039;&#039;, saving time and enabling mulching (adding organic litter at the base of crops like soybean, sorghum, and maize).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plowing methods include:  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using oxen-drawn plows.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Manual plowing.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Using a tiller.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_Labour.jpg|Légende=Plow|Alignement=Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Corn]] borers:&#039;&#039;&#039; These pests damage maize by eating its male inflorescence, disrupting reproduction.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Locusts]].&#039;&#039;&#039;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image|Image=Assouma_DegatsPyraleMais.jpg|Légende=Damage caused by corn borers on maize|Alignement=Center}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Strategies to address challenges====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lack of resources&#039;&#039;&#039; for plowing and insufficient equipment, which delays crop establishment: His solution is to&#039;&#039;&#039; use multiple tools/methods&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Against [[caterpillars]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; Through the project, he learned to produce [[Producing biopesticides based on neem leaves and seeds|biopesticides]] using local vegetation, such as neem, [[tobacco]] leaves, traditional soap, and crushed chili peppers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Water system====&lt;br /&gt;
There is &#039;&#039;&#039;no irrigation &#039;&#039;&#039;system in place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction/dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; Work intensity varies throughout the year, especially during plowing (June, July) and sowing, which are labor-intensive periods.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Living conditions:&#039;&#039;&#039; Fields are 4 km away, which Orou finds reasonable compared to other farmers with plots up to 16 km away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
====Technical support/assistance====&lt;br /&gt;
* By the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado Consultancy&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Through the &#039;&#039;&#039;ProSilience project&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Past support from the national structure on communal development for agricultural outreach on conventional and field-developed techniques.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Collaboration with &#039;&#039;&#039;Hunger Project&#039;&#039;&#039;, focusing on climate change adaptation in farm management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cooperation with other farmers====&lt;br /&gt;
* Orou is part of a &#039;&#039;&#039;farmers’ group&#039;&#039;&#039; addressing common issues, such as the &#039;&#039;&#039;cotton producers’ association&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is well*organized. Otherwise, there are no other significant associations.  &lt;br /&gt;
* A working group tackles shared challenges with support from the &#039;&#039;&#039;Monrado office&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspects==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Monthly income:&#039;&#039;&#039; None, as it’s a family farm, and no direct salaries are drawn.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Land cost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 hectare costs 500,000 FCFA, decreasing with distance from the village.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Equipment:&#039;&#039;&#039; Hoe, a plow, but no oxen currently.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Financial assistance/donations:&#039;&#039;&#039; None.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Expenses:&#039;&#039;&#039; Labor costs for plowing are the highest, amounting to 280,000 FCFA for the entire farm.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Revenue:&#039;&#039;&#039; Primary focus is &#039;&#039;&#039;personal consumption&#039;&#039;&#039; before selling surplus. &#039;&#039;&#039;Soybeans&#039;&#039;&#039; are the most profitable, with 8 sacks of 50 kg sold annually at 22,000 FCFA per sack.  &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Marketing strategy:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sales are made to local retailers or individuals who buy directly from the field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Advice from the farmer==&lt;br /&gt;
To preserve soil health, it’s essential to minimize mechanical interventions, practice crop rotation, and adopt soil conservation techniques. Orou is willing to guide others interested in starting farming by sharing his management methods and soil conservation techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Orou Douarou Assouma conducted in August 2024 by the &#039;&#039;&#039;Ver de Terre Production&#039;&#039;&#039; team as part of the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Urbane|Urbane project]]&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &lt;br /&gt;
Photo Credits: Ver de Terre Production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme d&#039;Orou Douarou Assouma]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mahomed_Demba_Kamara%27s_farm&amp;diff=7201</id>
		<title>Mahomed Demba Kamara&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Mahomed_Demba_Kamara%27s_farm&amp;diff=7201"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:33:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Mahomed Demba Kamara&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology,  diversity of crops, animal production, compost, intercropping&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = MahomedKamara_Association.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Mahomed Demba Kamara&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = MahomedKamara.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| URL = https://jardins-afrique.org/ferme-ecole-kaydara/#kaydara&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = MahomedKamara_PlanchesMaraicheres.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Sénégal&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 1&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Date de mise en œuvre = 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Aviculture (chair)&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sableux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy&lt;br /&gt;
| Cahier des charges = &lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Cassava@ Carrot@ Bell pepper@ Chili pepper@ Hibiscus@ Salad@ Onion@ Strawberry@ Papaya@ Banana@ Lemon@ Grapefruit@ Orange@ Mango@ Guava@ Coconut@ Cashew nut&lt;br /&gt;
| Latitude = 14.13083&lt;br /&gt;
| Longitude = -16.72782&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mohamed Demba Kamara, a farmer in Samba Dia, [[Senegal]], cultivates his lands according to the principles of [[agroecology]]. Here is a portrait of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Mahomed Demba Kamara.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Samba Dia. Senegal.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Installation date :&#039;&#039;&#039; 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated Area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 ha. Vegetable area: 150 m² but can go up to 600 m² when papayas are uprooted (after 2 years of production).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy soil.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Number of people working on the farm:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Productions:&#039;&#039;&#039; Poultry farming (meat), [[Cassava]], [[Carrot]], [[Bell pepper]], [[Chili pepper]], [[Hibiscus]], [[Lettuce]], [[Onion]], [[Strawberry]], [[Papaya]], [[Banana]], [[Lemon]], [[Grapefruit]], [[Orange]], [[Mango]], [[Guava]], [[Coconut]], [[Cashew nut]].&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; Samba Dia has a hot and dry desert climate (BWh) according to the Köppen-Geiger classification. The average temperature in Samba Dia is 28.6°C throughout the year, and the average annual precipitation is 678.5mm. Significant wind throughout the year.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Education/Training/Life Journey:&#039;&#039;&#039; Mahomed comes from the village of Samba Dia. His mother is a veterinarian and his father was an agronomic technician. He worked as a farm laborer at the beginning of the [https://jardins-afrique.org/ferme-ecole-kaydara/ Kaydara agroecological experimental farm] and stopped at the age of 19 after obtaining his driver&#039;s license and because he did not see the possibility of achieving economic balance through his work.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;In 2007:&#039;&#039;&#039; He travels to Europe via Senegal, then Morocco, and returns via Mauritania in 2011. During his journey, he held various jobs (construction, driver, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;In 2011:&#039;&#039;&#039; He leaves his village for Mauritania because, according to him, the elders did not set a good example in agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;In 2017:&#039;&#039;&#039; He returns to Samba Dia and decides to &#039;&#039;&#039;start a poultry farm for 250 meat chickens&#039;&#039;&#039;. He contacts Gora Ndiaye, president of the Kaydara farm, and explains his journey and the problems he encountered. He then begins training at Kaydara funded by its partners. Following his father&#039;s death in 2007, the family land had been sold, so he no longer had any available agricultural land. Kaydara and the municipality of Samba Dia therefore provide him with 1 ha in October 2017. He starts his &#039;&#039;&#039;training&#039;&#039;&#039;, learns, and implements &#039;&#039;&#039;multi-tiered farming&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;The beginnings are not easy&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Other activities:&#039;&#039;&#039; Mahomed is a well-digger, has afforestation activities, and is also a traditional organic livestock trainer at Kaydara.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed wants to &#039;&#039;&#039;preserve ancient and local breeds of chickens&#039;&#039;&#039;. He also wants to &#039;&#039;&#039;set an example and contribute to doing something better&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_PlanchesMaraicheres.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vegetable productions===&lt;br /&gt;
====Diversity of vegetable crops====&lt;br /&gt;
1700-1800 cassava plants (yielding 70 sacks of 70kg = 4.9 T), carrots, bell peppers, chili peppers, hibiscus (bissap), lettuces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Diversity of root crops====&lt;br /&gt;
* 7 beds of onions (used for his own consumption and the leaves for the chickens).&lt;br /&gt;
* 4 beds of onions combined with strawberries.&lt;br /&gt;
* 8 beds of lettuces (half for personal consumption, ¼ for poultry, and for sale).&lt;br /&gt;
* 4 beds of strawberries for personal consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_Bananiers.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Diversity of fruit trees====&lt;br /&gt;
* 75 papaya trees: yielding 2 T.&lt;br /&gt;
* 30 banana trees: 70 kg from the first harvest this year.&lt;br /&gt;
* 28 citrus trees in total: lemons with an ongoing annual production of 100 kg, grapefruits 150-200 kg from 2 trees, and oranges.&lt;br /&gt;
* 40 cashew trees.&lt;br /&gt;
* 20 coconut trees which are 5 years old and bearing their first fruits.&lt;br /&gt;
* 37 mango trees: first production in 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Seed management====&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed bought banana seeds to provide potassium for the papayas to enhance their quality.&lt;br /&gt;
He sells young mango trees in exchange for seeds from old varieties of mangoes.&lt;br /&gt;
For guava cultivation and seedling production, he either uses self-produced seeds from his farm or buys seeds.&lt;br /&gt;
Citrus seeds are produced on the farm, and trees are then grafted from cultivars present on the farm.&lt;br /&gt;
For vegetable seeds, Mahomed obtains them from Gora.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal productions=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_FiletVolailles.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Meat chicken workshop====&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed started his poultry farming with [[about]] twenty chickens. He keeps one rooster for every 10 hens. Initially, he acquired 4-5 month-old hens from a local breeder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Health====&lt;br /&gt;
The chickens are raised &#039;&#039;&#039;without the use of antibiotics or chemical dewormers&#039;&#039;&#039;. Internal and external deworming, often necessary during the rainy season, is carried out using &#039;&#039;&#039;preparations and macerates made from plants produced on the farm or locally available ones&#039;&#039;&#039;: neem, peppers, and wormwood leaves. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Moringa]] is also used for these purposes. The two main diseases the farmer faces during the rainy season are pox and coccidiosis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since veterinary treatments are expensive, pox is treated with a &#039;&#039;&#039;mixture of lemon and methylene blue&#039;&#039;&#039;. Coccidiosis is treated with &#039;&#039;&#039;powdered wormwood and ice plant&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Mesembryanthemum crystallinum&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reduce the impact of diseases and their spread,&#039;&#039;&#039; waterers are emptied and cleaned every day&#039;&#039;&#039;. The &#039;&#039;&#039;bedding&#039;&#039;&#039;, made of straw and sand, &#039;&#039;&#039;is changed every 15 days&#039;&#039;&#039;, and &#039;&#039;&#039;perches&#039;&#039;&#039; for the animals to sleep on are set up to limit disease transmission and spread. &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Dust baths&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039; containing ashes and sand are provided to the animals on the farm so they can self-deworm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Feeding====&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed prepares the mixture for his chickens&#039; feed himself. He makes a &#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;homemade&amp;quot; mix of cereals&#039;&#039;&#039; purchased during harvesting (aiming to reduce costs). The mix for the chickens consists of [[sorghum]], millet, [[maize]], fish meal, as well as [[cowpea]] or pigeon [[pea]] flour for the protein ration.&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;cost of feeding per chicken is approximately 2500 FCFA&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Marketing====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Sales peaks&#039;&#039;&#039; occur during &#039;&#039;&#039;religious festivities&#039;&#039;&#039; or major local events. When the hens have completed more than 3 broods, they are sent for fattening or sold for meat consumption. Chickens are sold after 6 to 7 months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Agricultural practices===&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
=====Crop rotation=====&lt;br /&gt;
In order to optimize soil fertilization, reduce [[organic matter]] depletion, and limit pests and diseases, Mahomed practices &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop rotation]]&#039;&#039;&#039; with fallow periods in vegetable cultivation. He [[Producing organic fertilizers in Africa|fertilizes]] all crops and adjusts the fertilization plan according to the type of crop. &#039;&#039;&#039;He adapts the fertilization plan based on the appearance and development of the plants.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Crop association=====&lt;br /&gt;
Another practice implemented for fertility management and space optimization, as well as interactions between plants, is &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|crop association]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. Mahomed has implemented an association this year: Onions + strawberries on some of his vegetable beds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_Jardin.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
=====Multi-tiered cultivation=====&lt;br /&gt;
Half of the orchard is an &#039;&#039;&#039;association of mangoes and coconut trees&#039;&#039;&#039;: 35 mango trees and 20 coconut trees. For each coconut tree, he plants 4 mango trees. The &#039;&#039;&#039;coconut trees occupy the upper space, the mango trees the lower stratum, and below he can implement vegetable cultivation and/or poultry farming.&#039;&#039;&#039; The vegetable cultivation areas are surrounded by barriers to prevent chickens from entering. The other part of the orchard is planted with citrus fruits (lemons, grapefruits), [[soursop]], oranges, coconut, and raffia palm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Green manure=====&lt;br /&gt;
During the rainy season, Mahomed cultivates &#039;&#039;&#039;cowpea&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Vigna unguiculata&#039;&#039;), a legume that not only provides a &#039;&#039;&#039;quality protein source for humans but also enriches the soil with nitrogen and helps reduce weeding and fertilization for the subsequent crop&#039;&#039;&#039;. He also grows &#039;&#039;&#039;pigeon pea&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Cajanus cajan&#039;&#039;), sown directly before [[vegetable crops]] for the same purpose. These two cover crops, in addition to fixing nitrogen in the soil, produce plant proteins used for chicken feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_TasFumier.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
=====Fertilization and organic manure=====&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed has developed his own system to produce fertilizer while minimizing costs. He has developed &#039;&#039;&#039;chicken farming to be self-sufficient in chicken manure to meet the macronutrient (NPK) needs of his trees and vegetable plants&#039;&#039;&#039;. His &#039;&#039;&#039;banana production also serves partly to produce fertilizer&#039;&#039;&#039; (especially for &#039;&#039;&#039;potassium&#039;&#039;&#039; needs). &lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, he e&#039;&#039;&#039;xchanges hay for cow manure&#039;&#039;&#039; with nearby livestock breeders to supplement his mixture.&lt;br /&gt;
* Every 15 days, the chicken coop is cleaned: he collects the manure.&lt;br /&gt;
* Banana: The peel and fruit are mixed with the manure.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hay in Sambe Dia: In return, breeders give him cow manure.&lt;br /&gt;
* He mixes everything in a basin for decomposition.&lt;br /&gt;
* He obtains [[Producing organic fertilizers in Africa|solid compost and liquid compost]]: this is what he uses for vegetable cultivation and coconut trees.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest management====&lt;br /&gt;
=====Biopesticides and macerates=====&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed &#039;&#039;&#039;does not use chemical pesticides&#039;&#039;&#039; on his farm. To address pest, [[insect]], and disease problems, &#039;&#039;&#039;he produces biopesticides and macerates&#039;&#039;&#039;. For example, to combat whiteflies on papayas, he prepares a treatment using &#039;&#039;&#039;fermented lemon peel macerate over 2 to 3 months&#039;&#039;&#039;. Every year he produces about 200 kg of lemons, of which he sells only 150 kg. He uses the seeds for the nursery, and the pulp and peel for maceration. &#039;&#039;&#039;He sells his lemon biopesticide for 2500 FCFA per liter&#039;&#039;&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
The treatment is applied by hand cleaning the fruits and stems with coconut fiber soaked in macerate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For chili peppers, he uses a &#039;&#039;&#039;neem oil treatment&#039;&#039;&#039;. To combat [[Aphididae|aphid]] attacks, he uses a [[garlic]] decoction: 4 teaspoons of garlic per 2 liters of water.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;He never uses a single treatment as insects become accustomed&#039;&#039;&#039; to it, he creates a&#039;&#039;&#039; mixture of neem oil and garlic.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The third biopesticide he produces consists of 3 different plants: &#039;&#039;&#039;[[tobacco]] + katiyanta + mumbu &#039;&#039;&#039;(or mundu, a plant that only grows in the rainy season that insects detest).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_Planches2.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
=====Soil work=====&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed has a &#039;&#039;&#039;small cultivator&#039;&#039;&#039; that he only uses for &#039;&#039;&#039;cassava&#039;&#039;&#039; cultivation. The cultivation beds are wetted, left for 2 days, then he manually weeds them. He uses a &#039;&#039;&#039;hoe&#039;&#039;&#039; to create the beds and their boundaries. For chili pepper and bell pepper cultivation, he works to a depth of 15 cm. For carrots and turnips, he works to a depth of 30 cm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Hydraulic system====&lt;br /&gt;
=====Source, volume, and flow=====&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;He pumps about 3000 L&#039;&#039;&#039; of water per day. With 2 pumps, a &#039;&#039;&#039;solar pump&#039;&#039;&#039; and a &#039;&#039;&#039;gasoline engine pump&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MahomedKamara_Pompe.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
=====Irrigation method=====&lt;br /&gt;
From 2017 to 2019, the entire farm was watered with watering cans. Subsequently, Mahomed invested in a gasoline engine pump, and then in a solar pump (600 watts, 3 panels of 3x250 watts).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Irrigation is carried out in different ways on the farm &#039;&#039;&#039;depending on the crops&#039;&#039;&#039;: &#039;&#039;&#039;hose&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;manual&#039;&#039;&#039; irrigation. At the beginning of the farm, the system consisted of a well from which water was extracted using a pulley.&lt;br /&gt;
* The system powered by the solar pump is used to irrigate the vegetable gardens, coconut trees, and papayas.&lt;br /&gt;
* The system powered by the gasoline engine pump is used to irrigate citrus trees with a hose as well as the vegetable beds.&lt;br /&gt;
* The pump also fills the basin from which he draws water for manual irrigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Irrigation frequency=====&lt;br /&gt;
* For &#039;&#039;&#039;vegetable gardens, banana trees, and papayas&#039;&#039;&#039;, Mahomed waters &#039;&#039;&#039;daily&#039;&#039;&#039;, averaging &#039;&#039;&#039;3 hours per day&#039;&#039;&#039; (1.5 to 2 people).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Coconut trees&#039;&#039;&#039; are watered &#039;&#039;&#039;every 3 days&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mango trees no longer require watering&#039;&#039;&#039; for the past few years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfactions / Dissatisfactions===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Watering: 4 hours per day (2 hours each with 2 people). Now 3 hours per day. &lt;br /&gt;
** Early morning harvesting: 3 hours per week. &lt;br /&gt;
** Employee: 1 young person working for him. &lt;br /&gt;
**In a week: 8 hours per day, totaling 56 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Well-digging activity:&#039;&#039;&#039; The workload varies depending on the season and demand. Systems are rare, so he is often in demand, approximately 15 times a year for 10 days each time. Therefore, he often leaves the farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{EChart Radar MSV&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de la ferme = Mahomed Demba Kamara&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction économique = 10&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction sociale = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| Confort au travail = 5&lt;br /&gt;
| Cadre de vie = 10&lt;br /&gt;
| Coopération = 10&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Economic:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Social:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Living environment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation with other farmers:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10. He trains young people who do internships at the Kaydara farm school. There, they receive good training.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scale from 1 = very dissatisfied, to 10 = very satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Technical support / Aid===&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed no longer receives external assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic Aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Land===&lt;br /&gt;
The land has been made available to Mahomed, where he has lived for 6 years. Once his training at the Kaydara farm school was completed, the land was financed by Kaydara&#039;s partners. They helped him by giving him the land to serve as an example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
* Gasoline Pump: 90,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* Solar Pump: 350,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* Chicken Coop: 1,500,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* Motorcycle: 500,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* Building: Housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Donations, Financial Aid===&lt;br /&gt;
No funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expenses===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Animal Feed:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2,100,000 FCFA. 2500 FCFA per chicken for feed: sorghum = 300 FCFA/kg, millet = 350 FCFA/kg. (Total sorghum per year: 2.5-3 tons and the same for millet.)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Worker&#039;s salary:&#039;&#039;&#039; The worker is paid 40,000 FCFA per month (= 360k€ per year).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Fuel for the motorcycle and pumps:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5,000 FCFA for 10-12 days x 8 months per year = 120,000 FCFA for gasoline.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Production transportation:&#039;&#039;&#039; Each trip costs 2,000 FCFA, 1-2 times per week. So, 4000 FCFA per week, about 200,000 FCFA per year for transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Manure:&#039;&#039;&#039; 28,000 FCFA (1 sack = 1,000 FCFA) + transportation: each year, minimum 100,000 FCFA for manure excluding transportation + 100,000 FCFA for transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Income===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Chickens:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Brahma chicken:&#039;&#039;&#039; For now, Mahomed does not have an incubator so he does not do industrial farming: about 350 chickens that he can sell for up to 7,000 FCFA / chicken during festive periods (10-year goal: 3000 chickens).&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;Classic chicken:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5000 FCFA / chicken. He sold 3 lots of 250 = 3,750,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Papaya:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2.2 tons: 700 FCFA / kilo.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Mango:&#039;&#039;&#039; 700 kg of mangoes that he sells between 1000 and 1500 FCFA / kg. He has been selling them for 6 years.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetable gardening:&#039;&#039;&#039; 300,000 FCFA for vegetable gardening.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Mahomed reinvests everything he earns in the farm&#039;&#039;&#039; and its ancillary activities. He has no debts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commercial strategy / Outlets===&lt;br /&gt;
* One of the commercial strategies that Mahomed would like to develop in the future is to create or integrate into a &#039;&#039;&#039;network to promote the meat of chickens raised with agroecological principles&#039;&#039;&#039;. Currently, it is very difficult for him to promote the meat he produces as &amp;quot;organic,&amp;quot; as networks are rare or nonexistent in the area where he is located.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Restaurant:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sale every Friday of fruits, vegetables, and chickens in a restaurant that seeks chickens raised according to the principles of organic agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Diversification]] of production:&#039;&#039;&#039; Chickens (meat and eggs) as main activities but also vegetable gardening and nursery activities with the sale of fruit tree seedlings. Price of chickens aged 7 months: 7-8,000 FCFA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mahomed&#039;s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
===Advice on agroecological practices===&lt;br /&gt;
* Advice to the youth: &#039;&#039;&#039;Diversify&#039;&#039;&#039;, try a bit of everything at first, and &#039;&#039;&#039;see what works and develop it&#039;&#039;&#039;. For example, multi-layered cultivation and associations, but also activities on the farm (chickens, vegetable gardening, nursery, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* If one has talent, they should seek networks to sell more and attract people. It&#039;s important to &#039;&#039;&#039;showcase one&#039;s skills and achievements&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Produce your own seeds, biopesticides, and as many inputs as possible on the farm to &#039;&#039;&#039;reduce costs&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;avoid dependency&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Advice for the economic model===&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduce the number of trees to &#039;&#039;&#039;focus on chicken farming&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;If there is no funding for the farm project&#039;&#039;&#039;, find &#039;&#039;&#039;another activity to finance the farm&#039;&#039;&#039;. Mahomed has his well-digging activity, he trains others, and he also does afforestation activities for people who buy land. He then traces and plants trees on the land. He produces half of the seedlings on his farm (lemon, mango, and coconut) and buys the other half from women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A young person with ambition and courage can achieve their dreams without funding. &#039;&#039;&#039;It requires patience, preservation, and honesty&#039;&#039;&#039;. If people trust you, it brings many benefits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Challenges faced==&lt;br /&gt;
There are always challenges, but they have learned to overcome them. The main difficulty is the problem of &#039;&#039;&#039;ticks and fleas&#039;&#039;&#039; on chickens and chicks and &#039;&#039;&#039;pest management in vegetable gardening&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Perspectives==&lt;br /&gt;
Mahomed&#039;s future projects include &#039;&#039;&#039;expanding the size of the chicken coop and the number of chickens by purchasing an incubator&#039;&#039;&#039; and also to increase its surface area to produce more and employ more young people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=19}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources== &lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Mahmed Demba Kamara conducted in February 2024 by the team of [[Structure:Ver de Terre production|Ver de Terre Production]] as part of the [[Urbane]] project. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo credits: Mahomed Demba Kamara.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Mahomed Demba Kamara]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Francis_Tei%27s_farm&amp;diff=7200</id>
		<title>Francis Tei&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Francis_Tei%27s_farm&amp;diff=7200"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:33:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Francis Tei&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = FrancisTei.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = &lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology, crop diversity, soil fertility, crop intercropping&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = FrancisTei_Parcelle.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = &lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Ghana&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 3&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Date de mise en œuvre = 1991&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Crop-livestock farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Sand&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Sandy&lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Maize@ Okra@ Cassava@ Eggplant@ Coconut@ Cocoa@ Squash@ Goat farming&lt;br /&gt;
| Latitude = 5.874619746500316&lt;br /&gt;
| Longitude = -0.32078526268986224&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Soil fertility, Crop association, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{A la une}}&lt;br /&gt;
Francis Tei, a farmer in Otukwadjo, [[Ghana]], cultivates his land according to the principles of agroecology. Here is the profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Francis Tei.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Otukwadjo, Ghana.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Installation date:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 3 ha.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Sandy with large amounts of [[organic matter]] on the surface horizon.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of people working on the farm:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2, but spread across 8 family members.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Productions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Maize]], [[okra]], [[cassava]], [[eggplant]], marrow ([[Cucurbita]] Pepo).&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Coconut]], [[cocoa]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; In Nsawam, the rainy season is overcast, the dry season is partly cloudy, and the weather is very hot and oppressive throughout the year. Over the year, temperatures typically range from 23°C to 34°C and rarely drop below 22°C or rise above 36°C. &lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/training/life path:&#039;&#039;&#039; Francis embarked on agriculture after being trained by his parents as well as through academic training and visits to farmers and peers. &amp;quot;From the start, I chose to be a farmer, which is why I studied agriculture in school and also attended agricultural training in Kumasi.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and goals==&lt;br /&gt;
Francis has a strong interest in [[agroecology]] and is even part of the [https://centrefornotill.org/ HGBF-Centre for no till].&lt;br /&gt;
His goal is to develop [[Pig farming|pig]] and [[Poultry (meat)|poultry]] farming, with [[about]] 300 heads.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agronomic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Crop production===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FrancisTei_FreshCorn.jpg|thumb|Fresh maize ears.|223x223px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FrancisTei_Maize.jpg|thumb|Dry maize ears.|223x223px]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Intercropping: Maize + Canavalia====&lt;br /&gt;
He practices this intercropping twice a year.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Planting&#039;&#039;&#039;: Early March for the main season and late August for the secondary season.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Fertilization&#039;&#039;&#039;: Two applications with [https://www.yara.com.gh/crop-nutrition/fertilisers/yaramila/yaramila-actyva/ Actyva] 20%: 25kg for 30 x 60 m.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Weeding&#039;&#039;&#039;: Once with a hoe, no chemical herbicide use.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Insecticides&#039;&#039;&#039;: Against Poecilium, three applications before harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Yield&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
**2000-2500 plants for 72x72 feets.&lt;br /&gt;
**12 &amp;quot;bucks&amp;quot; / acre (4050 m²), 16 bucks = 1 ton.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Marrow (&#039;&#039;Cucurbita Pepo&#039;&#039;) with velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) as a preceding crop==== &lt;br /&gt;
* Velvet bean as a [[Cover crops usable in Africa|cover crop]]: 20 plants on 2000 m² for 3 months (end of February/beginning of March until May).&lt;br /&gt;
* Cover crop destruction with a roller.&lt;br /&gt;
* Planting marrows (a cucurbit related to [[cucumber]]) in May directly into the residues of cream mucuna.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Youtube|id=https://youtu.be/HzYourjtZW4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Cassava====&lt;br /&gt;
* Planting &#039;&#039;Panicum maximum&#039;&#039; ([[Guinea grass]]) in November as a cover crop.&lt;br /&gt;
* Cover crop destruction with herbicide.&lt;br /&gt;
* Planting cassava in April.&lt;br /&gt;
* 2 [[mango]] trees and 30 other trees in association.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FrancisTei_Cacao.jpg|thumb|298x298px]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Cocoa====&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Harvest&#039;&#039;&#039;: 1 ton/year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Eggplants==== &lt;br /&gt;
* Area: 2 plots (2000 m²).&lt;br /&gt;
* Little profit on this crop and many issues with &#039;&#039;&#039;[[fall armyworm]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;[[Spodoptera frugiperda]]&#039;&#039;) attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Coconuts==== &lt;br /&gt;
* Area: 2 hectares of plantation.&lt;br /&gt;
* Harvest: Year-round.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Animal Production===&lt;br /&gt;
* Francis started a &#039;&#039;&#039;fish farming&#039;&#039;&#039; operation but is not yet selling.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Goats&#039;&#039;&#039;: 300 Cedis / goat, 600 Cedis / year.&lt;br /&gt;
* Francis would like to start raising &#039;&#039;&#039;chickens&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agricultural practices==&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil fertility management===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Reduction of chemical inputs to a minimum&#039;&#039;&#039;. Use of &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cover crops usable in Africa|cover crops]] during intercropping&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Crop association and rotation in Africa|associated crops]]&#039;&#039;&#039; to maximize &#039;&#039;&#039;biomass production&#039;&#039;&#039; and reduce the use of chemical inputs (particularly nitrogen fertilization).&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Diversification]] of production&#039;&#039;&#039; (no monoculture on the plots) and &#039;&#039;&#039;[[agroforestry]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (cocoa, coconut). The only crop receiving mineral fertilization is maize, all other productions are sustained by &#039;&#039;&#039;fertilization from the destruction of cover crops and organic fertilizers&#039;&#039;&#039; (mainly pig slurry and manure).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FrancisTei_Desmodium.jpg|thumb|Desmodium tortuosum.|197x197px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FrancisTei_DesmodiumFleurs.jpg|thumb|Desmodium tortuosum in bloom.|210x210px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Pest management===&lt;br /&gt;
*Fungicide treatment on maize.&lt;br /&gt;
*Use of insecticides only for maize against Poecilium, with 3 applications before harvest.&lt;br /&gt;
*To combat pests, Francis uses a &#039;&#039;&#039;cover crop called &amp;quot;push-push-push&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039; : &#039;&#039;Desmodium tortuosum&#039;&#039; = &#039;&#039;&#039;Twisted [[sainfoin]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. This plant, when it reaches maturity, releases a certain aroma that insects and pests cannot tolerate, causing them to stay away.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cream mucuna&#039;&#039;&#039; is not attacked by insects mainly due to the heat it traps under its leaves. Its structure resembles an umbrella covering the ground, making the temperature underneath very high, which is inhospitable to pests. It also helps protect the soil from [[Soil erosion|erosion]] and evaporation.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil tillage===&lt;br /&gt;
Francis practices the &#039;&#039;&#039;Direct Seeding Mulch-based Croping (DSMC)&#039;&#039;&#039; for all his crops. He seldom resorts to soil tillage, even on the surface. Weeding is mostly done with a hoe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Youtube|id=https://youtu.be/aw8QvboNv-g}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Strategies to address constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Water management]]&#039;&#039;&#039;: &amp;quot;For water management, we reduce the area of land we plant. For example, for maize, we plant only on half of the plot.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Reduction of planting density and plot size based on water availability.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;High labor requirements&#039;&#039;&#039;: &#039;&#039;&#039;Rental of a tractor&#039;&#039;&#039; for cover crop destruction with a roller and direct seeding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Water System===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Source volume and flow&#039;&#039;&#039;: Borehole.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
**6 plots.&lt;br /&gt;
**3 hours per plot.&lt;br /&gt;
**Twice a week.&lt;br /&gt;
**Total irrigation time: 36 hours per week.&lt;br /&gt;
**Too much time for irrigation, system is inefficient according to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfactions / dissatisfactions===&lt;br /&gt;
{{EChart Radar MSV&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de la ferme = Francis Tei&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction économique = 5&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction sociale = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| Confort au travail = 9&lt;br /&gt;
| Cadre de vie = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| Coopération = 9&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5, he works too much.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Economic:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5, he spends too much on tractor rental and labor. With inflation on inputs and prices indexed to the dollar, costs are constantly increasing. Problems with eggplant diseases result in little profit from this crop.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Work comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; 9.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Social:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Living environment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cooperation:&#039;&#039;&#039; 9, &amp;quot;I share my knowledge by teaching, and it helps the students a lot. I&#039;ve had many visitors on the farm, and they have all been satisfied.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scale from 1 = very dissatisfied, to 10 = very satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Organization of work time:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* 2 full-time equivalents for a total of 8 people working on the farm.&lt;br /&gt;
* 1-2 months per year for 6 people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Revenues===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Maize:&#039;&#039;&#039; 20000 Cedis for the main season. 1 buck = 400 - 1000 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
** 0.5 Cedis / fresh maize ear (cannot be stored for a long period).&lt;br /&gt;
** 1.5 Cedis / dry maize ear (can be stored for a long period).&lt;br /&gt;
Dry maize is three times more expensive because it can be stored in bags after harvest and sold to nearby poultry farms that come to collect it for feeding chickens. When farmers do not have sufficient storage facilities, maize is harvested fresh and sold directly at markets because it cannot be stored for long.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Vegetables + okra:&#039;&#039;&#039; 10000 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cassava:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5184 (72 x 72) plants = 2000 Cedis, 3-4 harvests per year = 8000 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Eggplants:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2 plots: 400 Cedis / year.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Coconuts:&#039;&#039;&#039; On 2ha, he harvests 10-15 bucks per year (380 Cedis/buck) = 3800 - 5700 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Marrow (Pepo):&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** 53 m² = 30000 Cedis (high season).&lt;br /&gt;
** -20000 Cedis for Canavalia seeds (1000kg of seeds, 1kg=20 Cedis)&lt;br /&gt;
** 10000 Cedis profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cocoa:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Harvest: 1 ton/year.&lt;br /&gt;
** 1300 Cedis / buck and he produces 16 bucks / year = 20800 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Total revenue:&#039;&#039;&#039; 100,000 Cedis / year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Costs===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Maize seeds:&#039;&#039;&#039; 820 Cedis/kg, purchase of 20kg of seeds = 16,000 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cocoa:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Harvest: 300 Cedis / buck.&lt;br /&gt;
** Pruning: 1000 Cedis / ha.&lt;br /&gt;
** Organic fertilization: 300 Cedis / L, 1L/ha.&lt;br /&gt;
** Tiller: 200 Cedis/ha, cocoa is not irrigated. Irrigation is only used for maize.&lt;br /&gt;
** Plantation: 1 acre = 450 trees, 1 tree = 55 Cedis, 1 plantain tree (intercropped): 3 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Insecticide against Poecilium:&#039;&#039;&#039; 25 Cedis per 200g sachet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Fertilizer:&#039;&#039;&#039; Activa: 25 kg = 240 Cedis for 75 days, 145 bags / acre, 28 bags per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Fuel:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** Irrigation: 21 liters for 3 days (13 Cedis / liter).&lt;br /&gt;
** 5 full months of irrigation.&lt;br /&gt;
** 800 L per year = 10,400 Cedis.&lt;br /&gt;
** No machines other than the pump, so no additional fuel expenses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Total costs:&#039;&#039;&#039; 30,000 Cedis / year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Profits===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;70,000 Cedis / year.&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Distribution channel===&lt;br /&gt;
80% of the production is sold in Accra at the &#039;&#039;&#039;local market&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Farmer&#039;s advice==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You need to get inspired by others and also help other farmers learn how to work well.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=40}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources== &lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Francis Tei conducted in February 2024 by the team of [[Structure:Ver de Terre production|Ver de Terre Production]] as part of the [[Urbane]] project. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo credits: Francis Tei and Vincent Levavasseur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Francis Tei]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Romuald_Gbegan%27s_farm&amp;diff=7199</id>
		<title>Romuald Gbegan&#039;s farm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Romuald_Gbegan%27s_farm&amp;diff=7199"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:32:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Portrait de ferme&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;agriculteur = Romuald Gbegan&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo de l&#039;agriculteur = RomualdGbegan.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de l&#039;exploitation = Akassato Farm&lt;br /&gt;
| Sous-titre = Agroecology, diversity of crops, soil fertility, compost, crop associations&lt;br /&gt;
| Bannière = Gbegan_Associations.png&lt;br /&gt;
| Photo d&#039;illustration = Gbegan Ferme.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| Département = Benin&lt;br /&gt;
| SAU = 1.3&lt;br /&gt;
| UTH = 2&lt;br /&gt;
| Date de mise en œuvre = 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Polyculture&lt;br /&gt;
| Texture du sol = Argilo-sableux&lt;br /&gt;
| Description de sol = Clay-sandy&lt;br /&gt;
| Cultures = Cucumber@ Tomato@ Lettuce@ Carrot@ Chili pepper@ Bell pepper@ Corn@ Cassava@ Cowpea@ Sorghum@ Papaya@ Lemongrass@ Peanut&lt;br /&gt;
| Latitude = 6.5073708&lt;br /&gt;
| Longitude = 2.365643&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Urbane Project, Farm portrait, Agroecology, Soil fertility, Crop association, Africa&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Romuald Gbegan, a farmer in Akassato, [[Benin]], cultivates his land according to the principles of agroecology. Here is the profile of his farm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Context==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Romuald Gbegan.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Location:&#039;&#039;&#039; Akassato, Benin.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Farm name:&#039;&#039;&#039; Akassato.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Installation date:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2017. His father was a farmer, and he worked with him since childhood.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cultivated area:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1.3 ha, with 1 ha cultivated.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Soil texture:&#039;&#039;&#039; Ferrallitic soil on loose sediment [[clay-sandy]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Number of people working on the farm:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Productions:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;[[Vegetable crops]]:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Cucumber]], [[tomato]] (60t/ha/year), [[lettuce]].&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Food crops:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Carrot]], [[chili pepper]], [[bell pepper]], [[corn]], [[cowpea]], [[sorghum]], [[lemongrass]], [[peanut]], [[cassava]].&lt;br /&gt;
**&#039;&#039;&#039;Fruit trees:&#039;&#039;&#039; [[Papaya]] (500m²) 63 trees, producing 80 papayas weekly.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Climate:&#039;&#039;&#039; From savannah to dry winter (Aw according to Köppen-Geiger classification). Akassato is an area with significant precipitation. Even during the driest month, it rains a lot. Throughout the year, the average temperature is 27.4°C, and the average precipitation is 1217.1mm.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Education/training/life path:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
**Master&#039;s degree in food technology in 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
**Training on entrepreneurship to be able to produce tomato paste.&lt;br /&gt;
**Two-part training on tomatoes by the company Holland Green Tech: Production (tomato varieties, life cycle, how to produce them) and value chain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Motivations and objectives==&lt;br /&gt;
According to Romuald, 90% of the ailments humans suffer from are due to poor nutrition. Farmers use a lot of chemical insecticides and pesticides. They modify the genetic material of plants. Romuald wants to do everything to &#039;&#039;&#039;contribute to the [[Agroecology|agroecological]] transition of local producers&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After noticing that tomatoes produced in Benin are waterlogged (making their processing and preservation difficult), Romuald decided to find and produce a variety of tomatoes with generous flesh, in order to &#039;&#039;&#039;start a tomato processing business&#039;&#039;&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agronomic aspect ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Agricultural practices===&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil fertility management====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Poultry manure&#039;&#039;&#039;: 1 bag of 50 kg = 15 plots of 6m². Purchase of &#039;&#039;&#039;150 bags of poultry manure per year&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Compost:&#039;&#039;&#039; 3 bags of 50 kg produced by Romuald from dead leaves, only for tomatoes.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;NPK:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1 kg of NPK.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pest Management====&lt;br /&gt;
The management of pests on the farm is carried out through fungicidal and insecticidal treatments &#039;&#039;&#039;applied preventively&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Insecticides:&#039;&#039;&#039; [https://horizonphytoplus.com/emacot-050-wg/ Emacot] and [https://sycoref.finances.bj/sycoref/web/app.php/article/9172 Gbayédo].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fongicide:&#039;&#039;&#039; [https://horizonphytoplus.com/manga-plus/ Manga plus].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gbegan_Billons.jpg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
====Soil Work====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Manual labor&#039;&#039;&#039; each time they sow.&lt;br /&gt;
*Establishment of &#039;&#039;&#039;ridges&#039;&#039;&#039; to turn over the soil, and he adds manure and cut weeds to the ridges to fertilize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Strategies to address constraints====&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Selection of 3 vegetables&#039;&#039;&#039; for production and sale in [[market gardening]]: Cucumber, tomato, lettuce to &#039;&#039;&#039;facilitate technical routes&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;improve yield&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Production of [[maize]] and cassava (associated):&#039;&#039;&#039; He adds &#039;&#039;&#039;peanut&#039;&#039;&#039; this year to try to &#039;&#039;&#039;reduce nitrogen input&#039;&#039;&#039; and have &#039;&#039;&#039;more production&#039;&#039;&#039;. It&#039;s a technique experimented by an elder of the village and has yielded good results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He started with Organic Farming, but customers &#039;&#039;&#039;do not value organic products&#039;&#039;&#039;. They consider them less &amp;quot;beautiful,&amp;quot; and Romuald couldn&#039;t sell them or only at a discount. So, he started using NPK. Now he uses poultry manure, and it works well.[[File:Gbegan_Bassin.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Water system===&lt;br /&gt;
====Source and equipment====&lt;br /&gt;
*Underground drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
*Electric pump with water storage in a surface tank.&lt;br /&gt;
*Irrigation system:&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Drip irrigation for tomatoes.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Banded irrigation for other [[:Category:Vegetable crops|vegetable crops]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Irrigation frequency====&lt;br /&gt;
*In the rainy season: &#039;&#039;&#039;2 times a day&#039;&#039;&#039;, for &#039;&#039;&#039;15 minutes&#039;&#039;&#039; per plot.&lt;br /&gt;
*In the dry season: &#039;&#039;&#039;3 times a day&#039;&#039;&#039;, for &#039;&#039;&#039;15 minutes&#039;&#039;&#039; per plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social aspect==&lt;br /&gt;
===Satisfaction / dissatisfaction===&lt;br /&gt;
{{EChart Radar MSV&lt;br /&gt;
| Nom de la ferme = Romuald Gbegan&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction économique = 9&lt;br /&gt;
| Satisfaction sociale = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| Confort au travail = 9&lt;br /&gt;
| Cadre de vie = 8&lt;br /&gt;
| Coopération = 9&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Workload:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8-9, very satisfied, he can hire a worker.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Economic:&#039;&#039;&#039; 9, he can pay a worker and support his family.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Work comfort:&#039;&#039;&#039; 9, love for his work, passion. He enjoys his work.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Social:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Living environment:&#039;&#039;&#039; 8.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scale from 1 = very dissatisfied, to 10 = very satisfied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Environment ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Technical Support / assistance ====&lt;br /&gt;
Support for training. The Dutch from Holland Green Tech come to train them on &#039;&#039;&#039;tomato production&#039;&#039;&#039; and the &#039;&#039;&#039;value chain&#039;&#039;&#039; to &#039;&#039;&#039;better enhance production&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cooperation with other farmers ====&lt;br /&gt;
Romuald is part of &#039;&#039;&#039;two cooperatives&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;The cooperative of cassava producers in Akassato&#039;&#039;&#039;, where the president is a wise man who practices crop association extensively. He taught Romuald the maize-cassava-peanut association, which yields very good results without the use of any chemical inputs.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;The cooperative of market gardeners in Akassato&#039;&#039;&#039;, where producers exchange ideas on production methods and especially pest control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economic aspect ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Land ===&lt;br /&gt;
Romuald is not the owner of his land, it is provided to him free of charge (for now) so that he can produce on it. This allows him to occupy and enhance the land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Machete:&#039;&#039;&#039; 5000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Hoeing tool:&#039;&#039;&#039; 3000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Electric sprayer:&#039;&#039;&#039; 40000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Manual sprayer:&#039;&#039;&#039; 25000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Rope:&#039;&#039;&#039; 2000 FCFA for 1 bag.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Watering cans:&#039;&#039;&#039; 15000 FCFA for 2 watering cans.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Irrigation system:&#039;&#039;&#039; 400,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Donations, financial assistance ===&lt;br /&gt;
No donations or financial assistance apart from the &#039;&#039;&#039;provision of land&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Expenses ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Water, electricity:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;With drip irrigation system:&#039;&#039;&#039; 500,000 FCFA per year.&lt;br /&gt;
** &#039;&#039;&#039;With watering cans:&#039;&#039;&#039; 350,000 FCFA per year.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Poultry manure:&#039;&#039;&#039; 150 bags per year = 200,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Seeds:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
** Cobra F1 Tomato: 45,000 FCFA for 50 grams. &lt;br /&gt;
** Jarrah Tomato: 20,000 FCFA for 1000 seeds, currently under experimentation. &lt;br /&gt;
** Bell Pepper: 40,000 FCFA for 50 grams. &lt;br /&gt;
** Carrots: 15,000 FCFA for 50 grams. &lt;br /&gt;
** Cucumber: 55,000 FCFA for 1000 seeds. &lt;br /&gt;
** Lettuce: 25,000 FCFA for 5000 seeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Cost of production for main crops ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tomatoes:&#039;&#039;&#039; 18,450,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cucumbers:&#039;&#039;&#039; 120,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Lettuces:&#039;&#039;&#039; 150,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gbegan_Cultures.jpg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Income ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Tomatoes:&#039;&#039;&#039; 42,000,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Cucumbers:&#039;&#039;&#039; 1,500,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Lettuces:&#039;&#039;&#039; 300,000 FCFA.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Papaya:&#039;&#039;&#039; The retail price range in CFA Francs for papayas is between &#039;&#039;&#039;591.10 and 1,182.20 FCFA/kg&#039;&#039;&#039; in Porto-Novo and Cotonou. A papaya tree produces between 30 and 40 kg of fruits over 22 months&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346316155_Fiche_technique_synthetique_pour_la_production_de_la_papaye_Carica_papaya_L Carica papaya L., Fiche technique synthétique pour la production de la papaye]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Commercial strategy / markets ===&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Sale to &amp;quot;good ladies&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&#039; intermediaries in the form of &#039;&#039;&#039;baskets&#039;&#039;&#039;, but it&#039;s &#039;&#039;&#039;not very profitable&#039;&#039;&#039; as he sells to them for [[about]] 300 FCFA/kg, compared to 1000 FCFA/kg at the supermarket.&lt;br /&gt;
* Sale to &#039;&#039;&#039;restaurants&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, local producers &#039;&#039;&#039;cannot organize into cooperatives&#039;&#039;&#039; to sell together and &#039;&#039;&#039;increase their margin&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farmer&#039;s advice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Everyone must eat,&#039;&#039;&#039; we will always manage to sell. He wants &#039;&#039;&#039;young people&#039;&#039;&#039; to come and settle with him to produce together according to the &#039;&#039;&#039;principles of agroecology&#039;&#039;&#039; to avoid impacts on human health primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, it is hard to find work in the public sector, so you must &#039;&#039;&#039;venture into entrepreneurship&#039;&#039;&#039;. If you become a farmer, you become both the employer and the employee; plants are our children, and they must be cared for. If you venture into agriculture, you must &#039;&#039;&#039;commit 100%&#039;&#039;&#039;. Agriculture should be your &#039;&#039;&#039;main activity&#039;&#039;&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo gallery==&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=43}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Agroecological transition through experimentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the pursuit of a more sustainable and resilient agriculture, Romuald has embarked on an experimentation of [[agroecology]] with the members of the [https://www.oreilleducampus.org/index.php/universite-abomey-calavi.html University of Abomey Calavi] and the team from [https://www.verdeterreprod.fr/ Ver de Terre Production]. This innovative initiative, undertaken within the framework of the [[Urbane|URBANE project]], aims to &#039;&#039;&#039;transform traditional practices by adopting environmentally friendly methods while preserving and/or improving agricultural productivity&#039;&#039;&#039;. At the heart of this approach lies the &#039;&#039;&#039;integration of cover crops associated with tomato crop rotation&#039;&#039;&#039;, followed by planting tomatoes in the&#039;&#039;&#039; ridges formed by cutting the cover plants&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main objective of this experimentation is to&#039;&#039;&#039; improve soil structure and its fertility in terms of chemical, physical, and biological properties&#039;&#039;&#039;. By &#039;&#039;&#039;promoting biodiversity&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;reducing soil tillage&#039;&#039;&#039;, Romuald hopes to &#039;&#039;&#039;reduce dependency on chemical inputs and irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039;. By associating legumes and cereals as [[Cover crops usable in Africa|cover crops]] for tomatoes, the experiment aims to &#039;&#039;&#039;enrich the soil with nitrogen and [[organic matter]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, two essential elements for soil fertility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Trial matrix ===&lt;br /&gt;
The experimentation is based on three cropping modalities:&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorghum+Cowpea.&lt;br /&gt;
* Maize+Cowpea.&lt;br /&gt;
* Maize+Peanut.&lt;br /&gt;
Each modality includes a control without cover crops. These different cropping arrangements allow evaluating the effectiveness of various crop combinations in improving soil fertility. The setup is &#039;&#039;&#039;repeated over multiple cycles&#039;&#039;&#039; to measure the long-term evolution of results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the experimentation, &#039;&#039;&#039;several challenges&#039;&#039;&#039; were identified, especially&#039;&#039;&#039; regarding water and soil fertility management&#039;&#039;&#039;. &#039;&#039;&#039;Off-season cultivation&#039;&#039;&#039;, while beneficial for production, &#039;&#039;&#039;required more irrigation and labor&#039;&#039;&#039;. However, the improvement of soil structure through legumes and organic matter from the decomposition of cover plants offers &#039;&#039;&#039;promising prospects for reducing the medium-term needs for mineral fertilizers and irrigation&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Further experimentation and recommendations ===&lt;br /&gt;
To maximize the benefits of this experimentation, it&#039;s essential to &#039;&#039;&#039;optimize certain parameters&#039;&#039;&#039; such as &#039;&#039;&#039;irrigation, type, and management of organic matter&#039;&#039;&#039;. An adaptation of the trial matrix based on the specific conditions of the terrain will lead to more precise and replicable results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, it is recommended to &#039;&#039;&#039;continue research&#039;&#039;&#039; to refine agricultural practices and ensure a successful transition to a more sustainable and resilient agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Experimentation photos ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Fertility trials ====&lt;br /&gt;
===== Establishment of experimentation: Planting and growth of cover crops =====&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=36}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Experimentation monitoring: VESS test, MERCI method, and cover crop destruction =====&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=27}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Experimentation monitoring: Tomatoes in the ridges =====&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=41}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Ralstonia trial ====&lt;br /&gt;
===== Establishment of experimentation: Planting and growth of crotalaria cover crop =====&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=37}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Experimentation monitoring: MERCI method and cover crop destruction =====&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=28}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Experimentation monitoring: Tomatoes in the ridges =====&lt;br /&gt;
{{PhotosUrbane|album=42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources== &lt;br /&gt;
Interview with Romuald Gbegan conducted in February 2024 by the team of [[Structure:Ver de Terre production|Ver de Terre Production]] as part of the [[Urbane]] project. &lt;br /&gt;
Photo credits: Romuald Gbegan and Alexandre Cottin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Appendices==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la mise en œuvre}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ferme de Romuald Gbegan]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Crop_association_and_rotation_in_Africa&amp;diff=7198</id>
		<title>Crop association and rotation in Africa</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.tripleperformance.ag/index.php?title=Crop_association_and_rotation_in_Africa&amp;diff=7198"/>
		<updated>2025-01-03T15:31:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Astrid Robette (1886608933): &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Pratique&lt;br /&gt;
| Image = AssociationCultures_Associations.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| ImageCaption = Peanut associated with other crops&lt;br /&gt;
| Main productions = Field crops&lt;br /&gt;
| Objectif = Integrated crop protection&lt;br /&gt;
| Mots-clés = Agroecology, Integrated crop protection, Biodiversity&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The association of crops or [[polyculture]] involves cultivating multiple crops on the same plot, while rotation involves successively cultivating different crops on the same plot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly all contexts are conducive to crop association and rotation, especially for farmers without mechanization or large agricultural areas. These practices are particularly recommended for poor or densely populated lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Benefits==&lt;br /&gt;
* Crop association &#039;&#039;&#039;enhances spatial diversity in the agroecosystem&#039;&#039;&#039;, while crop rotation &#039;&#039;&#039;increases temporal diversity&#039;&#039;&#039;. Together, they &#039;&#039;&#039;boost overall agroecosystem diversity&#039;&#039;&#039;, maximizing beneficial interactions and complementarities between plants&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kremen, Iles, and Bacon 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* These techniques &#039;&#039;&#039;increase productivity and efficiency&#039;&#039;&#039; in organic farming&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ponisio et al. 2015 ; Rosset 2000 ; M. A. Altieri, Funes-Monzote, and Petersen 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. A meta-analysis on crop associations in Africa indicates that &#039;&#039;&#039;yields are, on average, 23% higher&#039;&#039;&#039;, and gross incomes increase by 172 USD/ha/year (~100,000 FCFA/ha/year) compared to monocultures under similar conditions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Himmelstein et al. 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Leveraging plant interactions also generally reduces production costs (irrigation, fertilizers, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In rotations and associations, it is crucial to use indigenous varieties and &#039;&#039;&#039;include legumes&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;Fabaceae&#039;&#039;) because they have the ability to &#039;&#039;&#039;fix atmospheric nitrogen in the soil&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tonitto, David, and Drinkwater 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, serving as substitutes for synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. They also &#039;&#039;&#039;contribute to [[organic matter]]&#039;&#039;&#039; and other essential macronutrients such as phosphorus and potassium. Moreover, indigenous legumes are &#039;&#039;&#039;better adapted to local conditions&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;richer in nutrients&#039;&#039;&#039; compared to their non-native counterparts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shackleton, Pasquini, and Drescher 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criteria for choosing crop associations==&lt;br /&gt;
Several main criteria should be considered when choosing crop associations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Effect on pests or diseases===&lt;br /&gt;
Plants susceptible to a particular disease or pest can be associated with resistant or repellent plants. This is the technique of [[#Push-Pull Technique|Push-Pull]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image centrée|AssociationCultures_Push-Pull.jpg|border|Association of corn with repellent and attractive plants.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Botanical Families===&lt;br /&gt;
It is crucial to &#039;&#039;&#039;avoid associating plants belonging to the same botanical family&#039;&#039;&#039;. Indeed, plants within the same family are generally susceptible to the same diseases or pests. The main cultivated botanical families (according to the APG IV classification (2016)) are listed below, and plants not categorized belong to families where they are often the only cultivated plants ([[cassava]], [[yam]], [[pineapple]], etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Amaranthaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Amaranth]], [[beet]], [[chard]], [[spinach]], [[basella]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Amaryllidaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Onion]], [[leek]], [[garlic]], [[chives]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Apiaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Carrot]], [[celery]], [[fennel]], [[coriander]], [[parsley]], [[anise]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Asteraceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Lettuce]], [[dandelion]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Brassicaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Broccoli]], [[cabbage]], [[turnip]], [[radish]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Cucurbitaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Squash]], [[zucchini]], [[cucumber]], [[watermelon]], [[melon]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Fabaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Peanut]], [[soybean]], [[bean]], [[pea]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Lamiaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Thyme]], [[basil]], [[Peppermint|mint]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Malvaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Cotton]], [[okra]],...&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Poaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Corn]], [[sorghum]], [[rice]], [[sugar cane]], [[millet]], [[fonio]],...&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Solanaceae&#039;&#039;&#039;: [[Potato]], [[tomato]], [[chili pepper]], [[bell pepper]], [[eggplant]], gboma,...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Occupation of space (horizontal and vertical)=== &lt;br /&gt;
Certain plants, such as most Poaceae (corn, sorghum, etc.), can &#039;&#039;&#039;shelter other plants that spread on the ground&#039;&#039;&#039; like squash or even &#039;&#039;&#039;serve as a support for climbing species&#039;&#039;&#039; like some beans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Growth rate=== &lt;br /&gt;
Plants have different growth rates, it is advisable, for example, to plant &#039;&#039;&#039;slow-growing plants&#039;&#039;&#039; (cabbage, tomatoes, chili peppers, etc.) &#039;&#039;&#039;with fast-growing plants&#039;&#039;&#039; that will quickly &#039;&#039;&#039;cover the ground&#039;&#039;&#039; (lettuce, radishes,...).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Light requirements=== &lt;br /&gt;
Plants have different light requirements. For example, squash, coriander, and basil are shade-tolerant, while tomatoes or peppers need more sunlight. Example: The tomato plant provides shade for the basil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image centrée|AssociationCultures_LightNeed.jpg|border|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rooting type=== &lt;br /&gt;
Plants with different root systems will &#039;&#039;&#039;exploit different soil depths&#039;&#039;&#039;. Therefore, it is advisable to associate plants with relatively deep roots (eggplant, tomato, cucumber, squash, corn, beets, peas, etc.) with plants with shallow roots (cabbage, lettuce, garlic, onion, radishes, etc.). It is important to note that &#039;&#039;&#039;roots structure the soil&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;enrich it with organic matter&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fertilization=== &lt;br /&gt;
Plants have different fertilizer needs. To avoid depleting the soil, it is essential not to continuously cultivate demanding plants on the same plots.&lt;br /&gt;
These criteria help choose plants that will maximize their beneficial interactions and improve productivity or energy efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;
Crop association can take on various forms depending on the desired outcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Organization of plots==&lt;br /&gt;
===Surrounded Crops===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Entourees.jpg|thumb|Surrounded crops.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The crop surrounding the field provides &#039;&#039;&#039;protection for the central crop&#039;&#039;&#039;. Examples include [[lemongrass]], which repels insects from the field, or a relatively tall crop to shield against the wind.&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[#Push-Pull technique|Push-Pull technique]], an attractive plant is placed around the field to trap insects repelled by the repellent plants positioned in the middle of the field.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Alternate crops===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Alternees.jpg|thumb|Alternate crops.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Rows optimize interactions between the two plants&#039;&#039;&#039;. For example, a tall plant casting shade on a shade-loving plant or a legume enriching the soil for a nitrogen-demanding crop. Each row may not necessarily consist of a single species but could already involve an alternation between several plants.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mixed crops===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Melangees.jpg|thumb|Mixed crops.]]&lt;br /&gt;
This method is more specific because &#039;&#039;&#039;the random mix of plants makes the maintenance of each plant more challenging&#039;&#039;&#039;. However, it is &#039;&#039;&#039;well-suited, for example, to broadcast-seeded crops&#039;&#039;&#039; that require minimal care, such as the association of two cover crops (grass + legume).&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Push-Pull technique==&lt;br /&gt;
Push-pull is a &#039;&#039;&#039;biological integrated pest management technique&#039;&#039;&#039; using a &#039;&#039;&#039;repellent plant&#039;&#039;&#039; (&amp;quot;Push&amp;quot;) and an &#039;&#039;&#039;attractive plant&#039;&#039;&#039; (&amp;quot;Pull&amp;quot;) that traps pests. Over the years, this technique has been adapted to the effects of climate change and is known as &amp;quot;Climate-smart Push-Pull.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This technique addresses three problems faced by farmers:&lt;br /&gt;
* General soil poverty in Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
* Striga (witchweed), which parasitizes the roots of many crops like corn, sorghum, or rice.&lt;br /&gt;
* Stem borers (&#039;&#039;Busseola fusca&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;Chilo partellus&#039;&#039;) whose larvae burrow into corn stalks, particularly, but can also attack sorghum or millet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If all these factors align, the farmer can lose a significant portion of the harvest. Facing these issues, Climate-smart Push-Pull leverages two drought-resistant plants in association with the main crop:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Desmodium.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;Desmodium intortum.]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Desmodium intortum&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Greenleaf Desmodium), a perennial legume that covers the soil between rows of the main crop. It produces volatile compounds that repel (&amp;quot;Push&amp;quot;) pests and attract their natural enemies. Its roots produce compounds that destroy striga seeds in the soil. Additionally, its roots, in association with bacteria, can fix nitrogen in the soil. At the end of the season, the biomass produced by Desmodium can be used as fodder or as organic matter for the soil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Brachiaria.jpg|thumb|&#039;&#039;Brachiaria ruziziensis.]]&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;Brachiaria ruziziensis&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; (Mulato II), a perennial grass that produces volatile compounds that attract (&amp;quot;Pull&amp;quot;) pests for laying eggs. However, this plant does not provide the necessary conditions for the proper development of larvae, preventing pest multiplication. Moreover, Brachiaria also attracts natural enemies of pests. Ultimately, this plant serves as highly appreciated fodder for livestock.&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, Climate-smart Push-Pull also proves effective against a new pest from America: the &#039;&#039;&#039;[[fall armyworm]]&#039;&#039;&#039; (&#039;&#039;[[Spodoptera frugiperda]]&#039;&#039;). It causes significant damage to [[cereal]] crops across Africa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Through its various aspects, the Climate-smart Push-Pull technique effectively combats these pests at a lower cost, &#039;&#039;&#039;substituting the use of environmentally harmful pesticides&#039;&#039;&#039; and thus &#039;&#039;&#039;increasing yields of the main crop&#039;&#039;&#039; while &#039;&#039;&#039;improving the soil&#039;&#039;&#039; and &#039;&#039;&#039;producing fodder for livestock&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information on &amp;quot;Climate-smart Push-Pull&amp;quot;: [http://www.push-pull.net/ www.push-pull.net]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Image centrée|AssociationCultures_Push-PullScheme.jpg|border|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criteria for crop rotation selection==&lt;br /&gt;
===Botanical family=== &lt;br /&gt;
This criterion is arguably &#039;&#039;&#039;the most important&#039;&#039;&#039;, given that plants from the same family are generally threatened by the same diseases or pests. &#039;&#039;&#039;Diseases or pests can survive in the soil for several years&#039;&#039;&#039; even without finding suitable crops. Therefore, a certain period should be respected before replanting the same crop in the same location. It is difficult to provide an exact duration, however, a &#039;&#039;&#039;minimum of two seasons&#039;&#039;&#039; would be advisable in all cases. If the recurrence of a disease or pest is observed, longer durations should be considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Soil cover=== &lt;br /&gt;
Some plants do not sufficiently cover the soil (carrots, turnips, etc.) and should be grown alternately with crops that uniformly and rapidly cover the soil to &#039;&#039;&#039;eliminate weeds&#039;&#039;&#039; (cover crops, soybeans, squash, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fertilizer needs=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Arachide.jpg|thumb|Peanut is a legume (Fabaceae) that fixes nitrogen in the soil.]] &lt;br /&gt;
Plants have &#039;&#039;&#039;different fertilizer needs&#039;&#039;&#039;. To avoid depleting the soil, it is important not to continuously cultivate plants that are very demanding on the same plots. An &#039;&#039;&#039;alternation&#039;&#039;&#039; with less demanding plants is, therefore, encouraged. Green manures, such as &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Cover crops usable in Africa|cover crops]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, can also be integrated into the rotation before demanding crops. However, it should be noted that the contribution of organic fertilizer benefits not only the cultivated plant but the entire soil ecosystem. A soil greatly benefits from regular organic fertilizer input, such as [[compost]], regardless of the future crop it will host.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Uncertainty of selection criteria=== &lt;br /&gt;
It is important to mention that selection criteria for rotation have been the subject of very few serious research efforts&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dias, Dukes, and Antunes 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The criteria selected here are those that seem the most reliable. In general, for associations and rotations, the best choice is made based on local environmental conditions, indigenous species, and experience gained over the seasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AssociationCultures_Materiel.jpg|thumb|]] &lt;br /&gt;
Prior knowledge of crop associations and mastering the planning of multiple seasons is necessary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Necessary equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Hoe, machete&#039;&#039;&#039;: Cleaning the plot and preparing the soil.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;String&#039;&#039;&#039;: Plot sizing and transplanting of plants/shoots.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Boots&#039;&#039;&#039;: Foot protection.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Basin&#039;&#039;&#039;: Transport of solid compost.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Wheelbarrow&#039;&#039;&#039;: Transport of [[:Category:Materials and equipment|materials and equipment]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Sprayer&#039;&#039;&#039;: Application of biopesticides and liquid compost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Materials/Raw Materials===&lt;br /&gt;
*Seeds.&lt;br /&gt;
*Organic fertilizers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Biopesticides.&lt;br /&gt;
*Straw (if necessary).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Implementation steps==&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Determine the configuration&#039;&#039;&#039; of the association and rotations: Which plants to use? In what order? With what spatial arrangement?&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Acquire the seeds&#039;&#039;&#039; of the chosen crops.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Prepare and arrange the land&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Proceed with sowing&#039;&#039;&#039; according to the chosen configuration.&lt;br /&gt;
*&#039;&#039;&#039;Maintain the field&#039;&#039;&#039;: weeding and organic treatments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Challenges and constraints==&lt;br /&gt;
*Requires &#039;&#039;&#039;more attention during maintenance&#039;&#039;&#039;, especially for associations.&lt;br /&gt;
*Requires a &#039;&#039;&#039;good knowledge of plants&#039;&#039;&#039; and the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
*Often requires &#039;&#039;&#039;planning over multiple seasons&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rotation or Association: Which One to Choose?== &lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, it would be best to &#039;&#039;&#039;practice both associations and rotations simultaneously&#039;&#039;&#039;. However, this requires good knowledge of the local context and different plants, knowledge that is primarily acquired through practice and experiences. Some may prefer associations, while others may prefer rotations; the important thing is &#039;&#039;&#039;maximizing diversity that benefits both the producer and nature&#039;&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;slideshow&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
File:AssociationCultures_HaricotMais.jpg|Association of corn and beans. &lt;br /&gt;
File:AssociationCultures_CitronelleMaisBanane.jpg|Association of lemongrass, corn and [[banana]]. &lt;br /&gt;
File:AssociationCultures_JardinEspoir.jpg|Diverse crops in the Gardens of Hope, [[Benin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sources==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y252gTAub46QZqfwO4s4Hrr2IZfy0pr8/view Manuel des bonnes pratiques agroécologiques - SECAAR.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Partenariat Urbane}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Annexes de la pratique}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Association et rotation de cultures en Afrique]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Astrid Robette (1886608933)</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>